Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
In this study, we examined the factors that influence humans recognition of robots as social beings. Participants took part in sessions of the Ultimatum Game, a procedure frequently used in the fields of both economics and social psychology for examining peoples’ attitudes toward others. In the experiment, several agents having different appearances were used, and speech stimuli, which were expected to induce a mentalizing effect on the participants’ attitude toward the agents, were utilized. The results show that, while appearance per se did not elicit a significant difference in the participants attitudes, the mentalizing stimuli affected their attitudes in different fashions, depending on the robots’ appearance. These results showed that elements such as a simple conversation with an agent and the agents’ appearance are important factors that cause people to treat robots in a more humanlike fashion and as social beings.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Nishio, S., K. Ogawa, Y. Kanakogi, S. Itakura, and H. Ishiguro. 2012. Do robot appearance and speech affect people’s attitude? Evaluation through the ultimatum game. In 21st IEEE International symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2012), 809–814.
DiSalvo, C.F., F. Gemperle, J. Forlizzi, and S. Kiesler. 2002. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, DIS ’02, 321–326.
Yee, N., J.N. Bailenson, and K. Rickertsen. 2007. A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI, 1–10.
Kilner, J.M., Y. Paulignan, and S.J. Blakemore. 2003. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology 13 (6): 522–525. CrossRef
Komatsu, T., and S. Yamada. 2007. How do robotic agents’ appearances affect people’s interpretations of the agents’ attitudes? In Proceedings of the CHI, 2519–2524.
Frith, U., and C.D. Frith. 2003. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 358 (1431): 459–473. CrossRef
Reeves, Byron, and Clifford Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, H.L., A.I. Jack, A. Roepstorff, and C.D. Frith. 2002. Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage, 16 (3, Part A): 814–821. CrossRef
Itakura, S. 2008. Development of mentalizing and communication: From viewpoint of developmental cybernetics and developmental cognitive neuroscience. IEICE Transactions on Communications 91 (7): 2109–2117 CrossRef
Güth, Werner, Rolf Schmittberger, and Bernd Schwarze. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (4): 367–388. CrossRef
Falk, Armin, Ernst Fehr, and Urs Fischbacher. 2003. On the nature of fair behavior. Economic Inquiry 41 (1): 20–26. CrossRef
Yamagishi, T., Y. Horita, H. Takagishi, M. Shinada, S. Tanida, and K.S. Cook. 2009. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 106 (28): 11520–11523. CrossRef
Ohmura, Y., and T. Yamagishi. 2005. Why do people reject unintended inequity? Responders’ rejection in a truncated ultimatum game. Psychological Reports 96 (2): 533–541. CrossRef
Güth, Werner. 1995. On ultimatum bargaining experiments—A personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 27 (3): 329–344. CrossRef
Roth, E. 1989. An experimental study of sequential bargaining. American Economic Review 79 (3): 355–84.
Slembeck, T. 1999. Reputations and fairness in bargaining - experimental evidence from a repeated ultimatum game with fixed opponents. Technical report 9904, Department of Economics, University of St.Gallen, May 1999.
Nishio, S., H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita. June 2007. Geminoid: Teleoperated android of an existing person. In Humanoid Robots: New Developments, Armando Carlos de Pina Filho ed, 343–352. Vienna, Austria: I-Tech Education and Publishing.
- Do Robot Appearance and Speech Affect People’s Attitude? Evaluation Through the Ultimatum Game
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 16
Neuer Inhalt/© Filograph | Getty Images | iStock