Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9481-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Elite support for modifying electoral institutions and policies generally depends on whether a proposed change is expected to improve their party’s electoral prospects. Prior studies suggest that the average citizen evaluates potential reforms in a similar manner, but they fail to directly demonstrate that individuals actually consider their partisan self-interest when forming policy preferences. I address this limitation through two survey experiments that manipulate the specific group for whom reforms make voting more or less difficult. The results provide strong causal evidence that individuals update their attitudes as expected in response to that information. Members of both parties consistently express greater support for changes when framed as advancing their party’s electoral prospects than when characterized as benefiting their opponents. The findings have important implications for the constraints faced by political actors in gaming the electoral system in their favor and for understanding the role of self-interest in shaping policy attitudes.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 154 kb)11109_2018_9481_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., Levin, I., & Stewart, C., III. (2011). Voter opinions about election reform: Do they support making voting more convenient? Election Law Journal,10(2), 73–87.
Alvarez, R. M., Levin, I., & Sinclair, J. A. (2012). Making voting easier: Convenience voting in the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly,65(2), 248–262. CrossRef
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Banducci, S. A., & Karp, J. A. (1999). Perceptions of fairness and support for proportional representation. Political Behavior,21(3), 217–238. CrossRef
Barreto, M. A., Nuño, S. A., & Sanchez, G. R. (2007). Voter ID requirements and the disenfranchisements of Latino, Black and Asian voters. In Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
Barreto, M. A., Nuño, S. A., & Sanchez, G. R. (2009). The disproportionate impact of voter-ID requirements on the electorate—New evidence from Indiana. Political Science and Politics,42(1), 111–116. CrossRef
Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2012). A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(3), 571–597. CrossRef
Bentele, K. G., & O’Brien, E. E. (2013). Jim Crow 2.0? Why states consider and adopt restrictive voter access policies. Perspectives on Politics,11(4), 1088–1116. CrossRef
Berinksy, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis,20(3), 351–368. CrossRef
Biggers, D. R., & Hanmer, M. J. (2015). Who makes voting convenient? Explaining the adoption of early and no-excuse absentee voting in the American states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly,15(2), 192–210. CrossRef
Biggers, D. R., & Hanmer, M. J. (2017). Understanding the adoption of voter identification laws in the American states. American Politics Research,45(4), 560–588. CrossRef
Boix, C. (1999). Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review,93(3), 609–624. CrossRef
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2007). Reasoning about institutional change: Winners, losers, and support for electoral reforms. British Journal of Political Science,37(3), 455–476. CrossRef
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2013). The limits of electoral reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2002). Why might institutions change? Elite support for direct democracy in three nations. Political Research Quarterly,55(4), 731–754. CrossRef
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2006). Why politicians like electoral institutions: Self-interest, values, or ideology? Journal of Politics,68(2), 434–446. CrossRef
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. CrossRef
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fougere, J., Ansolabehere, S., & Persily, N. (2010). Partisanship, public opinion, and redistricting. Election Law Journal,9(4), 325–347.
Hanmer, M. J. (2009). Discount voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Herron, M. C., & Smith, D. A. (2014). Race, party, and the consequences of restricting early voting in Florida in the 2012 General Election. Political Research Quarterly,67(3), 646–665. CrossRef
Hibbing, J. R., & Alford, J. R. (2004). Accepting authoritative decisions: Humans as wary cooperators. American Journal of Political Science,48(1), 62–76. CrossRef
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Hicks, W. D., McKee, S. C., Sellers, M. D., & Smith, D. A. (2015). A principle or a strategy? Voter identification laws and partisan competition in the American states. Political Research Quarterly,68(1), 18–33. CrossRef
Hood, M. V., III, & Bullock, C. S., III. (2008). Worth a thousand words? An analysis of Georgia’s voter identification statute. American Politics Research,36(4), 555–579. CrossRef
Karol, D. (2009). Party position change in American politics: Coalition management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Karp, J. A., & Tolbert, C. J. (2010). Support for nationalizing presidential elections. Presidential Studies Quarterly,40(4), 771–793. CrossRef
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press. CrossRef
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review,88(1), 63–76. CrossRef
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science,59(1), 128–145. CrossRef
McGhee, E. (2014). Measuring partisan bias in single-member district electoral systems. Legislative Studies Quarterly,39(1), 55–85. CrossRef
Rocha, R. R., & Matsubayashi, T. (2014). The politics of race and voter ID laws in the states: The return of Jim Crow? Political Research Quarterly,67(3), 666–679. CrossRef
Shepsle, K. A. (2001). A comment on institutional change. Journal of Theoretical Politics,13(3), 321–325. CrossRef
Smith, D. A., Tolbert, C. J., & Keller, A. M. (2010). Electoral and structural losers and support for a national referendum in the US. Electoral Studies,29(3), 509–520. CrossRef
Stewart, C., III, Ansolabehere, S., & Persily, N. (2016). Revisiting public opinion on voter identification and voter fraud in an era of increasing partisan polarization. Stanford Law Review,68(6), 1455–1489.
Tolbert, C. J., Smith, D. A., & Green, J. C. (2009). Strategic voting and legislative redistricting reform: District and statewide representational winners and losers. Political Research Quarterly,62(1), 92–109. CrossRef
Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology,35(2), 117–125. CrossRef
Tyson, A., & Maniam, S. (2016). Behind Trump’s victory: Divisions by race, gender, education. Pew Research Center. Retrieved April 20, 2018 from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/.
Wenzel, J. P., Bowler, S., & Lanoue, D. J. (2000). Citizen opinion and constitutional choices: The case of the UK. Political Behavior,22(3), 241–265. CrossRef
Wilson, D. C., & Brewer, P. R. (2013). The foundations of public opinion on voter ID laws: Political predispositions, racial resentment, and information effects. Public Opinion Quarterly,77(4), 962–984. CrossRef
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Does Partisan Self-interest Dictate Support for Election Reform? Experimental Evidence on the Willingness of Citizens to Alter the Costs of Voting for Electoral Gain
Daniel R. Biggers
- Springer US
- Political Behavior
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität