nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Digital Twins for Precision Healthcare

verfasst von : Gabriela Ahmadi-Assalemi, Haider Al-Khateeb, Carsten Maple, Gregory Epiphaniou, Zhraa A. Alhaboby, Sultan Alkaabi, Doaa Alhaboby

Erschienen in: Cyber Defence in the Age of AI, Smart Societies and Augmented Humanity

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Precision healthcare is an emerging concept that will see technology-driven digital transformation of the health service. It enables customised patient outcomes via the development of novel, targeted medical approaches with a focus on intelligent, data-centric smart healthcare models. Currently, precision healthcare is seen as a challenging model to apply due to the complexity of the healthcare ecosystem, which is a multi-level and multifaceted environment with high real-time interactions among disciplines, practitioners, patients and discrete computer systems. Digital Twins (DT) pairs individual physical artefacts with digital models reflecting their status in real-time. Creating a live-model for healthcare services introduces new opportunities for patient care including better risk assessment and evaluation without disturbing daily activities. In this article, to address design and management in this complexity, we examine recent work in Digital Twins (DT) to investigate the goals of precision healthcare at a patient and healthcare system levels. We further discuss the role of DT to achieve precision healthcare, proposed frameworks, the value of active participation and continuous monitoring, and the cyber-security challenges and ethical implications for this emerging paradigm.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Biohacking Capabilities and Threat/Attack Vectors

Nächstes Kapitel 5G Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities with IoT and Smart Societies

Constitution of the world health organization: Principles., 2005

W. H. Organization (1986) The Ottawa charter for health promotion

Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, Hinder S, Procter R, Shaw S (2018) Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework. BMC Med 16(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1050-6 CrossRef

Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N (2014) Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 348:g3725. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725 CrossRef

Bhavnani SP, Sitapati AM (2019) Virtual care 2.0—a vision for the future of data-driven technology-enabled healthcare. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 21(5):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-019-0727-2 CrossRef

Pritchard DE, Moeckel F, Villa MS, Housman LT, McCarty CA, McLeod HL (2017) Strategies for integrating personalized medicine into healthcare practice. Pers Med 14(2):141–152. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2016-0064 CrossRef

Karakra A, Fontanili F, Lamine E, Lamothe J, Taweel A (2018) Pervasive computing integrated discrete event simulation for a hospital digital twin, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2018.8612796 CrossRef

Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD (2012) Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 307(14):1513–1516. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.362 CrossRef

Makary MA, Daniel M (2016) Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 353:i2139. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139 CrossRef

10.

C. I. f. H. Information (2018) National health expenditure trends, 1975 to 2018. https://www.cihi.ca/en/health-spending/2018/national-health-expenditure-trends

11.

O. E. Union (2018) Health at a glance Europe 2018: state of health in the EU Cycle, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/23056088

12.

O. f. N. Statistics (2019) Healthcare expenditure, UK Health Accounts: 2017. Office for National Statistics, 25/04/2019, p 27

13.

P. D United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017) World Population Ageing 2017. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/theme/ageing/WPA2017.asp

14.

Bryant N, Spencer N, King A, Crooks P, Deakin J, Young S (2017) IoT and smart city services to support independence and wellbeing of older people, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.23919/SOFTCOM.2017.8115553 CrossRef

15.

W. H. Organisation (2008) Preventing chronic diseases: a vital Investment.https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43314/9241563001_eng.pdf;jsessionid=F24F4FB0 22DCC5C9DCF70BAE5BA95C8D?sequence=1

16.

U. D. o. H. a. S. Care (2018) Policy Paper: the future of healthcare: our vision for digital, data and technology in health and care. D. o. H. a. S. Care (ed) UK Government

17.

Sehrawat D, Gill NS (2018) Emerging trends and future computing technologies: a vision for smart environment. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci 9(2):839. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v9i2.5838 CrossRef

18.

Gartner (2018) 5 Trends emerge in the gartner hype cycle for emerging technologies, 2018. ID G00363408, Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/document/3886564?ref=TypeAheadSearch&qid=808dc69ca889b4bd3fa85b2e3

19.

Rahman MA, Rashid MM, Hossain MS, Hassanain E, Alhamid MF, Guizani M (2019) Blockchain and IoT-based cognitive edge framework for sharing economy services in a smart city. IEEE Access:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896065

20.

Pacheco J, Zhu X, Badr Y, Hariri S (2017) Enabling risk management for smart infrastructures with an anomaly behavior analysis intrusion detection system, pp 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2017.167 CrossRef

21.

Gambhir SS, Ge TJ, Vermesh O, Spitler R (2018) Toward achieving precision health. Sci Transl Med 10(430):eaao3612. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aao3612 CrossRef

22.

Lee I, Sokolsky O, Chen S, Hatcliff J, Jee E, Kim B, King A, Mullen-Fortino M, Park S, Roederer A, Venkatasubramanian KK (2012) Challenges and research directions in medical cyber–physical systems. Proc IEEE 100(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2165270 CrossRef

23.

Laaki H, Miche Y, Tammi K (2019) Prototyping a digital twin for real time remote control over Mobile networks: application of remote surgery. IEEE Access 7:20325–20336. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897018 CrossRef

24.

Liu Y, Zhang L, Yang Y, Zhou L, Ren L, Wang F, Liu R, Pang Z, Deen MJ (2019) A novel cloud-based framework for the elderly healthcare services using digital twin. IEEE Access 7:49088–49101. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909828 CrossRef

25.

Iyawa GE, Herselman M, Botha A (2016) Digital health innovation ecosystems: from systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Proced Comput Sci 100:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.149 CrossRef

26.

Robinson L, Griffiths M, Wray J, Ure C, Stein-Hodgins JR, Shires G (2015) The use of digital health technology and social media to support breast screening. In: Digital mammography. Springer, pp 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04831-4_13

27.

Mellodge P, Vendetti C (2011) Remotely monitoring a patient’s mobility: a digital health application. IEEE Potentials 30(2):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2010.939453 CrossRef

28.

Kostkova P (2015) Grand challenges in digital health. Front Public Health 3:134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00134 CrossRef

29.

W. T. Organisation (2016) Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions: a practical guide to conducting research and assessment. ISBN 978–92–4-151176-6, Geneva. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252183/9789241511766-eng.pdf

30.

W. T. Organisation (2014) A universal truth: no health without a workforce.pdf. Geneva. https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/resources/GHWA-a_universal_truth_ report.pdf?ua=1

31.

Terris M (1975) Evolution of public health and preventive medicine in the United States. Am J Public Health 65(2):161–169. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.65.2.161 CrossRef

32.

Colijn C, Jones N, Johnston IG, Yaliraki S, Barahona M (2017) Toward precision healthcare: context and mathematical challenges. Front Physiol 8:136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00136 CrossRef

33.

Carrasco-Ramiro F, Peiró-Pastor R, Aguado B (2017) Human genomics projects and precision medicine Gene Ther 24:551, 08/14/online. https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2017.77

34.

Flores M, Glusman G, Brogaard K, Price ND, Hood L (2013) P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society. Pers Med 10(6):565–576. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.13.57 CrossRef

35.

Tuegel EJ, Ingraffea AR, Eason TG, Spottswood SM (2011) Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int J Aerosp Eng 2011:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/154798 CrossRef

36.

Negri E, Fumagalli L, Macchi M (2017) A review of the roles of digital twin in cps-based production systems. Proced Manuf 11:939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198 CrossRef

37.

Glaessgen E, Stargel D (2012) The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles, p 1818. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818 CrossRef

38.

Bruynseels K, Santoni de Sio F, van den Hoven J (2018) Digital twins in health care: ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm. Front Genet 9(31). https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00031

39.

Gartner (2018) Hype cycle for emerging technologies, 2018. ID G00340159. https://www.gartner.com/document/3885468?qid=eaeac87a4acbfd43931fc95&ref=solrAll&refval= 224658212&toggle=1

40.

Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 CrossRef

41.

Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q, Zhang M, Zhang H, Sui F (2018) Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):3563–3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 CrossRef

42.

Cox WE (1967) Product life cycles as marketing models. J Bus 40(4):375–384CrossRef

43.

Sacco M, Pedrazzoli P, Terkaj W (2010) VFF: virtual factory framework, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2010.7477041 CrossRef

44.

Rosen R, Von Wichert G, Lo G, Bettenhausen KD (2015) About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3):567–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141 CrossRef

45.

Schluse M, Rossmann J (2016) From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SysEng.2016.7753162 CrossRef

46.

Canedo A (2016) Industrial IoT lifecycle via digital twins, pp 1–1

47.

Schroeder GN, Steinmetz C, Pereira CE, Espindola DB (2016) Digital twin data modeling with automationML and a communication methodology for data exchange. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(30):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.115 CrossRef

48.

Smarslok B, Culler A, Mahadevan S (2012) Error quantification and confidence assessment of aerothermal model predictions for hypersonic aircraft, p 1817. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1817 CrossRef

49.

Bielefeldt B, Hochhalter J, Hartl D (2015) Computationally efficient analysis of SMA sensory particles embedded in complex aerostructures using a substructure approach, pp V001T02A007–V001T02A007. https://doi.org/10.1115/SMASIS2015-8975 CrossRef

50.

Qureshi B (2014) Towards a digital ecosystem for predictive healthcare analytics. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, Buraidah, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia, pp 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2668260.2668286 CrossRef

51.

León MC, Nieto-Hipólito JI, Garibaldi-Beltrán J, Amaya-Parra G, Luque-Morales P, Magaña-Espinoza P, Aguilar-Velazco J (April 27, 2016) Designing a model of a digital ecosystem for healthcare and wellness using the business model canvas. J Med Syst 40(6):144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0488-3 CrossRef

52.

Pramanik MI, Lau RYK, Demirkan H, Azad MAK (2017) Smart health: Big data enabled health paradigm within smart cities. Expert Sys Appl 87:370–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.027 CrossRef

53.

Huang G, Fang Y, Wang X, Pei Y, Horn B (2018) A survey on the status of smart healthcare from the universal village perspective, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/UV.2018.8642125 CrossRef

54.

Haughey H, Epiphaniou G, al-Khateeb HM (2016) Anonymity networks and the fragile cyber ecosystem. Netw Secur 2016(3):10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(16)30028-9 CrossRef

55.

Boyes HA, Isbell R, Norris P, Watson T (2014) Enabling intelligent cities through cyber security of building information and building systems, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1049/ic.2014.0046 CrossRef

56.

Augusto V, Murgier M, Viallon A (2018) A modelling and simulation framework for intelligent control of emergency units in the case of major crisis, pp 2495–2506. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2018.8632438 CrossRef

57.

Chen M, Yang J, Zhou J, Hao Y, Zhang J, Youn C (2018) 5G-smart diabetes: toward personalized diabetes diagnosis with healthcare big data clouds. IEEE Commun Mag 56(4):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700788 CrossRef

58.

Oleshchuk V, Fensli R (2011) Remote patient monitoring within a future 5G infrastructure. Wirel Pers Commun 57(3):431–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-010-0078-5 CrossRef

59.

Mattos WD d, Gondim PRL (2016) M-Health solutions using 5G networks and M2M communications. IT Professional 18(3):24–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.52 CrossRef

60.

Rahman MA, Hossain MS, Hassanain E, Muhammad G (2018) Semantic multimedia fog computing and IoT environment: sustainability perspective. IEEE Commun Mag 56(5):80–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700907 CrossRef

61.

Rahman MA, Hossain MS (2017) M-therapy: a multisensor framework for in-home therapy management: a social therapy of things perspective. IEEE Internet Things J 5(4):2548–2556. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2776150 CrossRef

62.

Fortino G, Guerrieri A, Russo W, Savaglio C (2014) Integration of agent-based and cloud computing for the smart objects-oriented IoT, pp 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2014.6846894 CrossRef

63.

Nastic S, Sehic S, Le D-H, Truong H-L, Dustdar S (2014) Provisioning software-defined IoT cloud systems, pp 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2014.52 CrossRef

64.

Ma Y, Li G, Xie H, Zhang H (2018) City profile: using SMART data to create digital URBAN spaces. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spati Infor Sci 4:75–82. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W7-75-2018 CrossRef

65.

Orozco A, Pacheco J, Hariri S (2017) Anomaly behavior analysis for smart grid automation system, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROPEC.2017.8261614 CrossRef

66.

Do Q, Martini B, Choo K-KR (2018) Cyber-physical systems information gathering: a smart home case study. Comput Netw 138:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.03.024 CrossRef

67.

Ahmadi-Assalemi G, al-Khateeb H, Epiphaniou G, Cosson J, Jahankhani H, Pillai P (2019) Federated blockchain-based tracking and liability attribution framework for employees and cyber-physical objects in a smart workplace. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGS3.2019.8688297 CrossRef

68.

al-Khateeb H, Epiphaniou G, Reviczky A, Karadimas P, Heidari H (2018) Proactive threat detection for connected cars using recursive Bayesian estimation. IEEE Sensors J 18(12):4822–4831. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2782751 CrossRef

69.

Glaa B, Hammadi S, Tahon C (2006) Modeling the emergency path handling and emergency department simulation, pp 4585–4590. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2006.384869 CrossRef

70.

Sinreich D, Marmor YN (2004) A simple and intuitive simulation tool for analyzing emergency department operations, pp 1994–2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2004.1371561 CrossRef

71.

Kammoun A, Loukil T, Hachicha W (2014) The use of discrete event simulation in hospital supply chain management, pp 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAdLT.2014.6864108 CrossRef

72.

Alwan A (2011) Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44579/9789240686458_eng.pdf;jsessionid=1D70E16CE9E288647B273D604E1D8991?sequence=1

73.

C. f. D. C. a. P (2019) Chronic diseases: the leading causes of death and disability in the United States. 01/08/2019. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/infographic/chronic-diseases.htm

74.

Richard AA, Shea K (2011) Delineation of self-care and associated concepts. J Nurs Scholarsh 43(3):255–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01404.x CrossRef

75.

Barnes C, Mercer G (2010) Exploring disability, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 2nd ed. Cambridge

76.

W. H. Organization (1992) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines

77.

Cohn S (2015) ‘Trust my doctor, trust my pancreas’: trust as an emergent quality of social practice. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 10(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-015-0029-6 CrossRef

78.

Gemmill M (2008) Research note: chronic disease management in Europe “employment, social affairs and equal opportunities” unit E1-social and demographic analysis. European Commission Directorate-General

79.

Fuchs S, Henschke C, Blümel M, Busse R (2014) Disease management programs for type 2 diabetes in Germany: a systematic literature review evaluating effectiveness. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111(26):453. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0453 CrossRef

80.

Gapp O, Schweikert B, Meisinger C, Holle R (2008) Disease management programmes for patients with coronary heart disease—an empirical study of German programmes. Health Policy 88(2–3):176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.009 CrossRef

81.

Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L Jr, Isham G, Snyder SR, Carande-Kulis VG, Garfield S (2002) The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 22(4):15–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00423-3 CrossRef

82.

Kummar S, Williams PM, Lih C-J, Polley EC, Chen AP, Rubinstein LV, Zhao Y, Simon RM, Conley BA, Doroshow JH (2015) Application of molecular profiling in clinical trials for advanced metastatic cancers. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 107(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv003

83.

Suite DH, La Bril R, Primm A, Harrison-Ross P (2007) Beyond misdiagnosis, misunderstanding and mistrust: relevance of the historical perspective in the medical and mental health treatment of people of color. J Natl Med Assoc 99(8):879–885

84.

Bajramovic E, Waedt K, Ciriello A, Gupta D (2016) Forensic readiness of smart buildings: preconditions for subsequent cybersecurity tests, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580754 CrossRef

85.

Skopik F, Settanni G, Fiedler R (2016) A problem shared is a problem halved: A survey on the dimensions of collective cyber defense through security information sharing. Comput Secur 60:154–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2016.04.003 CrossRef

86.

He H, Maple C, Watson T, Tiwari A, Mehnen J, Jin Y, Gabrys B (2016) The security challenges in the IoT enabled cyber-physical systems and opportunities for evolutionary computing & other computational intelligence, pp 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2016.7743900 CrossRef

87.

Coppinger R (2016) Design through the looking glass [digital twins of real products]. Eng Technol 11(11):58–60. https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2016.1106 CrossRef

88.

Wurm J, Jin Y, Liu Y, Hu S, Heffner K, Rahman F, Tehranipoor M (2017) Introduction to cyber-physical system Security: a cross-layer perspective. IEEE Trans Multi-Scale Comput Syst 3(3):215–227. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMSCS.2016.2569446 CrossRef

89.

Wu W, Kang R, Li Z (2015) Risk assessment method for cyber security of cyber physical systems, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRSE.2015.7366430 CrossRef

90.

Shafi Q (2012) Cyber Physical Systems Security: A Brief Survey, pp 146–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSA.2012.36 CrossRef

91.

Gallagher S (2014) Photos of an NSA “upgrade” factory show Cisco router getting implant

92.

Pagliery S (2015) Lenovo slipped ‘Superfish’ malware into laptops. CNN

93.

Al Ameen M, Liu J, Kwak K (2012) Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. J Med Syst 36(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9449-4 CrossRef

94.

Krombholz K, Hobel H, Huber M, Weippl E (2015) Advanced social engineering attacks. J Inform Secur Appl 22:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2014.09.005 CrossRef

95.

Gupta BB, Tewari A, Jain AK, Agrawal DP (2017) Fighting against phishing attacks: state of the art and future challenges. Neural Comput Appl 28(12):3629–3654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2275-y CrossRef

96.

Kammüller F, Nurse JRC, Probst CW (2016) Attack tree analysis for insider threats on the IoT using Isabelle, pp 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39381-0_21 CrossRef

97.

Cheh C, Keefe K, Feddersen B, Chen B, Temple WG, Sanders WH (2017) Developing models for physical attacks in cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 2017 workshop on cyber-physical systems security and privaCy, Dallas, pp 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3140241.3140249

98.

European Union Agency For Network And Information Security (ENISA) (2017) Baseline security recommendations for IoT in the context of critical information infrastructures. https://doi.org/10.2824/03228

99.

N. I. o. S. a. T. (NIST) (2016) NIST Special Publocation 800-183 Nentworks of ‘Things’. Department of Commerce, USA

100.

U. D. o. H. Security (2016) Strategic principles for security the Internet of Things (IoT). US Homeland Security

101.

U. S. D. o. H. a. H. S. F. a. D. A. F. C. f. D. a. a. R. Health (2018) Postmarket management of cybersecurity in medical devices

102.

Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017 Standard S. 1691, 2017–2018

103.

E. g. o. E. i. S. a. N. T. t. t. E. Commission (2015) The ethical implications of new health technologies and citizen participation. Brussels. https://doi.org/10.2872/633988

Titel: Digital Twins for Precision Healthcare
verfasst von: Gabriela Ahmadi-Assalemi
Haider Al-Khateeb
Carsten Maple
Gregory Epiphaniou
Zhraa A. Alhaboby
Sultan Alkaabi
Doaa Alhaboby
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Cyber Defence in the Age of AI, Smart Societies and Augmented Humanity
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35745-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-35746-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35746-7_8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"