Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Education and Information Technologies
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 1/2021

08.07.2020

Does behavior simulation based on augmented reality improve moral imagination?

verfasst von: Ratna Candra Sari, Mahfud Sholihin, Nurhening Yuniarti, Ida Ayu Purnama, Hardika Dwi Hermawan

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovative learning techniques are needed, to match the expectations of the current audience to improve business ethics education for the twenty-first century. One of the innovative technologies which is believed to have a big effect on a bachelor’s degree is augmented reality (AR). Incorporating AR into the modern education system is expected to produce optimal augmentation in the learning and teaching environment. This will have a large impact on increasing students’ moral imagination. This study examines the use of AR-based behavior simulation, as an innovative technique for learning ethics, to improve moral imagination. This study employs a 3 × 2 experiment method, three training modes (AR-based behavioral simulation, paper-based-behavioral simulation, and no training) and two times (time one and time two) between- and within-subject factorial design. The subjects are 147 students on a business ethics course. The result of this study reveals that the use of AR-based behavior simulation can improve moral imagination.
Vorheriger Artikel Application of innovation diffusion theory to the E-learning process: higher education context
Nächster Artikel The effect of Voki application on students’ academic achievements and attitudes towards English course

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The case is in Indonesian language as the participants are Indonesian; it is available upon request.
 
Literatur
Adler, R. W., & Milne, M. J. (1997). Improving the quality of accounting students’ learning through action-oriented learning tasks. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 191–215.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.
Bell, B. S., Kanar, A. M., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(8), 1416–1434.
Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). Projects in VR the MagicBook moving seamlessly between reality and Virtuality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(3), 6–8.
Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented reality in education – Cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media.
Buck, W. F. (2014). A theory of business ethics simulation games. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 11, 217–238.
Caldwell, D. F., & Moberg, D. (2007). An exploratory investigation of the effect of ethical culture in activating moral imagination. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(2), 193–204.
Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L., & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a Mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art Museum. Computers in Education, 71, 185–197.
Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462.
Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based Mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365.
Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2005). Marketing models in education: Students as customers, products, or partners. Marketing Education Review, 15(1), 1–10.
Conroy, S. J., & Emerson, T. L. N. (2004). Business ethics and religion: Religiosity as a predictor of ethical awareness among students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 383–396.
Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2009). Perceived interactivity leading to E-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive-affective user responses. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67(10), 850–869.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Dunbar, R. L. M., Stumpf, S. A., Mullen, T. P., & Arnone, M. (1992). Management development choosing the right leadership simulation for the task. Journal of Management Education, 16(2), 220–230.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22.
Eveland, W. P. (2003). A ‘mix of attributes’ approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 395–410.
Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and Moral imagination: Pragmatism in ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fleig-Palmer, M. M., Hodge, K. A., & Lear, J. L. (2012). Teaching ethical reasoning using Venn diagrams. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 9, 325–342.
Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387–396.
Gao, Q., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Perception of interactivity: Affects of four key variables in Mobile advertising. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 25(6), 479–505.
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260.
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and Meta - analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23, 447–459.
Hawtrey, K. (2007). Using experiential learning techniques. Journal of Economic Education, 38(2), 143–152.
Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long- versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493–504.
Jagger, S., Siala, H., & Sloan, D. (2016). It’s all in the game: A 3D learning model for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 383–403.
Javornik, A. (2016). ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ Consumer affective, cognitive and Behavioural responses to augmented reality applications. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9–10), 987–1011.
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Karamanoli, P., & Tsinakos, A. (2015). Use of augmented reality in terms of creativity in school learning. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1450, 45–53.
Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). ‘Making it real’: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3–4), 163–174.
Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (2005). Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg’s model. Psychological Review, 112(3), 629–649.
LeClair, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (2000). Innovation in experiential business ethics training. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 313–322.
Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64.
Mayhew, B. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2009). The impact of ethics education on reporting behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 397–416.
McDonald, R. J., McDonald, J. S., Kallmes, D. F., Jentoft, M. E., Murray, D. L., Thielen, K. R., Williamson, E. E., & Eckel, L. J. (2015). Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 275(3), 772–782.
Mekni, M., and Lemieux, A. (2014). “Augmented Reality: Applications, Challenges and Future Trends.” Applied Computational Science 205–14.
Moberg, D. J., & Seabright, M. A. (2000). The development of moral imagination. The Ethics of Creativity, 10(4), 845–884.
Mollen, A., & Wilson, H. (2010). Engagement, Telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 919–925.
Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Jorrín-Abellan, I. M., Asensio-Peréz, J. I., Martínez-Monés, A., Prieto, L. P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Supporting teacher orchestration in ubiquitous learning environments: A study in primary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 83–97.
Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Environmen Foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–68.
O’Leary, C., & Mohamad, S. (2008). The successful influence of teaching ethics on Malaysian accounting students. Malaysian Accounting Review, 7(2), 1–16.
O’Leary, C., & Stewart, J. (2013). The interaction of learning styles and teaching methodologies in accounting ethical instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 225–241.
OECD. (2015). OECD Economic surveys: Indonesia 2015. Retrieved from http://​dx/​doi.​org/​10.​1787/​eco_​surveys-idn-1015-en.​
Opp, K. D. (1970). The experimental method in the social sciences - some problems and proposals for its more effective use. Quality and Quantity, 4(1), 39–54.
Proserpio, L., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). Teaching the virtual generation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 69–80.
Raman, G. V., Swapnil, G., & Thapliyal, S. (2019). Integrative live case: A contemporary business ethics pedagogy. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4), 1009–1032.
Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Cameron, K., Shawn Burke, C., Stagl, K. C., Goodwin, G. F., & Halpin, S. M. (2008). Does team training improve team performance? A Meta-analysis. Human Factors, 50(6), 903–933.
Simola, S. K., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2010). Transformational leadership and leader moral orientation: Contrasting an ethic of justice and an ethic of care. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 179–188.
Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: Augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114–122.
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Characteristics determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–94.
Summers, G. J. (2004). Today’s business simulation industry. Simulation and Gaming, 35(2), 208–241.
Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing Interactivity’s effects. The Information Society, 20(5), 385–389.
Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME). In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbo. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Tomi, A. B., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2013). An interactive Mobile augmented reality magical playbook: Learning number with the thirsty crow. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 123–130.
van Noort, G., Voorveld, H. A. M., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 223–234.
Vidaver-cohen, D. (1997). Moral imagination in organizational problem-solving: An institutional perspective (Vol. 7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Werhane, P. H. (1998). Moral imagination and the search for ethical decision-making in management. Business Ethics Quarterly, 75–98.
Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management Decisionmaking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1–2), 33–42.
Whitaker, B. G., & Godwin, L. N. (2013). The antecedents of moral imagination in the workplace: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 61–73.
Wu, H.-k., Lee, S. W.-y., Chang, H.-y., & Liang, J.-c. (2013). Computers & education current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49.
Yoon, J. (2012). Detecting weak signals for long-term business opportunities using text Mining of web News. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16), 12543–12550.
Yuen, S. C.-Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., and Johnson, E. (2011). “Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education.” Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange 4(1).
Metadaten
Titel
Does behavior simulation based on augmented reality improve moral imagination?
verfasst von
Ratna Candra Sari
Mahfud Sholihin
Nurhening Yuniarti
Ida Ayu Purnama
Hardika Dwi Hermawan
Publikationsdatum
08.07.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10263-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Education and Information Technologies 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

No more excuses, learn English for free: Factors affecting L2 learners intention to use online technology for informal English learning

OriginalPaper

Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept

OriginalPaper

Integrating ICT into schools in Sub-Saharan Africa: from teachers’ capacity building to classroom implementation

OriginalPaper

Development of a Java-based Mobile application for mathematics learning

OriginalPaper

Investigating the impact of computer-assisted pronunciation teaching (CAPT) on improving intermediate EFL learners’ pronunciation ability

OriginalPaper

A comprehensive approach to learning analytics in Bulgarian school education