Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
In Part III of the book the organisational and human dimensions of innovation in the Asia Pacific are examined, beginning with Clarke and Gholamshahi’s analysis of the significance of human capital for the development of knowledge-based economies. In the OECD countries, more than half of GDP is accounted for by knowledge-based industries, including the main producers of high-technology goods, high and medium technology manufacturing, and knowledge intensive services such as finance, insurance, business, communication and social services. This is manifest in the rising human capital levels of the population in OECD countries as measure in educational attainment, and in the increased demand for highly educated and highly skilled workers. The challenge for the Asia Pacific is to develop the human, social and institutional capital necessary for successfully competing in the knowledge economy. The Forum for the Future (2016) suggest a five capitals model of human capital, social capital, finance capital, manufacturing capital and natural capital. Defining human capital as people’s health and well-being, knowledge, skills and motivation, and defining social capital as the institutions which sustain and develop human capital in partnership with others for example families, communities, businesses, unions, schools and voluntary organizations including the values and behaviours that allow these social forms to operate). Human capital is one of these five interdependent forms of capital, and is not a separate, substitutable item in itself (that is human capital works with and complements other forms of capital). Human and social capital become ever more critical as the knowledge economy progresses. Hoff and Stiglitz insist, “Development is no longer seen primarily as a process of capital accumulation but rather as a process of organizational change” (2001: 389). The Asian Development Bank in a report on Moving Towards Knowledge-Based Economies (2007) suggests a new paradigm for economic development “It is even envisaged that knowledge can eventually become a means of mass production—similar to manual labour in the industrial economy—once web-based information and communication technologies (ICTs) have reached worldwide penetration levels, allowing individuals to work and provide routine knowledge in a virtually networked (global) environment” (ADB 2007: ix).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
ADB. (2007). Moving toward knowledge-based economies: Asian experiences. Asian Development Bank
Bairoch, P. (1982). International industrialisation levels from 1750–1980. Journal of European History,2, 268–333.
Bowman, M. (1969). Economics of education. Review of Educational Research,39(5), 641–670.
Brungs, A. (2017). Innovation precincts. University of Technology Sydney.
Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2006). Rationales for public policy intervention from a systems of innovation approach: The case of VINNOVA. CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series Paper no. 2006/04.
Chand, M. (2015). Diasporas as drivers of national competitiveness, Elsevier.
Cheng, J. (2016). Engaging diasporas: The case of Australia and other key countries. Consultancy Report for Securing Australia’s Future Project.
Clarke, T. (1999) The development of management education in China. Education and training, 41(6/7), 273–276.
Coe, N., & Bunnell, T. (2003). Spatializing knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks. Global Networks,3(4), 437–456. CrossRef
Dunning, J. H. (2006). Towards a new paradigm of development: Implications for the determinants of international business activity. Transnational Corporations,15(1), 173–228.
Easterly, W. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: Economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Evans, P. (2007). In Search of the 21st Century Developmental State. Berkeley: University of California. Working Paper. July 27, 2007.
Evans, P., & Staveteig, S. (2006). 21st Century Industrialisation and Development in the Global South: The Chinese case in comparative-historical perspective. Berkeley: University of California. Working Paper. January 17, 2006.
Favell, A., Feldblum, M., & Smith, M. (2007) The human face of global mobility. Society, 44(2), 15–25.
Freeman, C. (1995). The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics,19, 5–24.
Freeman, C. (2008). Systems of innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Georghiou, L., Smith, K., Toivanen, O., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2003). Evaluation of the finnish innovation support system (38 pp). Finland: Ministry of Trade and Industry Publications 5/2003.
Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,17, 109–122. CrossRef
Gunter, G. B., & Hoevan, R. (2004). The social dimension of globalisation. Working Paper Number 24. World Commission on the Social Dimensions of Globalisation. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Hatch, W. F. (2003). Agenda for Asian Regionalism. Japanese Economy,32(21), 86–97.
Helpman, E. (2004). The mystery of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Mike Hobday. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710.
Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. (2001). Modern economic theory and development. In G. Meier & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Frontiers of development economics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
IBM. (2017). Upskilling India: Building India’s talent base to compete in the global economy. IBM Institute for Business Value.
JETRO. (1998). Jetero hakusho, white paper. Tokyo: JETRO.
Krugman, P. (1994). The myth of Asia’s miracle. Foreign Affairs,73(6), 62–78. CrossRef
Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the inequality of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(4), 857–880. CrossRef
Lasserre, P. (2003). Global strategic management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lawson, C. (1999). Towards a competence theory of the region. Cambridge Journal of Economics,23, 151–166. CrossRef
Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning. Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity, Regional Studies,33, 305–317.
Lingle, C. (1997). The rise and decline of the Asian century. Hong Kong: Asia 2000.
Livingstone, C. (2017). New chancellor says UTS has people focus to make innovation work. http://newsroom.uts.edu.au/news/2017/04/new-chancellor-says-uts-has-people-focus-make-innovation-work
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics,22(1), 3–42. CrossRef
Maddison, A. (2000). The world economy: A millennial perspective. Paris: OECD.
Mahroum, S. (2000). Scientific mobility. Science Communication,2(4), 367–378. CrossRef
McKinsey Global Institute. (2015). The China effect on global innovation. McKinsey Company
Meyer, J. B. (2001). Network approach versus brain drain: Lessons from the diaspora. International Migration,39(5), 91–110. CrossRef
Mizrahi, Y. (2004). Capacity enhancement indicators. World Bank Institute: Washington D.C.
O’Doherty, D., & Arnold, E. (2003). Understanding innovation: The need for a systemic approach (The IPTS Report. 71 Seville IPTS).
OECD. (2000). Science, technology and innovation in the new economy. OECD
OECD. (2001). Competencies for the knowledge economy. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2003). Human capital formation and foreign direct investment in developing countries. Paris: OECD. Working Paper 211.
Ozawa, T., Castello, S., & Phillips, R. J. (2001). The internet revolution, the McLuhan stage of catch-up, and institutional reforms in Asia. Journal of Economic Issues,35(2), 289–298. (Lincoln: Association for Evolutionary Economics Fiscal Office). CrossRef
Pitelis, C. (2009). The sustainable competitive advantage and catching-up of nations: FDI, clusters, and the liability (Asset) of smallness? Management International Review,49(1), 95–120. CrossRef
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossRef
Porter, M., Ketels, C., & Delgado, M. (2007). The microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index. In A. Lopez-Claros, M. E. Porter, X. Sali-i-Martin, & K. Schwab (Eds.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2006–2007.
PWC. (2016). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. PWC. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/industries-4.0/landing-page/industry-4.0-building-your-digital-enterprise-april-2016.pdf
Rodrik, D. (2004). Growth Strategies. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Working Paper.
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The Primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth,9, 131–165. CrossRef
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy,94(5), 1002–1037. CrossRef
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy,98(5), 71–102. CrossRef
Romer, P. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives,8, 3–22. CrossRef
Scott-Kemmis, D. (2008). Industry policy frameworks for a knowledge economy. In Review of the Australian Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industry (Vol. 2). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Sen, A. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives,8, 3–22.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Knopf.
Shapiro, H., & Taylor, L. (1990). The state and industrial strategy. World Development,18(6), 861–878. CrossRef
Sorenson, O. (2003). Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,13, 513–527. CrossRef
Staber, U. (2001). The structure of networks in industrial districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,25, 537–552. CrossRef
Teece, D. (2000). Managing intellectual capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review,29, 258–271.
Taylor, M., & Leonard, S. (Eds.). (2002). Embedded enterprise and social capital. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Turpin, T., Woolley, R., & Marceau, J. (2010). Scientists across the boundaries: National and global dimensions of scientific and technical human capital (STHC) and policy implications for Australia. Asia Pacific Migration Journal,19(1), 65–86. CrossRef
UNCTAD. (2005a). China in a globalising world. New York and Geneva: UN.
UNCTAD. (2005b). Trade and development report: New features of global interdependence. UN: New York and Geneva.
UNCTAD. (2007). World Investment Prospects Survey 2007–2009. UNCTAD. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs//wips2007_en.pdf
UNESCO. (2016). UNESCO science report—Towards 2030. UNESCO Publishing. http://en.unesco.org/unesco_science_report
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly,42, 35–67. CrossRef
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2006). The knowledge economy, the kam methodology and world bank operations. World Bank Institute: Washington D.C.
Yoshida, P. (2001). Asian economies striving to enhance innovation capabilities. Research Technology Management, 44(1), 2–6.
Young, A. (1994). Lessons from the East Asian NIE’s: A contrarian view. European Economic Review, 38, 964–73.
Yusuf, S. (2004). Competitiveness through technological advances under global production networking. In Yusuf et al. (2004a).
Yusuf, S., Anjum Altaf, M., & Nabeshima, K. (Eds.). (2004a). Global production networking and technological change in East Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yusuf, S., Anjum Altaf, M., & Nabeshima, K. (Eds.). (2004b). Global change and East Asian policy initiatives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yusuf, S., & Evenett, S. J. (2002). Can East Asia compete?. Washington D.C.: World Bank. CrossRef
Yusuf, et al. (2003). Innovative East Asia: The future of growth. Washington D.C.: Worlds Bank. CrossRef
- Developing Human Capital for Knowledge Based Economies
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 12
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Wissenstransfer im Outsourcing/© WrightStudio | stock.adobe.com