Skip to main content
Erschienen in: NanoEthics 1/2019

08.03.2019 | Original Paper

Development and Pilot Testing of an Evidence-Based Training Module for Integrating Social and Ethical Implications into the Lab

verfasst von: Lee Ann Kahlor, Xiaoshan Li, Jacy Jones

Erschienen in: NanoEthics | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this project, we (1) explore perceptions of the social and ethical implications (SEI) of nanotechnology among US scientists who work at the nanoscale, and (2) develop and pilot test an online training module to foster consideration of social and ethical implications in the lab. To meet our first goal, we drew qualitative insights from open-ended survey data collected from scientists affiliated with the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network. Our data suggest that while the survey participants responded positively to the idea that consideration of SEI should be a part of the work they do, there was confusion about whether SEI refers to lab safety, research integrity, or something more. This is something we sought to address in the online training module that we developed based on that qualitative data and on feedback collected from experts in nanoethics and lab management. We then pilot tested the module with undergraduate students studying nanotechnology in the National Science Foundation’s Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program and with scientists registered to use a National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure-funded microelectronics research lab. The undergraduate data suggested that students appreciated the SEI training but wished professors and scientists would begin integrating the ideas therein into coursework and mentoring. The scientist data suggested that the module increased understanding of “social and ethical implications,” increased the perceived need to implement SEI into workplace routines, and, interestingly, heightened perceptions of risk associated with the scientists’ own work. The practical and theoretical implications of this work are discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard CV, Ikah DSK (2006) Nanotechnology and nanoparticles toxicity: a case study of precaution. In: Hunt G, Mehta M (eds) Nanotechnology: risk, ethics and law. Earthscan, London, pp 154–166 Howard CV, Ikah DSK (2006) Nanotechnology and nanoparticles toxicity: a case study of precaution. In: Hunt G, Mehta M (eds) Nanotechnology: risk, ethics and law. Earthscan, London, pp 154–166
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jahnel J (2015) Conceptual questions and challenges associated with the traditional risk assessment paradigm for nanomaterials. Nanoethics 9(3):261–276CrossRef Jahnel J (2015) Conceptual questions and challenges associated with the traditional risk assessment paradigm for nanomaterials. Nanoethics 9(3):261–276CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brey P (2017) Ethics of emerging technologies. In: Hansson SO (ed), The ethics of technology. Methods and approaches. Rowman and Littlefield International, London, pp 175–192 Brey P (2017) Ethics of emerging technologies. In: Hansson SO (ed), The ethics of technology. Methods and approaches. Rowman and Littlefield International, London, pp 175–192
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Merton RK (1938) Science and the social order. Philos Sci 5(3):321–337CrossRef Merton RK (1938) Science and the social order. Philos Sci 5(3):321–337CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Galston AW (1972) Science and social responsibility: a case history. Ann N Y Acad Sci 196(4):223–235CrossRef Galston AW (1972) Science and social responsibility: a case history. Ann N Y Acad Sci 196(4):223–235CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Allhoff F, Lin P (2006) What’s so special about nanotechnology and nanoethics? Int J Appl Philos 20(2):179–190CrossRef Allhoff F, Lin P (2006) What’s so special about nanotechnology and nanoethics? Int J Appl Philos 20(2):179–190CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission E (2004) Towards a European strategy on nanotechnology. Brussels, Belgium Commission E (2004) Towards a European strategy on nanotechnology. Brussels, Belgium
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee HoCSaT (2004) Too little too late? Government investment in nanotechnology. Fifth report of session 2003–2004. House of Commons, London Committee HoCSaT (2004) Too little too late? Government investment in nanotechnology. Fifth report of session 2003–2004. House of Commons, London
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale. J Nanopart Res 4(4):281–295CrossRef Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale. J Nanopart Res 4(4):281–295CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood S, Geldart A, Jones R (2008) Crystallizing the nanotechnology debate. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20(1):13–27CrossRef Wood S, Geldart A, Jones R (2008) Crystallizing the nanotechnology debate. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20(1):13–27CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmberg C, Dernis H, Miguet C (2009) Nanotechnology: an overview based on indicators and statistics. (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2009/07), OECD Publishing, Paris Palmberg C, Dernis H, Miguet C (2009) Nanotechnology: an overview based on indicators and statistics. (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2009/07), OECD Publishing, Paris 
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Office USGP (2003) The 21st century nanotechnology research and development act. Washington, DC Office USGP (2003) The 21st century nanotechnology research and development act. Washington, DC
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Amato I, Carroll L (1999) Nanotechnology: shaping the world atom by atom. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Technology, Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering, and Technology, Washington, DC Amato I, Carroll L (1999) Nanotechnology: shaping the world atom by atom. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Technology, Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering, and Technology, Washington, DC
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrari A (2010) Developments in the debate on nanoethics: traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis. NanoEthics 4(1):27–52CrossRef Ferrari A (2010) Developments in the debate on nanoethics: traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis. NanoEthics 4(1):27–52CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Drexler KE (2000) Engines of creation: the coming era of nanotechnology. Foresight Institute, Los Altos (orig. 1986) Drexler KE (2000) Engines of creation: the coming era of nanotechnology. Foresight Institute, Los Altos (orig. 1986)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Omlor AJ, Nguyen J, Bals R, Dinh QT (2015) Nanotechnology in respiratory medicine. Respir Res 16(1):64CrossRef Omlor AJ, Nguyen J, Bals R, Dinh QT (2015) Nanotechnology in respiratory medicine. Respir Res 16(1):64CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Allhoff F (2007) Nanoethics: the ethical and social implications of nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken Allhoff F (2007) Nanoethics: the ethical and social implications of nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bacchini F (2013) Is nanotechnology giving rise to new ethical problems? Nanoethics 7(2):107–119CrossRef Bacchini F (2013) Is nanotechnology giving rise to new ethical problems? Nanoethics 7(2):107–119CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett-Woods D (2008) Nanotechnology: ethics and society. CRC press, Boca Raton Bennett-Woods D (2008) Nanotechnology: ethics and society. CRC press, Boca Raton
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley EA, Kim Y, Scheufele DA (2016) Scientists’ ethical obligations and social responsibility for nanotechnology research. Sci Eng Ethics 22(1):111–132CrossRef Corley EA, Kim Y, Scheufele DA (2016) Scientists’ ethical obligations and social responsibility for nanotechnology research. Sci Eng Ethics 22(1):111–132CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordijn B, Cutter AM (2014) In pursuit of nanoethics: an introduction. In: Gordijn B, Cutter AM (eds), In pursuit of nanoethics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–11 Gordijn B, Cutter AM (2014) In pursuit of nanoethics: an introduction. In: Gordijn B, Cutter AM (eds), In pursuit of nanoethics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–11
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Macnaghten P, Kearnes MB, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27(2):268–291CrossRef Macnaghten P, Kearnes MB, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27(2):268–291CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat McGinn R (2008) Ethics and nanotechnology: views of nanotechnology researchers. Nanoethics 2(2):101–131CrossRef McGinn R (2008) Ethics and nanotechnology: views of nanotechnology researchers. Nanoethics 2(2):101–131CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat McGinn R (2010) Ethical responsibilities of nanotechnology researchers: a short guide. NanoEthics 4(1):1–12CrossRef McGinn R (2010) Ethical responsibilities of nanotechnology researchers: a short guide. NanoEthics 4(1):1–12CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat McGinn RE (2010) What’s different, ethically, about nanotechnology?: foundational questions and answers. Nanoethics 4(2):115–128CrossRef McGinn RE (2010) What’s different, ethically, about nanotechnology?: foundational questions and answers. Nanoethics 4(2):115–128CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasmussen AJ, Ebbesen M, Andersen S (2012) Nanoethics—a collaboration across disciplines. Nanoethics 6(3):185–193CrossRef Rasmussen AJ, Ebbesen M, Andersen S (2012) Nanoethics—a collaboration across disciplines. Nanoethics 6(3):185–193CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutcliffe SH, Pense CM, Zvalaren M (2012) Framing the discussion: nanotechnology and the social construction of technology--what STS scholars are saying. NanoEthics 6(2):81–99CrossRef Cutcliffe SH, Pense CM, Zvalaren M (2012) Framing the discussion: nanotechnology and the social construction of technology--what STS scholars are saying. NanoEthics 6(2):81–99CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunwald A (2005) Nanotechnology—a new field of ethical inquiry? Sci Eng Ethics 11(2):187–201CrossRef Grunwald A (2005) Nanotechnology—a new field of ethical inquiry? Sci Eng Ethics 11(2):187–201CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Dunwoody S, Shih T-J, Hillback E, Guston DH (2007) Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nat Nanotechnol 2(12):732–734CrossRef Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Dunwoody S, Shih T-J, Hillback E, Guston DH (2007) Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nat Nanotechnol 2(12):732–734CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Viseu A, Maguire H (2012) Integrating and enacting ‘social and ethical issues’ in nanotechnology practices. NanoEthics 6(3):195–209CrossRef Viseu A, Maguire H (2012) Integrating and enacting ‘social and ethical issues’ in nanotechnology practices. NanoEthics 6(3):195–209CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson DG (2007) Ethics and technology ‘in the making’: an essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):21–30CrossRef Johnson DG (2007) Ethics and technology ‘in the making’: an essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):21–30CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahlor LA, Dudo A, Liang M-C, Lazard AJ, AbiGhannam N (2016) Ethics information seeking and sharing among scientists: the case of nanotechnology. Sci Commun 38(1):74–98CrossRef Kahlor LA, Dudo A, Liang M-C, Lazard AJ, AbiGhannam N (2016) Ethics information seeking and sharing among scientists: the case of nanotechnology. Sci Commun 38(1):74–98CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Olmstead M, Bassett D (2009) Teaching nanoethics to graduate students. In: Bassett D, Wysocki A, Brainard S (eds) Monograph: nanoethics graduate education symposium. Center for Workforce Development, University of Washington, Seattle, pp 131–140 Olmstead M, Bassett D (2009) Teaching nanoethics to graduate students. In: Bassett D, Wysocki A, Brainard S (eds) Monograph: nanoethics graduate education symposium. Center for Workforce Development, University of Washington, Seattle, pp 131–140
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Patra D (2011) Responsible development of nanoscience and nanotechnology: contextualizing socio-technical integration into the nanofabrication laboratories in the USA. NanoEthics 5(2):143–157CrossRef Patra D (2011) Responsible development of nanoscience and nanotechnology: contextualizing socio-technical integration into the nanofabrication laboratories in the USA. NanoEthics 5(2):143–157CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller RL (1976) Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change. Public Opin Q 40(2):229–233CrossRef Miller RL (1976) Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change. Public Opin Q 40(2):229–233CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjølberg K, Wickson F (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: mapping the early literature. NanoEthics 1(2):89–104CrossRef Kjølberg K, Wickson F (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: mapping the early literature. NanoEthics 1(2):89–104CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjølberg KL, Strand R (2011) Conversations about responsible nanoresearch. NanoEthics 5(1):99–113CrossRef Kjølberg KL, Strand R (2011) Conversations about responsible nanoresearch. NanoEthics 5(1):99–113CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Allenby B (2006) Macroethical systems and sustainability science. Sustain Sci 1(1):7–13CrossRef Allenby B (2006) Macroethical systems and sustainability science. Sustain Sci 1(1):7–13CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher E, Maricle G (2014) Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting. Sci Public Policy 42(1):72–85CrossRef Fisher E, Maricle G (2014) Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting. Sci Public Policy 42(1):72–85CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat McGregor J, Wetmore JM (2009) Researching and teaching the ethics and social implications of emerging technologies in the laboratory. Nanoethics 3(1):17–30CrossRef McGregor J, Wetmore JM (2009) Researching and teaching the ethics and social implications of emerging technologies in the laboratory. Nanoethics 3(1):17–30CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Foley RW, Bennett I, Wetmore JM (2012) Practitioners’ views on responsibility: applying nanoethics. NanoEthics 6(3):231–241CrossRef Foley RW, Bennett I, Wetmore JM (2012) Practitioners’ views on responsibility: applying nanoethics. NanoEthics 6(3):231–241CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K (1988) An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 15(4):351–377CrossRef McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K (1988) An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 15(4):351–377CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Arthur W Jr, Bennett W Jr, Edens PS, Bell ST (2003) Effectiveness of training in organizations: a meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. J Appl Psychol 88(2):234–245CrossRef Arthur W Jr, Bennett W Jr, Edens PS, Bell ST (2003) Effectiveness of training in organizations: a meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. J Appl Psychol 88(2):234–245CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Christian LM, Dillman DA, Smyth JD (2008) The effects of mode and format on answers to scalar questions in telephone and web surveys. Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology 12:250–275 Christian LM, Dillman DA, Smyth JD (2008) The effects of mode and format on answers to scalar questions in telephone and web surveys. Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology 12:250–275
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott J, Carrington PJ (2011) The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE publications, London Scott J, Carrington PJ (2011) The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE publications, London
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Stern PN (1980) Grounded theory methodology: its uses and processes. J Nurs Scholarsh 12(1):20–23 Stern PN (1980) Grounded theory methodology: its uses and processes. J Nurs Scholarsh 12(1):20–23
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva Costa H, Sethe S, Pêgo AP, Olsson IAS (2011) Scientists’ perception of ethical issues in nanomedicine: a case study. Nanomedicine 6(4):681–691CrossRef Silva Costa H, Sethe S, Pêgo AP, Olsson IAS (2011) Scientists’ perception of ethical issues in nanomedicine: a case study. Nanomedicine 6(4):681–691CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Bronfenbrenner U (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol 32(7):513–531CrossRef Bronfenbrenner U (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol 32(7):513–531CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S, Neuwirth K (1999) Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environ Res 80(2):S230–S245CrossRef Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S, Neuwirth K (1999) Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environ Res 80(2):S230–S245CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahlor L (2010) PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model. Health Commun 25(4):345–356CrossRef Kahlor L (2010) PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model. Health Commun 25(4):345–356CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Eosco GM, Tallapragada M, McComas KA, Brady M (2014) Exploring societal and ethical views of nanotechnology REUs. NanoEthics 8(1):91–99CrossRef Eosco GM, Tallapragada M, McComas KA, Brady M (2014) Exploring societal and ethical views of nanotechnology REUs. NanoEthics 8(1):91–99CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat National Academy of Sciences, N. A. (2009) On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC National Academy of Sciences, N. A. (2009) On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Metadaten
Titel
Development and Pilot Testing of an Evidence-Based Training Module for Integrating Social and Ethical Implications into the Lab
verfasst von
Lee Ann Kahlor
Xiaoshan Li
Jacy Jones
Publikationsdatum
08.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
NanoEthics / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Elektronische ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00336-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

NanoEthics 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe