nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

02.01.2020 | Original Paper

Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability

verfasst von: Charles Barthold, Peter Bloom

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this article is to introduce the concept of dissensus as an important perspective for making current organizational discourses of environmental sustainability more radically democratic. It presents the Anthropocene as a force for social naturalization—one that paradoxically acknowledges humanity’s role in negatively impacting the environment while restricting their agency to address this problem to those compatible with a market ideology. Radical democratic theories of agonism help to denaturalize the relation of organizations to the environment yet risk reproducing values of anthropocentrism and patriarchy in doing so. Dissensus, by contrast, emphasizes the need to ‘redistribute the sensible’, treating organizations as a space for continually denaturalizing and renaturalizing our socio-material relation with the world. Yet it also puts forward a radically democratic political ethics demanding that firms ecologically preserve the environment to allow for positive dissensus while internally resisting institutional power structures that naturalize these organizational environments. This paper, thus, seeks to show the significance of dissensus for enhancing radical democracy both in regards to discourses of environmental sustainability specifically and more generally within organizations.

Vorheriger Artikel The Peasant Way of a More than Radical Democracy: The Case of La Via Campesina

Nächster Artikel Dissent in Consensusland: An Agonistic Problematization of Multi-stakeholder Governance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alcaraz, J. M., Sugars, K., Nicolopoulou, K., & Tirado, F. (2016). Cosmopolitanism or globalization: The Anthropocene turn. Society and Business Review,11(3), 313–332.

Arias-Maldonado, M. (2013). Rethinking sustainability in the Anthropocene. Environmental Politics,22(3), 428–446.

Armiero, M., & De Angelis, M. (2017). Anthropocene: Victims, narrators, and revolutionaries. South Atlantic Quarterly,116(2), 345–362.

Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Embedding sustainability across the organization: A critical perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education,10(4), 719–731.

Barry, J., & Ellis, G. (2011). Beyond consensus? Agonism, republicanism and a low carbon future. Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public. From NIMBY to Participation (pp. 29–42). London: Earthscan.

Beloff, B., & Lines, M. (2005). Introduction. In B. Beloff, M. Lines, & D. Tanzil (Eds.), Transforming sustainability strategy into action: The chemical industry (pp. 1–6). Oxford: Wiley.

Beyes, T., & Volkmann, C. (2010). The fantasy of the organizational One: Postdemocracy, organizational transformation and the (im) possibility of politics. Journal of Organizational Change Management.,23(6), 651–668.

Biermann, F. (2014). The Anthropocene: A governance perspective. The Anthropocene Review,1(1), 57–61.

Calisto Friant, M., & Langmore, J. (2015). The buen vivir: A policy to survive the Anthropocene? Global Policy,6(1), 64–71.

Castree, N. (2017). Unfree radicals: Geoscientists, the Anthropocene, and left politics. Antipode,49(1), 52–74.

Chandler, D. (2018). Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene: An introduction to mapping, sensing and hacking. London: Routledge.

Clark, N. (2014). Geo-politics and the disaster of the anthropocene. The Sociological Review,62(Supplement 1), 19–37.

Contu, A. (2014). Rationality and relationality in the process of whistleblowing: Recasting whistleblowing through readings of Antigone. Journal of Management Inquiry,23(4), 393–406.

Crutzen, P., & Stoermer, E. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter,41, 17–18.

Dalby, S. (2007). Anthropocene geopolitics: Globalisation, empire, environment and critique. Geography Compass,1(1), 103–118.

Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics,95(3), 471–486.

Dawkins, C. (2015). Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement. Business Ethics Quarterly,25(1), 1–28.

de Bettignies, H. C., & Lépineux, F. (2009). Can multinational corporations afford to ignore the global common good? Business and Society Review,114(2), 153–182.

Derickson, K. D., & MacKinnon, D. (2015). Toward an interim politics of resourcefulness for the Anthropocene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,105(2), 304–312.

Ergene, S., Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (2018). Ecologies of sustainable concerns: Organization theorizing for the Anthropocene. Gender, Work & Organization,25(3), 222–245.

Esper, S. C., Cabantous, L., Barin-Cruz, L., & Gond, J. P. (2017). Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises. Organization,24(5), 671–699.

Frenzel, F., Feigenbaum, A., & McCurdy, P. (2014). Protest camps: An emerging field of social movement research. The Sociological Review,62(3), 457–474.

Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,26(1), 1–24.

Grear, A. (2015). Deconstructing anthropos: A critical legal reflection on ‘anthropocentric’ law and anthropocene ‘humanity’. Law and Critique,26(3), 225–249.

Grove, K., & Chandler, D. (2017). Introduction: Resilience and the Anthropocene: The stakes of ‘renaturalising’ politics. Resilience,5(2), 79–91.

Heikkurinen, P., & Bonnedahl, K. J. (2013). Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: A review and conceptual comparison of market-and stakeholder-oriented strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production,43, 191–198.

Hoffman, A., & Ehrenfeld, J. (2014). The Fourth wave, management science and practice in the age of the Anthropocene. Ross School of Business Working Paper, 1196.

Huault, I., & Perret, V. (2016). Can management education practise Rancière? In C. Steyaert, T. Beyes, & M. Parker (Eds.), The routledge companion to reinventing management education (pp. 161–177), New York: Taylor & Francis.

Huault, I., Perret, V., & Spicer, A. (2014). Beyond macro- and micro-emancipation: Rethinking emancipation in organization studies. Organization,21(1), 22–49.

Johnson, E., Morehouse, H., Dalby, S., Lehman, J., Nelson, S., Rowan, R., et al. (2014). After the Anthropocene: Politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch. Progress in Human Geography,38(3), 439–456.

Kalonaityte, V. (2018). When rivers go to court: The Anthropocene in organization studies through the lens of Jacques Rancière. Organization,25(4), 517–532.

Karlsson, R. (2013). Ambivalence, irony, and democracy in the Anthropocene. Futures,46, 1–9.

Kenny, K. (2018). Censored: Whistleblowers and impossible speech. Human Relations,71(8), 1025–1048.

Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left (pp. 44–89). London: Verso.

Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.

Lawrence, J. C. (2017). Managing the environment: Neoliberal governmentality in the Anthropocene. In P. Heikkurinen (Ed.), Sustainability and peaceful coexistence for the Anthropocene (pp. 68–84). London: Routledge.

Libby, R., & Steffen, W. (2007). History for the Anthropocene. History Compass,5(5), 1694–1719.

Lozano, R. (2014). Creativity and organizational learning as means to foster sustainability. Sustainable Development,22(3), 205–216.

Machin, A. (2012). Decisions, disagreement and responsibility: Towards an agonistic green citizenship. Environmental Politics,21(6), 847–863.

Machin, A. (2019). Agony and the anthropos: Democracy and boundaries in the Anthropocene. Nature and Culture,14(1), 1–16.

Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review,1(1), 62–69.

Markman, G. D., Russo, M., Lumpkin, G. T., Jennings, P. D., & Mair, J. (2016). Entrepreneurship as a platform for pursuing multiple goals: A special issue on sustainability, ethics, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies,53(5), 673–694.

Mirzoeff, N. (2014). Visualizing the anthropocene. Public Culture,26(2(73)), 213–232.

Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research,66(3), 745–758.

Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.

Murphy, V. P. (2012). Integrating corporate sustainability and strategy for business performance. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development,8(1), 5–17.

Nyberg, D., Spicer, A., & Wright, C. (2013). Incorporating citizens: Corporate political engagement with climate change in Australia. Organization,20(3), 433–453.

Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society,50(1), 6–27.

Papastergiadis, N. (2014). A breathing space for aesthetics and politics: An introduction to Jacques Rancière. Theory, Culture & Society,31(7–8), 5–26.

Parker, S., & Parker, M. (2017). Antagonism, accommodation and agonism in critical management studies: Alternative organizations as allies. Human Relations,70(11), 1366–1387.

Pattberg, P., & Zelli, F. (2016). Environmental politics and governance in the Anthropocene: Institutions and legitimacy in a complex world. London: Routledge.

Purdy, J. (2015). After nature: A politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreements. Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Rancière, J. (2000). Le Partage du Sensible. Paris: La Fabrique.

Rancière, J. (2006). Hatred of democracy. London: Verso.

Rancière, J. (2009). The emancipated spectator. London: Verso.

Rhodes, C., & Harvey, G. (2012). Agonism and the possibilities of ethics for HRM. Journal of Business Ethics,111(1), 49–59.

Robinson, N. A. (2012). Beyond sustainability: Environmental management for the Anthropocene epoch. Journal of Public Affairs,12(3), 181–194.

Roux-Rosier, A., Azambuja, R., & Islam, G. (2018). Alternative visions: Permaculture as imaginaries of the Anthropocene. Organization,25(4), 550–572.

Staeheli, L. A. (2010). Political geography: Democracy and the disorderly public. Progress in Human Geography,34(1), 67–78.

Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011a). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,369(1938), 842–867.

Steffen, W., Persson, Å., Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., et al. (2011b). The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio,40(7), 739.

Swyngedouw, E., & Ernstson, H. (2018). Interrupting the anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and depoliticizing ontologies in the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society,35(6), 3–30.

Temper, L., Walter, M., Rodriguez, I., Kothari, A., & Turhan, E. (2018). A perspective on radical transformations to sustainability: Resistances, movements and alternatives. Sustainability Science,13(3), 747–764.

van Bommel, K., & Spicer, A. (2011). Hail the snail: Hegemonic struggles in the slow food movement. Organization Studies,32(12), 1717–1744.

Waterton, C. (2010). Barcoding nature: Strategic naturalization and innovatory practice in the genomic ordering of things. The Sociological Review,52(1), 152–171.

Weiskopf, R., & Tobias-Miersch, Y. (2016). Whistleblowing, parrhesia and the contestation of truth in the workplace. Organization Studies,37(11), 1621–1640.

Wright, C., Nyberg, D., & Grant, D. (2012). “Hippies on the third floor”: Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organization Studies,33(11), 1451–1475.

Titel: Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability
verfasst von: Charles Barthold
Peter Bloom
Publikationsdatum: 02.01.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04397-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Dissent in Consensusland: An Agonistic Problematization of Multi-stakeholder Governance

Envisioning a Democratic Culture of Difference: Feminist Ethics and the Politics of Dissent in Social Movements

The Virtues of Equality and Dissensus: MacIntyre in a Dialogue with Rancière and Mouffe

Dissensus! Radical Democracy and Business Ethics

Managerial Appropriations of the Ethos of Democratic Practice: Rating, ‘Policing’, and Performance Management

How to Whistle-Blow: Dissensus and Demand