Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6/2008

01.09.2008 | Life Cycle Management

Development of PCR for WWTP based on a case study

verfasst von: Adriana Del Borghi, Pier Luigi Gaggero, Michela Gallo, Carlo Strazza

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

In order to apply the Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) to products or services, specific rules [Product Category Rules (PCR)] have to be issued to ensure comparability among different declarations within the same service group. The aim of the present study is to describe the reasons leading to each choice in the development of PCR applied to Collecting and Treatment Service of Municipal Wastewater and to evaluate, through life cycle analysis (LCA), their influence on the potential environmental impact of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), analysed as a case study. Specific data were collected during the year 2003 from an Italian active sludge treatment plant with separate wastewater and sludge treatment lines.

Materials and methods

The PCR 2005:5 (Collecting and treatment service of municipal wastewater (MWW). Product group/service type: refuse disposal, sanitation and similar activities, NACE code:90) document was prepared by the Department of Chemical and Process Engineering “G.B. Bonino” (University of Genoa, Italy). This PCR was tested on the Collection and Treatment Service of Municipal Wastewater in a wastewater treatment plant located in Savona, Italy (Consorzio per la Depurazione delle Acque di Scarico). The PCR 2005:5 document was issued in an open and participatory process between companies and organizations having good knowledge of the specific environmental aspects of the service to be included in the EPD® system. PCR, LCA, and EPD studies were developed according to the document “Requirements for an International EPD Scheme” (EU funded LIFE Env 2003 program, INTEND Project, www.​intendproject.​net).

Results

The following LCA-based information was considered in preparing the PCR: definition of service type, definition of functional unit, choice and description of system boundaries, choice of cutoff criteria, choice of allocation rules, description of quality requirements for data, choice of selected LCI results or other selected parameters for description of environmental performance to be included in the declaration, description of parameters contributing to each preset category, description of specific information to be included in the use stage of the declaration, other environmental information. Ecotoxicity characterization factors, evaluated by the model Uniform System for the Evaluation of Substances (USES-LCA), was added to the PCR as an Annex. The potential environmental impacts of the considered case study were evaluated separately for the following phases: sewer net and plant construction, sewer net and plant management, sludge management. Alternative sludge management techniques were investigated.

Discussion

PCR of Collecting and Treatment Service of Municipal Wastewater (MWW) was prepared in an open and participatory process between companies and organizations having in-depth knowledge of the specific environmental aspects of the service, in order to safeguard the provision and input of appropriate product-specific knowledge from relevant companies and branch organizations. The main problems characterizing the open consultation regarded are functional unit, system boundaries, boundary in time, parameters to be declared, and other information.

Conclusions

The annual amount of treated wastewater was considered as a functional unit. In order to evaluate water quality aspects, the request for additional information [biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)/chemical oxygen demand (COD) and nutrient removal] was added to the PCR document. These characteristics aim to complete the lack of information about wastewater quality due to the use of a fixed amount of wastewater as a functional unit. The following parameters were identified: resources use (use of nonrenewable resources, use of renewable resources, water consumption, electricity consumption), pollutant emissions as potential environmental impact (global warming, acidification, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidant formation, eutrophication), and new standard parameters (fresh aquatic ecotoxicity, fresh sediment ecotoxicity, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, marine sediment ecotoxicity). The reference model used for the calculation of toxicity potentials was the global nested multimedia fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. The comparison of the LCA results obtained for the considered life cycle phases shows that sewer net and plant construction have less than 10% of the total impacts for all the considered categories. Plant management has a higher impact with respect to sewer net and sludge management. In general, sludge treatment for agricultural land application has a lower impact than its treatment in landfill, but the specific results depend on the impact categories.

Recommendations and perspectives

One of the most important properties of EPDs is that they provide possibilities to add up and accumulate information along the supply chain as well as to make comparisons between declarations with regard to the environmental performance of products and services. Therefore, the PCR 2005:5 document has been prepared to ensure comparability between declarations within collecting and treatment service of municipal wastewater. However, a new revised version of these rules has to be prepared according to the newly published ISO standard for EPD (ISO 14025) and to the incoming revision document of the international EPD® system.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Das TK (2002) Evaluating the life cycle environmental performance of chlorine disinfection and ultraviolet technologies. Clean Techn Environ Policy 4(1):32–43CrossRef Das TK (2002) Evaluating the life cycle environmental performance of chlorine disinfection and ultraviolet technologies. Clean Techn Environ Policy 4(1):32–43CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Del Borghi A, Pagnanelli F, Gallo M (2005) Life Cycle Assessment e valutazione dei potenziali di ecotossicità associati ai metalli pesanti. 3rd national conference on heavy metal pollution: bioavailability. Sassari, May 5–6, 2005 Del Borghi A, Pagnanelli F, Gallo M (2005) Life Cycle Assessment e valutazione dei potenziali di ecotossicità associati ai metalli pesanti. 3rd national conference on heavy metal pollution: bioavailability. Sassari, May 5–6, 2005
Zurück zum Zitat Del Borghi A, Binaghi L, Del Borghi M, Gallo M (2007) The application of the environmental product declaration to waste disposal in a sanitary landfill—four case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(1):40–49 Del Borghi A, Binaghi L, Del Borghi M, Gallo M (2007) The application of the environmental product declaration to waste disposal in a sanitary landfill—four case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(1):40–49
Zurück zum Zitat Dennison FJ, Azapagic A, Clift R, Colbourne JS (1998) Assessing management options for wastewater treatment works in the context of life cycle assessment. Water Sci Technol 38(11):23–30CrossRef Dennison FJ, Azapagic A, Clift R, Colbourne JS (1998) Assessing management options for wastewater treatment works in the context of life cycle assessment. Water Sci Technol 38(11):23–30CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fet AM, Skaar C (2006) Eco-labeling, product category rules and certification procedures based on ISO 14025 requirements. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):49–54CrossRef Fet AM, Skaar C (2006) Eco-labeling, product category rules and certification procedures based on ISO 14025 requirements. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):49–54CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gloria T, Russell A, Atherton J, Baker S, Cook M (2006) Ecological toxicity methods and metals. an examination of two case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):26–33CrossRef Gloria T, Russell A, Atherton J, Baker S, Cook M (2006) Ecological toxicity methods and metals. an examination of two case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):26–33CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grahl B, Schmincke E (2007) The part of LCA in ISO type III environmental declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Spec Issue 12(1):38–45 Grahl B, Schmincke E (2007) The part of LCA in ISO type III environmental declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Spec Issue 12(1):38–45
Zurück zum Zitat Hospido A, Moreira T, Feijoo G (2008) A comparison of municipal wastewater treatment plants for big centres of population in Galicia (Spain). Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(1):57–64CrossRef Hospido A, Moreira T, Feijoo G (2008) A comparison of municipal wastewater treatment plants for big centres of population in Galicia (Spain). Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(1):57–64CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huijbregts MAJ, Thissen U, Guinée JB, Jager T, Kalf D, van de Meent D, Ragas AMJ, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Reijnders L (2000) Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessmentPart I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES–LCA. Chemosphere 41(4):541–573CrossRef Huijbregts MAJ, Thissen U, Guinée JB, Jager T, Kalf D, van de Meent D, Ragas AMJ, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Reijnders L (2000) Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessmentPart I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES–LCA. Chemosphere 41(4):541–573CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life-cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life-cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006b) ISO 14025: environmental labelling and declarations—type III environmental declarations—principles and procedure. International Organisation for Standardisation ISO (2006b) ISO 14025: environmental labelling and declarations—type III environmental declarations—principles and procedure. International Organisation for Standardisation
Zurück zum Zitat Klöpffer W (2005) Life cycle assessment in the mirror of Int J LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(6):379–380CrossRef Klöpffer W (2005) Life cycle assessment in the mirror of Int J LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(6):379–380CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lundin M, Morrison GM (2002) A life cycle assessment based procedures for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water 4:145–152CrossRef Lundin M, Morrison GM (2002) A life cycle assessment based procedures for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water 4:145–152CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalf & Eddy Inc. (1991) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, reuse. 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill International Metcalf & Eddy Inc. (1991) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, reuse. 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill International
Zurück zum Zitat Nyland CA, Modahl IS, Raadal HL, Hanssen OJ (2003) Application of LCA as a decision-making tool for waste management systems: material flow modelling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):331–336 Nyland CA, Modahl IS, Raadal HL, Hanssen OJ (2003) Application of LCA as a decision-making tool for waste management systems: material flow modelling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):331–336
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiza M, Raluya RG, Serra L (2007) Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town. Desalination 204(1–3):121–131CrossRef Ortiza M, Raluya RG, Serra L (2007) Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town. Desalination 204(1–3):121–131CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmincke E, Grahl B (2006) Umwelteigenschaften von Produkten. Die Rolle der Ökobilanz in ISO Typ III Umweltdeklarationen. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 18(3):185–192CrossRef Schmincke E, Grahl B (2006) Umwelteigenschaften von Produkten. Die Rolle der Ökobilanz in ISO Typ III Umweltdeklarationen. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 18(3):185–192CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suh Y-J, Rousseaux P (2002) An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios. Resour Conserv Recy 35(3):191–200CrossRef Suh Y-J, Rousseaux P (2002) An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios. Resour Conserv Recy 35(3):191–200CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tawfic AM (2007) Life cycle assessment, a decision-making tool in wastewater treatment facilities. In: “Wastewater reuse—risk assessment, decision-making and environmental security”. Springer, Netherlands Tawfic AM (2007) Life cycle assessment, a decision-making tool in wastewater treatment facilities. In: “Wastewater reuse—risk assessment, decision-making and environmental security”. Springer, Netherlands
Zurück zum Zitat Tsagarakis KP, Mara DD, Angelakis AN (2003) Application of cost criteria for selection of municipal wastewater treatment systems. Water Air Soil Poll 142(1–4):187–210CrossRef Tsagarakis KP, Mara DD, Angelakis AN (2003) Application of cost criteria for selection of municipal wastewater treatment systems. Water Air Soil Poll 142(1–4):187–210CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development of PCR for WWTP based on a case study
verfasst von
Adriana Del Borghi
Pier Luigi Gaggero
Michela Gallo
Carlo Strazza
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0023-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe

PANEL-BASED DECISION MAKING • METHODOLOGY

Applying voting rules to panel-based decision making in LCA