Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3/2017

19.04.2017

Digital Infrastructure for the Humanities in Europe and the US: Governing Scholarship through Coordinated Tool Development

verfasst von: Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner

Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, I provide a comparative perspective on current digital infrastructure policies for the humanities in Europe and the US. Thereby I mean to move beyond analyzing the shaping of technology within individual infrastructure projects and instead trace in a more encompassing way how dynamics at the institutional and policy level mediate the reorganization of disciplinary tool development. Drawing conceptual inspiration from the work of Sheila Jasanoff, I propose that digital infrastructure actually functions as a regulatory technology, i.e. as an interface through which the different actor groups (researchers, funders, policy makers) rearticulate their mutual relations. European initiatives, I argue, are based on a more centralizing, technology-driven vision of digital infrastructure that serves the European Commission’s policy goal of integrating national research systems in institutional and epistemic terms. This causes a certain disconnect between tool developers and prospective scholarly users who are often unfamiliar with digital approaches, but the emphasis on central coordination also ensures that no single community gains exclusive control over technology development. In the US, by contrast, the original impetus to adopt a concerted strategy for digital infrastructure has not been provided by science policy makers and administrators, but by researchers in the area of digital humanities. These scholars have successfully promoted a sociotechnical view of infrastructure as an emergent, evolutionary phenomenon, which also implies that conceptual and managerial authority should be situated at well-established digital humanities centers. While avoiding problems related to the implementation of technology in more traditional scholarly practices, this arrangement will tend to privilege the intellectual and technological preferences of existing elites within digital humanities over those of other research communities.
Nächster Artikel From Episodes to Continuity of Care: a Study of a Call Center for Supporting Independent Living

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
In my usage, the term ‘infrastructure’ denotes purposefully coordinated assemblages of tools and the actors who maintain them. By ‘tools’ and ‘instruments’ – which I use interchangeably – I thus refer to constituent elements of a larger infrastructure.
 
2
Following the European incentive, many countries have since started to develop their own national roadmaps, which are typically closely aligned with the shared European perspective (ESFRI 2011).
 
3
This is a well-known problem in the development of large-scale information systems, see for example Finholt and Birnholtz (2006) as well as Livari et al. (2010).
 
4
For a formal critique along those lines, see Piersma and Ribbens (2013).
 
5
Skype interview with Mirjam Blümm (8 May 2014).
 
6
Skype interview with Tobias Blanke, 7 May 2014.
 
7
Skype interviews with Tobias Blanke (7 May 2014) and Christof Schöch (22 May 2014); personal interview with Joris van Zundert (8 April 2014, The Hague).
 
8
Skype interviews with Steven Krauwer (15 May 2014), Laurents Sesink (21 May 2014), and Jan Odijk (4 June 2014).
 
Literatur
Anderson, Sheila; Tobias Blanke; and Stuart Dunn (2010). Methodological Commons: Arts and Humanities e-Science Fundamentals. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 368, no. 1925, pp. 3779–3796.
Atkins, Daniel E; Kelvin K. Droegemeier; Stuart I. Feldman; Hector Garcia-Molina; Michael L. Klein et al. (2003). Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation blue–ribbon advisory panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Washington, D.C.: NSF. http://​www.​nsf.​gov/​cise/​sci/​reports/​atkins.​pdf. Accessed 12 September 2008.
Barjak, Franz; Julia Lane; Zack Kertcher; Meik Poschen; Rob Procter; and Simon Robinson (2009). Case Studies of e-Infrastructure Adoption. Social Science Computer Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 583–600.
Barjak, Franz; Kathryn Eccles; Eric T. Meyer; Ralph Schroeder; and Simon Robinson (2013). The Emerging Governance of E-Infrastructure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–24.
Becher, Tony; and Paul R. Trowler (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Borgman, Christine L (2007). Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Borgman, Christine L (2015). Big Data, Little Data, No Data. Scholarship in the Networked World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bos, Nathan; Ann Zimmerman; Judith Olson; Jude Yew; Jason Yerkie; and Erik Dahl (2007). From Shared Databases to Communities of practice: A Taxonomy of Collaboratories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 318–338.
Breschi, Stefano; and Lucia Cusmano (2004). Unveiling the Texture of a European Research Area: Emergence of Oligarchic Networks Under EU Framework Programmes. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 747–772.
Busa, Roberto (1980). The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus. Computers and the Humanities, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 83–90.
Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clarke, Adele (2005). Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Harry M. Collins (1985). Changing Order. Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, Ellen; Monica E. Bulger; and Eric T. Meyer (2012). Discipline Matters: Technology Use in the Humanities. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 1–2, pp. 76–92.
de la Flor, Grace; Marina Jirotka; Paul Luff; John Pybus; and Ruth Kirkham (2010). Transforming Scholarly Practice: Embedding Technological Interventions to Support the Collaborative Analysis of Ancient Texts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 309–334.
Dombrowski, Quinn (2014). What Ever Happened to Project Bamboo? Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 326–339.
Dutton, William H.; and Paul W. Jeffreys (eds) (2010). World Wide Research. Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Edwards, Paul N.; Steven J. Jackson; Geoffrey C. Bowker; and Cory P. Knobel (2007). Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design. NSF Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures”. http://​hdl.​handle.​net/​2027.​42/​49353. Accessed 14 July 2014.
Edwards, Paul N.; Geoffrey C. Bowker; Steven J. Jackson; and Robin Williams (2009). Introduction: An Agenda for Infrastructure Studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 364–374.
Finholt, Thomas A.; and Jeremy P. Birnholtz (2006). If we build it, will they come? The cultural challenges of cyberinfrastructure development. In W. S. Bainbridge and M.C. Roco (eds): Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society. New York: Springer, pp. 89–101.
Fry, Jenny; and Sanna Talja (2007). The Intellectual and Social Organization of Academic Fields and the Shaping of Digital Resources. Journal of Information Science, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 115–133.
Funtowicz, Silvio; and Jerome J. Ravetz (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 735–755.
Galison, Peter (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gavin, Michael; and Kathleen M. Smith (2012). An interview with Brett Bobley. In M. K. Gold (ed): Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 61–66.
Gieryn, Thomas F (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 781–795.
Hine, Christine (2008). Systematics as Cyberscience: Computers, Change and Continuity in science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jackson, Steven J.; Stephanie B. Steinhardt; and Ayse Buyuktur (2013). Why CSCW needs science policy (and vice versa). In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, February 23–27. San Antonio, Texas: ACM, pp. 1113–1124.
Jankowski, Nicholas W (2007). Exploring e-Science: An Introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 542–569.
Jankowski, Nicholas W. (ed) (2009). E-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice. London: Routledge.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1987). Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science. Social Studies of Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 195–230.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2007). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Karasti, Helena; Karen S. Baker; and Eija Halkola (2006). Enriching the notion of data curation in e-Science: Data managing and information infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) network. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 321–358.
Karasti, Helena; Karen S. Baker; and Florence Millerand (2010). Infrastructure Time: Long-term Matters in Collaborative Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 377–415.
Kee, Kerk F.; and Browning, Larry D (2010). The Dialectical Tensions in the Funding Infrastructure of Cyberinfrastructure. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 283–308.
Kirschenbaum, Matthew G (2010). What Is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments? ADE Bulletin, vol. 150, pp. 55–61.
Kirschenbaum, Matthew G (2012). Digital Humanities As/Is a Tactical Term. In M. K. Gold (ed): Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 415–428.
Kok, Jan; and Paul Wouters (2013). Virtual Knowledge in Family History: Visionary Technologies, Research Dreams, and Research Agendas. In S. Wyatt; A. Scharnhorst; A. Beaulieu; and P. Wouters (eds): Virtual Knowledge: Experimenting in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 219–250.
Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Livari, Juhani; Hannakaisa Isomäki; and Samuli Pekkola (2010). The user – the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Information Systems Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 109–117.
Meijer, Ingeborg; Jordi Molas-Gallart; and Pauline Mattsson (2012). Networked Research Infrastructures and their Governance: The Case of Biobanking. Science and Public Policy, vol. 39, no. 4, p. 491–499.
Meyer, Eric T.; and Ralph Schroeder (2015). Knowledge Machines. Digital Transformations of the Sciences and Humanities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Michel, Jean-Baptiste; Yuan Kui Shen; Aviva Presser Aiden; Adrian Veres; Matthew K. Gray et al. (2011). Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science, vol. 331, no. 6014, pp. 176–182.
Millett, Bella (2013). Whatever happened to electronic editing? In V. Gillespie; and A. Hudson (eds): Probable Truth: Editing Medieval Texts from Britain in the Twenty-First Century. Turnhout, BE: Brepols, pp. 39–54.
Moretti, Franco (2013). Distant Reading. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
Nowotny, Helga; Paul Scott; and Michael Gibbons (2001). Rethinking Science: Knowledge in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Olson, Gary M.; Ann Zimmerman; and Nathan Bos (eds) (2008). Scientific Collaboration On the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Piersma, Hienke; and Kees Ribbens (2013). Digital Historical Research Context, Concepts and the Need for Reflection. BMGN. Low Countries Historical Review, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 78–102.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1997). Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ribes, David; and Thomas A. Finholt (2009). The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating Tensions in Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 375–398.
Ribes, David, and Charlotte P. Lee (2010). Sociotechnical Studies of Cyberinfrastructure and e-Research: Current Themes and Future Trajectories. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 231–244.
Shrum, Wesley; Joel Genuth; and Ivan Chompalov (2007). Structures of Scientific Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Star, Suzan L.; and Karen Ruhleder (1996). Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 111–134.
Vonortas, Nicholas S (2009). Scale and Scope in Research. In H. Delanghe; U. Muldur; and L. Soete (eds) European Science and Technology Policy. Towards Integration or Fragmentation? pp. 142–159. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Whitley, Richard (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wisbey, Roy A (1962). Mechanization in Lexicography. The Times Literary Supplement, no. 30. Reprinted in: Freeing the Mind – Articles and Letters From the Times Literary Supplement, March–June 1962. London: The Times, pp. 15–18.
Wouters, Paul (2010). The agenda-setting role of e-research. In W. H. Dutton; and Paul W. Jeffreys (eds): World Wide Research: Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 272–276.
Wouters, Paul; and Anne Beaulieu (2006). Imagining E-Science Beyond Computation. In C. Hine (ed): New Infrastructure for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science. London: Information Science Publishing, pp. 48–70.
Wouters, Paul; Anne Beaulieu; Andrea Scharnhorst; and Sally Wyatt (eds) (2013). Virtual Knowledge: Experimenting in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wyatt, Sally; Andrea Scharnhorst; Anne Beaulieu; and Paul Wouters (2013). Introduction to Virtual Knowledge. In P. Wouters; A. Beaulieu; A. Scharnhorst; and S. Wyatt (eds): Virtual Knowledge: Experimenting in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1–23.
Metadaten
Titel
Digital Infrastructure for the Humanities in Europe and the US: Governing Scholarship through Coordinated Tool Development
verfasst von
Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner
Publikationsdatum
19.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0925-9724
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9272-2