nach oben

Erschienen in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

11. Development of Sustainability Reporting Frameworks: The Case of Australia

verfasst von : Nigel Finch

Erschienen in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to explore the literature regarding sustainability and extended reporting frameworks, to catalogue various typologies of reporting frameworks, to investigate the motivation by organisations to adopt such frameworks, and to identify the extent of their use in Australia.

We start by defining corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability and provide a brief overview of the historical development of the concepts of sustainability. Central to this is understanding stakeholders and their importance as a motivator for organisations to adopt sustainability reporting frameworks.

We find that traditional accounting frameworks are an inadequate reflection of a business as they focus solely on economic performance. We outline the background to the development of alternative reporting frameworks proposed in sustainability academic literature that encompass both economic and social performance. We identify and catalogue 11 reporting and social accounting guidelines, and focus on the development of one particular framework, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). We conclude that such guidelines provide for a more complete picture of total business welfare.

We find the main motivating factor for adopting sustainability disclosure frameworks is to communicate with company stakeholders the performance of management in achieving long-run corporate benefits, such as improved financial performance, increased competitive advantage, profit maximisation, and the long-term success of the firm.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel CSR Reporting Seen from an Ethical Perspective: An Empirical Investigation

Nächstes Kapitel An Evaluation Framework for CSR Reporting

Adams, C., & McNicholas, P. (2007). Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 382–402.CrossRef

Anderson, J. W. (1989). Corporate social responsibility. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

Arlow, P., & Gannon, M. J. (1982). Social responsiveness, corporate structure and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 235–241.

Bedford, N. M. (1965). Income determination theory: An accounting framework. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Bros.

Brown, H., Jong, M., & Levy, D. (2009a). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 571–580.CrossRef

Brown, H., Jong, M., & Lessidrenska, T. (2009b). The rise of the global reporting initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18, 182–200.CrossRef

Carroll, A. (1979). A three dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 99–120.

Caswell, T. (2004). Sustainability: A vital agenda or 21st century good governance. Journal of Charted Secretaries Australia, 56(2), 85–90.

Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

Committee for Economic Development (CED). (1971). Social responsibilities of business corporations. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

Daub, C. (2007). Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: An alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 75–85.CrossRef

Deegan, C. (1999). Implementing triple bottom line performance and reporting mechanisms. Charter, 70, 40–42.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 4, 65–91.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

Estes, R. (1976). Corporate social accounting. New York: Wiley.

Fowler, G. (2002). Sustainability reporting – a global framework. Company Director, Nov, Sydney.

Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Freidman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, 13 Sept, pp. 122–126.

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gelb, D. S., & Strawser, J. A. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosures: An alternative explanation for increased disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(33), 1–13.CrossRef

Global Reporting Initiative. (2014). Sustainability disclosure database. http://database.globalreporting.org/. Accessed Mar 2014.

Goodpaster, K. E. (1998). The corporation and its stakeholders. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2009). Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report. Accounting Forum, 33(2), 89–98.CrossRef

Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1993). The Australian Public Sector in the 1990s: New accountability regimes in motion. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2(1), 57–79.

Guthrie, J., & Yongvanich, K. (2006). An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 309–321.CrossRef

ICAEW. (2004). Sustainability: The role of accountants. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales.

ICAEW. (2010). New reporting models for business. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales.

Jones, T., & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206–221.

Mays, S. (2003). Corporate sustainability – an investor perspective; The Mays report. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Heritage.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 1(26), 117–127.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(15), 321–357.CrossRef

Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 296–308.CrossRef

Pigou, A. C. (1938). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan and Co.

Preston, L. (1978). Research in corporate social performance and policy. Greenwich: JAI Press.

RepuTex. (2003). RepuTex social responsibility ratings. Melbourne: Reputation Measurement.

Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.CrossRef

Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4–8.

Tilt, C. A. (2010). Corporate responsibility, accounting and accountants. In S. O. Idowu & W. Leal Filho (Eds.), Professionals’ perspectives of corporate social responsibility (pp. 11–32). Heidelberg: Springer.

Vos, J. F. (2003). Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10, 141–152.CrossRef

Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance – financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRef

Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–719.

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Geneva: Oxford University Press.

Titel: Development of Sustainability Reporting Frameworks: The Case of Australia
verfasst von: Nigel Finch
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10908-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-10909-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10909-1_11