Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 5/2019

25.01.2019 | Research Paper

Data Portability on the Internet

An Economic Analysis

verfasst von: Michael Wohlfarth

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Data portability allows users to transfer data between competing online services. As data gets increasingly valuable for online services and users alike, the enforcement of data portability within the European Union by the General Data Protection Regulation will have important ramifications for the competition in online markets. Thus, this paper develops a game-theoretic model to examine firms’ strategic reaction to data portability and to identify the ensuing market outcomes. It can be shown, among others, that although data portability is designed to protect users, they may be hurt because market entrants have an incentive to increase the amount of collected data compared to a regime without data portability. However, profits for new services and total surplus increase if the costs for implementation are not too large. This likely improves innovation and service variety. Consequently, the results provide important insights and case-specific recommendations for managers and policy makers in data-driven online markets.
Vorheriger Artikel Data Sovereignty and Data Space Ecosystems
Nächster Artikel Discovering Data Quality Problems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
We do not consider consumption-related benefits for users, i.e., the base utility \(v_i\) for CP i does not depend on the amount of entered data, additionally, see Sect. 6.2.
 
2
As shown in “Appendix 4”, it is irrelevant whether we assume users to be myopic or strategic.
 
3
In “Appendix 5”, we show that the entrant CP B always requires at least the amount of data CP A required in \(t=1\) if \(v_B \ge v_A\). Users then only need to reveal the net amount of required data. If \(v_B\in [{15v_A}/{16}, v_A)\), CP B sets a lower data consumption level than CP A. Then users that switch CPs derive a net benefit from a right to data portability because (1) the new service requires less data and (2) the old service has to delete already entered data due to the right to erasure which is part of the GDPR (c.f., European Commission 2016b, Article 17 and “Appendix 5”).
 
4
Formally, the derivative changes its sign in the feasible parameter range. The effect of an increasing \(\tau\) on \(\pi _A^P\) is positive if \(\tau > {\sqrt{22v_A^2-12v_A v_B+4v_B^2}}/{6}\); the effect of an increasing \(\tau\) on \(\pi _A^{NP}\) is positive if \(\tau > {\sqrt{26v_A^2-12v_A v_B+4v_B^2}}/{6}\); the effect of an increasing \(\tau\) on \(\pi _B^{NP}\) is positive if \(\tau > {(6v_B-9v_A)}/{16}\).
 
Literatur
Anderson SA (2012) Advertising on the internet. In: Peitz M, Waldfogel J (eds) The Oxford handbook of the digital economy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 355–390
Caminal R, Matutes C (1990) Endogenous switching costs in a duopoly model. Int J Ind Organ 8(3):353–373CrossRef
Chen PY, Hitt LM (2002) Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: a study of the online brokerage industry. Inf Syst Res 13(3):255–274CrossRef
Choi JP, Kim BC (2010) Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND J Econ 47(5):1145–1150
d’Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF (1979) On Hotelling’s “Stability in competition”. Econometrica 47(5):1145–1150CrossRef
Dou W (2004) Will internet users pay for online content? J Advert Res 44(4):349–359CrossRef
Easley R, Guo H, Kraemer J (2018) From network neutrality to data neutrality: a techno-economic framework and research agenda. Inf Syst Res Forthcom 29(2):253–272CrossRef
European Commission (2016b) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (...) on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). http://​data.​europa.​eu/​eli/​reg/​2016/​679/​oj. Accessed 29 Nov 2018
Evans D (2009) The online advertising industry: economics, evolution, and privacy. J Econ Perspect 23(3):37–60CrossRef
Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: competition with switching costs and network effects. In: Armstrong M, Porter RH (eds) Handbook of industrial organization. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1967–2072
Farrell J, Saloner G (1992) Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J Ind Econ 40(1):9–35CrossRef
Gehrig T, Stenbacka R (2004) Differentiation-induced switching costs and poaching. J Econ Manag Strategy 13(4):635–655CrossRef
Graef I (2015) Mandating portability and interoperability in online social networks: regulatory and competition law issues in the European Union. Telecommun Policy 39(6):502–514CrossRef
Irmen A, Thisse JF (1998) Competition in multi-characteristics spaces: hotelling was almost right. J Econ Theory 78(1):76–102CrossRef
Katz M, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75(3):424–440
Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 8(2):93–115CrossRef
Klemperer P (1987a) Markets with consumer switching costs. Q J Econ 102(2):375–394CrossRef
Klemperer P (1987b) The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. RAND J Econ 18(1):138–150CrossRef
Klemperer P (1989) Price wars caused by switching costs. Rev Econ Stud 53(3):405–420CrossRef
Klemperer P (1995) Competition when consumers have switching costs: an overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 62(2):515–539CrossRef
Kourandi F, Krämer J, Valletti T (2015) Net neutrality, exclusivity contracts, and internet fragmentation. Inf Syst Res 26(2):320–338CrossRef
Petcu D, Vasilakos AV (2014) Portability in clouds: approaches and research opportunities. Scalable Comput Pract Exp 15(3):251–270
Pollock R (2009) The control of porting in platform markets. J Econ Asymmetries 6(2):155–180CrossRef
Ranabahu A, Sheth A (2010) Semantics centric solutions for application and data portability in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the international conference on cloud computing technology and science (CloudCom), pp 234–241
Ray S, Kim SS, Morris JG (2012) Research note—online users’ switching costs: their nature and formation. Inf Syst Res 23(1):197–213CrossRef
Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Manag Sci 58(4):696–707CrossRef
Swire P, Lagos Y (2013) Why the right to data portability likely reduces consumer welfare: antitrust and privacy critique. Md Law Rev 72(2):335–380
Vanberg AD, Ünver MB (2017) The right to data portability in the GDPR and EU competition law: odd couple or dynamic duo? Eur J Law Technol 8(1):1–22
Metadaten
Titel
Data Portability on the Internet
An Economic Analysis
verfasst von
Michael Wohlfarth
Publikationsdatum
25.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00580-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Business & Information Systems Engineering 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Research Paper

The New Era of Business Intelligence Applications: Building from a Collaborative Point of View

Editorial

Data Sovereignty and Data Space Ecosystems

Catchword

Hybrid Intelligence

Profile

Interview with Reinhold Achatz on “Data Sovereignty and Data Ecosystems”

Research Paper

Privacy-Preserving Process Mining

Research Paper

Discovering Data Quality Problems