nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

11. Digital Twin: Conclusion and Future Perspectives

verfasst von : Josip Stjepandić, Markus Sommer, Sebastian Stobrawa

Erschienen in: DigiTwin: An Approach for Production Process Optimization in a Built Environment

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The concept of Digital Twin is almost twenty years old, posing an enhancement of well-known concepts like Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), with expected benefits through ubiquitous simulation, real-time analysis and synchronous processing. The theoretical framework and practical implementations of Digital Twins still do not follow this vision rather discover some specific characteristics of the Digital Twin. Although many successful implementations exist, a Digital Twin is still offered and sold as a project for a company’s specific purpose. While sufficient implementation details are not publicly available, it is difficult to assess effectiveness of different solutions and make comparisons in a structured manner. A recent taxonomy from literature is used to explain the state of development of Digital Twin. At first, the way for the further development of the presented approach is discussed. At second, current trends and challenges related to the Digital Twin and its research domains are explained in a comprehensive overview. The assessment is based on eight dimensions and 18 characteristics which serve as an initial part of a future universal reference framework. The Digital Twin applications in different domains are classified and the possible Digital Twin evolution is discussed. Novel research trends and challenges are identified, advancing the theory and practice of Digital Twins. The results show an evolution of Digital Twin's role from an enabler of cyber-physical systems to a product lifecycle data integration and processing platform.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Commercialization of Digital Twin by an Extension of a Business Ecosystem

Verhagen WJC, Stjepandić J, Wognum N (2015) Challenges of CE. In: Stjepandić J, Wognum N, Verhagen WJC (eds) Concurrent engineering in the 21st century. Springer International Publishing, pp 807–833

Verhagen WJC, Stjepandić J, Wognum N (2019) Future perspectives in systems engineering. In: Stjepandić J, Wognum N, Verhagen WJC (eds) Systems engineering in research and industrial practice. Springer International Publishing, pp 403–420

van der Valk H, Haße H, Möller F, Arbter M, Henning JL, Otto B (2020) A Taxonomy of digital twins. In: Anderson B, Thatcher J, Meservy R (eds) Proceedings of 26th Americas conference on information systems, pp 1–10

Jiang Z, Guo Y, Wang Z (2021) Digital twin to improve the virtual-real integration of industrial IoT. J Ind Inf Integr 22:100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2020.100196

Hong Lim KY, Zheng P, Chen CH (2020) A state-of-the-art survey of digital twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. J Intell Manuf 31:1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01512-wCrossRef

Fuller A, Fan Z, Day C, Barlow C (2020) Digital twin: enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8, Art. no. 9103025, pp 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358

Redelinghuys AJH, Basson AH, Kruger K (2019) A six-layer architecture for the digital twin: a manufacturing case study implementation. J Intell Manuf 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01516-6

Lu Y, Xu X (2019) Cloud-based manufacturing equipment and big data analytics to enable on-demand manufacturing services. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 57:92–102CrossRef

El-khoury J, Berezovskyi A, Nyberg A (2019) An industrial evaluation of data access techniques for the interoperability of engineering software tools. J Ind Inf Integr 15(2019):58–68

10.

Lu Y, Liu C, Wang KIK, Huang H, Xu X (2020) Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 61:101837

11.

Leng J, Liu Q, Ye S, Jing J, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang D, Chen X (2020) Digital twin-driven rapid reconfiguration of the automated manufacturing system via an open architecture model. Rob Comput-Integr Manuf 63:101895

12.

Bicocchia N, Cabria G, Mandreolia F, Mecella M (2019) Dynamic digital factories for agile supply chains: an architectural approach. J Ind Inf Integr 15:111–121

13.

Erkoyuncu JA, del Amo IF, Ariansyah D, Bulk D, Vrabic R, Roy R (2020) A design framework for adaptive digital twins. CIRP Ann 69(1):145–148CrossRef

14.

Pang Z, Xie B, Zhu H, Luvisotto M (2019) Location aided commissioning of building automation devices enabled by high accuracy indoor positioning. J Ind Inf Integr 15:258–263

15.

Mohamad EB, Ibrahim MAB, Sukarma L, Rahman MAA, Shibghatullah ASB, Salleh MRB (2017) Improved decision making in lean manufacturing using simulation-based approach. Int J Agile Syst Manage 10(1):34–48

16.

Zheng P, Sivabalan AS (2020) A generic tri-model-based approach for product-level digital twin development in a smart manufacturing environment. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf, vol 64, August 2020. Article number 101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101958

17.

Ladj A, Wang Z, Meski O, Belkadi F, Ritou M, Da Cunha C (2020) A knowledge-based digital shadow for machining industry in a digital twin perspective. J Manuf Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.018CrossRef

18.

Okita T, Kawabata T, Murayama H, Nishino N, Aichi M (2019) A new concept of digital twin of artifact systems synthesizing monitoring/inspections, physical/numerical models, and social system models. Procedia-CIRP 79:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.048CrossRef

19.

Guo H, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Ren Y, Chen M, Zhang R (2021) A digital twin-based layout optimization method for discrete manufacturing workshop. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:1307–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06568-0CrossRef

20.

Zhong RY, Ge W (2018) Internet of things enabled manufacturing: a review. Int J Agile Syst Manage 11(2):126–154CrossRef

21.

Cheng J, Zhang H, Tao F, Juang CF (2020) DT-II-digital twin enhanced industrial internet reference framework towards smart manufacturing. Rob Comput Integr Manuf 62 April 2020, 101881

22.

Biahmou A, Emmer C, Pfouga A, Stjepandić J (2016) Digital master as an enabler for industry 4.0. Adv Transdiscip Eng 4, pp 672–681

23.

Kaur MJ, Mishra VP, Maheshwari P (2020) The convergence of digital twin, IoT, and machine learning: transforming data into action, internet of things, pp 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18732-3_1

24.

Wang Y, Wang S, Yang B, Zhu L, Liu F (2020) Big data driven hierarchical digital twin predictive remanufacturing paradigm: architecture, control mechanism, application scenario and benefits. J Clean Prod 248:119299

25.

Schleich B, Dittrich MA, Clausmeyer T, Damgrave R, Erkoyuncu JA, Haefner B, Wuest T (2019) Shifting value stream patterns along the product lifecycle with digital twins. Procedia CIRP 86:3–11CrossRef

26.

Adamenko D, Kunnen S, Pluhnau R, Loibl A, Nagarajah A (2020) Review and comparison of the methods of designing the Digital Twin. Procedia CIRP 91:27–32CrossRef

27.

Ying L, Yongping R, Jiamin W, Chao-Hsiu L (2020) BIM based cyber-physical systems for intelligent disaster prevention. J Ind Inf Integr 20:100171

28.

Biesinger F, Meike D, Kraß B, Weyrich M (2018) A case study for a digital twin of body-in-white production systems—general concept for automated updating of planning projects in the digital factory. In: 23rd international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). IEEE. 04–07 September 2018, pp 19–26

29.

Lu Q, Chen L, Li S, Pitta M (2020) Semi-automatic geometric digital twinning for existing buildings based on images and CAD drawings. Autom Constr 115:103183

30.

Sieg O, Völl C (2020) Digital twin and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) as part of the corporate strategy [Digital Twin und PLM als Teil der Unternehmensstrategie], ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, vol 115, April 2020, p 38

31.

Booyse W, Wilke DN, Heyns S (2020) Deep digital twins for detection, diagnostics and prognostics. Mech Syst Signal Process 140:106612

32.

Gürdür Broo D, Boman U, Törngren M (2021) Cyber-physical systems research and education in 2030: scenarios and strategies. J Ind Inf Integr 21:100192

33.

Martínez GS, Sierla SA, Karhela TA, Lappalainen J, Vyatkin V (2018) Automatic generation of a high-fidelity dynamic thermal-hydraulic process simulation model from a 3D plant model. IEEE Access 6:45217–45232CrossRef

34.

Wognum N, Mo J, Stjepandić J (2019) Transdisciplinary engineering systems. In: Kenett RS, Swarz RS, Zonnenshain A (eds) Systems engineering in the fourth industrial revolution: big data, novel technologies, and modern systems engineering, John Wiley & Co., Hoboken, pp 483–510

35.

Avazpour I, Grundy J, Zhu L (2019) Engineering complex data integration, harmonization and visualization systems. J Ind Inf Integr 16:100103

36.

Pfouga A, Stjepandić J (2018) Leveraging 3D geometric knowledge in the product lifecycle based on industrial standards. J Comput Des Eng 5(1):54–67

37.

Chen Y (2020) A Survey on industrial information integration 2016–2019. J Ind Integr Manage 5(1):33–163. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862219500167CrossRef

38.

Xu LD (2020) Industrial information integration—an emerging subject in industrialization and informatization process. J Ind Inf Integr 17:100128

39.

Donoghue I, Hannola L, Papinniemi J, Mikkola A (2018) The Benefits and impact of digital twins in product development phase of PLM. In: Chiabert P, Bouras A, Noël F, Ríos J (eds) PLM 2018: product lifecycle management to support industry 4.0. Springer International Switzerland, pp 432–441

40.

Riascos Castaneda R, Ostrosi E, Majić T, Stjepandić J, Sagot JC (2020) A method to explore product risk in product lifecycle management of configured products. In: Proceedings of the design society: DESIGN conference, pp 687–696

41.

Denkena B, Doreth K, Köller M, Wilmsmeier S, Winter F (2020) Simulationsbasierte kombinierte Instandhaltungs- und Produktionsplanung, Ablaufsimulation in der Automobilindustrie. Springer Vieweg, Hrsg G, Mayer C, Pöge S, Spieckermann S, Wenzel S, pp 261–273

42.

Donhauser T, Endter U, Schmidt T, Baier L, Schuderer P, Franke J (2020) Echtzeitabbild der Produktion. wt werkstattstechnik 110(4):214–219

43.

Meudt T, Pohl M, Metternich J (2017). Die Automatisierungspyramide-Ein Literaturüberblick, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt

44.

Dehraj P, Sharma A (2021) A review on architecture and models for autonomic software systems. J Supercomput 77:388–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03268-0CrossRef

45.

Tomforde S, Rudolph S, Bellman K, Würt RP (2016) An organic computing perspective on self-improving system interweaving at runtime. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on autonomic computing (ICAC), Würzburg, pp 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2016.15

46.

Tahir M, Mamoon AQ, Dabbagh M, Computing TEA (2019) In: IoT ecosystem IEEE intl conf on dependable, autonomic and secure computing, intl conf on pervasive intelligence and computing, intl conf on cloud and big data computing, intl conf on cyber science and technology congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech). Fukuoka, Japan 2019:646–651. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech.2019.00122.)

47.

Kritzinger W, Traar G, Sihn W (2018) Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. In: IFAC-Papers OnLine, vol 51, no 11, pp 1016–1022

48.

Zhou G, Zhang C, Li Z, Ding K, Wang C (2020) Knowledge-driven digital twin manufacturing cell towards intelligent manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 58(4):1034–1051CrossRef

49.

Ramakrishnan R, Pendse A, Sharma C, Chimurkar P (2020) Speed breaker detection and mapping using IoT. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on smart systems and inventive technology, ICSSIT 2020, 9214224, pp 294–299

50.

Tomforde S, Gruhl C (2020) Fairness, performance, and robustness: is there a CAP theorem for self-adaptive and self-organising systems? In: Proceedings—2020 IEEE international conference on autonomic computing and self-organizing systems companion, ACSOS-C 2020, 9196252, pp 54–59

51.

Sanchez M, Exposito E, Aguilar J (2020) Autonomic computing in manufacturing process coordination in industry 4.0 context. J Ind Inf Integr 19:100159

52.

Ruppert T, Abonyi J (2020) Integration of real-time locating systems into digital twins. J Ind Inf Integr 20:100174

53.

Wallis R, Stjepandic J, Rulhoff S, Stromberger F, Deuse J (2014) Intelligent utilization of digital manufacturing data in modern product emergence processes. Adv Transdiscipl Eng 261–270. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-440-4-261

54.

Perno M, Hvam L (2020) Developing a framework for scoping digital twins in the process manufacturing industry. Adv Transdiscipl Eng 13:475–486

55.

Zhang C, Chen Y (2020) A review of research relevant to the emerging industry trends: industry 4.0, IoT, blockchain, and business analytics. J Ind Integr Manage 5(1):165–180

56.

Wagner L (2020) Kein digital twin ohne digitale Durchgängigkeit. Zeitschrift für den wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, Band 115, April 2020, pp 43–45. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112315

57.

Stjepandić J, Liese H, Trappey AC (2015) Intellectual Property Protection. In: Stjepandić J et al (eds) Concurrent engineering in the 21st century: foundations. Developments and challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 521–552

58.

Liese H, Stjepandic J, Rulhoff S (2010) Securing product know-how by embedding IP-protection into the organization. In: 2010 IEEE international technology management conference. ICE 2010:7477025

59.

Kim JH (2017) A survey of IoT security: risks, requirements, trends, and key technologies. J Ind Integr Manage 2:1750008

60.

DigiTwins NN (2021) Digital twins for better health. https://www.digitwins.org/. Accessed 30 Jan 2021

61.

Takahashi K (2020) Social issues with digital twin computing. NTT Tech Rev. https://www.ntt-review.jp/archive/ntttechnical.php?contents=ntr202009fa5.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2021

62.

Pobuda P (2020) The digital twin of the economy: proposed tool for policy design and evaluation. Real-World Econ Rev 94:140–148. http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue94/Pobuda94.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2021

63.

Trauer J, Schweigert-Recksiek S, Engel C, Spreitzer K, Zimmermann M (2020) What is a digital twin?—definitions and insights from an industrial case study in technical product development. In: International design conference—design 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.15.

64.

Riascos R, Ostrosi E, Sagot J-C, Stjepandic J (2020) An approach for agile engineering change management within global product development. Adv Transdiscipl Eng 12:584–593

65.

Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A, Yon J, Hicks B (2020) Characterising the digital twin: a systematic literature review. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 29(Part A):36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002

66.

Nutzerorganisation NN (2021) Industrial digital twin association gegründet. https://www.vdma.org/v2viewer/-/v2article/render/52443301. Accessed 20 Jan 2021

67.

DIN SPEC 91345 (2016) Referenzarchitekturmodell Industrie 4.0 (RAMI4.0), Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) e.V. https://doi.org/10.31030/2436156

68.

Kutzke DT, Carter JB, Hartman BT (2021) Subsystem selection for digital twin development: a case study on an unmanned underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng 223:108629

69.

Sharma A, Kosasih E, Zhang J, Alexandra A, Calinescu A (2020) Digital twins: state of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions. arXiv:2011.02833v3

70.

De Modesti PH, Carvalhar Fernandes E, Borsato M (2020) Production planning and scheduling using machine learning and data science processes. Adv Transdiscipl Eng 13:155–166

71.

Zhang K, Qu T, Zhou D, Jiang H, Lin Y, Li P, Guo H, Liu Y, Li C, Huang GQ (2020) Digital twin-based opti-state control method for a synchronized production operation system. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 63:101892

72.

Biahmou A, Stjepandic J (2016) Towards agile enterprise rights management in engineering collaboration. Int J Agile Syst Manage 9:302–325CrossRef

73.

Xia K, Sacco C, Kirkpatrick M, Saidy C, Nguyen L, Kircaliali A, Harik R (2020) A digital twin to train deep reinforcement learning agent for smart manufacturing plants: environment, interfaces and intelligence. J Manuf Syst (in press)

74.

Li D, Liu S, Gao F, Sun X (2021) Continual learning classification method with constant-sized memory cells based on the artificial immune system. Knowl-Based Syst, 213:106673

75.

Zhang W, Li X, Ma H, Luo Z, Li X (2021) Federated learning for machinery fault diagnosis with dynamic validation and self-supervision. Knowl-Based Syst 213:106679

76.

Han X, Leira BJ, Sævik S (2021) Vessel hydrodynamic model tuning by discrete Bayesian updating using simulated onboard sensor data. Ocean Eng 220:108407

77.

Ritto TG, Rochinha FA (2021) Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 155:107614

78.

Mo JPT, Beckett RC (2019) Architectural modeling of transdisciplinary system with inherent social perspectives. J Ind Integr Manage 1950012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S242486221950012X

79.

Zhu Z, Liu C, Xu X (2019) Visualisation of the digital twin data in manufacturing by using augmented reality. Procedia CIRP 81:898–903CrossRef

80.

Wilhelm J, Beinke T, Freitag M (2020) Improving Human-machine interaction with a digital twin. In: Freitag M, Haasis HD, Kotzab H, Pannek J (eds) Dynamics in logistics. LDIC 2020. Lecture notes in logistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44783-0_49

81.

Dietz, M, Vielberth, M, Pernul, G. (2020) Integrating digital twin security simulations in the security operations center. In: ACM international conference proceeding series 25 August 2020 15th international conference on availability, reliability and security, ARES 2020; Virtual, Online; Ireland; 25 August 2020 through 28 August 2020; Code 162046

82.

Voell C, Chatterjee P, Rauch A, Golovatchev J (2018) How digital twins enable the next level of PLM—a guide for the concept and the implementation in the internet of everything era. In: Chiabert P et al (eds) Product lifecycle management to support industry 4.0. Springer International, Cham, pp 238–249

83.

Ma X, Tao F, Zhang M, Wang T, Zuo Y (2019) Digital twin enhanced human-machine interaction in product lifecycle. Procedia CIRP 83:789–793CrossRef

84.

Wognum N, Bil C, Elgh F, Peruzzini M, Stjepandić J, Verhagen WJC (2019) Transdisciplinary systems engineering: implications, challenges and research agenda. Int J Agile Syst Manage 12(1):58–89

85.

Wognum N, Bil C, Elgh F, Peruzzini M, Stjepandić J, Verhagen W (2018) Transdisciplinary engineering research challenges. Adv Transdiscipl Eng 7:753–762

86.

Grieves M, Vickers J (2017) Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen FJ, Flumerfelt S, Alves A (eds) Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems: new findings and approaches. Springer International, Cham, pp 85–113

87.

Zhao C, Chen M, Wang L, Zhang L (2020) Collaboration of smart device in cloud manufacturing: a case of active recommendation model based on service agent. Adv Transdiscipl Eng 13:551–562

88.

Lo CK, Chen CH, Zhong RY (2021) A review of digital twin in product design and development. Adv Eng Inf (in press)

Titel: Digital Twin: Conclusion and Future Perspectives
verfasst von: Josip Stjepandić
Markus Sommer
Sebastian Stobrawa
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: DigiTwin: An Approach for Production Process Optimization in a Built Environment
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77538-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-77539-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77539-1_11

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten