Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1/2020

27.07.2019 | Research Paper

Determination of sample size for input variables in RBDO through bi-objective confidence-based design optimization under input model uncertainty

verfasst von: Yongsu Jung, Hyunkyoo Cho, Zunyi Duan, Ikjin Lee

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Reliability analysis accounting for only randomness of input variables often shows a significant error due to the lack of knowledge and insufficient data in the real world. Confidence of reliability indicates that the reliability has uncertainty caused by epistemic uncertainties such as input statistical model and simulation model uncertainties, and these uncertainties can be reduced and manipulated by additional knowledge. In this paper, uncertainty of input statistical models prevailing due to limited resources in practical applications is mainly treated in the context of confidence-based design optimization (CBDO). The purpose of this research is to estimate the optimal sample size for input variables in reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) to reduce the overall cost incorporating development cost for collecting samples. There are two ways to increase the confidence of reliability to be satisfied: (1) shifting the design vector toward feasible domain and (2) supplementing more input data. Thus, it is essential to find a balanced optimum to minimize the overall cost accounting for trade-off between two operations, optimally distributing the resources to the operating cost of the design vector and the development cost of acquiring new data. In this study, two types of costs are integrated into a bi-objective function, and the probabilistic constraints for the confidence of reliability need to be satisfied. Since the sample size for input variables is also included in the design variables to be optimized, stochastic sensitivity analysis of confidence with respect to the sample size of input data is developed. As a result, the proposed bi-objective CBDO can provide the optimal sample size for input data estimated from the initial data. Then, the designers are able to decide the number of tests for collecting input samples according to the optimum of the bi-objective CBDO. In addition, the different optimal sample size for each input variable can be an indicator of which random variables are relatively important to satisfy the confidence of reliability. Numerical examples and an engineering application for the multi-scale composite frame are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed bi-objective CBDO.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bae S, Kim NH, Jang SG (2018) Reliability-based design optimization under sampling uncertainty: shifting design versus shaping uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1845–1855MathSciNetCrossRef Bae S, Kim NH, Jang SG (2018) Reliability-based design optimization under sampling uncertainty: shifting design versus shaping uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1845–1855MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bae S, Kim NH, Jang SG (2019) System reliability-based design optimization under tradeoff between reduction of sampling uncertainty and design shift. J Mech Des 141(4):041403CrossRef Bae S, Kim NH, Jang SG (2019) System reliability-based design optimization under tradeoff between reduction of sampling uncertainty and design shift. J Mech Des 141(4):041403CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul NJ, Lee I, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2016) Conservative reliability-based design optimization method with insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1609–1630MathSciNetCrossRef Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul NJ, Lee I, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2016) Conservative reliability-based design optimization method with insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1609–1630MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho H, Choi KK, Lamb D (2017) Sensitivity developments for RBDO with dependent input variable and varying input standard deviation. J Mech Des 139(7):071402CrossRef Cho H, Choi KK, Lamb D (2017) Sensitivity developments for RBDO with dependent input variable and varying input standard deviation. J Mech Des 139(7):071402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Der Kiureghian A, Ditlevsen O (2009) Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct Saf 31(2):105–112CrossRef Der Kiureghian A, Ditlevsen O (2009) Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct Saf 31(2):105–112CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duan Z, Yan J, Lee I, Wang J, Yu T (2018) Integrated design optimization of composite frames and materials for maximum fundamental frequency with continuous fiber winding angles. Acta Mech Sinica 34(6):1084–1094MathSciNetCrossRef Duan Z, Yan J, Lee I, Wang J, Yu T (2018) Integrated design optimization of composite frames and materials for maximum fundamental frequency with continuous fiber winding angles. Acta Mech Sinica 34(6):1084–1094MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duan Z, Yan J, Lee I, Lund E, Wang J (2019) A two-step optimization scheme based on equivalent stiffness parameters for forcing convexity of fiber winding angle in composite frames. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(6):2111–2129MathSciNetCrossRef Duan Z, Yan J, Lee I, Lund E, Wang J (2019) A two-step optimization scheme based on equivalent stiffness parameters for forcing convexity of fiber winding angle in composite frames. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(6):2111–2129MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dubourg V, Sudret B (2014) Meta-model-based importance sampling for reliability sensitivity analysis. Struct Saf 49:27–36CrossRef Dubourg V, Sudret B (2014) Meta-model-based importance sampling for reliability sensitivity analysis. Struct Saf 49:27–36CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gelman A, Stern HS, Carlin JB, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Gelman A, Stern HS, Carlin JB, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC
Zurück zum Zitat Gunawan S, Papalambros PY (2006) A Bayesian approach to reliability-based optimization with incomplete information. J Mech Des 128(4):909–918CrossRef Gunawan S, Papalambros PY (2006) A Bayesian approach to reliability-based optimization with incomplete information. J Mech Des 128(4):909–918CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hao P, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang B, Wu H (2017) A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:572–593MathSciNetCrossRef Hao P, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang B, Wu H (2017) A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:572–593MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ito M, Kim NH, Kogiso N (2018) Conservative reliability index for epistemic uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1919–1935MathSciNetCrossRef Ito M, Kim NH, Kogiso N (2018) Conservative reliability index for epistemic uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1919–1935MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang Z, Chen W, Fu Y, Yang RJ (2013) Reliability-based design optimization with model bias and data uncertainty. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 6(3):502–516CrossRef Jiang Z, Chen W, Fu Y, Yang RJ (2013) Reliability-based design optimization with model bias and data uncertainty. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 6(3):502–516CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jung Y, Cho H, Lee I (2019a) MPP-based approximated DRM (ADRM) using simplified bivariate approximation with linear regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(5):1761–1773MathSciNetCrossRef Jung Y, Cho H, Lee I (2019a) MPP-based approximated DRM (ADRM) using simplified bivariate approximation with linear regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(5):1761–1773MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kang YJ, Lim OK, Noh Y (2016) Sequential statistical modeling method for distribution type identification. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1587–1607CrossRef Kang YJ, Lim OK, Noh Y (2016) Sequential statistical modeling method for distribution type identification. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1587–1607CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Lee I (2017) Accuracy improvement of the most probable point-based dimension reduction method using the hessian matrix. Int J Numer Methods Eng 111(3):203–217MathSciNetCrossRef Kang SB, Park JW, Lee I (2017) Accuracy improvement of the most probable point-based dimension reduction method using the hessian matrix. Int J Numer Methods Eng 111(3):203–217MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kang K, Qin C, Lee B, Lee I (2019) Modified screening-based Kriging method with cross validation and application to engineering design. Appl Math Model 70:626–642MathSciNetCrossRef Kang K, Qin C, Lee B, Lee I (2019) Modified screening-based Kriging method with cross validation and application to engineering design. Appl Math Model 70:626–642MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Choi KK, Gorsich D (2010) Sensitivity analyses of FORM-based and DRM-based performance measure approach (PMA) for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Int J Numer Methods Eng 82(1):26–46MATH Lee I, Choi KK, Gorsich D (2010) Sensitivity analyses of FORM-based and DRM-based performance measure approach (PMA) for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Int J Numer Methods Eng 82(1):26–46MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Zhao L, Gorsich D (2011) Sampling-based stochastic sensitivity analysis using score functions for RBDO problems with correlated random variables. J Mech Des 133(2):021003CrossRef Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Zhao L, Gorsich D (2011) Sampling-based stochastic sensitivity analysis using score functions for RBDO problems with correlated random variables. J Mech Des 133(2):021003CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Noh Y, Yoo D (2012) A novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using noncentral or generalized chi-squared distributions. J Mech Des 134(10):100912CrossRef Lee I, Noh Y, Yoo D (2012) A novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using noncentral or generalized chi-squared distributions. J Mech Des 134(10):100912CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Lamb D (2013) Comparison study between probabilistic and possibilistic methods for problems under a lack of correlated input statistical information. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):175–189MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Lamb D (2013) Comparison study between probabilistic and possibilistic methods for problems under a lack of correlated input statistical information. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):175–189MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald M, Zaman K, Mahadevan S (2013) Probabilistic analysis with sparse data. AIAA J 51(2):281–290CrossRef McDonald M, Zaman K, Mahadevan S (2013) Probabilistic analysis with sparse data. AIAA J 51(2):281–290CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meng Z, Li G, Wang BP, Hao P (2015) A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 146:32–43CrossRef Meng Z, Li G, Wang BP, Hao P (2015) A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 146:32–43CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moon MY, Choi KK, Cho H, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2017) Reliability-based design optimization using confidence-based model validation for insufficient experimental data. J Mech Des 139(3):031404CrossRef Moon MY, Choi KK, Cho H, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2017) Reliability-based design optimization using confidence-based model validation for insufficient experimental data. J Mech Des 139(3):031404CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moon MY, Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2018) Confidence-based reliability assessment considering limited numbers of both input and output test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):2027–2043MathSciNetCrossRef Moon MY, Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2018) Confidence-based reliability assessment considering limited numbers of both input and output test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):2027–2043MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moon MY, Choi KK, Gaul N, Lamb D (2019) Treating epistemic uncertainty using bootstrapping selection of input distribution model for confidence-based reliability assessment. J Mech Des 141(3):031402CrossRef Moon MY, Choi KK, Gaul N, Lamb D (2019) Treating epistemic uncertainty using bootstrapping selection of input distribution model for confidence-based reliability assessment. J Mech Des 141(3):031402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nannapaneni S, Mahadevan S (2016) Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 155:9–20CrossRef Nannapaneni S, Mahadevan S (2016) Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 155:9–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noh Y, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level under input model uncertainty due to limited test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(4):443–458MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Noh Y, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level under input model uncertainty due to limited test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(4):443–458MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pan H, Xi Z, Yang RJ (2016) Model uncertainty approximation using a copula-based approach for reliability based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1543–1556MathSciNetCrossRef Pan H, Xi Z, Yang RJ (2016) Model uncertainty approximation using a copula-based approach for reliability based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1543–1556MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peng X, Li J, Jiang S (2017) Unified uncertainty representation and quantification based on insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(6):1305–1317CrossRef Peng X, Li J, Jiang S (2017) Unified uncertainty representation and quantification based on insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(6):1305–1317CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Picheny V, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2010) Application of bootstrap method in conservative estimation of reliability with limited samples. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):205–217MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Picheny V, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2010) Application of bootstrap method in conservative estimation of reliability with limited samples. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):205–217MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2011) Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(7):814–824CrossRef Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2011) Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(7):814–824CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sankararaman S, McLemore K, Mahadevan S, Bradford SC, Peterson LD (2013) Test resource allocation in hierarchical systems using Bayesian networks. AIAA J 51(3):537–550CrossRef Sankararaman S, McLemore K, Mahadevan S, Bradford SC, Peterson LD (2013) Test resource allocation in hierarchical systems using Bayesian networks. AIAA J 51(3):537–550CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman BW (2018) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Routledge Silverman BW (2018) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Routledge
Zurück zum Zitat Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564CrossRef Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xi Z (2019) Model-based reliability analysis with both model uncertainty and parameter uncertainty. J Mech Des 141(5):051404CrossRef Xi Z (2019) Model-based reliability analysis with both model uncertainty and parameter uncertainty. J Mech Des 141(5):051404CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yan J, Duan Z, Lund E, Wang J (2017) Concurrent multi-scale design optimization of composite frames with manufacturing constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(3):519–533CrossRef Yan J, Duan Z, Lund E, Wang J (2017) Concurrent multi-scale design optimization of composite frames with manufacturing constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(3):519–533CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo D, Lee I (2014) Sampling-based approach for design optimization in the presence of interval variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):253–266MathSciNetCrossRef Yoo D, Lee I (2014) Sampling-based approach for design optimization in the presence of interval variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):253–266MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Youn BD, Wang P (2008) Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36(2):107–123CrossRef Youn BD, Wang P (2008) Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36(2):107–123CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125(2):221–232CrossRef Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125(2):221–232CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Determination of sample size for input variables in RBDO through bi-objective confidence-based design optimization under input model uncertainty
verfasst von
Yongsu Jung
Hyunkyoo Cho
Zunyi Duan
Ikjin Lee
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02357-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.