nach oben

Erschienen in:

14.07.2016

Do measures of depressive symptoms function differently in people with spinal cord injury versus primary care patients: the CES-D, PHQ-9, and PROMIS^®-D

verfasst von: Karon F. Cook, Michael A. Kallen, Charles Bombardier, Alyssa M. Bamer, Seung W. Choi, Jiseon Kim, Rana Salem, Dagmar Amtmann

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether items of three measures of depressive symptoms function differently in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) than in persons from a primary care sample.

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale, and the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS^®) version 1.0 eight-item depression short form 8b (PROMIS-D). The presence of differential item function (DIF) was evaluated using ordinal logistic regression.

Results

No items of any of the three target measures were flagged for DIF based on standard criteria. In a follow-up sensitivity analyses, the criterion was changed to make the analysis more sensitive to potential DIF. Scores were corrected for DIF flagged under this criterion. Minimal differences were found between the original scores and those corrected for DIF under the sensitivity criterion.

Conclusions

The three depression screening measures evaluated in this study did not perform differently in samples of individuals with SCI compared to general and community samples. Transdiagnostic symptoms did not appear to spuriously inflate depression severity estimates when administered to people with SCI.

Vorheriger Artikel The perceived constraints subscale of the Sense of Mastery Scale: dimensionality and measurement invariance

Nächster Artikel Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Craig, A., Tran, Y., & Middleton, J. (2009). Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal Cord, 47(2), 108–114.CrossRefPubMed

Herrick, S., Elliott, T. R., & Crow, F. (1994). Social support and the prediction of health complications among persons with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Psychology, 39, 231–250.CrossRef

Elliott, T., & Harkins, S. (1991). Psychosocial concomitants of persistent pain among persons with spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1(4), 9–18.

Fuhrer, M. J., Rintala, D. H., Hart, K. A., Clearman, R., & Young, M. E. (1993). Depressive symptomatology in persons with spinal cord injury who reside in the community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(3), 255–260.PubMed

MacDonald, M. R., Nielson, W. R., & Cameron, M. G. (1987). Depression and activity patterns of spinal cord injured persons living in the community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(6), 339–343.PubMed

Krause, J. S., Zhai, Y., Saunders, L. L., & Carter, R. E. (2009). Risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: An 8-year prospective study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(10), 1708–1715.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fann, J. R., Bombardier, C. H., Richards, J. S., Tate, D. G., Wilson, C. S., Temkin, N., et al. (2011). Depression after spinal cord injury: Comorbidities, mental health service use, and adequacy of treatment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(3), 352–360.CrossRefPubMed

Kalpakjian, C. Z., Bombardier, C. H., Schomer, K., Brown, P. A., & Johnson, K. L. (2009). Measuring depression in persons with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(1), 6–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A new self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRef

10.

Orlando Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J. A., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S134–S142.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications. Advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S152–S170.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Teresi, J. A., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Kleinman, M., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., et al. (2007). Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): Applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 43–68.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Cook, K. F., Bamer, A. M., Amtmann, D., Molton, I. R., & Jensen, M. P. (2012). Six patient-reported outcome measurement information system short form measures have negligible age- or diagnosis-related differential item functioning in individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(7), 1289–1291.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fieo, R., Mukherjee, S., Dmitrieva, N. O., Fyffe, D. C., Gross, A. L., Sanders, E. R., et al. (2015). Differential item functioning due to cognitive status does not impact depressive symptom measures in four heterogeneous samples of older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(9), 911–918.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Wanders, R. B., Wardenaar, K. J., Kessler, R. C., Penninx, B. W., Meijer, R. R., & de Jonge, P. (2015). Differential reporting of depressive symptoms across distinct clinical subpopulations: What DIFference does it make? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(2), 130–136.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Chung, H., Kim, J., Askew, R. L., Jones, S. M., Cook, K. F., & Amtmann, D. (2015). Assessing measurement invariance of three depression scales between neurologic samples and community samples. Quality of Life Research, 24(8), 1829–1834.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., Cella, D., et al. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., & Lowe, B. (2010). The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: A systematic review. General Hospital Psychiatry, 32(4), 345–359.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Bombardier, C. H., Kalpakjian, C. Z., Graves, D. E., Dyer, J. R., Tate, D. G., & Fann, J. R. (2012). Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in assessing major depressive disorder during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(10), 1838–1845.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Sakakibara, B. M., Miller, W. C., Orenczuk, S. G., Wolfe, D. L., & Team, S. R. (2009). A systematic review of depression and anxiety measures used with individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 47(12), 841–851.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 595–607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kuramoto, S. J., Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Greiner, L., et al. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: Development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(1), 71–82.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Weissman, M. M., Sholomskas, D., Pottenger, M., Prusoff, B. A., & Locke, B. Z. (1977). Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: A validation study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 106(3), 203–214.PubMed

26.

Allison, D. J., & Ditor, D. S. (2015). Targeting inflammation to influence mood following spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 12, 204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Robinson-Whelen, S., Taylor, H. B., Hughes, R. B., & Nosek, M. A. (2013). Depressive symptoms in women with physical disabilities: Identifying correlates to inform practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(12), 2410–2416.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA, 282(18), 1737–1744.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Johnson, K. L., & Cella, D. (2011). The PROMIS initiative: Involvement of rehabilitation stakeholders in development and examples of applications in rehabilitation research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Suppl), S12–S19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Fogelberg, D. J., Vitiello, M. V., Hoffman, J. M., Bamer, A. M., & Amtmann, D. (2015). Comparison of self-report sleep measures for individuals with multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(3), 478–483.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Krause, J. S., Saunders, L. L., Bombardier, C., & Kalpakjian, C. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9: A study of the participants from the spinal cord injury model systems. PM R, 3(6), 533–540. quiz 540.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Jensen, M. P., Smith, A. E., Bombardier, C. H., Yorkston, K. M., Miro, J., & Molton, I. R. (2014). Social support, depression, and physical disability: Age and diagnostic group effects. Disability and Health Journal, 7(2), 164–172.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). Lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), 159–176.CrossRef

35.

Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores (Psychometric Monograph no. 17). Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society. Retrieved from http://www.psychometrika.org/journal/online/MN17.pdf.

36.

Lance, C., Butts, M., & Michels, L. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220.CrossRef

37.

West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

38.

Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

40.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterization model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.CrossRef

41.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(s), 1–55.

42.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

44.

Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type(ordinal) item scores. Ottawa: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.

45.

Jodoin, M. G., & Gierl, M. J. (2001). Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 329–349.CrossRef

46.

Kim, S. H., Cohen, A. S., Alagoz, C., & Kim, S. (2007). DIF detection effect size measures for polytomously scored items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 93–116.CrossRef

47.

Crane, P. K., van Belle, G., & Larson, E. B. (2004). Test bias in a cognitive test: Differential item functioning in the CASI. Statistics in Medicine, 23(2), 241–256.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Cook, K., Cella, D., Narasimhalu, K., et al. (2007). A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 69–84.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Koenig, H. G., George, L. K., Peterson, B. L., & Pieper, C. F. (1997). Depression in medically ill hospitalized older adults: Prevalence, characteristics, and course of symptoms according to six diagnostic schemes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(10), 1376–1383.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Simon, G. E., & Von Korff, M. (2006). Medical co-morbidity and validity of DSM-IV depression criteria. Psychological Medicine, 36(1), 27–36.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Williams, J. W, Jr., Noel, P. H., Cordes, J. A., Ramirez, G., & Pignone, M. (2002). Is this patient clinically depressed? JAMA, 287(9), 1160–1170.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Fann, J. R., Bombardier, C. H., Richards, J. S., Wilson, C. S., Heinemann, A. W., Warren, A. M., et al. (2015). Venlafaxine extended-release for depression following spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(3), 247–258.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Perkes, S. J., Bowman, J., & Penkala, S. (2014). Psychological therapies for the management of co-morbid depression following a spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology, 19(12), 1597–1612.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Coventry, P. A., Hudson, J. L., Kontopantelis, E., Archer, J., Richards, D. A., Gilbody, S., et al. (2014). Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e108114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Gilbody, S., Bower, P., Fletcher, J., Richards, D., & Sutton, A. J. (2006). Collaborative care for depression: A cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(21), 2314–2321.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Gilbody, S., Whitty, P., Grimshaw, J., & Thomas, R. (2003). Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care: A systematic review. JAMA, 289(23), 3145–3151.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Green, C., Richards, D. A., Hill, J. J., Gask, L., Lovell, K., Chew-Graham, C., et al. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: Economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial (CADET). PLoS ONE, 9(8), e104225.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Do measures of depressive symptoms function differently in people with spinal cord injury versus primary care patients: the CES-D, PHQ-9, and PROMIS®-D
verfasst von: Karon F. Cook
Michael A. Kallen
Charles Bombardier
Alyssa M. Bamer
Seung W. Choi
Jiseon Kim
Rana Salem
Dagmar Amtmann
Publikationsdatum: 14.07.2016
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1363-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Quality of life in patients with a permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery

Quality of life in aphasic patients 1 year after a first stroke

Quality of life among working and non-working adolescents

Development of a French version of the Endometriosis Health Profile 5 (EHP-5): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Mexican version of the kidney disease questionnaire KDQOL-SF36 version 1.3

Longitudinal patterns of pain in patients with diffuse and limited systemic sclerosis: integrating medical, psychological, and social characteristics