nach oben

Quantum Information Processing

Erschienen in:

01.04.2021

Digital quantum simulation of non-equilibrium quantum many-body systems

verfasst von: Benedikt Fauseweh, Jian-Xin Zhu

Erschienen in: Quantum Information Processing | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Digital quantum simulation uses the capabilities of quantum computers to determine the dynamics of quantum systems, which are beyond the computability of modern classical computers. A notoriously challenging task in this field is the description of non-equilibrium dynamics in quantum many-body systems. Here, we use the IBM quantum computers to simulate the non-equilibrium dynamics of few spin and fermionic systems. Our results reveal that with a combination of error mitigation, noise extrapolation and optimized initial state preparation, one can tackle the most important drawbacks of modern quantum devices. The systems we simulate demonstrate the potential for large-scale quantum simulations of light–matter interactions in the near future.

Vorheriger Artikel Quantum summation using d-level entanglement swapping

Nächster Artikel Engineering distributed atomic NOON states via single-photon detection

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Fausti, D., Tobey, R.I., Dean, N., Kaiser, S., Dienst, A., Hoffmann, M.C., Pyon, S., Takayama, T., Takagi, H., Cavalleri, A.: Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe-ordered cuprate. Science 331(6014), 189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197294ADSCrossRef

Mitrano, M., Cantaluppi, A., Nicoletti, D., Kaiser, S., Perucchi, A., Lupi, S., Di Pietro, P., Pontiroli, D., Riccò, M., Clark, S.R., Jaksch, D., Cavalleri, A.: Possible light-induced superconductivity in K3C60 at high temperature. Nature 530(7591), 461–464 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16522ADSCrossRef

Sieea, E.J., Nyby, C.M., Pemmaraju, C.D., Park, S.J., Shen, X., Yang, J., Hoffmann, M.C., Ofori-Okai, B.K., Li, R., Reid, A.H., Weathersby, S., Mannebach, E., Finney, N., Rhodes, D., Chenet, D., Antony, A., Balicas, L., Hone, J., Devereaux, T.P., Heinz, T.F., Wang, X., Lindenberg, A.M.: An ultrafast symmetry switch in a Weyl semimetal. Nature 565(7737), 61–66 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0809-4ADSCrossRef

Feynman, R.P.: Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21(6), 467–488 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179MathSciNetCrossRef

Lloyd, S.: Universal quantum simulators. Science 273(5278), 1073–1078 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5278.1073ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Preskill, J.: Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79CrossRef

Cory, D.G., Fahmy, A.F., Havel, T.F.: Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy. PNAS 94(5), 1634–1639 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.5.1634ADSCrossRef

Gershenfeld, N.A., Chuang, I.L.: Bulk spin-resonance quantum computation. Science 275(5298), 350–356 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5298.350MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Vandersypen, L.M.K., Steffen, M., Breyta, G., Yannoni, C.S., Sherwood, M.H., Chuang, I.L.: Experimental realization of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 414(6866), 883–887 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/414883aADSCrossRef

10.

Wendin, G.: Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80(10), 106001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1aADSMathSciNetCrossRef

11.

Bruzewicz, C.D., Chiaverini, J., McConnell, R., Sage, J.M.: Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6(2), 021314 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164ADSCrossRef

12.

Shor, P.W.: Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493–R2496 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493ADSCrossRef

13.

Steane, A.M.: Error correcting codes in quantum theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793–797 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.793ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATH

14.

Knill, E., Laflamme, R.: Theory of quantum error-correcting codes. Phys. Rev. A 55, 900–911 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.900ADSMathSciNetCrossRef

15.

Salathé, Y., Mondal, M., Oppliger, M., Heinsoo, J., Kurpiers, P., Potočnik, A., Mezzacapo, A., Las Heras, U., Lamata, L., Solano, E., Filipp, S., Wallraff, A.: Digital quantum simulation of spin models with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021027 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021027CrossRef

16.

Barends, R., Lamata, L., Kelly, J., García-Álvarez, L., Fowler, A.G., Megrant, A., Jeffrey, E., White, T.C., Sank, D., Mutus, J.Y., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Hoi, I.C., Neill, C., O’Malley, P.J.J., Quintana, C., Roushan, P., Vainsencher, A., Wenner, J., Solano, E., Martinis, J.M.: Digital quantum simulation of fermionic models with a superconducting circuit. Nat. Commun. 6(1), 7654 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8654ADSCrossRef

17.

Barends, R., Shabani, A., Lamata, L., Kelly, J., Mezzacapo, A., Heras, U.L., Babbush, R., Fowler, A.G., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Jeffrey, E., Lucero, E., Megrant, A., Mutus, J.Y., Neeley, M., Neill, C., O’Malley, P.J.J., Quintana, C., Roushan, P., Sank, D., Vainsencher, A., Wenner, J., White, T.C., Solano, E., Neven, H., Martinis, J.M.: Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit. Nature 534(7606), 222–226 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17658ADSCrossRef

18.

Smith, A., Kim, M.S., Pollmann, F., Knolle, J.: Simulating quantum many-body dynamics on a current digital quantum computer. NPJ Quantum Inf. 5(1), 106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0217-0ADSCrossRef

19.

Lamm, H., Lawrence, S.: Simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 170501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.170501ADSCrossRef

20.

Zhukov, A.A., Remizov, S.V., Pogosov, W.V., Lozovik, Y.E.: Algorithmic simulation of far-from-equilibrium dynamics using quantum computer. Quantum Inf. Process. 17(9), 223 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-2002-yADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATH

21.

Klco, N., Dumitrescu, E.F., McCaskey, A.J., Morris, T.D., Pooser, R.C., Sanz, M., Solano, E., Lougovski, P., Savage, M.J.: Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers. Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032331ADSCrossRef

22.

Cervera-Lierta, A.: Exact Ising model simulation on a quantum computer. Quantum 2, 114 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-12-21-114CrossRef

23.

Chiesa, A., Tacchino, F., Grossi, M., Santini, P., Tavernelli, I., Gerace, D., Carretta, S.: Quantum hardware simulating four-dimensional inelastic neutron scattering. Nat. Phys. 15(5), 455–459 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0437-4CrossRef

24.

Francis, A., Freericks, J.K., Kemper, A.F.: Quantum computation of magnon spectra. Phys. Rev. B 101, 014411 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.014411ADSCrossRef

25.

Lysne, N.K., Kuper, K.W., Poggi, P.M., Deutsch, I.H., Jessen, P.S.: Small, highly accurate quantum processor for intermediate-depth quantum simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 230501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.230501ADSCrossRef

26.

Choo, K., von Keyserlingk, C.W., Regnault, N., Neupert, T.: Measurement of the entanglement spectrum of a symmetry-protected topological state using the ibm quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086808 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086808ADSCrossRef

27.

Babukhin, D.V., Zhukov, A.A., Pogosov, W.V.: Hybrid digital-analog simulation of many-body dynamics with superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. A 101, 052337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.052337ADSCrossRef

28.

Myatt, C.J., King, B.E., Turchette, Q.A., Sackett, C.A., Kielpinski, D., Itano, W.M., Monroe, C., Wineland, D.J.: Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs. Nature 403(6767), 269–273 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35002001ADSCrossRef

29.

Barreiro, J.T., Schindler, P., Gühne, O., Monz, T., Chwalla, M., Roos, C.F., Hennrich, M., Blatt, R.: Experimental multiparticle entanglement dynamics induced by decoherence. Nat. Phys. 6(12), 943–946 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1781CrossRef

30.

Barreiro, J.T., Müller, M., Schindler, P., Nigg, D., Monz, T., Chwalla, M., Hennrich, M., Roos, C.F., Zoller, P., Blatt, R.: An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions. Nature 470(7335), 486–491 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09801ADSCrossRef

31.

Wang, H., Ashhab, S., Nori, F.: Quantum algorithm for simulating the dynamics of an open quantum system. Phys Rev A 83, 062317 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062317ADSCrossRef

32.

Shen, C., Noh, K., Albert, V.V., Krastanov, S., Devoret, M.H., Schoelkopf, R.J., Girvin, S.M., Jiang, L.: Quantum channel construction with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. B 95, 134501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.134501ADSCrossRef

33.

Wang, B.X., Tao, M.J., Ai, Q., Xin, T., Lambert, N., Ruan, D., Cheng, Y.C., Nori, F., Deng, F.G., Long, G.L.: Efficient quantum simulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. NPJ Quantum Inf. 4(1), 52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-018-0102-2ADSCrossRef

34.

García-Pérez, G., Rossi, M.A.C., Maniscalco, S.: Ibm q experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems. NPJ Quantum Inf. 6(1), 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0235-yADSCrossRef

35.

Rabi, I.I.: Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field. Phys. Rev. 51, 652–654 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.51.652ADSCrossRefMATH

36.

Feynman, R.P., Vernon, F.L., Hellwarth, R.W.: Geometrical representation of the Schrödinger equation for solving maser problems. J. Appl. Phys. 28(1), 49–52 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722572ADSCrossRef

37.

Temme, K., Bravyi, S., Gambetta, J.M.: Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509ADSMathSciNetCrossRef

38.

Li, Y., Benjamin, S.C.: Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021050CrossRef

39.

Kandala, A., Temme, K., Córcoles, A.D., Mezzacapo, A., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M.: Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor. Nature 567(7749), 491–495 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1040-7ADSCrossRef

40.

Jordan, P., Wigner, E.: Über das paulische äquivalenzverbot. Z. Phys. 47(9), 631–651 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01331938ADSCrossRefMATH

41.

Bethe, H.: Zur Theorie der Metalle. Z. Phys. 71(3–4), 205–226 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341708ADSCrossRefMATH

42.

Uhrig, G.S.: Interaction quenches of fermi gases. Phys. Rev. A 80, 061602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.061602ADSCrossRef

43.

Karrasch, C., Rentrop, J., Schuricht, D., Meden, V.: Luttinger-liquid universality in the time evolution after an interaction quench. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 126406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.126406ADSCrossRef

44.

Manmana, S.R., Wessel, S., Noack, R.M., Muramatsu, A.: Strongly correlated fermions after a quantum quench. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 210405 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.210405ADSCrossRef

45.

Hamerla, S.A., Uhrig, G.S.: One-dimensional fermionic systems after interaction quenches and their description by bosonic field theories. New J. Phys. 15(7), 073012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073012ADSCrossRef

46.

Ilievski, E., De Nardis, J., Wouters, B., Caux, J.S., Essler, F.H.L., Prosen, T.: Complete generalized Gibbs ensembles in an interacting theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 157201 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.157201ADSCrossRef

47.

Essler, F.H.L., Fagotti, M.: Quench dynamics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 6, 064002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/06/064002MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

48.

Iten, R., Reardon-Smith, O., Mondada, L., Redmond, E., Singh Kohli, R., Colbeck, R.: Introduction to UniversalQCompiler (2019) . arXiv e-prints arXiv:1904.01072

49.

Iten, R., Colbeck, R., Kukuljan, I., Home, J., Christandl, M.: Quantum circuits for isometries. Phys. Rev. A 93, 032318 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032318ADSCrossRef

50.

Jurcevic, P., Javadi-Abhari, A., Bishop, L.S., Lauer, I., Bogorin, D.F., Brink, M., Capelluto, L., Günlük, O., Itoko, T., Kanazawa, N., Kandala, A., Keefe, G.A., Kruslich, K., Landers, W., Lewandowski, E.P., McClure, D.T., Nannicini, G., Narasgond, A., Nayfeh, H.M., Pritchett, E., Rothwell, M.B., Srinivasan, S., Sundaresan, N., Wang, C., Wei, K.X., Wood, C.J., Yau, J.B., Zhang, E.J., Dial, O.E., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M.: Demonstration of quantum volume 64 on a superconducting quantum computing system. Quantum Science and Technology 6(2), 025020 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abe519

51.

Asfaw, A., Bello, L., Ben-Haim, Y., Bravyi, S., Bronn, N., Capelluto, L., Vazquez, A.C., Ceroni, J., Chen, R., Frisch, A., Gambetta, J., Garion, S., Gil, L., Gonzalez, S.D.L.P., Harkins, F., Imamichi, T., McKay, D., Mezzacapo, A., Minev, Z., Movassagh, R., Nannicni, G., Nation, P., Phan, A., Pistoia, M., Rattew, A., Schaefer, J., Shabani, J., Smolin, J., Temme, K., Tod, M., Wood, S., Wootton, J. Learn quantum computation using qiskit (2020). http://community.qiskit.org/textbook

52.

Dewes, A., Ong, F.R., Schmitt, V., Lauro, R., Boulant, N., Bertet, P., Vion, D., Esteve, D.: Characterization of a two-transmon processor with individual single-shot qubit readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 057002 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.057002ADSCrossRef

53.

Maciejewski, F.B., Zimborás, Z., Oszmaniec, M.: Mitigation of readout noise in near-term quantum devices by classical post-processing based on detector tomography. Quantum 4, 257 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-04-24-257CrossRef

54.

Hatano, N., Suzuki, M.: Finding Exponential Product Formulas of Higher Orders, pp. 37–69. Springer, Berlin (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11526216_2CrossRef

55.

Barenco, A., Bennett, C.H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D.P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J.A., Weinfurter, H.: Elementary gates for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457–3467 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3457ADSCrossRef

56.

Plesch, M.: Brukner icv, : Quantum-state preparation with universal gate decompositions. Phys Rev A 83, 032302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.032302ADSCrossRef

57.

Fauseweh, B., Zhu, J.X.: Supplementary Material for “Digital Quantum Simulation of Non-Equilibrium Quantum Many-Body Systems”

58.

Smolin, J.A., Gambetta, J.M., Smith, G.: Efficient method for computing the maximum-likelihood quantum state from measurements with additive gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.070502ADSCrossRef

59.

Cornfeld, E., Sela, E., Goldstein, M.: Measuring fermionic entanglement: entropy, negativity, and spin structure. Phys. Rev. A 99, 062309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062309ADSCrossRef

Titel: Digital quantum simulation of non-equilibrium quantum many-body systems
verfasst von: Benedikt Fauseweh
Jian-Xin Zhu
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Quantum Information Processing / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1570-0755
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1332
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-021-03079-z

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Nachhaltigkeitsaward Key Visual/© Cometis AG/Global ESG Monitor | Daniel Rupp | Generiert mit KI, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, E-Autos im Fuhrpark: Lohnt sich das noch?/© Petair / stock.adobe.com, Kryptowährungen/© gopixa / Getty Images / iStock, MG4 aus China auf dem Prüfstand im ADAC-Technik-Zentrum in Landsberg am Lech/© ADAC e.V., Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Sustainibility Finance/© Robert Kneschke / stock.adobe.com / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2024/© AndreyPopov / Getty Images / iStock, 2023_Antrieb/© supervisuell

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Robustness of Wigner function negativity under the exciton-exciton interaction effects inside two coupled semiconductor quantum dots

Novel methods to construct nonlocal sets of orthogonal product states in an arbitrary bipartite high-dimensional system

Multi-mode plug-and-play dual-phase-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution

Criteria for partial entanglement of three qubit states arising from distributive rules

Quantum forgery attacks on COPA, AES-COPA and marble authenticated encryption algorithms

Quantum k-means algorithm based on trusted server in quantum cloud computing

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.