Definition of the Research Groups and Creation of the Groups of Interest for CCAM User Needs
- Open Access
- 2026
- OriginalPaper
- Buchkapitel
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)
Abstract
1 Introduction
Today’s transport ecosystems are experiencing a pivotal moment. Smart mobility planning, integrating CCAM (Cooperative, connected and automated mobility) solutions, has the potential to implement greener, safer, and more sustainable means of transport [European Commission, 2023]. However, to achieve social equity for all users and a real change in the entire transport system, the development of CCAM must be holistic, considering users, non-users and relevant stakeholders just as much as technical advancements. The EU project SINFONICA covers this aspect by using co-creation processes that acknowledge the needs of all relevant stakeholders and citizens. The concept of co-creation is a technical discipline and conceptual framework that originates in the transformative process of the entrepreneurial world [Senabre, 2015]. The main root of the co-creation concept lies in the participatory approaches used to engage the stakeholders in the decision-making processes. Co-creation processes in the transport domain have become popular in recent years, for instance within the EU projects TRIPS and Cities4People. However, in the field of CCAM, so far, no citizen and stakeholder-oriented co-creation process has been undertaken at the European level. Therefore, the SINFONICA project decided to put human factors at the center of the creation of its work to realize an ‘all-inclusive’ CCAM as a societal service for European citizens.
2 Definition of the Groups of Interest in SINFONICA
The vision of the SINFONICA project is to develop functional, efficient, and innovative strategies, methods, and tools to engage CCAM users, providers, and other stakeholders to collect, understand, and structure in a manageable and exploitable way their needs, desires, and concerns related to CCAM. To build the co-creation on a strong, equal, and inclusive base, the project team decided to begin its work with a theoretical framework about mobility needs as well as the expectations and requirements of citizens and stakeholders. Based on this, we composed the four SINFONICA groups of interest which are defined as follows: groups of people involved in the co-creation activities; comprised of certain users from the research groups (people with mobility challenges), citizen representatives, as well as relevant stakeholders; can be different for the four research site partners; managed by the four SINFONICA research site partners in Trikala, Hamburg, the region of West Midlands and the Noord-Brabant province.
Anzeige
3 Inclusivity and Engagement Strategies for People with Mobility Challenges: Building the Research Groups
3.1 Activities to Create the Research Groups
An important aspect of the Groups of Interest (GoI) is to represent people with mobility challenges. To include them accordingly within the participatory methodologies of SINFONICA, we first built a theoretical framework to describe people's mobility needs regarding CCAM with a special focus on individuals facing mobility challenges [Anke & Ringhand, 2023]. Coming up from this literature review, we identified eight categories having special mobility needs (low-income and unemployed; elderly; people with disabilities; migrants, ethnic minorities and people with language barriers; young people; women and gender-related aspects; people living in rural areas; digitally non-connected people). Subsequently, drawing from this review, the consortium engaged the research site partners to collaboratively construct a priority ranking. The research site partners were tasked with ascertaining the relative significance of each group of people with mobility challenges within their unique local context as “low”, “moderate”, or “high”. The criteria for determining relevance were inextricably tied to the prevalence and significance of each category within the territorial domain. The ranking yielded a core set of five categories that emerged as universally pertinent across all research site partners, regardless of their respective geographical or sociocultural contexts. These categories included the elderly, individuals with cognitive disabilities, the digitally non-connected, those confronting gender-related vulnerabilities, and the youth. Consequently, these five categories were incorporated as integral part of every GoI, thereby ensuring their systematic inclusion and engagement.
Furthermore, recognizing the idiosyncrasies of individual research site partners and their unique demographics, each GoI added additional categories that were not defined according to an academic process, but they were chosen because they are particularly important to their respective territories. Trikala enhanced its GoI with the inclusion of individuals residing in rural areas and university students. Hamburg incorporated cyclists and individuals with physical disabilities. Noord-Brabant introduced the categories of migrants, single-parent families, and rural residents. West Midlands added individuals with physical disabilities and individuals from low-income backgrounds. Therefore, in Trikala, Hamburg, and West Midlands 7 groups of people with mobility challenges will be involved in the participatory activities, while Noord Brabant will involve 8 groups of people with mobility challenges.
3.2 Definition of Research Groups of People with Mobility Challenges
For the final set of the five research groups being covered by all four research site partners, we provide a summary of the transport challenges that these people experience.
Elderly: Regarding CCAM services, elderly people's mobility needs rise in terms of safety, accessibility, and availability, requiring CCAM among others, to be comfortable, easy to use, and allow enough time for hopping on-off and short walking distances. Mobility challenges arise due to biological, psychological, and sociological changes associated with increasing age.
Anzeige
People with disabilities: Around 87 million people in the EU have some form of disability. This means that with 448 million inhabitants in the EU, people with disabilities make up 19% of all EU citizens. According to the European Commission [2022], the biggest challenges for people with disabilities are: a higher number of unemployness; a higher risk of poverty and a lower level of education; around half of all persons with disabilities feel discriminated against. Regarding mobility and transport, these groups have other requirements of trip distances than others. Special and unique transport services (especially prototypes) can lead to exclusions if the requirements of disabled people are not considered. But also, in terms of standard options for production manufacturing, they are not considered for cost reasons.
Women and gender related aspects: The aim of transportation is to give everyone the same chances to use different transport modes and reduce the dissonance of travel modes [Hu et al., 2023] Mobility patterns and mode choices of men and women differ significantly: women are more likely to have trip chains and combine several trip purposes, they are also more likely to work in part-time jobs [Ortega et al., 2019], with some modes of transport, they perceive difficulties in transporting goods and children [Ramboll, 2021]. Another key issue is how to account for LGBTQIA + people when designing CCAMs. People having sexual and gender-nonconforming identities experience gender and homophobic-based violence and discrimination more often in public transport compared to heterosexual people and they use more expensive travel alternatives or take less direct routes to overcome their experiences of unsafe and inaccessible public transport alternatives [Weintrob et al., 2021]. CCAMs should provide women and LGBTQIA + people advantage in terms of accessibility, affordability, and safety.
Young people: Around 16% of people living in the EU are young people aged 15–29 [Eurostat, 2022] and children younger than 15 years old account for 15% of the total population of the EU. This makes up 31% of all EU citizens, showing the importance of this user group for CCAMs. Young people are dependent on their parents up to a certain age to fulfil their mobility needs and have lesser needs for self-autonomy [Mobility in Germany, 2019]. To get autonomy and have an inexpensive means of transport, young people are very keen on cycling and other alternatives to car transport at this age. However, transportation is crucial in accessing education, work, and social interactions.
Digitally non-connected people: Digital inclusiveness is a primary goal for future transport systems. In 2021, people with at least basic digital skills made up 54% of the EU population (aged 16–74). People with low digital literacy and/or no access to digital services (combined: digitally non-connected people) can face difficulties in accessing information, booking tickets, and making payments for transportation services if digital knowledge and access are needed (like cashless paying). They may also struggle with using digital devices like smartphone applications and navigating digital platforms. Further, these people might experience a risk of paying higher fares for paper tickets than for online tickets or fail to be notified of service changes or disruptions. As a result, their mobility patterns can be limited, and they may face greater challenges in accessing essential destinations such as work, healthcare, and education.
4 Engaging Citizens: Identifying Relevant Categories and Participatory Approaches
In pursuit of the objective of broader citizen engagement within the ambit of SINFONICA's participatory methodologies, a collaborative decision was reached with the research site partners to orchestrate focus groups, each strategically tailored to capture distinct demographic parameters. These parameters encompassed age cohorts (i.e., 16–35 years, 36–45 years, 46–65 years, and individuals aged 66 and above), income (defined in accordance with the specific socioeconomic criteria relevant to each respective country), and variations in public transport utilization patterns. The methodological design governing the categorization of citizens into these distinct groupings was derived through a collaborative brainstorming process involving a multidisciplinary consortium comprising municipalities, transport engineers, psychologists, and sociologists. This collaborative, interdisciplinary approach was instrumental in refining and operationalizing the delineation of the categories of people that will join the focus groups activities. The selection of focus groups as the preferred engagement modality was predicated upon its inherent capacity to foster a deliberative and comfortable dialogue environment. This approach was deliberately structured to cultivate an atmosphere conducive to the emergence of novel perspectives, innovative ideas, and unexplored possibilities.
Furthermore, this approach reflects a systematic strategy for expanding citizen participation within SINFONICA's initiatives, drawing upon the structuring of focus groups to facilitate nuanced dialogues and engender a deeper understanding of the transformative potentialities ushered in by CCAM within the transportation landscape.
5 Stakeholders Engagement: Identifying Relevant Categories and Effective Approaches
Finally, to ensure a complete vision of the world of transport, we focused on stakeholders’ participation. The first step was the definition of a long list that included all the categories of stakeholders involved in the transport sector. Starting from those lists, we asked the research site partners to report which categories of stakeholders were present in their territories. We were therefore able to establish a list of stakeholders with whom all research site partners were in contact. This comprehensive stakeholder inventory served as the foundation for deliberations regarding the optimal participatory modalities aimed at their effective involvement. A decisive consensus was reached to conduct a series of three workshops, designed to cultivate robust stakeholders’ engagement. This strategic choice was grounded in the anticipation that workshops would furnish a conducive environment for in-depth dialogue, collaborative problem-solving, and the synthesis of diverse perspectives. These workshops, thus, were conceived as the optimal conduits for nurturing multifaceted stakeholder participation and for advancing a holistic understanding of the intricate dynamics within the realm of transportation. In particular, the first workshop will develop a critical analysis of the mobility of the present times, discussing the findings of the Focus groups and the semi-structured interviews. This step will allow to identify barriers and potential solutions for the CCAM implementation. The categories of the stakeholders that will be involved in the workshops are: Service providers, Government representatives, Infrastructure managers, Industry representatives, Non-profit organization and representative bodies, Universities and knowledge institution representatives (only part of the first workshop). The second workshop is aimed at investigating on the CCAM potential to meet mobility needs, discussing expectations, desires and concerns. The third workshop will focus on co-definition of the requirements for an inclusive, equitable, and accessible CCAM deployment. This step will consider the needs of the users, while considering the abilities and constraints that industry stakeholders and policy makers face.
6 Conclusion
The formation of the GOI necessitated the development of a methodological framework rooted in the principles of co-creation, serving as a conduit for the convergence of theoretical constructs and practical implementation. In this context, the representatives hailing from the four research sites played a pivotal role, effectively functioning as intermediaries that facilitated a symbiotic relationship between academic researchers and the distinct territorial contexts involved in SINFONICA. The overarching aim of this endeavor was to articulate a comprehensive repertoire of participatory strategies designed to engender the active engagement of a diverse spectrum of citizens, including those confronted with mobility constraints, as well as various stakeholders. The realities on which these groups of interest have been created have been selected in order to guarantee different perspectives and points of view at the geographical level, at the level of digital advancement, at the level of experience and interactions with CCAM.
Acknowledgements
This work is part of SINFONICA which has received funding from the European Union under the Horizon Europe Research and Innovation program (Grant Agreement N° 101064988). The content reflects only the authors’ views, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.