Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11127-017-0433-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
While the nature of party switching is expected to have significant consequences for democratic representation, the current literature has not explored sufficiently the different dynamics that facilitate legislators to depart from their parties individually or collectively. We argue that target parties’ concerns about the policy consequences of absorbing an ideologically different group of legislators constrain the opportunities of factions even though they share the same electoral concerns as individual legislators. Turkey’s highly unstable legislative party system from 1991 to 2002 allows us to conduct a two-stage conditional logit analysis of party affiliation. In line with our theory, we find that individual switchers are affected by immediate electoral concerns while policy related factors matter most in cases of factional and/or collective switches.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 589 kb)11127_2017_433_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Aleskerov, F., Ersel, H., & Sabuncu, Y. (2000). Power and coalitional stability in the Turkish parliament 1991–1999. Turkish Studies,1(2), 21–38. CrossRef
Ayan Musil, P., & Dikici Bilgin, H. (2014). Types of outcomes in factional rivalries: Lessons from non-democratic parties in Turkey. International Political Science Review,37(2), 166–183. CrossRef
Back, H. (2008). Intra-party politics and coalition formation: Evidence from Swedish local government. Party Politics,14(1), 71–89. CrossRef
Back, H., & Dumont, P. (2007). Combining large-n and small-n strategies: The way forward in coalition research. West European Politics,30(3), 467–501. CrossRef
Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., et al. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics,21(1), 143–152. CrossRef
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis,14(1), 63–82. CrossRef
Canon, D. T., & Sousa, D. J. (1992). Party system change and political career structures in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly,17(3), 347–363. CrossRef
Ceron, A. (2012). Bounded oligarchy: How and when factions constrain leaders in party position-taking? Electoral Studies,31(4), 689–701. CrossRef
Ceron, A. (2015). The politics of fission: An analysis of faction breakaways among Italian parties (1946–2011). British Journal of Political Science,45(1), 121–139. CrossRef
Ceron, A. (2016). Inter-factional conflicts and government formation: Do party leaders sort out ideological heterogeneity? Party Politics,22(6), 797–808. CrossRef
Ciftci, S., Forrest, W., & Tekin, Y. (2008). Committee assignments in a nascent party system: The case of the Turkish Grand National Assembly. International Political Science Review,29(3), 303–324. CrossRef
Cox, G. W., & Rosenbluth, F. (1995). Anatomy of a split: The liberal democrats of Japan. Electoral Studies,14(4), 355–376. CrossRef
Desposato, S. W. (2006). Parties for rent? Careerism, ideology, and party switching in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies. American Journal of Political Science,50(1), 62–80. CrossRef
Desposato, S. W. (2009). Party switching in Brazil: Causes, effects, and representation. In W. B. Heller & J. Mershon (Eds.), Political parties and legislative party switching (pp. 109–146). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Desposato, S. & Scheiner, E. (2008). Governmental centralization and party affiliation: Legislator strategies in Brazil and Japan. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 509–524. CrossRef
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica,47(1), 153–161. CrossRef
Heller, W. B., & Mershon, C. (2005). Party switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1996–2001. The Journal of Politics,67(2), 536–559. CrossRef
Heller, W. B., & Mershon, C. (2008). Dealing in discipline: Party switching and legislative voting in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1988–2000. American Journal of Political Science,52(4), 910–925. CrossRef
Heller, W. B., & Mershon, C. (2009). Introduction: Legislative party switching, parties, and party systems. In W. B. Heller & J. Mershon (Eds.), Political parties and legislative party switching (pp. 3–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Marks, G., et al. (2010). Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: The Chapel Hill expert surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research,49(5), 687–703. CrossRef
Kalaycioglu, E., & Carkoglu, A. (2007). Turkish democracy today: Elections, protest and stability in an Islamic society. New York: I.B.Tauris.
Kato, J. (1998). When the party breaks up: Exit and voice among Japanese legislators. American Political Science Review,92(4), 857–870. CrossRef
Katz, R. S. (2006). Party in democratic theory. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 34–47). London: Sage. CrossRef
Kesgin, B., & Kaarbo, J. (2010). When and how parliaments influence foreign policy: The case of Turkey’s Iraq decision. International Studies Perspectives,11(1), 19–36. CrossRef
Kreuzer, M., & Pettai, V. (2009). Party switching, party systems, and political representation. In W. B. Heller & J. Mershon (Eds.), Political parties and legislative party switching (pp. 265–286). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Kselman, D. (2009). Electoral institutions, intra- party competition, and political conflict. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University.
Laver, M., Kenneth, B., & John, G. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review,97(2), 311–331. CrossRef
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical outcomes using stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
McLaughlin, E. (2011). Electoral regimes and party-switching floor-crossing in South Africa’s local legislatures. Party Politics,18(4), 563–579. CrossRef
McMenamin, I., & Gwiazda, A. (2011). Three roads to institutionalisation: Vote-, office- and policy-seeking explanations of party switching in Poland. European Journal of Political Research,50(6), 838–866. CrossRef
Mershon, C. (2008). Legislative party switching and executive coalitions. Japanese Journal of Political Science,9(3), 391–414. CrossRef
Mershon, C., & Shvetsova, O. (2008). Parliamentary cycles and party switching in legislatures. Comparative Political Studies,41(1), 99–127. CrossRef
Mershon, C., & Shvetsova, O. (2013). The microfoundations of party system stability in legislatures. Journal of Politics,75(4), 865–878. CrossRef
Morgenstern, S. (2001). Organized factions and disorganized parties: Electoral incentives in Uruguay. Party Politics,7(2), 235–256. CrossRef
Mutlu-Eren, H. (2015). Keeping the party together. Public Choice,164(1), 117–133. CrossRef
Nokken, T. P. (2009). Party switching and the procedural party agenda in the US house of representatives. In W. B. Heller & J. Mershon (Eds.), Political parties and legislative party switching (pp. 81–108). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
O’brien, D. Z., & Shomer, Y. (2013). A cross-national analysis of party switching. Legislative Studies Quarterly,38(1), 111–141. CrossRef
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science,29(2), 357–384. CrossRef
Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Radean, M. (2013). Party politics and legislative party switching. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations, Florida State University.
Reed, S. R. & Scheiner, E. (2003). Electoral incentives and policy preferences: Mixed motives behind party defections in Japan. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 469–490. CrossRef
Sayarı, S. (2007). Towards a new Turkish party system? Turkish Studies,8(2), 197–210. CrossRef
Shabad, G., & Slomczynski, M. (2004). Inter-party mobility among parliamentary candidates in post-communist East Central Europe. Party Politics,10(2), 151–176. CrossRef
Strom, K., & Muller, W. C. (1999). Political parties and hard choices. In W. C. Muller & K. Strom (Eds.), Policy, office or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions (pp. 1–35). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Thames, F. C. (2007). Searching for the electoral connection: Parliamentary party switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998–2002. Legislative Studies Quarterly,32(2), 223–256. CrossRef
Turan, I. (1985). Changing horses in midstream: Party changers in the Turkish National Assembly. Legislative Studies Quarterly,10(1), 21–34. CrossRef
Turan, I. (2003). Volatility in politics, stability in parliament: An impossible dream? The Turkish Grand National Assembly during the last two decades. Journal of Legislative Studies,9(2), 151–176. CrossRef
Turan, I., Iba, S., & Zarakol, A. (2005). Inter-party mobility in the Turkish Grand National Assembly: Curse or blessing? European Journal of Turkish Studies, Thematic Issue No. 3, Being an MP in Contemporary Turkey. http://www.ejts.org/document400.html.
Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Merz, N., Regel, S., Werner, A., & Schultze, H. (2014). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2014b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
Young, D. J. (2014). An initial look into party switching in Africa: Evidence from Malawi. Party Politics,20(1), 105–115. CrossRef
- Defecting alone or splitting together? Individual and collective party switching by legislators
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität