Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2020

05.11.2019 | SOCIETAL LCA

Different paths in social life cycle impact assessment (S-LCIA)—a classification of type II impact pathway approaches

verfasst von: Solène Sureau, Sabrina Neugebauer, Wouter M. J. Achten

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

In social life cycle assessment (S-LCA), we can distinguish two main types of impact assessment (LCIA): type I can be seen as a reporting approach with the use of performance reference points and type II aims at including cause-effect chains or impact pathways in the analysis. Given the heterogeneity of those type II approaches, this review provides a classification of existing type II approaches.

Methods

We reviewed a total of 28 articles against the background of their main purpose, the method used, the issues covered and the origin of data (observation/characterization/ measurement). We checked the articles against (i) the reflection of an impact pathway, (ii) the availability of so-called inventory and impact indicators, and (iii) the presence of characterization models or factors translating correlations or causality.

Results and discussion

The analysis reveals three main paths to include impact pathways in S-LCA, which differ in authors’ intentions: (1) some studies identify and propose variables composing impact pathways, or frameworks gathering several pathways; (2) other studies investigate or test known pathways empirically, and until now seek mainly to link income data with health impacts at a macro scale, and (3) a last batch applies known and already quantified characterization models or factors from other research works in case studies. Until now, these case studies focus mainly on income-related social effects or on health impacts. Further, each path is further characterized and classified under nine approaches. Our findings highlight not only the heterogeneous nature of approaches, but also their common denominator which is to not consider phenomena or impacts in isolation but to consider them in relation to their sources or further impacts. It should be noted that type II studies are not only limited to quantitative approaches and variables, but can also use more qualitative variables and methods.

Conclusions

The presented classification may be used as a guidance tool for authors to make their methodological choices. Also, our findings indicate the opportunity of extending future type II S-LCA research to variables tackled in type I studies (e.g., safe and fair employment and working conditions), beyond pathways including incomes and health impacts. This can be done by using theories from social sciences for the identification of impact pathways. Those could then further be investigated through statistical approaches or in the framework of S-LCA case studies, with specific data and potentially more qualitative methods to analyze causality or social mechanisms.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
In type I studies, referring to characterization is not correct since there is no characterization per se (as in E-LCA), but rather a referencing with performance reference points/a reference scale (i.e., generally a translation from qualitative to semi-quantitative variables).
 
2
These three paths (identification of variables, testing, and applications) are not to be understood as subsequent steps, but rather as a way to highlight the authors’ intentions within their studies. However, the studies relating to the different paths may benefit from each other and one may be used as the basis for further studies.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arvidsson R, Baumann H, Hildenbrand J (2014) On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:161–173CrossRef Arvidsson R, Baumann H, Hildenbrand J (2014) On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:161–173CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arvidsson R, Hildenbrand J, Baumann H, Islam KMN, Parsmo R (2018) A method for human health impact assessment in social LCA: lessons from three case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:690–699CrossRef Arvidsson R, Hildenbrand J, Baumann H, Islam KMN, Parsmo R (2018) A method for human health impact assessment in social LCA: lessons from three case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:690–699CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the Production of an Airbag Injure more People than the Airbag Saves in Traffic? J Ind Ecol 17:517–527CrossRef Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the Production of an Airbag Injure more People than the Airbag Saves in Traffic? J Ind Ecol 17:517–527CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Behaghel L (2006) Lire l’économétrie, Collection Repères. Economie ; 460. La Découverte, Paris Behaghel L (2006) Lire l’économétrie, Collection Repères. Economie ; 460. La Découverte, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît C, Mazijn B (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC, Paris Benoît C, Mazijn B (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Bocoum I, Macombe C, Revéret J-P (2015) Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:405–417CrossRef Bocoum I, Macombe C, Revéret J-P (2015) Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:405–417CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bonacina De Auraujo J, Ugaya CML (2018) Development of S-LCIA models: a review of multivariate data analysis methods, in: Pre-Proceedings, Fruitrop Thema. Presented at the 6th Social LCA conference - People and places for partnerships, CIRAD, Pescara, Italy Bonacina De Auraujo J, Ugaya CML (2018) Development of S-LCIA models: a review of multivariate data analysis methods, in: Pre-Proceedings, Fruitrop Thema. Presented at the 6th Social LCA conference - People and places for partnerships, CIRAD, Pescara, Italy
Zurück zum Zitat Brent A, Labuschagne C (2006) Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15CrossRef Brent A, Labuschagne C (2006) Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2014) ‘Socializing’ sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17:579–596CrossRef Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2014) ‘Socializing’ sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17:579–596CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Di Cesare S (2016) Farmworkers’ pesticides exposition assessment: the Wesseling pathway Di Cesare S (2016) Farmworkers’ pesticides exposition assessment: the Wesseling pathway
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2005) A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assessment 11:88–97.CrossRef Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2005) A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assessment 11:88–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feschet P (2014) Analyse du Cycle de Vie Sociale. Pour un nouveau cadre conceptuel et théorique. Université de Montpellier 1, Montpellier Feschet P (2014) Analyse du Cycle de Vie Sociale. Pour un nouveau cadre conceptuel et théorique. Université de Montpellier 1, Montpellier
Zurück zum Zitat Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M, Loeillet D, Saez AR, Benhmad F (2012) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503CrossRef Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M, Loeillet D, Saez AR, Benhmad F (2012) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gorton WA (2019) The Philosophy of Social Science. Internet Encycl Philos Gorton WA (2019) The Philosophy of Social Science. Internet Encycl Philos
Zurück zum Zitat Grubert E (2018) Rigor in social life cycle assessment: improving the scientific grounding of SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:481–491CrossRef Grubert E (2018) Rigor in social life cycle assessment: improving the scientific grounding of SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:481–491CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hofstetter P, Norris GA (2003) Why and how should we assess occupational health impacts in integrated product policy? Environ Sci Technol 37:2025–2035CrossRef Hofstetter P, Norris GA (2003) Why and how should we assess occupational health impacts in integrated product policy? Environ Sci Technol 37:2025–2035CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang L, Ernstoff A, Fantke P, Csiszar SA, Jolliet O (2017) A review of models for near-field exposure pathways of chemicals in consumer products. Sci Total Environ 574:1182–1208CrossRef Huang L, Ernstoff A, Fantke P, Csiszar SA, Jolliet O (2017) A review of models for near-field exposure pathways of chemicals in consumer products. Sci Total Environ 574:1182–1208CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA Methodology and Case Study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382CrossRef Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA Methodology and Case Study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod Sustain Supply Chain Manage 16:1688–1698 Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod Sustain Supply Chain Manage 16:1688–1698
Zurück zum Zitat Iofrida N, Luca AID, Strano A, Gulisano G (2018) Can social research paradigms justify the diversity of approaches to social life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:464–480CrossRef Iofrida N, Luca AID, Strano A, Gulisano G (2018) Can social research paradigms justify the diversity of approaches to social life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:464–480CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iofrida N, De Luca AI, Silveri F, Falcone G, Stillitano T, Gulisano G, Strano A (2019) Psychosocial risk factors’ impact pathway for social life cycle assessment: an application to citrus life cycles in South Italy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:767–780CrossRef Iofrida N, De Luca AI, Silveri F, Falcone G, Stillitano T, Gulisano G, Strano A (2019) Psychosocial risk factors’ impact pathway for social life cycle assessment: an application to citrus life cycles in South Italy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:767–780CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2009) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRef Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2009) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Jørgensen MS, Finkbeiner M, Hauschild MZ (2010) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:376–384CrossRef Jørgensen A, Jørgensen MS, Finkbeiner M, Hauschild MZ (2010) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:376–384CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knight CR, Winship C (2013) The causal implications of mechanistic thinking: identification using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). In: Morgan SL (ed) Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_14 CrossRef Knight CR, Winship C (2013) The causal implications of mechanistic thinking: identification using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). In: Morgan SL (ed) Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 275–299. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-94-007-6094-3_​14 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde V, Macombe C (2012) Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 18:172–184CrossRef Lagarde V, Macombe C (2012) Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 18:172–184CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macombe C (2013) How can one predict social effects and impacts?, in: Social LCAs - Socio-Economic Effects in Value Chains, Fruitrop Thema. CIRAD/IRSTEA Macombe C (2013) How can one predict social effects and impacts?, in: Social LCAs - Socio-Economic Effects in Value Chains, Fruitrop Thema. CIRAD/IRSTEA
Zurück zum Zitat Menikpura SNM, Gheewala SH, Bonnet S (2012) Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management systems with an application to a case study in Thailand. Waste Manag Res 30:708–719CrossRef Menikpura SNM, Gheewala SH, Bonnet S (2012) Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management systems with an application to a case study in Thailand. Waste Manag Res 30:708–719CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moriizumi Y, Matsui N, Hondo H (2010) Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18(16-17):1629–1638CrossRef Moriizumi Y, Matsui N, Hondo H (2010) Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18(16-17):1629–1638CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J, Sensenig R, Miyingo E, Makanda JV, Hakimian A, Eckelman MJ (2015) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod 96:569–579CrossRef Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J, Sensenig R, Miyingo E, Makanda JV, Hakimian A, Eckelman MJ (2015) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod 96:569–579CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neugebauer S (2016) Enhancing life cycle sustainability assessment tiered approach and new characterization models for social life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Technischen Universität Berlin, Berlin Neugebauer S (2016) Enhancing life cycle sustainability assessment tiered approach and new characterization models for social life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Technischen Universität Berlin, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Neugebauer S, Traverso M, Scheumann R, Chang Y-J, Wolf K, Finkbeiner M (2014) Impact pathways to address social well-being and social justice in SLCA—fair wage and level of education. Sustainability 6:4839–4857CrossRef Neugebauer S, Traverso M, Scheumann R, Chang Y-J, Wolf K, Finkbeiner M (2014) Impact pathways to address social well-being and social justice in SLCA—fair wage and level of education. Sustainability 6:4839–4857CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neugebauer S, Emara Y, Hellerström C, Finkbeiner M (2017) Calculation of fair wage potentials along products’ life cycle – Introduction of a new midpoint impact category for social life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 143:1221–1232CrossRef Neugebauer S, Emara Y, Hellerström C, Finkbeiner M (2017) Calculation of fair wage potentials along products’ life cycle – Introduction of a new midpoint impact category for social life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 143:1221–1232CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles—towards life cycle Attribute Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104CrossRef Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles—towards life cycle Attribute Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russo Garrido S, Parent J, Beaulieu L, Revéret J-P (2018) A literature review of type I SLCA—making the logic underlying methodological choices explicit. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:432–444CrossRef Russo Garrido S, Parent J, Beaulieu L, Revéret J-P (2018) A literature review of type I SLCA—making the logic underlying methodological choices explicit. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:432–444CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silveri F (2016) Anticipating psychosocial factors effects in the agri-food sector: the Siegrist’s pathway Silveri F (2016) Anticipating psychosocial factors effects in the agri-food sector: the Siegrist’s pathway
Zurück zum Zitat Sureau S, Achten WMJ (2018) Including governance and economic aspects to assess and explain social impacts: a methodological proposal for S-LCA, in: Pre-Proceedings, Fruitrop Thema. Presented at the 6th Social LCA conference - People and places for partnerships, Pescara, Italy Sureau S, Achten WMJ (2018) Including governance and economic aspects to assess and explain social impacts: a methodological proposal for S-LCA, in: Pre-Proceedings, Fruitrop Thema. Presented at the 6th Social LCA conference - People and places for partnerships, Pescara, Italy
Zurück zum Zitat Sureau S, Mazijn B, Garrido SR, Achten WMJ (2018) Social life-cycle assessment frameworks: a review of criteria and indicators proposed to assess social and socioeconomic impacts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:904–920CrossRef Sureau S, Mazijn B, Garrido SR, Achten WMJ (2018) Social life-cycle assessment frameworks: a review of criteria and indicators proposed to assess social and socioeconomic impacts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:904–920CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Touceda MI, Neila FJ, Degrez M (2018) Modeling socioeconomic pathways to assess sustainability: a tailored development for housing retrofit. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:710–725CrossRef Touceda MI, Neila FJ, Degrez M (2018) Modeling socioeconomic pathways to assess sustainability: a tailored development for housing retrofit. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:710–725CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weidema BP (2006) The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:89–96CrossRef Weidema BP (2006) The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:89–96CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weidema BP (2018a) Towards a taxonomy for social impact pathway indicators, in: Pre-Proceedings, Fruitrop Thema. Presented at the 6th Social LCA conference—People and places for partnerships, CIRAD, Pescara, Italy Weidema BP (2018a) Towards a taxonomy for social impact pathway indicators, in: Pre-Proceedings, Fruitrop Thema. Presented at the 6th Social LCA conference—People and places for partnerships, CIRAD, Pescara, Italy
Zurück zum Zitat Weidema BP (2018b) The social footprint—a practical approach to comprehensive and consistent social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:700–709CrossRef Weidema BP (2018b) The social footprint—a practical approach to comprehensive and consistent social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:700–709CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226CrossRef Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu SR, Chen J, Apul D, Fan P, Yan Y, Fan Y, Zhou P (2015) Causality in social life cycle impact assessment (SLCIA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1312–1323CrossRef Wu SR, Chen J, Apul D, Fan P, Yan Y, Fan Y, Zhou P (2015) Causality in social life cycle impact assessment (SLCIA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1312–1323CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Different paths in social life cycle impact assessment (S-LCIA)—a classification of type II impact pathway approaches
verfasst von
Solène Sureau
Sabrina Neugebauer
Wouter M. J. Achten
Publikationsdatum
05.11.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01693-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe