nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Development of an Iron-Based Adsorption System to Purify Biogas for Small Electricity Generation Station in Vietnam: A Case Study

verfasst von : Khac-Uan Do, Trung-Dung Nghiem, Shin Dong Kim, Thi-Thu-Hien Nguyen, Bich-Thuy Ly, Dac-Chi Tran, Duc-Ho Vu, Jun Woo Park

Erschienen in: Renewable Energy in Developing Countries

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In Vietnam, there are about 17,000 pig farms with over 500 pigs, and less than 0.3% of them have a biogas facility. Biogas production from this size is about 50,000 m³/year. This biogas is methane-rich, based on a typical composition of 60–70% methane. However, trace amounts of H₂S are also present, which hinder their use as it is very toxic and corrodes the equipment. In this study, an adsorption system using iron-based adsorbent (FeOOH) was developed to remove hydrogen sulfide from biogas at the Thanh Hung pig farm (Thanh Oai District, Hanoi, Vietnam). The initial biogas contained high CH₄ concentration of 72%, and the H₂S was at the rage of 1995 to about 4000 ppm. Based on the results obtained from the study, it could be seen that FeOOH has high capacity for H₂S purification from biogas. The adsorption capacity of the FeOOH was estimated to be up to 0.18 g H₂S/g FeOOH. The H₂S concentration in the effluent was almost lower than 5 ppm which was suitable for electric generators. In this study, the purified biogas was used for a small electricity generator of 3.5 KVA. As a result, the biogas consumed was about 0.64 m³ per 1 kWh of electricity produced. This amount could fully meet the demand of electricity of a farm. In conclusion, the potential of market for biogas production and consumption in Vietnam is huge. Biogas purification technology for electricity generation, therefore, plays an important role in the biogas market of Vietnam.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Enhancement of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Disintegrated Sludge: A Techno-Economic Assessment for Sludge Management of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Vietnam

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abatzoglou N, Boivin S (2009) A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 3:42–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.117CrossRef

Ács N, Bagi Z, Rákhely G, Minárovics J, Nagy K, Kovács KL (2015) Bioaugmentation of biogas production by a hydrogen-producing bacterium. Bioresour Technol 186:286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.098CrossRef

Akbulut A (2012) Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat generation from farm-scale biogas plant: Çiçekdağı case study. Energy 44:381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.017CrossRef

Alvarez-Gaitan JP, Short MD, Lundie S, Stuetz R (2016) Towards a comprehensive greenhouse gas emissions inventory for biosolids. Water Res 96:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.059CrossRef

Álvarez-Gutiérrez N, García S, Gil MV, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2014) Towards bio-upgrading of biogas: biomass waste-based adsorbents. Energy Procedia 63:6527–6533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.688CrossRef

APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC

Arshad M, Bano I, Khan N, Shahzad MI, Younus M, Abbas M, Iqbal M (2018) Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: an assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1241–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.007CrossRef

Bao PN, Kuyama T, Kataoka Y (2013) Urban domestic wastewater management in Vietnam – challenges and oppotunities. WEPA Policy Brief 5:1–10

Bruun S, Jensen LS, Khanh Vu VT, Sommer S (2014) Small-scale household biogas digesters: an option for global warming mitigation or a potential climate bomb? Renew Sust Energ Rev 33:736–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.033CrossRef

Cheng S, Li Z, Mang H-P, Huba E-M, Gao R, Wang X (2014) Development and application of prefabricated biogas digesters in developing countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.035CrossRef

Ciotola RJ, Lansing S, Martin JF (2011) Emergy analysis of biogas production and electricity generation from small-scale agricultural digesters. Ecol Eng 37:1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.031CrossRef

Cobbledick J, Aubry N, Zhang V, Rollings-Scattergood S, Latulippe DR (2016) Lab-scale demonstration of recuperative thickening technology for enhanced biogas production and dewaterability in anaerobic digestion processes. Water Res 95:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.051CrossRef

Costa A, Gusmara C, Gardoni D, Zaninelli M, Tambone F, Sala V, Guarino M (2017) The effect of anaerobic digestion and storage on indicator microorganisms in swine and dairy manure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:24135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0011-5CrossRef

Crone BC, Garland JL, Sorial GA, Vane LM (2016) Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: a review. Water Res 104:520–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.019CrossRef

Do AT, Bach DQ, Do UK, Prieto A, Lan Huong HT (2016) Performance of airlift MBR for on-site treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in urban areas of Vietnam. Water Sci Technol 74:2245. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.418CrossRef

Dornelas KC, Schneider RM, do Amaral AG (2017) Biogas from poultry waste—production and energy potential. Environ Monit Assess 189:407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6054-8CrossRef

Fitamo T, Triolo JM, Boldrin A, Scheutz C (2017) Rapid biochemical methane potential prediction of urban organic waste with near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Water Res 119:242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.051CrossRef

Ghimire PC (2013) SNV supported domestic biogas programmes in Asia and Africa. Renew Energy 49:90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.058CrossRef

Gu J, Xu G, Liu Y (2017) An integrated AMBBR and IFAS-SBR process for municipal wastewater treatment towards enhanced energy recovery, reduced energy consumption and sludge production. Water Res 110:262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.031CrossRef

Hasan Chowdhury S, Maung Than Oo A (2012) Study on electrical energy and prospective electricity generation from renewable sources in Australia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:6879–6887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.015CrossRef

Hasan MH, Muzammil WK, Mahlia TMI, Jannifar A, Hasanuddin I (2012) A review on the pattern of electricity generation and emission in Indonesia from 1987 to 2009. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:3206–3219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.075CrossRef

Huong LQ, Forslund A, Madsen H, Dalsgaard A (2014a) Survival of Salmonella spp. and fecal indicator bacteria in Vietnamese biogas digesters receiving pig slurry. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217:785–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.04.004CrossRef

Huong LQ, Madsen H, Anh LX, Ngoc PT, Dalsgaard A (2014b) Hygienic aspects of livestock manure management and biogas systems operated by small-scale pig farmers in Vietnam. Sci Total Environ 470:53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.023CrossRef

Jensen PD, Astals S, Lu Y, Devadas M, Batstone DJ (2014) Anaerobic codigestion of sewage sludge and glycerol, focusing on process kinetics, microbial dynamics and sludge dewaterability. Water Res 67:355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.024CrossRef

Jiang X, Sommer SG, Christensen KV (2011) A review of the biogas industry in China. Energy Policy 39:6073–6081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.007CrossRef

Jin X, Li X, Zhao N, Angelidaki I, Zhang Y (2017) Bio-electrolytic sensor for rapid monitoring of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion process. Water Res 111:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.045CrossRef

Kampanatsanyakorn K, Holasut S, Kachanadul P (2013) Upgrading of biogas to marketable purified methane exploiting microalgae farming. Google Patents

Kavitha S, Yukesh Kannah R, Yeom IT, Do K-U, Banu JR (2015) Combined thermo-chemo-sonic disintegration of waste activated sludge for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 197:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.131CrossRef

Kim M-S et al (2016) More value from food waste: lactic acid and biogas recovery. Water Res 96:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.064CrossRef

Kovács E et al (2015) Augmented biogas production from protein-rich substrates and associated metagenomic changes. Bioresour Technol 178:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.111CrossRef

Lantz M (2012) The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – a comparison of different CHP technologies. Appl Energy 98:502–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.015CrossRef

Lauer M, Thrän D (2017) Biogas plants and surplus generation: cost driver or reducer in the future German electricity system? Energy Policy 109:324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.016CrossRef

Lijó L, Malamis S, González-García S, Fatone F, Moreira MT, Katsou E (2017) Technical and environmental evaluation of an integrated scheme for the co-treatment of wastewater and domestic organic waste in small communities. Water Res 109:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.057CrossRef

Lu X, Zhen G, Ni J, Kubota K, Li Y-Y (2017) Sulfidogenesis process to strengthen re-granulation for biodegradation of methanolic wastewater and microorganisms evolution in an UASB reactor. Water Res 108:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.073CrossRef

Makareviciene V, Sendzikiene E (2015) Technological assumptions for biogas purification. Environ Technol 36:1745–1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1008585CrossRef

Matassa S, Boon N, Verstraete W (2015) Resource recovery from used water: the manufacturing abilities of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria. Water Res 68:467–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.028CrossRef

Mohseni F, Magnusson M, Görling M, Alvfors P (2012) Biogas from renewable electricity – increasing a climate neutral fuel supply. Appl Energy 90:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.024CrossRef

Nghiem LD, Koch K, Bolzonella D, Drewes JE (2017) Full scale co-digestion of wastewater sludge and food waste: bottlenecks and possibilities. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.062CrossRef

Pham CH, Triolo JM, Sommer SG (2014) Predicting methane production in simple and unheated biogas digesters at low temperatures. Appl Energy 136:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.057CrossRef

Pham CH et al (2017) Biogas production from steer manures in Vietnam: effects of feed supplements and tannin contents. Waste Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.002

Rennuit C, Sommer S (2013) Decision support for the construction of farm-scale biogas digesters in developing countries with cold seasons. Energies 6:5314CrossRef

Rios M, Kaltschmitt M (2016) Electricity generation potential from biogas produced from organic waste in Mexico. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.033CrossRef

Roubík H, Mazancová J, Banout J, Verner V (2016) Addressing problems at small-scale biogas plants: a case study from central Vietnam. J Clean Prod 112:2784–2792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.114CrossRef

Roubík H, Mazancová J, Phung LD, Banout J (2017) Current approach to manure management for small-scale Southeast Asian farmers – Using Vietnamese biogas and non-biogas farms as an example. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.068

Santos IFS, Barros RM, Tiago Filho GL (2016) Electricity generation from biogas of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants in Brazil: an assessment of feasibility and potential. J Clean Prod 126:504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.072CrossRef

Schoen ME, Xue X, Wood A, Hawkins TR, Garland J, Ashbolt NJ (2017) Cost, energy, global warming, eutrophication and local human health impacts of community water and sanitation service options. Water Res 109:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.044CrossRef

Shafie SM, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Ahmad-Yazid A (2012) A review on electricity generation based on biomass residue in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:5879–5889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.06.031CrossRef

Surendra KC, Takara D, Hashimoto AG, Khanal SK (2014) Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev 31:846–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015CrossRef

Thien Thu CT, Cuong PH, Hang LT, Chao NV, Anh LX, Trach NX, Sommer SG (2012) Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries – using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example. J Clean Prod 27:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.006CrossRef

Ullah Khan I, Hafiz Dzarfan Othman M, Hashim H, Matsuura T, Ismail AF, Rezaei-DashtArzhandi M, Wan Azelee I (2017) Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – a review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage. Energy Convers Manag 150:277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035CrossRef

WorldBank (2014) Socialist Republic of Vietnam: review of urban water and wastewater utility reform and regulation. © World Bank, Washington, DC

Titel: Development of an Iron-Based Adsorption System to Purify Biogas for Small Electricity Generation Station in Vietnam: A Case Study
verfasst von: Khac-Uan Do
Trung-Dung Nghiem
Shin Dong Kim
Thi-Thu-Hien Nguyen
Bich-Thuy Ly
Dac-Chi Tran
Duc-Ho Vu
Jun Woo Park
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Renewable Energy in Developing Countries
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89808-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-89809-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89809-4_10

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"