Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Grounded in person–environment fit theory, this field experiment was designed to test the effects of job advertisements emphasizing information about demands–abilities (D–A) or needs–supplies (N–S) fit on the size and quality of the applicant pool. The wording used in 56 actual job ads was manipulated to emphasize D–A or N–S fit, and data were collected about application behavior and applicant quality based on ratings of the resumes submitted by 991 applicants. Other study hypotheses were tested using survey data collected from a subsample (n = 91).
Job ads emphasizing N–S fit, rather than D–A fit, elicited more applications (relative to job ad views) and a higher quality applicant pool. Analyses of survey data provided support for mediated and moderated effects that provide insight into how and for whom N–S fit information in job ads is ultimately linked to greater attraction.
The findings indicate that recruiting organizations can craft job ads to emphasize specific types of fit and favorably affect applicants’ perceived fit, attraction, and application behavior, as well as the quality of the applicant pool.
This study is one of only a few field experiments containing manipulations of the content of job ads in the recruitment literature. The distinction between two important fit constructs that have received surprisingly little empirical attention in recruitment contexts was found to have effects on application behavior and applicant quality—two critically important, yet rarely examined outcomes.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Athey, R. (2004). It’s 2008: Do you know where your talent is? New York, NY: Deloitte & Touche.
Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organizational perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1996). Image theory, the unifying perspective. In L. R. Beach (Ed.), Decision making in the workplace: A unified perspective (pp. 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Boudreau, J. W., & Rynes, S. L. (1985). Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 354–366. CrossRef
Breaugh, J. (2008). Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 103–118. CrossRef
Breaugh, J. A., & Starke, M. (2000). Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management, 26, 405–434. CrossRef
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311. CrossRef
Carless, S. A. (2005). Person–job fit versus person–organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 411–429. CrossRef
Carlson, K. D., Connerly, M. L., & Mecham, R. L., I. I. I. (2002). Recruitment evaluation: The case for assessing the quality of applicants attracted. Personnel Psychology, 55, 461–490. CrossRef
Chapman, D. S., & Borodenko, N. (2006). Targeting recruiting efforts at the individual, occupational and universal level. In C. Harold (Chair), The rules of attraction: What, when and why applicants choose. Symposium conducted at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
Chapman, D. S., & Webster, J. (2006). Integrating applicant reactions into the critical contact framework of recruiting. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 1032–1057. CrossRef
Collins, C. J., & Han, J. (2004). Exploring applicant pool quantity and quality: The effects of early recruitment practice strategies, corporate advertising, and firm reputation. Personnel Psychology, 57, 685–717. CrossRef
De Cooman, R., Stynen, D., Van den Broeck, A., Sels, L., & De Witte, H. (2013). How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: Implications for work effort. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1342–1352. CrossRef
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. CrossRef
Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person–job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (vol. 6, pp. 283–357). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279. CrossRef
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. CrossRef
Highhouse, S., Beadle, D., Gallo, A., & Miller, L. (1998). Get ‘em while they last! Effects of scarcity information in job advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 779–795. CrossRef
Highhouse, S., & Hoffman, J. R. (2001). Organizational attraction and job choice. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16, 37–64.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jones, D. A., Shultz, J. W., & Chapman, D. S. (2006). Recruiting through job advertisements: The effects of cognitive elaboration on decision making. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 167–179. CrossRef
Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359–394. CrossRef
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person–organizational fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. CrossRef
Kristof-Brown, A. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643–671. CrossRef
Kristof-Brown, A., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person– environment fit. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 3–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, US.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. CrossRef
Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454–470. CrossRef
Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56, 75–102. CrossRef
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Piasentin, K. A., & Chapman, D. S. (2006). Subjective person–organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 202–221. CrossRef
Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Staffing in the 21st century: New challenges and strategic opportunities. Journal of Management, 32, 868–897. CrossRef
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. CrossRef
Ryan, G., Gubern, M., & Rodriguez, I. (2000). Recruitment advertising: The marketing–human resource interface. International Advances in Economic Research, 6, 354–364. CrossRef
Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 399–444). Paolo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395–426. CrossRef
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453. CrossRef
Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773. CrossRef
Slaughter, J. E., & Greguras, G. J. (2009). Initial attraction to organizations: The influence of trait inferences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 1–18. CrossRef
Spence, A. M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374. CrossRef
Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, et al. (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 197–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tangirala, S., & Alge, B. J. (2006). Reactions to unfair events in computer-mediated groups: A test of uncertainty management theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 1–20. CrossRef
Tom, V. R. (1971). The role of personality and organizational images in the recruiting process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 573–592. CrossRef
Turban, D. B., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 733–751. CrossRef
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work and Stress, 22, 277–294. CrossRef
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., de Witte, S., de Witte, H., & Deci, E. L. (2004). The ‘why’ and ‘why not’ of job search behavior: Their relation to searching, unemployment experience, and well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 345–363. CrossRef
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557–574. CrossRef
- Does Emphasizing Different Types of Person–Environment Fit in Online Job Ads Influence Application Behavior and Applicant Quality? Evidence from a Field Experiment
Joseph A. Schmidt
Derek S. Chapman
David A. Jones
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta