Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare 2/2022

20.03.2022 | Original Paper

Cycles in synchronous iterative voting: general robustness and examples in Approval Voting

verfasst von: Benoît R. Kloeckner

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We consider synchronous iterative voting, where voters are given the opportunity to strategically choose their ballots depending on the outcome deduced from the previous collective choices. We propose two settings for synchronous iterative voting, one of classical flavor with a discrete space of states, and a more general continuous-space setting extending the first one. We give a general robustness result for cycles not relying on a tie-breaking rule, showing that they persist under small enough perturbations of the behavior of voters. Then we give examples in Approval Voting of electorates applying simple, sincere and consistent heuristics (namely Laslier’s Leader Rule or a modification of it) leading to cycles with bad outcomes, either not electing an existing Condorcet winner, or possibly electing a candidate ranked last by a majority of voters. Using the robustness result, it follows that those “bad cycles” persist even if only a (large enough) fraction of the electorate updates its choice of ballot at each iteration. We complete these results with examples in other voting methods, including ranking methods satisfying the Condorcet criterion; an in silico experimental study of the rarity of preference profiles exhibiting bad cycles; and an example exhibiting chaotic behavior.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
A similar argument has been raised by Warren D. Smith and is used by advocates of Approval Voting and Range Voting, see https://​www.​rangevoting.​org/​AppCW.​html. The argument of Smith is less rigorous than Laslier’s, since the equilibrium assumption is kept implicit.
 
2
An example of cycle under the Leader Rule is given as exercise 8.4.4 in Meir (2018), but there are no Condorcet winner.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Airiau S, Grandi U, Perotto FS (2017) Learning agents for iterative voting. In: International conference on algorithmic decision theory. In: International conference on algorithmic decision theory. Springer, pp 139–152 Airiau S, Grandi U, Perotto FS (2017) Learning agents for iterative voting. In: International conference on algorithmic decision theory. In: International conference on algorithmic decision theory. Springer, pp 139–152
Zurück zum Zitat Black D (1986) The theory of committees and elections. Springer (Originally published 1958) Black D (1986) The theory of committees and elections. Springer (Originally published 1958)
Zurück zum Zitat Bowman C, Hodge JK, Yu A (2014) The potential of iterative voting to solve the separability problem in referendum elections. Theory Decis 77(1):111–124CrossRef Bowman C, Hodge JK, Yu A (2014) The potential of iterative voting to solve the separability problem in referendum elections. Theory Decis 77(1):111–124CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (2010) Going from theory to practice: the mixed success of approval voting. In: Handbook on approval voting. Springer, pp 19–37 Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (2010) Going from theory to practice: the mixed success of approval voting. In: Handbook on approval voting. Springer, pp 19–37
Zurück zum Zitat Brams S, Fishburn PC (2007) Approval voting. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin Brams S, Fishburn PC (2007) Approval voting. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD (eds) (2016) Handbook of computational social choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD (eds) (2016) Handbook of computational social choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Brânzei S, Caragiannis I, Morgenstern J, Procaccia AD (2013) How bad is selfish voting? In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 138–144 Brânzei S, Caragiannis I, Morgenstern J, Procaccia AD (2013) How bad is selfish voting? In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 138–144
Zurück zum Zitat Chopra S, Pacuit E, Parikh R (2004) Knowledge-theoretic properties of strategic voting. In: European workshop on logics in artificial intelligence. Springer, pp 18–30 Chopra S, Pacuit E, Parikh R (2004) Knowledge-theoretic properties of strategic voting. In: European workshop on logics in artificial intelligence. Springer, pp 18–30
Zurück zum Zitat De Sinopoli F, Dutta B, Laslier J-F (2006) Approval voting: three examples. Int J Game Theory 35:27–38CrossRef De Sinopoli F, Dutta B, Laslier J-F (2006) Approval voting: three examples. Int J Game Theory 35:27–38CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Durand F (2015) Vers des modes de scrutin moins manipulable. Ph.D. thesis. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Durand F (2015) Vers des modes de scrutin moins manipulable. Ph.D. thesis. Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Zurück zum Zitat Durand F, Mathieu F, Noirie L (2016) Can a condorcet rule have a low coalitional manipulability? ECAI IOS Press 2016:707–715 Durand F, Mathieu F, Noirie L (2016) Can a condorcet rule have a low coalitional manipulability? ECAI IOS Press 2016:707–715
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbard A (1973) Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica 587–601 Gibbard A (1973) Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica 587–601
Zurück zum Zitat Grandi U, Hughes D, Rossi F, Slinko A (2019) Gibbard–Satterthwaite games for k-approval voting rules. Math Soc Sci 99:24–35CrossRef Grandi U, Hughes D, Rossi F, Slinko A (2019) Gibbard–Satterthwaite games for k-approval voting rules. Math Soc Sci 99:24–35CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grandi U, Loreggia A, Rossi F, Venable KB, Walsh T (2013) Restricted manipulation in iterative voting: condorcet efficiency and borda score. In: International conference on algorithmic decision-theory. Springer Grandi U, Loreggia A, Rossi F, Venable KB, Walsh T (2013) Restricted manipulation in iterative voting: condorcet efficiency and borda score. In: International conference on algorithmic decision-theory. Springer
Zurück zum Zitat Green-Armytage J, Tideman TN, Cosman R (2016) Statistical evaluation of voting rules. Soc Choice Welf 46(1):183–212CrossRef Green-Armytage J, Tideman TN, Cosman R (2016) Statistical evaluation of voting rules. Soc Choice Welf 46(1):183–212CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Katok A, Hasselblatt B (1995) Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. In: Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications, vol 54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (With a supplementary chapter by Katok and Leonardo Mendoza) Katok A, Hasselblatt B (1995) Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. In: Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications, vol 54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (With a supplementary chapter by Katok and Leonardo Mendoza)
Zurück zum Zitat Koolyk A, Strangway T, Lev O, Rosenschein JS (2017) Convergence and quality of iterative voting under non-scoring rules. In: Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on autonomous agents & multiagent systems Koolyk A, Strangway T, Lev O, Rosenschein JS (2017) Convergence and quality of iterative voting under non-scoring rules. In: Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on autonomous agents & multiagent systems
Zurück zum Zitat Laslier J-F (2009) The Leader Rule: a model of strategic approval voting in a large electorate. J Theor Polit 21(1):113–136CrossRef Laslier J-F (2009) The Leader Rule: a model of strategic approval voting in a large electorate. J Theor Polit 21(1):113–136CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laslier J-F (2010) In silico voting experiments. Handbook on approval voting. Springer, Berlin, pp 311–335CrossRef Laslier J-F (2010) In silico voting experiments. Handbook on approval voting. Springer, Berlin, pp 311–335CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lepelley D, Louichi A, Valognes F (2000) Computer simulations of voting systems. Adv Complex Syst 3(1–4):181–194CrossRef Lepelley D, Louichi A, Valognes F (2000) Computer simulations of voting systems. Adv Complex Syst 3(1–4):181–194CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lev O, Rosenschein JS (2016) Convergence of iterative scoring rules. J Artif Intell Res 57:573–591CrossRef Lev O, Rosenschein JS (2016) Convergence of iterative scoring rules. J Artif Intell Res 57:573–591CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meir R (2018) Strategic voting. Synth Lect Artif Intell Mach Learn 13(1):1–167 Meir R (2018) Strategic voting. Synth Lect Artif Intell Mach Learn 13(1):1–167
Zurück zum Zitat Meir R (2015) Plurality voting under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press, pp 2103–2109 Meir R (2015) Plurality voting under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press, pp 2103–2109
Zurück zum Zitat Meir R (2017) Iterative voting. Trends Comput Soc Choice 69–86 Meir R (2017) Iterative voting. Trends Comput Soc Choice 69–86
Zurück zum Zitat Meir R, Polukarov M, Rosenschein JS, Jennings NR (2017) Iterative voting and acyclic games. Artif Intell 252:100–122CrossRef Meir R, Polukarov M, Rosenschein JS, Jennings NR (2017) Iterative voting and acyclic games. Artif Intell 252:100–122CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meir R, Lev O, Rosenschein JS (2014) A local-dominance theory of voting equilibria. In:Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on economics and computation. ACM, New York, pp 313–330 Meir R, Lev O, Rosenschein JS (2014) A local-dominance theory of voting equilibria. In:Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on economics and computation. ACM, New York, pp 313–330
Zurück zum Zitat Obraztsova S, Lev O, Polukarov M, Rabinovich Z, Rosenschein JS (2015) Farsighted voting dynamics. In: 1st workshop on algorithmic game theory at IJCAIgame theory at IJCAI Obraztsova S, Lev O, Polukarov M, Rabinovich Z, Rosenschein JS (2015) Farsighted voting dynamics. In: 1st workshop on algorithmic game theory at IJCAIgame theory at IJCAI
Zurück zum Zitat Obraztsova S, Markakis E, Polukarov M, Rabinovich Z, Jennings NR (2015) On the convergence of iterative voting: how restrictive should restricted dynamics be? In: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press, pp 993–999 Obraztsova S, Markakis E, Polukarov M, Rabinovich Z, Jennings NR (2015) On the convergence of iterative voting: how restrictive should restricted dynamics be? In: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press, pp 993–999
Zurück zum Zitat Rabinovich Z, Obraztsova S, Lev O, Markakis E, Rosenschein JS (2015) Analysis of equilibria in iterative voting schemes. In: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press Rabinovich Z, Obraztsova S, Lev O, Markakis E, Rosenschein JS (2015) Analysis of equilibria in iterative voting schemes. In: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press
Zurück zum Zitat Reijngoud A, Endriss U (2012) Voter response to iterated poll information. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems-volume 2. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp 635–644 Reijngoud A, Endriss U (2012) Voter response to iterated poll information. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems-volume 2. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp 635–644
Zurück zum Zitat Satterthwaite MA (1975) Strategy-proofness and arrow’s conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. J Econ Theory 10(2):187–217CrossRef Satterthwaite MA (1975) Strategy-proofness and arrow’s conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. J Econ Theory 10(2):187–217CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sertel MR, Sanver MR (2004) Strong equilibrium outcomes of voting games are the generalized condorcet winners. Soc Choice Welf 22(2):331–347CrossRef Sertel MR, Sanver MR (2004) Strong equilibrium outcomes of voting games are the generalized condorcet winners. Soc Choice Welf 22(2):331–347CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walters P (1982) An introduction to ergodic theory, Graduate texts in mathematics, vol 79. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Walters P (1982) An introduction to ergodic theory, Graduate texts in mathematics, vol 79. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cycles in synchronous iterative voting: general robustness and examples in Approval Voting
verfasst von
Benoît R. Kloeckner
Publikationsdatum
20.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-022-01395-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Social Choice and Welfare 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe