Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Topics in Catalysis
Erschienen in: Topics in Catalysis 7-8/2018

30.04.2018 | Original Paper

Difference and Significance of Regenerative Versus Renewable Carbon Fuels and Products

verfasst von: George A. Olah, Thomas Mathew, Alain Goeppert, G. K. Surya Prakash

Erschienen in: Topics in Catalysis | Ausgabe 7-8/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents the concept of regenerative versus renewable carbon fuels and materials on which Professor George A. Olah was actively working on at the time of his unfortunate passing away in 2017. As fossil fuels become depleted or their use constrained by undesirable carbon emissions, more sustainable pathways to fulfill our needs for carbon-based fuels and products will be required. Renewable carbon materials can be produced from biomass while regenerative carbon materials will be obtained by reductive recycling of CO2, constituting an anthropogenic equivalent to nature’s photosynthesis-based carbon cycle. At the heart of this transition is chemistry and catalysis. Development of new catalysts and improvement of existing ones are essential for these transformations. Methanol, an established fuel and chemical feedstock, which can be made from biomass and recycling of CO2, and therefore be both renewable and regenerative is of particular interest for the transitioning to a sustainable future.
Vorheriger Artikel Preface
Nächster Artikel The Methanol Economy: Methane and Carbon Dioxide Conversion

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Chen NY (2001) Chem Innov 31(1):14–20
2.
3.
4.
Jos GJO, Greet J-M, Marilena M, Peters JAHW (2016) Trends in global CO2 emissions: 2016 report. PBL Publishers, The Hague
5.
6.
Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ (2017) Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge
7.
8.
International Energy Agency, IEA (2016) Renewables information 2016. International Energy Agency (IEA), OECD, Paris
9.
10.
International Energy Agency, IEA (2016) Key world energy statistics 2016. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris
11.
Leung DYC, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer MM (2014) Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:426–443CrossRef
12.
D’Alessandro DM, Smit B, Long JR (2010) Angew Chem Int Ed 49:6058–6082CrossRef
13.
14.
Malpani S, Joseph E (2015) Int J Appl Res 1:532
15.
16.
Dibenedetto A, Angelini A, Stufano PJ (2014) Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:334CrossRef
17.
Das Neves Gomes C, Jacquet O, Villiers C, Thuéry P, Ephritikhine M, Cantat T (2012) Angew Chem Int Ed 51:187CrossRef
18.
19.
Aresta M, Dibenedetto A (2007) Dalton Trans 2975
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Olah GA, Goeppert A, Czaun M, Mathew T, May RB, Prakash GKS (2015) J Am Chem Soc 137(27):8720–8729CrossRefPubMed
26.
Olah GA, Mathew T (2015) Chapters 13–15. In: A life of magic chemistry: autobiographical reflections including post-nobel prize years and the methanol economy, 2nd updated edition. Wiley, New York
27.
Kothandaraman J, Goeppert A, Czaun M, Olah GA, Prakash GKS (2016) J Am Chem Soc 138:778–781CrossRefPubMed
28.
Kothandaraman J, Goeppert A, Czaun M, Prakash GKS, Olah GA (2016) Green Chem 18:5831CrossRef
29.
Markewitz P, Kuckshinrichs W, Leitner W, Linssen J, Zapp P, Bongartz R, Schreiber A, Muller TE (2012) Energy Environ Sci 5(6):7281–7305CrossRef
30.
Pires JCM, Martins FG, Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Simões M (2011) Chem Eng Res Des 89(9):1446–1460CrossRef
31.
Boot-Handford ME, Abanades JC, Anthony EJ, Blunt MJ, Brandani S, Mac Dowell N, Fernandez JR, Ferrari M-C, Gross R, Hallett JP, Haszeldine RS, Heptonstall P, Lyngfelt A, Makuch Z, Mangano E, Porter RTJ, Pourkashanian M, Rochelle GT, Shah N, Yao JG, Fennell PS (2014) Energy Environ Sci 7(1):130–189CrossRef
39.
33.
Olah GA, Goeppert A, Meth S, Prakash GKS (2010) Nano-structure supported solid regenerative polyamine and polyamine polyol absorbents for the separation of carbon dioxide from gas mixtures including the air. US Patent 7 795 175
34.
Goeppert A, Meth S, Prakash GKS, Olah GA (2010) Energy Environ Sci 3:1949–1960CrossRef
35.
Meth S, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS, Olah GA (2012) Energy Fuel 26(5):3082–3090CrossRef
36.
Goeppert A, Czaun M, May RB, Prakash GKS, Olah GA, Narayanan SR (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:20164–20167CrossRefPubMed
37.
Czaun M, Goeppert A, May RB, Peltier D, Zhang H, Prakash GKS, Olah GA (2013) J CO2 Util 1(1):1–7CrossRef
38.
Goeppert A, Zhang H, Czaun M, May RB, Prakash GKS, Olah GA, Narayanan SR (2014) ChemSusChem 7(5):1386–1397CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zhang H, Goeppert A, Olah GA, Prakash GKS (2017) J CO2 Util 19:91–99CrossRef
40.
Zhang H, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS, Olah G (2015) RSC Adv 5(65):52550–52562CrossRef
41.
Zhang H, Goeppert A, Czaun M, Prakash GKS, Olah GA (2014) RSC Adv 4(37):19403–19417CrossRef
42.
Goeppert A, Zhang H, Olah GA, Prakash GKS (2016) Regenerative adsorbents of modified amines on solid supports. US Patent App. US20160199810A1
43.
Goeppert A, Zhang H, Prakash GKS, Olah GA (2017) Regenerative adsorbents of modified amines on nano-structured supports. US Patent App. US20170304764A1
44.
45.
Trumper K, Bertzky M, Dickson B, van der Heijden G, Jenkins M, Manning P (2009) The natural fix? The role of ecosystems in climate mitigation. A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Program. UNEPWCMC, Cambridge
46.
47.
Styring P, Jansen D, de Coninck H, Reith H, Armstrong K (2011) Carbon capture and utilization in the green economy. Report No. 501. Centre for Low Carbon Futures, UK
48.
49.
Stevens P (2012) The ‘shale gas revolution’: developments and changes. Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House, London
50.
Burnham A, Han J, Clark CE, Wang M, Dunn JB, Palou-Rivera I (2012) Environ Sci Technol 46:619CrossRefPubMed
51.
52.
53.
54.
Ishida TA, Oyagi K, Niwa T, Chen Y, Murata S, Chen Q (2012) Geophys Res Lett 39:L16309CrossRef
55.
56.
Olah GA, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS (2009) Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRef
57.
58.
Olah GA, Prakash GKS, Mathew T (2015) Across conventional lines: selected papers of George A. Olah. The sixth decade and the methanol economy, vol 3. World Scientific, Singapore
59.
Bertau M, Offermanns H, Plass L, Schmidt F, Wernicke H-J (eds) (2014) Methanol: the basic chemical and energy feedstock of the future: Asinger’s vision today. Springer, Berlin
60.
Asinger F (1987) Methanol, Chemie- und Energierohstoff. Die Mobilisation der Kohle. Springer, Heidelberg
61.
Hansen JB, Højlund Nielsen PE (2008) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim
62.
Studt F, Sharafutdinov I, Abild-Pedersen F, Elkjaer CF, Hummelshøj JS, Dahl S, Chorkendorff I, Nørskov JK (2014) Nat Chem 6:320–324CrossRefPubMed
63.
64.
Specht M, Bandi A (1995) Forshungsverbund Sonnenenergie, Themen 1994–1995, Energiespeicherung, p 41
65.
Specht M, Bandi A (1999) “The Methanol Cycle”—sustainable supply of liquid fuels. Center for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research (ZSW), Stuttgart
66.
Pasel J, Peters R, Specht M (2000) Forshungsverbund Sonnenenergie, Themen 1999–2000: Zukunftstechnologie Brennstoffzelle. Berlin, p 46
67.
Perry JH, Perry CP (1990) Methanol, bridge to a renewable energy future. University Press of America, Lanham
68.
69.
Biedermann P, Grube T, Höhlein B (eds) (2006) Methanol as an energy carrier. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany
70.
71.
72.
73.
Cheng W-H, Kung HH (eds) (1994) Methanol production and use. Marcel Dekker, New York
74.
75.
Ushikoshi K, Moria K, Watanabe T, Takeuchi M, Saito M (1998) Stud Surf Sci Catal 114:357–362CrossRef
76.
Kar S, Kothandaraman J, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS (2018) J CO2 Util 23:212–218CrossRef
77.
Sordakis K, Tang C, Vogt LK, Junge H, Dyson PJ, Beller M, Laurenczy G (2018) Chem Rev 118(2):372–433CrossRefPubMed
78.
Czaun M, Kothandaraman J, Goeppert A, Yang B, Greenberg S, May RB, Olah GA, Prakash GKS (2016) ACS Catal 6(11):7475–7484CrossRef
79.
Kothandaraman J, Czaun M, Goeppert A, Haiges R, Jones J-P, May RB, Prakash GKS, Olah GA (2015) ChemSusChem 8(8):1442–1451CrossRefPubMed
80.
Goeppert A, Olah GA, Surya Prakash GK (2018) Green chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 919–962
81.
Smolowe J (1986) Time Magazine (September 8)
82.
83.
Olah GA, Prakash GKS, Goeppert A, Czaun M, Mathew T (2013) J Am Chem Soc 135(27):10030–10031CrossRefPubMed
84.
Lee S (1990) Methanol synthesis technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Metadaten
Titel
Difference and Significance of Regenerative Versus Renewable Carbon Fuels and Products
verfasst von
George A. Olah
Thomas Mathew
Alain Goeppert
G. K. Surya Prakash
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Topics in Catalysis / Ausgabe 7-8/2018
Print ISSN: 1022-5528
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9028
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-018-0964-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7-8/2018

Topics in Catalysis 7-8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

A Stable and Electrocatalytic Iron Electrode for Oxygen Evolution in Alkaline Water Electrolysis

Original Paper

Quantification of the Michael-Acceptor Reactivity of α,β-Unsaturated Acyl Azolium Ions

Original Paper

A Review on the Recent Advances in the Reductions of Carbon–Carbon/Oxygen Multiple Bonds Including Aromatic Rings Using Raney Ni–Al Alloy or Al Powder in the Presence of Noble Metal Catalysts in Water

Original Paper

Toward Asymmetric Synthesis of Pentaorganosilicates

Original Paper

N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Catalyzed Trifluoromethylation of Aromatic N-Tosylaldimines

Original Paper

α-Thio Carbocations (Thionium Ions) as Intermediates in Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Reactions of Enone-Derived 1,3-Dithianes and 1,3-Dithiolanes

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise