Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Reading and Interpreting Ethnography Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Curiosity, Creativity, and Surprise as Analytic Tools: Grounded Theory Method

verfasst von : Michael Muller

Erschienen in: Ways of Knowing in HCI

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Grounded Theory Method offers a rigorous way to explore a domain, with an emphasis on discovering new insights, testing those insights, and building partial understandings into a broader theory of the domain. It begins with observations of a phenomenon for which no theory yet exists. Through layered coding of these observations and continual reexamination of the data, a theory emerges.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Reading and Interpreting Ethnography
Nächstes Kapitel Knowing by Doing: Action Research as an Approach to HCI
Fußnoten
1
For more discussion of pragmatism, see Hayes’ chapter on Action Research in this volume.
 
2
This approach is similar to HCI ideas of iterative design, and the quick, in-process evaluations of designs through formative evaluation (Nielsen, 1992). GTM adds methodological rigor and the coordinated development of both data and theory.
 
3
Note that there is controversy among GTM researchers about the appropriate time to consult Formal Theory (i.e., the research literature). See “Creativity and Imagination,” below.
 
4
In other cases, the “situation” could be a group, or an organization, or a document, or a conversation.
 
5
All URLs were accessed successfully during July 2012.
 
Literatur
Adolph, S., Hall, W., & Kruchten, P. (2008). A methodological leg to stand on: Lessons learned using grounded theory to study software development. Proceedings of Conference on the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research 2008. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Ambos, T. C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2010). How do new ventures evolve? An inductive study of archetype changes in science-based ventures. Organization Science, 21(6), 1125–1140.CrossRef
Awbrey, J., & Awbrey, S. (1995). Interpretation as action: The risk of inquiry. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 15, 40–52.
Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan-Kaufmann.
Blythe, M., & Cairns, P. (2009). Critical methods and user generated content: The iPhone on YouTube. Proceedings of the CHI 2009, pp. 1467–1476
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Cennamo, K., Douglass, S.A., Vernon, M., Brandt, C., Scott, B., Reimer, Y., et al. (2011). Promoting creativity in the computer science design studio. Proceedings of the SIGCSE 2011, pp. 649–654
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 203–241). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Chetty, M., Hashim, D., Baird, A., Ofoha, U., Sumner, B., & Grinter, R.E. (2011). Why is my internet slow? Making network speeds visible. Proceedings of the CHI 2011, pp. 1889–1898
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Cooney, A. (2011). Rigour and grounded theory. Nurse Researcher, 18(4), 17–22.CrossRef
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research 3e. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRef
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic.
Elliott, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to recognise a “quality” grounded theory research study. Australian Journal of Nursing, 22(3), 48–52.
Eyrich-Garg, K. M. (2011). Sheltered in cyberspace? Computer use among the unsheltered “street” homeless. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 296–303.CrossRef
Faily, S., & Flechals, I. (2011). Persona cases: A technique for grounding personas. Proceedings of the CHI 2011, pp. 2267–2270
Faste, H., & Lin, H. (2012). The untapped potential of digital mind maps. Proceedings of the CHI 2012, pp. 1017–1026
Funder, M. (2005). Bias, intimacy, and power in qualitative fieldwork strategies. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studes, 4(1), 1–9.
Furniss, D., Blandford, A., & Curson, P. (2011). Confessions from a grounded theory phd: Experiences and lessons learnt. Proceedings of the CHI 2011, pp. 113–122
Gasson, S. (2003). Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In M. Whitman & A. Woszczynski (Eds.), Handbook for information systems research (pp. 79–102). Hershey, PA, US: Idea Group.CrossRef
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA, USA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA, USA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine [[[e.g., ‘The published word is not the final one, but only a pause in the never-ending process of generating theory’]]].
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). A time for dying. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine.
Gold, J., Walton, J., Cureton, P., & Anderson, L. (2011). Theorising and practitioners in HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 35(3), 230–246.CrossRef
Haig, B. D. (1995). Grounded theory as scientific method. In Philosophy of education yearbook 1995.
Haig, B.D. (2005). Grounded theory as scientific method. Philosophy of Education Yearbook 2005. Philosophy of Education Society.
Hall, W., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257–272.CrossRef
Hoda, R. (2011). Self-organizing agile teams: A grounded theory. Wellington, NZ: Victoria University of Wellington.
Holton, J. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage [[[coding practices + Charmaz + Corbin]]].
Kelle, U. (2007). The development of categories: Different approaches in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 191–213). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Kim, H., & Lee, W. (2012). Framing creative users for describing cases of appropriation (poster). Proceedings of the CSCW 2012, pp. 135–138
Kim, T., Hong, H., & Magerko, B. (2010). Design requirements for ambient display that supports sustainable lifestyle. Proceeding of the DIS 2010, pp. 103–112
Kjeldskov, J., & Paay, J. (2005). Just-for-us: A context-aware mobile information system facilitating sociality. Proceedings of the MobileCHI 2005, pp. 23–30
Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Lewis, S., & Lewis, D.A. (2012). Examining technology that supports community policing. Proceedings of the CHI 2012, pp. 1371–1380
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1995). Naturalistic inquiry. London, UK: Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–188). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Lopes, E. (2010). A grounded theory of decision-making under uncertainty and complexity. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
Macrì, D. M., Tagliaventi, M. R., & Bertolotti, F. (2002). A grounded theory for resistance to change in a small organization. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 15(3), 292–310.CrossRef
Matavire, R. & Brown, I. 2008. Investigating the use of “Grounded Theory” in information systems research. Proceedings of the SAICSIT 2008, pp. 139–147
Mathiasen, N.R., & Bødker, S. (2011). Experiencing security in interaction design. Proceedings of the CHI 2011, pp. 2325–2334
Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., & Yuen, S. (2011). Collaboration personas: A new approach to designing workplace collaboration. Proceedings of the CHI 2011, pp. 2247–2256
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: Left Coast Press.
Muller, M., & Kogan, S. (2012). Ground theory method in HCI. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human computer interaction handbook. Florence, KY, USA: CRC Press.
Muller, M., Millen, D.R., & Feinberg, J. (2009). Information curators in an enterprise file-sharing service. Proceedings of the ECSCW 2009. Vienna, Austria: Springer
Nardi, B. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Nielsen, J. (1992). The usability engineering lifecycle. IEEE Computer, 25(3), 12–22.CrossRef
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). Designing for dynamic family structures: Divorced families and interactive systems. Proceedings of the DIS 2010, pp. 151–160
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.CrossRef
Paay, J., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., & Dave, B. (2009). Out on the town: A socio-physical approach to the design of a context-aware urban guide. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16(2), 1–34. article 7.CrossRef
Pauleen, D. J., & Yoong, P. (2004). Studying human-centered IT innovation using a grounded action learning approach. The Qualitative Report, 9(1), 137–160.
Peirce, C.S. (1903). Harvard lectures on pragmatism. Collected Papers 5.1, pp. 71–172
Popper, K. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Torchbook [[[falsifiability]]].
Reichertz, J. (2007). Abduction: The logic of discovery in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 214–228). London: Sage.
Reichertz, J. (2010). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 11(1), 16. Art 13.
Riitta, H., Urquhart, C., & Iivari, N. (2009). “Who's in charge, and whose rules are followed…?” Power in an inter-organisational IS project. Proceedings of the ECIS 2009, pp. 943–956
Riitta, H., & Newman, M. (2011). The complex nature of emotions in an inter-organisational information system project. Proceedings of the ECIS 2011, pp. 943–956
Rode, J. (2009). Digital parenting: Designing for children’s safety. Proceedings of the BCS HCI 2009, pp. 244–251
Sayago, S., & Blat, J. (2009). About the relevance of accessibility barriers in the everyday interactions of older people with th web. Proc. W4A2009-Technical, 104–113
Seidel, S., & Recker, J. (2009). Using grounded theory for studying business process management phenomena. Proc. ECIS 2009, 490–501
Shannak, R. O., & Aldhmour, F. M. (2009). Grounded theory as methodology for theory generation in information systems research. European Journal of Economics, Finance, and Administrative Services, 15.
Star, S. L. (2007). Living grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–392.CrossRef
Star, S. L. (1985). Scientific work and uncertainty. Social Studies of Science, 15(3), 391–427.CrossRef
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRef
Stern, P. N. (2007). Properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York, NY, USA: Aldine.
Strauss, A. L., & Glaser, B. G. (1970). Anguish. Mill Valley, CA, USA: Sociology Press.
Thom-Santelli, J., Muller, M.J., & Millen, D.R. (2008) Social tagging roles: Publishers, evangelists, leaders. Proceedings of the CHI 2008
Urquhart, C., & Fernández, W.D. (2006). Grounded theory method: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. Proceedings of the ICIS 2006, pp. 457–464
Vines, J., Blythe, M., Lindsay, S., Dunphy, P., Monk, A., & Olivier, P. (2012). Questionable concepts: Critique as a resource for designing with eighty-somethings. Proceedings of the CHI 2012, pp. 1169–1178
Wyche, S.P., & Grinter, R.E. (2009). Extraordinary computing: Religion as a lens for reconsidering the home. Proceedings of the CHI 2009, pp. 749–758
Wyche, S.P., Smyth, T.N., Chetty, M., Aoki, P.M., & Grinter, R.E. (2010). Deliberate interactions: Characterizing technology use in Nairobi, Kenya. Proceedings of the CHI 2010, pp. 2593–2602
Yardi, S., & Bruckman, A. (2012). Income, race, and class: Exploiting socioeconomic differences in family technology use. Proceedings of the CHI 20120, pp. 3041–3050
Metadaten
Titel
Curiosity, Creativity, and Surprise as Analytic Tools: Grounded Theory Method
verfasst von
Michael Muller
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer New York
Buch
Ways of Knowing in HCI

Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0377-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4939-0378-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_2

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise