Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 4/2016

01.08.2016

Designing Commercial Therapeutic Robots for Privacy Preserving Systems and Ethical Research Practices Within the Home

verfasst von: Elaine Sedenberg, John Chuang, Deirdre Mulligan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The migration of robots from the laboratory into sensitive home settings as commercially available therapeutic agents represents a significant transition for information privacy and ethical imperatives. We present new privacy paradigms and apply the fair information practices (FIPs) to investigate concerns unique to the placement of therapeutic robots in private home contexts. We then explore the importance and utility of research ethics as operationalized by existing human subjects research frameworks to guide the consideration of therapeutic robotic users—a step vital to the continued research and development of these platforms. Together, privacy and research ethics frameworks provide two complementary approaches to protect users and ensure responsible yet robust information sharing for technology development. We make recommendations for the implementation of these principles—paying particular attention to specific principles that apply to vulnerable individuals (i.e., children, disabled, or elderly persons)—to promote the adoption and continued improvement of long-term, responsible, and research-enabled robotics in private settings.
Vorheriger Artikel Social and Assistive Robotics in Dementia Care: Ethical Recommendations for Research and Practice
Nächster Artikel An Ethical Evaluation of Human–Robot Relationships

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Similar discussions of privacy implications from smart devices in the home can be seen with regard to Mattel’s “Hello Barbie” [21] and Samsung’s “Smart TV” [34].
 
2
An exception would be if a private company receives federal grant money to fund a study, but even academic collaborations often do not trigger Institutional Review Board (IRB) oversight. Some companies have private ethical review practices or private IRBs, but these actions are not regulated or standardized.
 
3
The Belmont Report refers to vulnerable populations as those that “either have limited capacities to consent, have subordinate relationships to the investigator or his institutions...or—by virtue of other aspects of their life—are especially vulnerable.” The Report goes on to specify that those with “limited capacities to consent” include children, fetuses, prisoners, mentally institutionalized, those under the influences of addiction, or those otherwise vulnerable as a consequence of their life situations (for example, those legally enfranchised to grant consent but are in reality incapable of sufficient comprehension, persons with prolonged illness) [36].
 
Literatur
1.
16 CFR Part 312—Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule
2.
Alaiad A, Zhou L (2014) The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Med Inform 83(11):825–840CrossRef
3.
Anciaux N, Bonnet P, Bouganim L, Nguyen B, Pucheral P, Sandu-Popa I (2013) Trusted cells: a sea change for personnal data services. In: CIDR 2013—6th biennal conference on innovative database research
4.
Bennett CJ, Raab CD (2006) The governance of privacy: policy instruments in global perspective. 2nd and updated edition
5.
Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2):94–103CrossRef
6.
Butler DJ, Huang J, Roesner F, Cakmak M (2015) The privacy-utility tradeoff for remotely teleoperated robots. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, New York, pp 27–34
7.
Caine K, Šabanović S, Carter M (2012) The effect of monitoring by cameras and robots on the privacy enhancing behaviors of older adults. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), pp 343–350
8.
Calo R (2010) Robots and privacy. In: Lin P, Bekey G, Abney K (eds) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge
9.
Cao HL, Pop C, Simut R, Furnemónt R, De Beir A, Van de Perre G, Esteban PG, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2015) Probolino: a portable low-cost social device for home-based autism therapy. In: Social robotics. Springer, New York, pp 93–102
10.
11.
12.
de Montjoye YA, Wang SS, Pentland A, Anh DTT, Datta A et al (2012) On the trusted use of large-scale personal data. IEEE Data Eng Bull 35(4):5–8
13.
Decker M (2008) Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: the perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. AI Soc 22(3):315–330CrossRef
14.
Denning T, Matuszek C, Koscher K, Smith JR, Kohno T (2009) A spotlight on security and privacy risks with future household robots: attacks and lessons. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on ubiquitous computing. ACM, New York, pp 105–114
15.
16.
17.
Dittrich D, Kenneally E et al (2011) The Menlo Report: ethical principles guiding information and communication technology research. US Department of Homeland Security
18.
Edwards WK, Grinter RE (2001) At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In: Ubicomp 2001: ubiquitous computing. Springer, New York, pp 256–272
19.
Gellman R (2014) Fair information practices: a basic history. Available at SSRN 2415020
20.
Grimmelmann J (2015) The law and ethics of experiments on social media users
21.
22.
Hong JI, Landay JA (2004) An architecture for privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, New York, pp 177–189
23.
24.
25.
Johnson DG, Nissenbaum H (1995) Computers, ethics and social values
26.
27.
Kaminski ME (2015) Robots in the home: What will we have agreed to? Idaho Law Rev 51(3):661
28.
Khosla R, Nguyen K, Chu MT (2015) Socially assistive robot enabled home-based care for supporting people with autism
29.
Kramer AD, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Nat Acad Sci 111(24):8788–8790CrossRef
30.
Lerner JI, Mulligan DK (2008) Taking the long view on the fourth amendment: stored records and the sanctity of the home. Stanf Technol Law Rev 3:60
31.
Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (2011) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT press, Cambridge
32.
Lisovich MA, Mulligan DK, Wicker SB (2010) Inferring personal information from demand-response systems. IEEE Secur Priv 8(1):11–20CrossRef
33.
Liu C, Conn K, Sarkar N, Stone W (2007) Affect recognition in robot assisted rehabilitation of children with autism spectrum disorder. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 1755–1760
34.
35.
Moor JH (2006) Using genetic information while protecting the privacy of the soul. In: Tawani HT (ed) Ethics, computing, and genomics. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, pp 109–119
36.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Bethesda, MD (1978) The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research: Appendix Report Vol. 1. ERIC Clearinghouse
37.
Nissenbaum H (2004) Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash Law Rev 79:119
38.
Nissenbaum H (2009) Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto
39.
Riek LD, Howard D (2014) A code of ethics for the human–robot interaction profession. In: Proceedings of we robot
40.
Robinson H, MacDonald B, Broadbent E (2014) The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int J Soc Robot 6(4):575–591CrossRef
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40CrossRef
46.
Stopczynski A, Pietri R, Pentland A, Lazer D, Lehmann S (2014) Privacy in sensor-driven human data collection: a guide for practitioners. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1403.​5299
47.
Sung JY, Guo L, Grinter RE, Christensen HI (2007) My roomba is rambo: intimate home appliances. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 145–162
48.
Tavani HT (2008) Informational privacy: concepts, theories, and controversies. In: Himma KE, Tavani HT (eds) The handbook of information and computer ethics. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 131–164CrossRef
49.
The National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) The Belmont Report—Office of the Secretary, Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects Research
50.
51.
52.
The Nuremberg Code (1949) Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under control council law 10:181–182
53.
Thompson RM (2014) The fourth amendment third-party doctrine. Congressional Research Service
54.
US Department of Health and Human Services and others (2009) Code of federal regulations. Title 45 Public welfare. Department of Health and Human Services. Part 46: Protection of human subjects
55.
Westin AF (1968) Privacy and freedom. Wash Lee Law Rev 25(1):166
Metadaten
Titel
Designing Commercial Therapeutic Robots for Privacy Preserving Systems and Ethical Research Practices Within the Home
verfasst von
Elaine Sedenberg
John Chuang
Deirdre Mulligan
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0362-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

International Journal of Social Robotics 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

ContinuingEducation

Integrating Robot Support Functions into Varied Activities at Returning Hospital Visits

ContinuingEducation

Hygiene and the Use of Robotic Animals in Hospitals: A Review of the Literature

Continuing Education

Using Theatre to Study Interaction with Care Robots

Continuing Education

Understanding Therapists’ Needs and Attitudes Towards Robotic Support. The Roboterapia Project

Continuing Education

An Ethical Evaluation of Human–Robot Relationships

ContinuingEducation

Enhancing Emotional Facial Expressiveness on NAO

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise