Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Semantics of Entrepreneurial Learning in New Technology-Based Firms Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Defining Academic Spinoffs and Entrepreneurial University

verfasst von : Maksim Belitski, Hanna Aginskaya

Erschienen in: Technology Entrepreneurship

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The traditional vision of the university as a teaching institution still prevails in many countries. Typical of this vision is the high-risk aversion to knowledge commercialization due to lack of institutional support and market knowledge. Therefore, university scholars and seem more interested in publishing and graduates are more interested in secured life-time employability instead of commercialising their research and ideas on the market which does not contribute to technology transfer (TT) process and economic growth.
This chapter aims at providing insights into the important success factors of creation of academic spin-offs and entrepreneurial university, by carrying out a systemic review of eclectic literature on knowledge commercialization a technology transfer. It reveals that technology transfer offices (TTOs), centres for entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship education as important success factors for academics spin-offs and knowledge commercialisation. Practical implications for entrepreneurship university and other stakeholders and discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Development of ICT Industry in Belarus: Impact of Educational and State-Support Policies
Nächstes Kapitel The Impact of Entrepreneurship Governance and Institutional Frameworks on Knowledge-Based Spin-Offs
Fußnoten
1
Based on the QS World University Rankings by Subject 2016.
 
Literatur
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The role of information asymmetry in the market for university–industry research collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 84–100.CrossRef
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Ferretti, M., & Parmentola, A. (2012). An individual-level assessment of the relationship between spin-off activities and research performance in universities. R&D Management, 42(3), 225–242.CrossRef
Algieri, B., Aquino, A., & Succurro, M. (2013). Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: The case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 382–400.CrossRef
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory in action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2013). The missing pillar: The creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1–18.
Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601.CrossRef
Azagra-Caro, J. M., Archontakis, F., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., & Ferńandez-de-Lucio, F. (2006). Belarusian State Economic University. Research Policy, 35, 37–55.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
BIS. (2015, November). Fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice.
Caiazza, R., & Audretsch, D. (2013). A general framework for classifying spin-offs. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 15–30.
Caiazza, R., & Volpe, T. (2016). Innovation and its diffusion: Process, actors and actions. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29, 181–189. ISSN 0953-7325.
Caiazza, R., Audretsch, D., Volpe, T., & Debra Singer, J. (2014). Policy and institutions facilitating entrepreneurial spin-offs: USA, Asia and Europe. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 3(2), 186–196.CrossRef
Chiesa, V., & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: The general framework and the case of academic spin-off companies. R&D Management, 30(4), 329–340.CrossRef
Chinni, D., & Gimpel, J. (2011). Our patchwork nation: The surprising truth about the ‘real’ America. New York, NY: Gotham Books.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Milton Keynes: Pergamon.
Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79.CrossRef
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64–77.CrossRef
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.CrossRef
European Commission. (2013). European knowledge transfer report 2013. Final Report (June), DG Research and Innovation, Brussels.
Ewalt, D. (2015). The world’s most innovative universities. Reuters.
Fernald, L., Solomon, G., & El Tarabishy, A. (2005). A new paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership. Southern Business Review, 30(2), 1–10.
Fiet, J. O. (2001a). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 1–24.CrossRef
Fiet, J. O. (2001b). The pedagogical side of entrepreneurship theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 101–117.CrossRef
Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127.CrossRef
Fontes, M. (2005). The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs. Technovation, 25(4), 339–347.CrossRef
Gibb, A. (2002). In pursuit of new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: Creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3), 233–269.CrossRef
Gibb, A. (2012). Exploring the synergistic potential in entrepreneurial university development: Towards the building of a strategic framework. Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, 3, 16742.CrossRef
Giunta, A., Pericoli, F., & Pierucci, E. (2016). University–industry collaboration in the biopharmaceuticals: The Italian case. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 818–840.CrossRef
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2010). The creation and development of entrepreneurial universities in Spain: An institutional approach. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Hayter, C. S. (2013). Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: Perspectives from the literature. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 899–911.CrossRef
Hindle, K. (2010). How community context affects entrepreneurial process: A diagnostic framework. Entrepreneurship and regional development, 22(7–8), 599-647.
Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555–1568.CrossRef
Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model. Research Policy, 38(9), 1407–1422.CrossRef
Kolympiris, C., & Klein, P. G. (2017). The effects of academic incubators on university innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(2), 145–170.
Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities’ spinout strategies. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 185–200.CrossRef
Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 241–263.CrossRef
Markuerkiaga, L., Caiazza, R., Igartua, J. I., & Errasti, N. (2016). Factors fostering students’ spin-off firm formation: An empirical comparative study of universities from North and South Europe. Journal of Management Development, 35(6), 814–846.CrossRef
Mavi, R. K. (2014). Indicators of entrepreneurial university: Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 370–387.CrossRef
Meyer, G. D. (2011). The reinvention of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 1–8.CrossRef
Mustar, P. (1997). Spin-off enterprises – how French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 37–43.
Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., et al. (2006). Conceptualizing the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35(2), 289–308.CrossRef
Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55–70.CrossRef
Neck, H. M., Greene, P. G., & Brush, C. G. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship: A practice-based approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef
Netval. (2014). Unire I Puntini Per Completare Il Disegno Dell’innovazione. XI Rapporto Netval Sulla Valorizzazione Della Ricerca Pubblica Italiana. Technical Report, Milan, Italy.
Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161–170.CrossRef
Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Simulating entrepreneurial learning: Integrating experiential and collaborative approaches to learning. Management Learning, 38(2), 211–233.CrossRef
Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127–151.CrossRef
Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 489–504.CrossRef
Taylor, D. W., & Thorpe, R. (2004). Entrepreneurial learning: A process of co-participation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(2), 203–211.CrossRef
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Binks, M. (2006). Venture capital and university spin-outs. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Defining Academic Spinoffs and Entrepreneurial University
verfasst von
Maksim Belitski
Hanna Aginskaya
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Technology Entrepreneurship

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73508-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-73509-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73509-2_11