Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Developing a Rapid Assessment Method to Estimate Berg Balance Scale Score of Elderly People Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Design of a Robotic Workmate

verfasst von : Sarah Luisa Müller, Stefan Schröder, Sabina Jeschke, Anja Richert

Erschienen in: Digital Human Modeling. Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics, and Risk Management: Ergonomics and Design

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the near future, robots and people will work hand in hand. Through technical development, robots will be able to follow social rules, interact and communicate with people and move freely in the environment. The number of these so-called social robots will increase significantly especially in production spaces forming hybrid human-robot-teams. This expected increasing integration of robots in production environments raises questions on how to design an ideal robot for hybrid collaboration. While most of the research focuses on the technical aspects of human-machine interactions, there is still a strong need for research on the psychological and social aspects that influence the cooperation within hybrid teams.
In addition to existing research work, the present research project investigates how the appearance and accuracy of a robot influences the outcomes of a collaborative task (i.e. performance, perceived team functionality and trust) within a Wizard-of-Oz experiment, which was set in a virtual reality setting.
One major finding was that the accuracy of the robot influenced the level of trust, faulty robots were perceived as less trustworthy. Furthermore, the appearance of the robots influenced the perceived team functionality and the collaborative performance. Industrial robots led to a higher task reflexivity and performance.
The results will help to improve the future designs of robots, focusing on psychological needs of the human partners.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Quantification of Elegant Motions for Receptionist Android Robot
Nächstes Kapitel The Effects of the Robot Patient’s Patient-Likeness on Nursing Students
Fußnoten
1
The participants interact with the system that they believe to be autonomous, but which is actually being operated by an unseen human being.
 
2
The Virtual Theater (by MSE Weibull) is an immersive simulator that combines the natural user interfaces of a Head Mounted Display and an omnidirectional conveyor belt. Through a tracking system, the user’s position and orientation in virtual space could be determined. It was combined with a wireless presenter (Logitech Wireless Presenter R400), which served as an input device.
 
3
The production hall and the robots were designed using Cinema 4D and implemented with Unreal Engine (game engine) and C++.
 
5
Considering the Godspeed Test to measure the users’ perception of the robot, the humanoid robot was rated as more humanlike (\( \bar{x} = 2.0 6,SD = . 5 3 \) vs. \( \bar{x} = 2. 3 8,SD = . 7 7 \)), t (114.54) = −2.94, p = .004. Humanoids were also perceived as more animated (\( \bar{x} = 2. 5 4,SD = . 5 7 \) vs. \( \bar{x} = 2. 7 5,SD = . 7 1 \)), t (151) = −2.09, p = .038, likeable (\( \bar{x} = 3. 1 9,SD = . 4 8 \) vs. \( \bar{x} = 3. 7 8,SD = . 5 3 \) \( \bar{x} = 3. 7 8,SD = . 5 3 \)), t (151) = −7.15, p < .001, and intelligent (\( \bar{x} = 3.0 9,SD = . 6 7 \) vs. \( \bar{x} = 3. 3 9,SD = . 5 8 \)), t (151) = −2.84, p = .005. No influence was found in the level of perceived safety (\( \bar{x} = 2. 6 9,SD = . 5 2 \) vs. \( \bar{x} = 2. 5 4,SD = . 5 8 \)), t (151) = 1.69, p = .093.
 
Literatur
1.
Knight, W.: Inside Amazon. At a new fulfillment center in New Jersey, humans and robots work together in a highly efficient system. MIT Technol. Rev. (2015)
2.
3.
Charles, R.L., Charalambous, G., Fletcher, S.: Your new colleague is a robot. Is that ok? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors, pp. 307–311 (2015)
4.
5.
Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.: Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2004). doi:10.​1075/​z.​124.​02int
6.
Han, Y.: Software Infrastructure for Configurable Workflow Systems. A Model-Driven Approach Based on Higher Order Object Nets and CORBA, 1st edn. Wissenschaft und Technik, Berlin (1997)
7.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A., Tanndenbaum, S.I.: Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In: Swezey, R.W., Salas, E. (eds.) Teams: Their Training and Performance, pp. 3–29. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1992)
8.
Haeussling, R.: Die zwei Naturen sozialer Aktivitaet. Relationalistische Betrachtung aktueller Mensch-Roboter-Kooperationen. In: Rehberg, K.-S. (ed.) Die Natur der Gesellschaft: Verhandlungen des 33. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Kassel 2006, pp. 720–735. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main (2008)
9.
Charalambous, G., Fletcher, S., Webb, P.: Human-automation collaboration in manufacturing: identifying key implementation factors. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Manufacturing Research (2013). doi:10.​1201/​b13826-16
10.
Wickens, C.D., Sebok, A., Li, H., Sarter, N., Gacy, A.M.: Using modeling and simulation to predict operator performance and automation-induced complacency with robotic automation: a case study and empirical validation. Hum. Factors (2015). doi:10.​1177/​0018720814566454​
11.
Hancock, P.A., Billings, D.R., Schaefer, K.E., Chen, J.Y.C., de Visser, E.J., Parasuraman, R.: A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum. Factors (2011). doi:10.​1177/​0018720811417254​
12.
Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., Dautenhahn, K.: Would you trust a (faulty) robot? Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2015). doi:10.​1145/​2696454.​2696497
13.
14.
Freud, S.: The ‘Uncanny’. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XVII, pp. 217–256 (1919)
15.
16.
17.
Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication ROMAN (2003). doi:10.​1109/​ROMAN.​2003.​1251796
18.
Richert, A., Shehadeh, M.A., Muller, S.L., Schroder, S., Jeschke, S.: Socializing with robots: human-robot interactions within a virtual environment. In: The 2016 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts, IEEE ARSO 2016, 7–10 July 2016, Shanghai, China, pp. 49–54. IEEE, Piscataway (2016). doi:10.​1109/​ARSO.​2016.​7736255
19.
Richert, A., Shehadeh, M.A., Müller, S.L., Schröder, S., Jeschke, S.: Robotic workmates—hybrid human-robot-teams in the industry 4.0. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on e-Learning, pp. 127–131 (2016)
20.
21.
22.
Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., Kato, K.: Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2004). doi:10.​1109/​ROMAN.​2004.​1374726
23.
24.
Beier, G.: Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik. Rep. Psychol. 9, 684–693 (1999)
25.
26.
Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C.J., Klein, M.C., Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A.: Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der fünf Dimensionen der Persönlichkeit. 10 Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10). methoden, daten, analyse (2013). doi:10.​12758/​mda.​2013.​013
27.
28.
Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire. an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. (1993). doi:10.​1207/​s15327108ijap030​3_​3
29.
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2009). doi:10.​1007/​s12369-008-0001-3
30.
Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Böcking, S., Gysbers, A., Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P.: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Entstehung von räumlichem Präsenzerleben. Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie: Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Köln: von Halem, pp. 70–95 (2008)
31.
West, M.A.: Effective Teamwork. Personal and Professional Development. British Psychological Society, Leicester (1994)
32.
Phillips, E., Ososky, S., Grove, J., Jentsch, F.: From tools to teammates. toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2011). doi:10.​1177/​1071181311551310​
Metadaten
Titel
Design of a Robotic Workmate
verfasst von
Sarah Luisa Müller
Stefan Schröder
Sabina Jeschke
Anja Richert
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Digital Human Modeling. Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics, and Risk Management: Ergonomics and Design

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58462-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-58463-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58463-8_37

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise