Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management 8/2015

01.06.2015

Developing a Non-Discrete Dynamic Game Model and Corresponding Monthly Collocation Solution Considering Variability in Reservoir Inflow

verfasst von: Mehran Homayounfar, Sai Hin Lai, Mehdi Zommorodian, Amin Oroji, Arman Ganji, Sara Kaviani

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 8/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

So far a huge number of dynamic game models, both discrete and continuous, have been developed for reservoir operation. Most of them seek to overcome potential conflicts while allocating limited water among various users in reservoir systems. A number of them have successfully provided efficient approaches to tackle the problem of optimal water allocation. There are, however, still weaknesses in determining optimal policies. By taking account of the random nature of the inflow while producing monthly operating policies for a reservoir in a dynamic non-discrete framework, many of these deficiencies can be eliminated. In this study, considering the randomness in reservoir inflow, a continuous dynamic game model for water allocation in a reservoir system was developed. A corresponding monthly-basis solution based on collocation was then structured. This collocation method does not rely on first and second degree approximations. Instead, in order to evaluate the uncertainty triggered by the random variable, a discrete approximant was applied to quantify the random variable in the state transition function. A case study was carried out at the Zayandeh-Rud river basin in central Iran to identify the efficiency of the proposed method and evaluate the effect of uncertainty on decision variables. The results of the presented model (i.e., monthly-basis operating rules and value functions) proved to be more practical and reliable than similar continuous dynamic game models working on an annual basis. Moreover, the results show that bringing the stochasticity associated with inflow into the equation has an impact on the value functions and operating polices. Indeed, applying the mean of the random variable of inflow (deterministic form) reduce consistancy in monthly reliability indices throughout the year.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Carraro C, Marchiori C, Sgobbi A (2007) Negotiating on water: insights from noncooperative bargaining theory. Environ Dev Econ 12:329–349CrossRef Carraro C, Marchiori C, Sgobbi A (2007) Negotiating on water: insights from noncooperative bargaining theory. Environ Dev Econ 12:329–349CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dufournaud CM (1982) On the mutually beneficial cooperative scheme: dynamic change in the payoff matrix of international river basin schemes. Water Resour Res 18(4):764–772CrossRef Dufournaud CM (1982) On the mutually beneficial cooperative scheme: dynamic change in the payoff matrix of international river basin schemes. Water Resour Res 18(4):764–772CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn JC, Bertsekas DP (1989) Efficient dynamic programming implementations of Newton’s method for unconstrained optimal control problems. J Optim Theor Appl 63(1):23–38CrossRef Dunn JC, Bertsekas DP (1989) Efficient dynamic programming implementations of Newton’s method for unconstrained optimal control problems. J Optim Theor Appl 63(1):23–38CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fisvold GB, Caswell MF (2000) Transboundary water management: gametheoretic lessons for projects on the US–Mexico border. Agric Econ 24:101–111 Fisvold GB, Caswell MF (2000) Transboundary water management: gametheoretic lessons for projects on the US–Mexico border. Agric Econ 24:101–111
Zurück zum Zitat Fundenberg D, Tirole J (1996) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge Fundenberg D, Tirole J (1996) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Ganji A, Karamouz M, Khalili D (2007a) Development of stochastic conflict resolution models for reservoir operation, II. The value of players’ information availability and cooperative behavior. Adv Water Resour 30:157–168CrossRef Ganji A, Karamouz M, Khalili D (2007a) Development of stochastic conflict resolution models for reservoir operation, II. The value of players’ information availability and cooperative behavior. Adv Water Resour 30:157–168CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamouz M (2007b) Development of stochastic conflict resolution models for reservoir operation. I. The perfect symmetric stochastic model. Adv Water Resour 30:528–542CrossRef Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamouz M (2007b) Development of stochastic conflict resolution models for reservoir operation. I. The perfect symmetric stochastic model. Adv Water Resour 30:528–542CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamoz M, Ponnambalam K (2008) A fuzzy stochastic dynamic Nash game analysis of policies for managing water allocation in a reservoir system. J Water Resour Manage 22(1):51–66CrossRef Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamoz M, Ponnambalam K (2008) A fuzzy stochastic dynamic Nash game analysis of policies for managing water allocation in a reservoir system. J Water Resour Manage 22(1):51–66CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbons R (1992) Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press, Princeton Gibbons R (1992) Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Zurück zum Zitat Golubtsov PV, Lyubetsky VA (2003) Stochastic dynamic games with various types of information. Problems Info Trans 39(3):266–293CrossRef Golubtsov PV, Lyubetsky VA (2003) Stochastic dynamic games with various types of information. Problems Info Trans 39(3):266–293CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grafton RQ, Kompas T, Lindenmayer D (2005) Marine reserves with ecological uncertainty. Bull Math Biol 67:957–971CrossRef Grafton RQ, Kompas T, Lindenmayer D (2005) Marine reserves with ecological uncertainty. Bull Math Biol 67:957–971CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Han Y, Huang YF, Wang GQ, Maqsood I (2010) A multi-objective linear programming model with interval parameters for water resources allocation in Dalian City. Water Resour Manage 25(2):449–463CrossRef Han Y, Huang YF, Wang GQ, Maqsood I (2010) A multi-objective linear programming model with interval parameters for water resources allocation in Dalian City. Water Resour Manage 25(2):449–463CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Homayounfar M, Ganji A, Martinez CJ (2011) A novel solution for stochastic dynamic game of water allocation from a reservoir using collocation method. Water Resour Manag 25(13):3427–3444CrossRef Homayounfar M, Ganji A, Martinez CJ (2011) A novel solution for stochastic dynamic game of water allocation from a reservoir using collocation method. Water Resour Manag 25(13):3427–3444CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Homayounfar M, Lai SH, Zomorodian M, Sepaskhah AR, Ganji A (2014) Optimal crop water allocation in case of drought occurrence, imposing deficit irrigation with proportional cutback constraint. Water Resour Manag 28(10):3207–3225 Homayounfar M, Lai SH, Zomorodian M, Sepaskhah AR, Ganji A (2014) Optimal crop water allocation in case of drought occurrence, imposing deficit irrigation with proportional cutback constraint. Water Resour Manag 28(10):3207–3225
Zurück zum Zitat Homayoun-Far M, Ganji A, Khalili D, Harris J (2010) Two solution methods ForDynamic game in reservoir operation. Adv Water Resour 33(7):752–761CrossRef Homayoun-Far M, Ganji A, Khalili D, Harris J (2010) Two solution methods ForDynamic game in reservoir operation. Adv Water Resour 33(7):752–761CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jin L, Huang G, Fan Y, Nie X, Cheng G (2012) A hybrid dynamic dual interval programming for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 26(5):1183–1200CrossRef Jin L, Huang G, Fan Y, Nie X, Cheng G (2012) A hybrid dynamic dual interval programming for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 26(5):1183–1200CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaviani S, Hassanli AM, Homayounfar H (2014) Optimal crop water allocation based on constrain-state method and nonnormal stochastic Variable. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0856-z Kaviani S, Hassanli AM, Homayounfar H  (2014) Optimal crop water allocation based on constrain-state method and nonnormal stochastic Variable. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.​1007/​s11269-014-0856-z
Zurück zum Zitat Kerachian R, Karamouz M (2007) A stochastic conflict resolution model for water quality management in reservoir-river systems. Adv Water Resour 30:866–882CrossRef Kerachian R, Karamouz M (2007) A stochastic conflict resolution model for water quality management in reservoir-river systems. Adv Water Resour 30:866–882CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kilgour DM, Dinar A (2001) Flexible water sharing within an international river Basin. Environ Resour Econ 18(1):43–60CrossRef Kilgour DM, Dinar A (2001) Flexible water sharing within an international river Basin. Environ Resour Econ 18(1):43–60CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat LaFrance JT, Barney LD (1991) The envelope theorem in dynamic optimization. J Econ Dyn Cont 15:355–385CrossRef LaFrance JT, Barney LD (1991) The envelope theorem in dynamic optimization. J Econ Dyn Cont 15:355–385CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li YP, Huang GH (2008) Interval-parameter two-stage stochastic nonlinear programming for water resources management under uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 22(6):681–698CrossRef Li YP, Huang GH (2008) Interval-parameter two-stage stochastic nonlinear programming for water resources management under uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 22(6):681–698CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loucks DP, Stedinger JR, Haith DA (1988) Water resources system planning and analysis. Prentice-Hall, England Cliffs Loucks DP, Stedinger JR, Haith DA (1988) Water resources system planning and analysis. Prentice-Hall, England Cliffs
Zurück zum Zitat Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238CrossRef Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Madani K, Dinar A (2012a) Non-cooperative institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: application to groundwater. Ecol Econ 74:34–45CrossRef Madani K, Dinar A (2012a) Non-cooperative institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: application to groundwater. Ecol Econ 74:34–45CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Madani K, Dinar A (2012b) Cooperative institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: application to groundwater. Water Resour Res 48(9):W09553 Madani K, Dinar A (2012b) Cooperative institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: application to groundwater. Water Resour Res 48(9):W09553
Zurück zum Zitat Madani K, Hipel KW (2007) Strategic insights into the Jordan River conflict. In: Kabbes KC (ed) Proceeding of the 2007 world environmental and water resources congress. American Society of Civil Engineers, Florida, pp 1–10 Madani K, Hipel KW (2007) Strategic insights into the Jordan River conflict. In: Kabbes KC (ed) Proceeding of the 2007 world environmental and water resources congress. American Society of Civil Engineers, Florida, pp 1–10
Zurück zum Zitat Madani K, Lund JR (2011) A Monte-Carlo game theoretic approach for multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 34(5):607–616CrossRef Madani K, Lund JR (2011) A Monte-Carlo game theoretic approach for multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 34(5):607–616CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maskin E, Tirole J (1994) Markov perfect equilibrium. Harvard institute of economic research. Harvard Univ, Cambridge Maskin E, Tirole J (1994) Markov perfect equilibrium. Harvard institute of economic research. Harvard Univ, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Miranda MJ, Fackler PL (2002) Applied computational economics and finance. MIT press Miranda MJ, Fackler PL (2002) Applied computational economics and finance. MIT press
Zurück zum Zitat Murray DM, Yakowitz SJ (1984) Differential dynamic programming and Newton’s method for discrete optimal control problems. J Optim Theor Appl 43(3):359–414CrossRef Murray DM, Yakowitz SJ (1984) Differential dynamic programming and Newton’s method for discrete optimal control problems. J Optim Theor Appl 43(3):359–414CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parrachino I, Dinar A, Patrone F (2006) Cooperative game theory and its application to natural, environmental, and water resource issues: 3. Application to water resources. World bank policy research working paper No. 4074, WPS4074. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4074, Washington Parrachino I, Dinar A, Patrone F (2006) Cooperative game theory and its application to natural, environmental, and water resource issues: 3. Application to water resources. World bank policy research working paper No. 4074, WPS4074. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4074, Washington
Zurück zum Zitat Petit ML (1990) Control theory and dynamic games in economic policy analysis. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge Petit ML (1990) Control theory and dynamic games in economic policy analysis. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Provencher B, Bishop RC (1997) An estimable dynamic model of recreation behavior with an application to great lakes angling. J Environ Econ Manage 33(2):107–127CrossRef Provencher B, Bishop RC (1997) An estimable dynamic model of recreation behavior with an application to great lakes angling. J Environ Econ Manage 33(2):107–127CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers P (1969) A game theory approach to the problems of international river basins. Water Resour Res 5(4):749–760CrossRef Rogers P (1969) A game theory approach to the problems of international river basins. Water Resour Res 5(4):749–760CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio SJ, Casino B (2003) Strategic behavior and efficiency in the common property extraction of groundwater. Environ Resour Econ 26(1):73–87CrossRef Rubio SJ, Casino B (2003) Strategic behavior and efficiency in the common property extraction of groundwater. Environ Resour Econ 26(1):73–87CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sadegh M, Mahjouri N, Kerachian R (2010) Optimal inter-basin water allocation using crisp and fuzzy shapley games. Water Resour Manage 24(10):2291–2310CrossRef Sadegh M, Mahjouri N, Kerachian R (2010) Optimal inter-basin water allocation using crisp and fuzzy shapley games. Water Resour Manage 24(10):2291–2310CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sechi GM, Zucca R, Zuddas P (2013) Water costs allocation in complex systems using a cooperative game theory approach. Water Resour Manage 27(6):1781–1796CrossRef Sechi GM, Zucca R, Zuddas P (2013) Water costs allocation in complex systems using a cooperative game theory approach. Water Resour Manage 27(6):1781–1796CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sheikhmohammady M, Madani K (2008) Bargaining over the Caspian Sea–the largest Lake on the earth. In: Babcock RW, Walton R (eds) Proceeding of the 2008 world environmental and water resources congress. American Society of Civil Engineers, Honolulu, pp 1–9 Sheikhmohammady M, Madani K (2008) Bargaining over the Caspian Sea–the largest Lake on the earth. In: Babcock RW, Walton R (eds) Proceeding of the 2008 world environmental and water resources congress. American Society of Civil Engineers, Honolulu, pp 1–9
Zurück zum Zitat Supalla R, Klaus B, Yeboah O, Bruins R (2002) A game theory approach to deciding who will supply instream flow water. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38(4):959–966CrossRef Supalla R, Klaus B, Yeboah O, Bruins R (2002) A game theory approach to deciding who will supply instream flow water. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38(4):959–966CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tolwinski B (1989) Newton-type methods for stochastic games. Diff Games Appl 119:128–144CrossRef Tolwinski B (1989) Newton-type methods for stochastic games. Diff Games Appl 119:128–144CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu X, Whittington D (2006) Incentive compatibility and conflict resolution in international river basins: a case study of the Nile Basin. Water Resources Research 42, W02417. doi:10.1029/2005WR004238 Wu X, Whittington D (2006) Incentive compatibility and conflict resolution in international river basins: a case study of the Nile Basin. Water Resources Research 42, W02417. doi:10.​1029/​2005WR004238
Zurück zum Zitat Zara S, Dinar A, Patrone F (2006) Cooperative game theory and its application to natural, environmental, and water resource issues: 2. Application to Natural and Environmental Resources. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4073 Zara S, Dinar A, Patrone F (2006) Cooperative game theory and its application to natural, environmental, and water resource issues: 2. Application to Natural and Environmental Resources. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4073
Metadaten
Titel
Developing a Non-Discrete Dynamic Game Model and Corresponding Monthly Collocation Solution Considering Variability in Reservoir Inflow
verfasst von
Mehran Homayounfar
Sai Hin Lai
Mehdi Zommorodian
Amin Oroji
Arman Ganji
Sara Kaviani
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0959-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2015

Water Resources Management 8/2015 Zur Ausgabe