nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

08.09.2020

Design and validation of an instrument of self-perception regarding the lecturers’ use of ICT resources: to teach, evaluate and research

verfasst von: Francisco D. Guillén-Gámez, María J. Mayorga-Fernández

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study is part of a research about the use of ICT resources by Higher Education teachers to teach, evaluate and research (UICT-TER). The aim, in this case, is the creation and validation of a measuring instrument on the use of ICT resources based on the UICT-TER model. After the preparation and application of the instrument to a sample of 867 Higher Education teachers in the Spanish territory, the reliability, content validity, comprehension and construct validity were analyzed. In the initial creation of the instrument, three dimensions corresponding to a total of 24 items were established, achieving a final version of 16 items. Regarding content validity, the experts (n = 4) positively assessed the construct, dimensions and items of the questionnaire. The reliability analysis through Cronbach’s alpha were highly satisfactory and in relation to the Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the results found a good fit of the model. In addition, the instrument had external evidence of validity through different descriptive analyses with the variables gender, type of university (public-private), employment relationship (full-part-time), area of knowledge of the teaching staff (Science and Engineering-Architecture, Health Sciences, Art-Humanities and Social-Legal Sciences). Taking into account all the results obtained, the instrument created meets the psychometric properties required to be considered a valid and reliable instrument to measure the use of ICT resources according to the UICT-TER model in the Higher Education.

Vorheriger Artikel Teaching-learning conceptions, teaching motivation, and perceptions towards ICT: A research in Turkish public high schools

Nächster Artikel Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Agreda, M., Hinojo, M.A., y Sola, J.M. (2017). Diseño y validación de un instrumento para evaluar la competencia digital de los docentes en la educación superior española. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 49, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i49.03.

Almeraya, J. M. C., & Tobón, S. (2019). Validez de una rúbrica para medir competencias investigativas en pedagogía desde la socioformación. Atenas, 3(47), 1–17 https://atenas.reduniv.edu.cu/index.php/atenas/article/view/486.

Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

Biggs, J. (2005). Calidad del aprendizaje universitario. Madrid: Narcea.

Bozu, Z. y Canto, P.J. (2009). El profesorado universitario en la sociedad del conocimiento: competencias profesionales docentes. Revista de Formación e Innovación Educativa en la Universidad, 2 (2), 87–97.

Buela-Casal, G., Guillén-Riquelme, A., Ramiro-Sánchez, T., y Quevedo-Blasco, R. (2017). Ranking de investigación de las universidades públicas españolas. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 8, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2017.08.003.

Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456.CrossRef

Cabero, J., Marín, V. y Llorente, C. (2010). Hacia el diseño de un instrumento de diagnóstico de competencias tecnológicas del profesorado universitario. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 52 (7), 1-12https://doi.org/10.35362/rie5271761.

Cabezas González, M., Casillas Martín, S., Sanches-Ferreira, M., Diogo, T., & Luís, F. (2017). Validación de un instrumento para medir la competencia digital de estudiantes universitarios (CODIEU). Revista de estudios e investigación en Psicología y Educación. (13): 21-24. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.13.2180.

Calvo, M. B., Abad, F. M., & Conde, M. J. R. (2017). Validación psicométrica de un instrumento de evaluación de competencias informacionales en la educación secundaria. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía, 69(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2016.48593.CrossRef

Carretero-Dios, H. y Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(3), 521–551.

Castro, L., Carvajar, C. y Ugarte, J. (2004). La cultura de la investigación científica en la educación superior en Colombia. Una aproximación desde seis universidades del país. Bogotá. Universidad de los Adres. Progama de Maestría en Dirección Universitaria.

Comisión Europea (2012). Comunicación de la comisión al parlamento europeo, al consejo, al comité económico y social europeo y al comité de las regiones. COM/2018/029 final. Estrasburgo.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/BG/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0029&from=ES

Correa, M. R., & Rivadulla-López, J. C. (2017). The training of university teachers and students in the use of ICT and Moodle. Educational Contexts: Revista de Educación, (2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.2966.

Cortada de Kohan, N. (1999). Teorías psicométricas y Construcción de Tests. Buenos Aires: Editorial Lugar.

Cunha, M. I. (2015). Investigación y docencia: escenarios y senderos epistemológicos para la evaluación de la educación superior. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 13(1), 79–94.CrossRef

Dauda, M., Ayanda, M., & Jibrin, A. (2018). Analysis of students’ attitude towards the use of information and communication Technology in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education, 6(1), 100–105 Available on line at: http://www.atbuftejoste.com/index.php/joste/article/view/487.

Dellit, J. (2001). Using ICT for quality in teaching-learning evaluation processes. Learning federation secretariat Australian education systems officials committee [EN]. http://ictliteracy.info/rf.pdf/UsingICTQuality.pdf

De-Moya-Anegón, F., Herrán-Páez, E., Bustos-González, A., CoreraÁlvarez, E., Tibaná-Herrera, G., y Rivadeneyra, F. (2019). Ranking Iberoamericano de instituciones de educación superior 2019 (SIR Iber). Recuperado de http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/documentos/SIR_Iber_2019.pdf

Díaz, W. (2016). Formación del profesorado universitario, evaluación de la actividad docente, recursos y promoción profesional. Estudios Pedagógicos, 42(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000100005.CrossRef

Durán, M., Gutiérrez, I. y Prendes, M. (2016). Certificación de la competencia Tic del profesorado universitario. Diseño y validación de un instrumento. Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa, 21(69), 527–556.

Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540119.CrossRef

Fernández-Márquez, E., Leiva-Olivencia, J. J., & López-Meneses, E. (2018). Competencias digitales en docentes de Educación Superior. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 213–231.CrossRef

Flores-Lueg, C., & Vila, R. R. (2016). Diseño y validación de una escala de autoevaluación de competencias digitales para estudiantes de pedagogía. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación. (48): 209-224.

From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence--between values, knowledge and skills. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p43.CrossRef

Ge, W., Han, X., & Shen, X. (2018). Developing a validated instrument to measure Teachers' ICT competencies for university teaching in a digital age. In 2018 seventh international conference of educational innovation through technology (EITT) (pp. 101-105). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2018.00028.

Ghomi, M., & Redecker, C. (2018). Digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu): Development and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for teachers’ digital competence. In proceedings of the 11th international conference on computer supported education - volume 1: CSEDU, pages 541–548. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007679005410548.

González Jaimes, E.I., López Chau, A., Trujillo Mora, V. y Bautista López, J. (2019). Instrumento certificador de tecnologías de la información y la comunicación y tecnologías del aprendizaje y el conocimiento para docentes universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana para la investigación y el desarrollo educativo, 10(19), 1-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v10i19.516.

Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085.CrossRef

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Lugones, A., Mayorga-Fernández, M. J., & Wang, S. (2019). ICT use by pre-service foreign languages teachers according to gender, age and motivation. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1574693. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1574693.CrossRef

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., Sánchez-Rivas, E., & Colomo-Magaña, E. (2020). ICT resources for research: An ANOVA analysis on the digital research skills of higher education teachers comparing the areas of knowledge within each gender. Education and information technologies. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10176-6.

Gutiérrez Castillo, J. J., Cabero Almenara, J., & Estrada Vidal, L. I. (2017). Diseño y validación de un instrumento de evaluación de la competencia digital del estudiante universitario. Revista Espacios, 38(10), 1–27 http://revistaespacios.com/a17v38n10/17381018.html.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tathan, R. y Black, W. (2009). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Pearson.

Helleve, I., Grov Almås, A., & Bjørkelo, B. (2019). Becoming a professional digital competent teacher. Professional development in education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585381.

Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485.MathSciNetCrossRef

Hernández, I. (2009). El docente investigador en la formación de profesionales. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, 27, 1–21 https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1942/194215432011.pdf.

Hernández, R. M. (2017). Impacto de las TIC en la educación: Retos y Perspectivas. Propósitos y representaciones, 5(1), 325–347.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure 17 analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation 18 Modeling: A Multidisciplinary J, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef

Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A. T. (2018). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. Accessed On, 15, 1–74.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.MATH

Lagoa-Varela, D., Álvarez-García, B., y Boedo, L. (2018). Recent changes in the role of Spanish lecturers in economics and business: An empirical analysis based on their own perspectives. Studies in Higher Education, 43, 1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1250738.

Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712.CrossRef

Lazaro, L. M. (2018). Enseñar e investigar hoy en educación comparada: la perspectiva de tres décadas de dedicación académica en ese campo. RBEC. Revista Brasileña de Educación Comparada, 1(1), 1–7 https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbec/article/view/9387.CrossRef

Lázaro-Cantabrana, J., Usart-Rodríguez, M., & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2019). Assessing teacher digital competence: The construction of an instrument for measuring the knowledge of pre-service teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 8(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.370.CrossRef

Marsh, H. W. (1993). The multidimensional structure of physical fitness: Invariance over gender and age. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(3), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1993.10608810.CrossRef

Martínez-Serrano, M. D. C. D. (2018). Diseño y validación de un cuestionario sobre la competencia digital del alumnado de educación primaria. Eduser-Revista de Educação, 10(2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.34620/eduser.v10i2.113.CrossRef

Medina-Rebollo, D., Grimaldi-Puyana, M., Del Río-Rama, M., & Sánchez-Oliver, A. (2019). Elaboración y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar el uso didáctico de la plataforma de teleformación Moodle en el contexto universitario. Revista ESPACIOS, 40(09), 1–9.

Ministerio de Educación, C. y D. (MECD) (2019). Datos y cifras del sistema universitario español. http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:2af709c9-9532-414e-9bad-c390d32998d4/datos-y-cifras-sue-2018-19.pdf

Nordén, L. Å., Mannila, L., & Pears, A. (2017). Development of a self-efficacy scale for digital competences in schools. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190673.

Pérez, F., y Aldás, J. (Dirs.) (2018). U-Ranking 2018. Indicadores sintéticos de las universidades españolas (6ª ed.). Madrid: Fundación BBVA. Recuperado de https://www.fbbva.es/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/ Informe-U-Ranking-FBBVA-Ivie-2018.pdf.

Rivera-Laylle, L. I., Fernández-Morales, K., Guzmán-Games, F. J. y Eduardo-Pulido, J. (2017). ICT acceptance by university professors: Knowledge, attitude, and practicality. Revista Electrónica Educare, 21(3), 99-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-3.

Salajan, F. D. (2018). An analysis of rhetorical devices in policy narratives on the European Institute of Innovation and Technology: Implications for European higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 17, 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117720793.CrossRef

Sánchez, A., Lagunes, A., Torres, C. A., Judikis, J. C., & López, F. (2019). Exploratory factor analysis of a digital competency questionnaire for research. In Iberoamerican workshop on human-computer interaction (pp. 189-210). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37386-3_15.

Sánchez-Mena, A., Martí-Parreño, J., & Aldás-Manzano, J. (2018). Teachers’ intention to use educational video games: The moderating role of gender and age. Innovations in education and teaching international, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1433547.

Sevillano-García, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2015). The impact of digital Mobile devices in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 106–118 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.1.106.

Suwanroj, T., Leekitchwatana, P., & Pimdee, P. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis of the essential digital competencies for undergraduate students in Thai higher education institutions. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.645.CrossRef

Tapasco, O. A., & Giraldo, J. A. (2017). Estudio Comparativo sobre Percepción y uso de las TIC entre Profesores de Universidades Públicas y Privadas. Formación universitaria, 10(2), 03–12. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062017000200002.CrossRef

Taquez, H., Rengifo, D., & Mejía, D. (2017). Diseño de un instrumento para evaluar el nivel de uso y apropiación de las TIC en una institución de educación superior. Repositorio Digital Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1–30. Cali, Colombia: Universidad Icesi http://recursos.portaleducoas.org/sites/default/files/5030.pdf.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1111.bjet.12380.

Tourón, J., Martín, D., Navarro, E., Pradas, S., & e Iñigo, V. (2018). Construct validation of a questionnaire to measure teachers’digital competence (CDD). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(269), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP76-1-2018-02.CrossRef

Trejo, R. M. (2017). Diseño Y Validación De Un Instrumento De Evaluación De La Competencia Digital Docente. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat de les Illes Balears).

Uriel, E., & Aldás, J. (2005). Análisis multivariante aplicado. 1ª. Edición. Thomson. Madrid.

Vázquez-Cano, E., Meneses, E. L., & García-Garzón, E. (2017). Differences in basic digital competences between male and female university students of social sciences in Spain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0065-y.CrossRef

Titel: Design and validation of an instrument of self-perception regarding the lecturers’ use of ICT resources: to teach, evaluate and research
verfasst von: Francisco D. Guillén-Gámez
María J. Mayorga-Fernández
Publikationsdatum: 08.09.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10321-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

The effectiveness of a virtual fitness trainer app in motivating and engaging students for fitness activity by applying motor learning theory

Feelings of belonging or alienation and social emotional perceptions of immigrant youths in the digital age, in comparison with native-born youths

‘Dreaming in colour’: disabled higher education students’ perspectives on improving design practices that would enable them to benefit from their use of technologies

Influence of social learning on the completion rate of massive online open courses

A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation

User acceptance of learning innovation: A structural equation modelling based on the GUAM framework