Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Action Editor: John Huguenard
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10827-010-0282-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Significant inroads have been made to understand cerebellar cortical processing but neural coding at the output stage of the cerebellum in the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) remains poorly understood. The DCN are unlikely to just present a relay nucleus because Purkinje cell inhibition has to be turned into an excitatory output signal, and DCN neurons exhibit complex intrinsic properties. In particular, DCN neurons exhibit a range of rebound spiking properties following hyperpolarizing current injection, raising the question how this could contribute to signal processing in behaving animals. Computer modeling presents an ideal tool to investigate how intrinsic voltage-gated conductances in DCN neurons could generate the heterogeneous firing behavior observed, and what input conditions could result in rebound responses. To enable such an investigation we built a compartmental DCN neuron model with a full dendritic morphology and appropriate active conductances. We generated a good match of our simulations with DCN current clamp data we recorded in acute slices, including the heterogeneity in the rebound responses. We then examined how inhibitory and excitatory synaptic input interacted with these intrinsic conductances to control DCN firing. We found that the output spiking of the model reflected the ongoing balance of excitatory and inhibitory input rates and that changing the level of inhibition performed an additive operation. Rebound firing following strong Purkinje cell input bursts was also possible, but only if the chloride reversal potential was more negative than −70 mV to allow de-inactivation of rebound currents. Fast rebound bursts due to T-type calcium current and slow rebounds due to persistent sodium current could be differentially regulated by synaptic input, and the pattern of these rebounds was further influenced by HCN current. Our findings suggest that active properties of DCN neurons could play a crucial role for signal processing in the cerebellum.
ESM 1 (PDF 1075 kb)10827_2010_282_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Achard, P., & De Schutter, E. (2006). Complex parameter landscape for a complex neuron model. PLoS Computational Biology, 2, 794–804. CrossRef
Aizenman, C. D., & Linden, D. J. (1999). Regulation of the rebound depolarization and spontaneous firing patterns of deep nuclear neurons in slices of rat cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82, 1697–1709. PubMed
Alvina, K., & Khodakhah, K. (2008). Selective regulation of spontaneous activity of neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei by N-type calcium channels in juvenile rats. Journal of Physiology-London, 586, 2523–2538. CrossRef
Alzheimer, C., Schwindt, P. C., & Crill, W. E. (1993). Modal gating of Na+ channels as a mechanism of persistent Na+ current in pyramidal neurons from rat and cat sensorimotor cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 660–673. PubMed
Anchisi, D., Scelfo, B., & Tempia, F. (2001). Postsynaptic currents in deep cerebellar nuclei. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 323–331. PubMed
Baranauskas, G., Tkatch, T., & Surmeier, D. J. (1999). Delayed rectifier currents in rat globus pallidus neurons are attributable to Kv2.1 and Kv3.1/3.2K(+) channels. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 6394–6404. PubMed
Bower, J. M. (1997). Is the cerebellum sensory for motor’s sake, or motor for sensory’s sake: the view from the whiskers of a rat? Progress in Brain Research, 114, 483–516. CrossRef
Bower, J. M., & Beeman, D. (1997). The book of Genesis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Brown, A. M., Schwindt, P. C., & Crill, W. E. (1994). Different voltage-dependence of transient and persistent Na+ currents is compatible with modal-gating hypothesis for sodium-channels. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 2562–2565. PubMed
Castelfranco, A. M., & Hartline, D. K. (2002). Simulations of space-clamp errors in estimating parameters of voltage-gated conductances localized at different electrotonic distances. Neurocomputing, 44–46, 75–80. CrossRef
Chan-Palay, V. (1977). Cerebellar dentate nucleus. Springer-Verlag.
De Schutter, E., & Bower, J. M. (1994). An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell. II. Simulation of synaptic responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 401–419. PubMed
Destexhe, A., Neubig, M., Ulrich, D., & Huguenard, J. (1998). Dendritic low-threshold calcium currents in thalamic relay cells. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 3574–3588. PubMed
Fredette, B. J., & Mugnaini, E. (1991). The GABAergic cerebello-olivary projection in the rat. Anatomy and Embryology (Berlin), 184, 225–243. CrossRef
Gardette, R., Debono, M., Dupont, J.-L., & Crepel, F. (1985a). Electrophysiological studies on the postnatal development of intracerebellar nuclei neurons in rat cerebellar slices maintained in vitro. I. Postsynaptic potentials. Developmental Brain Research, 19, 47–55. CrossRef
Gardette, R., Debono, M., Dupont, J.-L., & Crepel, F. (1985b). Electrophysiological studies on the postnatal development of intracerebellar nuclei neurons in rat cerebellar slices maintained in vitro. II. Membrane conductances. Developmental Brain Research, 20, 97–106. CrossRef
Gardner, E. P., & Fuchs, A. F. (1975). Single-unit responses to natural vestibular stimuli and eye movements in deep cerebellar nuclei of the alert rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 38, 627–649. PubMed
Gauck, V., & Jaeger, D. (2000). The control of rate and timing of spikes in the deep cerebellar nuclei by inhibition. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3006–3016. PubMed
Gauck, V., & Jaeger, D. (2003). The contribution of NMDA and AMPA conductances to the control of spiking in neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 8109–8118. PubMed
Gauck, V., Thomann, M., Jaeger, D., & Borst, A. (2001). Spatial distribution of low- and high-voltage-activated calcium currents in neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, RC158. PubMed
Gleeson, P., Crook, S., Cannon, R. C., Hines, M. L., Billings, G. O., Farinella, M., Morse, T. M., Davison, A. P., Ray, S., Bhalla, U. S., Barnes, S. R., Dimitrova, Y. D., & Silver, R. A. (2010). NeuroML: a language for describing data driven models of neurons and networks with a high degree of biological detail. PLoS Computational Biology 6, e1000815.
Hepp, K., Henn, V., & Jaeger, J. (1982). Eye movement related neurons in the cerebellar nuclei of the alert monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 45, 253–264. CrossRef
Hille, B. (2001). Ion channels of excitable membranes (3rd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer.
Houk, J. C., Buckingham, J. T., & Barto, A. G. (1996). Models of the cerebellum and motor learning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 368–383. CrossRef
Ivry, R. B., & Keele, S. W. (1989). Timing functions of the cerebellum. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 136–152. CrossRef
Jaeger, D., & Bower, J. M. (1999). Synaptic control of spiking in cerebellar Purkinje cells: dynamic current clamp based on model conductances. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 6090–6101. PubMed
Jahnsen, H. (1986a). Electrophysiological characteristics of neurones in the guinea-pig deep cerebellar nuclei in vitro. Journal de Physiologie, 372, 129–147.
Jahnsen, H. (1986b). Extracellular activation and membrane conductances of neurones in the guinea-pig deep cerebellar nuclei in vitro. Journal de Physiologie, 372, 149–168.
Lang, E. J., Sugihara, I., Welsh, J. P., & Llinas, R. (1999). Patterns of spontaneous Purkinje cell complex spike activity in the awake rat. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2728–2739. PubMed
Lee, H. H. C., Walker, J. A., Williams, J. R., Goodier, R. J., Payne, J. A., & Moss, S. J. (2007). Direct protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation regulates the cell surface stability and activity of the potassium chloride cotransporter KCC2. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 29777–29784. PubMedCrossRef
Llinas, R., & Muhlethaler, M. (1988). Electrophysiology of guinea-pig cerebellar nuclear cells in the in vitro brain stem-cerebellar preparation. Journal de Physiologie, 404, 241–258.
MacKay, W. A. (1988). Cerebellar nuclear activity in relation to simple movements. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 47–58. CrossRef
Medina, J. F., Garcia, K. S., Nores, W. L., Taylor, N. M., & Mauk, M. D. (2000). Timing mechanisms in the cerebellum: testing predictions of a large-scale computer simulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 5516–5525. PubMed
Molineux, M. L., McRory, J. E., McKay, B. E., Hamid, J., Mehaffey, W. H., Rehak, R., et al. (2006). Specific T-type calcium channel isoforms are associated with distinct burst phenotypes in deep cerebellar nuclear neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 5555–5560. PubMedCrossRef
Muri, R., & Knopfel, T. (1994). Activity induced elevations of intracellular calcium concentration in neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 420–428. PubMed
Nejad, R. T., Molineux, M. L., Mehaffey, W. H., & Turner, R. W. (2007). Transient and weak bursting deep cerebellar neurons exhibit differential coding properties for membrane hyperpolarizations. Program No. 409.12. Neuroscience Meeting Planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience Online.
Palkovits, M., Mezey, E., Hamori, J., & Szentagothai, J. (1977). Quantitative histological analysis of the cerebellar nuclei in the cat. I. Numerical data on cells and synapses. Experimental Brain Research, 28, 189–209. CrossRef
Paulin, M. G. (1995). System identification of spiking sensory neurons using realistically constrained nonlinear time series models. In I. Gath & G. Inbar (Eds.), Advances in processing and pattern analysis of biological signals (pp. 183–194). Plenum: New York.
Quaia, C., Lefevre, P., & Optican, L. M. (1999). Model of the control of saccades by superior colliculus and cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82, 999–1018. PubMed
Raman, I. M., Gustafson, A. E., & Padgett, D. (2000). Ionic currents and spontaneous firing in neurons isolated from the cerebellar nuclei. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 9004–9016. PubMed
Robinson, D. A. (1976). Adaptive gain control of vestibuloocular reflex by cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 39, 954–969. PubMed
Sangrey, T. D., & Jaeger, D. (2005). Currents underlying hyperpolarization-induced rebound spiking in deep cerebellar nuclei neurons. In Program No. 179.10. 2005 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2005. Online.
Schmahmann, J. D. (1991). An emerging concept: the cerebellar contribution to higher function. Archives of Neurology, 48, 1178–1187. PubMed
Shen, G. Y. Y., Chen, W. R., Midtgaard, J., Shepherd, G. M., & Hines, M. L. (1999). Computational analysis of action potential initiation in mitral cell soma and dendrites based on dual patch recordings. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82, 3006–3020. PubMed
Steuber, V., De Schutter, E., & Jaeger, D. (2004). Passive models of neurons in the deep cerebellar nuclei: the effect of reconstruction errors. Neurocomputing, 58–60, 563–568. CrossRef
Timmann, D., Citron, R., Watts, S., & Hore, J. (2001). Increased variability in finger position occurs throughout overarm throws made by cerebellar and unskilled subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2690–2702. PubMed
van Kan, P. L., Houk, J. C., & Gibson, A. R. (1993). Output organization of intermediate cerebellum of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 57–73. PubMed
Wetmore, D. Z., Mukamel, E. A., & Schnitzer, M. (2007). Lock-and-key mechanisms of cerebellar memory recall based on rebound currents. J Neurophysiol. epub in press.
- Determinants of synaptic integration and heterogeneity in rebound firing explored with data-driven models of deep cerebellar nucleus cells
Nathan W. Schultheiss
R. Angus Silver
Erik De Schutter
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com