Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 3/2017

30.12.2016 | Original paper

Distinctive Effects of Horizontal At-Rest Pressure on Conventional Limit Pressure Results

verfasst von: Radhi Alzubaidi

Erschienen in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Pressuremeter testing plays an important role in the design of foundations, where several parameters can be deduced from a single test result. Conventional and theoretical limit pressures can be interpreted from pressuremeter tests and are considered key to bearing capacity calculations and shallow foundation designs. Limit pressure can be evaluated using different methods, all of which show discrepancies in values obtained from the same tests. Horizontal at-rest earth pressure can similarly be deduced from different methods of analysis, which also show distinctive differences in results for the same tests. This research explored the important finding that the values of the conventional limit pressure experience considerable discrepancies when using different values of the horizontal at-rest pressure. Values calculated for conventional limit pressure showed considerable increases when increasing the value of the horizontal at-rest pressure, but there was no effect on the theoretical limit pressure.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat AlZubaidi R (2014) Different results in pressuremeter theories. Geotech Geol Eng 32(4):965–972CrossRef AlZubaidi R (2014) Different results in pressuremeter theories. Geotech Geol Eng 32(4):965–972CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat AlZubaidi R (2015) A new approach for interpretation strength sensitivity to Po in pressuremeter testing. Geotech Geol Eng 33(4):813–832CrossRef AlZubaidi R (2015) A new approach for interpretation strength sensitivity to Po in pressuremeter testing. Geotech Geol Eng 33(4):813–832CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baguelin F, Jezequel J, Shields D (1978) The Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering. Trans. Tech. Publications, Switzerland Baguelin F, Jezequel J, Shields D (1978) The Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering. Trans. Tech. Publications, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat Messaoud F, Nouaouria M, Cosentino P (2009) Pencel pressuremeter test evaluation for developing P-Y curves for driven piles. Int J Recent Trends Eng 1(6):20–24 Messaoud F, Nouaouria M, Cosentino P (2009) Pencel pressuremeter test evaluation for developing P-Y curves for driven piles. Int J Recent Trends Eng 1(6):20–24
Zurück zum Zitat Monnet J (2008) Numerical analysis for an interpretation of the pressuremeter test in cohesive soil. Stud Geotech Mech 30(1–2):41–49 Monnet J (2008) Numerical analysis for an interpretation of the pressuremeter test in cohesive soil. Stud Geotech Mech 30(1–2):41–49
Zurück zum Zitat Ramdane B, Nassim A, Ouarda B (2013) Interpretation of a pressuremeter test in cohesive soils. In: Proceedings of the international conference on geotechnical engineering, Tunisia Ramdane B, Nassim A, Ouarda B (2013) Interpretation of a pressuremeter test in cohesive soils. In: Proceedings of the international conference on geotechnical engineering, Tunisia
Zurück zum Zitat Schnaid F, Ortigao J, Mántaras F, Cunha R, MacGregor I (2000) Analysis of self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) and Marchetti dilatometer (DMT) tests in granitesaprolites. Can Geotech J 37:796–810CrossRef Schnaid F, Ortigao J, Mántaras F, Cunha R, MacGregor I (2000) Analysis of self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) and Marchetti dilatometer (DMT) tests in granitesaprolites. Can Geotech J 37:796–810CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shwaik RM (1984) Pressuremeter practice in testing glacial tills. PhD, Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Strathclyde Shwaik RM (1984) Pressuremeter practice in testing glacial tills. PhD, Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Strathclyde
Zurück zum Zitat Yu H, Charles M, Khong C (2005) Analysis of pressuremeter geometry effects in clay using critical state models. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 29(8):845–859CrossRef Yu H, Charles M, Khong C (2005) Analysis of pressuremeter geometry effects in clay using critical state models. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 29(8):845–859CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Distinctive Effects of Horizontal At-Rest Pressure on Conventional Limit Pressure Results
verfasst von
Radhi Alzubaidi
Publikationsdatum
30.12.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-3182
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0152-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe