Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning 1/2018

27.01.2017 | Original research

Distributed Scaffolding: Synergy in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments

verfasst von: Hale H. Ustunel, Saniye Tuğba Tokel

Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

When technology is employed challenges increase in learning environments. Kim et al. (Sci Educ 91(6):1010–1030, 2007) presented a pedagogical framework that provides a valid technology-enhanced learning environment. The purpose of the present design-based study was to investigate the micro context dimension of this framework and to analyze interactions between the student and tool, teacher and student, and teacher and tool. In this respect, to understand how the roles of the teacher and technology tool are balanced in a technology-enhanced learning environment, the distribution of scaffolds between teacher and the tool were analyzed. Forty-one middle-school students attending an international school in Turkey were scaffolded with technology-based scaffolding treatments in two groups supervised by two teachers. Qualitative analysis was conducted. The results showed that the students benefited from the use of hints, sentence starters and question prompts, which led the students to develop their ability to construct arguments with a claim, ground, backing, warrants, and in some cases, more sophisticated arguments using rebuttals as in the Toulmin argumentation pattern (Toulmin 2003). The results of the study also showed that technology-based scaffolds, which are provided with active support by the teacher, create a more effective environment, and students need multiple forms of support and multiple learning opportunities to learn science successfully in the dynamic and complex environment of the classroom. Since there is a strong interaction and balance between teacher support and the technology scaffolds, there is also a synergetic relationship that promotes student learning and improves the student’s ability to construct arguments.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90.CrossRef Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2000). Designing Mildred: Scaffolding students’ reflection and argumentation using a cognitive software guide. In Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 142–149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2000). Designing Mildred: Scaffolding students’ reflection and argumentation using a cognitive software guide. In Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 142–149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 73–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 73–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797–817.CrossRef Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797–817.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Belland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: The impact of computer-based scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 285–309.CrossRef Belland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: The impact of computer-based scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 285–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Belland, B. R., Burdo, R., & Gu, J. (2015a). A blended professional development program to help a teacher learn to provide one-to-one scaffolding. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 263–289. Belland, B. R., Burdo, R., & Gu, J. (2015a). A blended professional development program to help a teacher learn to provide one-to-one scaffolding. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 263–289.
Zurück zum Zitat Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 401–422.CrossRef Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 401–422.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Armbrust, S., & Cook, B. (2015b). Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: A mixed-method study in a rural middle school. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 325–353.CrossRef Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Armbrust, S., & Cook, B. (2015b). Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: A mixed-method study in a rural middle school. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 325–353.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, K., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22.CrossRef Cho, K., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cuthbert, A. J., & Slotta, J. D. (2004). Designing a web-based design curriculum for middle school science: The WISE ‘Houses In The Desert’ project. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 821–844.CrossRef Cuthbert, A. J., & Slotta, J. D. (2004). Designing a web-based design curriculum for middle school science: The WISE ‘Houses In The Desert’ project. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 821–844.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Demetriadis, S. N., Papadopoulos, P. M., Stamelos, I. G., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Journal of Computers and Education, 51(2), 939–954. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.012.CrossRef Demetriadis, S. N., Papadopoulos, P. M., Stamelos, I. G., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Journal of Computers and Education, 51(2), 939–954. doi:10.​1016/​j.​compedu.​2007.​09.​012.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Zurück zum Zitat Ge, X., & Land, M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38.CrossRef Ge, X., & Land, M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu, C.-C., Chiu, C.-H., Lin, C.-H., & Wang, T.-I. (2015a). Enhancing skill in constructing scientific explanations using a structured argumentation scaffold in scientific inquiry. Computers & Education, 91, 46–59.CrossRef Hsu, C.-C., Chiu, C.-H., Lin, C.-H., & Wang, T.-I. (2015a). Enhancing skill in constructing scientific explanations using a structured argumentation scaffold in scientific inquiry. Computers & Education, 91, 46–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu, Y.-S., Lai, T.-L., & Hsu, W.-H. (2015b). A design model of distributed scaffolding for inquiry-based learning. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 241–273.CrossRef Hsu, Y.-S., Lai, T.-L., & Hsu, W.-H. (2015b). A design model of distributed scaffolding for inquiry-based learning. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 241–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu, P. S., Van Dyke, M., & Chen, Y. (2015c). Examining the effect of teacher guidance on collaborative argumentation in middle level classrooms. RMLE Online, 38(9), 1–11.CrossRef Hsu, P. S., Van Dyke, M., & Chen, Y. (2015c). Examining the effect of teacher guidance on collaborative argumentation in middle level classrooms. RMLE Online, 38(9), 1–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu, P. S., Van Dyke, M., Chen, Y., & Smith, T. J. (2015d). The Effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 31(1), 32–58.CrossRef Hsu, P. S., Van Dyke, M., Chen, Y., & Smith, T. J. (2015d). The Effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 31(1), 32–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of SOCRATES learning environment. Science Education, 99(2), 282–311.CrossRef Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of SOCRATES learning environment. Science Education, 99(2), 282–311.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011a). Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: A qualitative case study. Instructional Science, 39(3), 255–282.CrossRef Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011a). Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: A qualitative case study. Instructional Science, 39(3), 255–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, M., & Hannafin, M. (2011b). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56, 403–417.CrossRef Kim, M., & Hannafin, M. (2011b). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56, 403–417.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91(6), 1010–1030.CrossRef Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91(6), 1010–1030.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Köroğlu, L. S. (2009). Sekizinci Sinif Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersi Kalitim Konusunun Tartişma Öğeleri Temelli Rehber Sorularla Desteklenen Benzetim Ortaminda Öğretiminin Akademik Başari Ve Tartişma Öğelerini Kullanma Düzeyine Etkisi. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Köroğlu, L. S. (2009). Sekizinci Sinif Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersi Kalitim Konusunun Tartişma Öğeleri Temelli Rehber Sorularla Desteklenen Benzetim Ortaminda Öğretiminin Akademik Başari Ve Tartişma Öğelerini Kullanma Düzeyine Etkisi. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Zurück zum Zitat Land, S. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. ETR&D, 51(4), 65–84.CrossRef Land, S. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. ETR&D, 51(4), 65–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Land, S., Zimmerman, H., Choi, G., Seely, B., & Mohney, M. (2015). Design of mobile learning for outdoor environments. Educational Media & Technology Yearbook, 39, 101–113.CrossRef Land, S., Zimmerman, H., Choi, G., Seely, B., & Mohney, M. (2015). Design of mobile learning for outdoor environments. Educational Media & Technology Yearbook, 39, 101–113.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laru, J., Jarvela, S., & Clariana, R. B. (2012). Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning: A case study with K-12 learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(2), 103–117.CrossRef Laru, J., Jarvela, S., & Clariana, R. B. (2012). Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning: A case study with K-12 learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(2), 103–117.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Leontiev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology. Sharpe: Armonk, NY. Leontiev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology. Sharpe: Armonk, NY.
Zurück zum Zitat Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.CrossRef Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lu, J., Lajoie, S., & Wiseman, J. (2010). Scaffolding problem-based learning with CSCL tools. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 283–298.CrossRef Lu, J., Lajoie, S., & Wiseman, J. (2010). Scaffolding problem-based learning with CSCL tools. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 283–298.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61, 59–76. CrossRef Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61, 59–76.  CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver, K., & Hannafin, M. (2001). Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 5–32. Oliver, K., & Hannafin, M. (2001). Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 5–32.
Zurück zum Zitat Özçinar, H. (2015). Scaffolding computer-mediated discussion to enhance moral reasoning and argumentation quality in pre-service teachers. Journal of Moral Education, 44(2), 232–251. Özçinar, H. (2015). Scaffolding computer-mediated discussion to enhance moral reasoning and argumentation quality in pre-service teachers. Journal of Moral Education, 44(2), 232–251.
Zurück zum Zitat Patton, M. Q. (2002). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Patton, M. Q. (2002). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Pumtambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.CrossRef Pumtambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Puntambekar, S. (2015). Distributing scaffolding across multiple levels: Individuals, small groups, and a class of students. In P. Ertmer (Ed.), Essential readings in problem-based learning (pp. 207–221). Indiana: Purdue University Press. Puntambekar, S. (2015). Distributing scaffolding across multiple levels: Individuals, small groups, and a class of students. In P. Ertmer (Ed.), Essential readings in problem-based learning (pp. 207–221). Indiana: Purdue University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.CrossRef Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.CrossRef Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raes, A., & Schellens, T. (2016). The effects of teacher-led class interventions during technology-enhanced science inquiry on students’ knowledge integration and basic need satisfaction. Computers & Education, 92–93, 125–141.CrossRef Raes, A., & Schellens, T. (2016). The effects of teacher-led class interventions during technology-enhanced science inquiry on students’ knowledge integration and basic need satisfaction. Computers & Education, 92–93, 125–141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reiser, B. J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In Proceedings of the conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 255–264). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Reiser, B. J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In Proceedings of the conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 255–264). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263–305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263–305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372.CrossRef Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 27–46.CrossRef Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 27–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smagorinsky, P., Clayton, C., & Johnson, L. (2015). Distributed scaffolding in a service-learning course. Theory Into Practice, 54, 71–78.CrossRef Smagorinsky, P., Clayton, C., & Johnson, L. (2015). Distributed scaffolding in a service-learning course. Theory Into Practice, 54, 71–78.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305–335.CrossRef Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. J. (1999). Steering the course of dialogue in inquiry-based science classrooms. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. J. (1999). Steering the course of dialogue in inquiry-based science classrooms.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dijk, A. M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016). Scaffolding students’ use of learner-generated content in a technology-enhanced inquiry learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 194–204. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.834828.CrossRef Van Dijk, A. M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016). Scaffolding students’ use of learner-generated content in a technology-enhanced inquiry learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 194–204. doi:10.​1080/​10494820.​2013.​834828.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and society (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and society (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410.CrossRef Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.CrossRef Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRef Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zacharia, Z., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N., Jong, T., Pedaste, M., Van Riesen, S., et al. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 257–302.CrossRef Zacharia, Z., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N., Jong, T., Pedaste, M., Van Riesen, S., et al. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 257–302.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zydney, J. M. (2010). The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students’ understanding, consideration of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem. Computers & Education, 54(2), 360–370.CrossRef Zydney, J. M. (2010). The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students’ understanding, consideration of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem. Computers & Education, 54(2), 360–370.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Distributed Scaffolding: Synergy in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments
verfasst von
Hale H. Ustunel
Saniye Tuğba Tokel
Publikationsdatum
27.01.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Elektronische ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9299-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Technology, Knowledge and Learning 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.