Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 1/2013

01.07.2013 | Original Research

Does tax convexity matter for risk? A dynamic study of tax asymmetry and equity beta

verfasst von: Adrian C. H. Lei, Martin H. Y. Yick, Keith S. K. Lam

Erschienen in: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of tax convexity on firms’ market risk, where tax convexity measures the progressivity of firms’ tax function. We examine the relation between equity beta and tax convexity based on a standard contingent-claims model, in which firms face nonlinear tax schedules. We verify that in the presence of default and growth options, the effect of tax convexity on beta is significant and depends on several countervailing forces. Tax convexity has a direct, positive effect on beta, as well as two indirect countereffects through default and growth options. The overall effect is ambiguous and quantitatively significant. As asymmetric tax schedules are used in most countries, assuming a linear tax schedule in the valuation framework may misestimate beta and thus fail to assess risk accurately. Our theoretical model shows that tax convexity should be taken into consideration when estimating equity beta.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Continuity means the equity value is a continuous function of the profit flow. There is no jump in this function. Real option literature states that continuity is a valid and appropriate setting on the valuation of real options.
 
2
Smooth pasting is a kind of boundary condition in real option theory. In our paper, this condition is to ascertain that at the point of bankruptcy, X = XBG, the function of equity value is differentiable, and the slope should be zero so that the whole equity function can be derived.
 
3
Based on the base parameter values and setting δ = 0, the leverage ratios are 56.89, 28.07, and 19.29 % for X = 2, 4, and 6, respectively. The high-leverage firm has a lower change compared with the low-leverage firm. When tax asymmetry is present, all leverage ratios increase. To obtain the leverage ratios, pre-expansion debt value is also derived using the same method as in Sects. 3 and 4.
 
4
We use the base case parameter values suggested by Hong and Sarkar (2007) to achieve the new result. We also verify that the other results of this model are consistent with the literature.
 
5
Supported by empirical evidence, the two papers state that growth opportunity is a key determinant for beta. Specifically, Hong and Sarkar (2007) provide a detailed study of the effect of the growth option on equity beta. Empirically, they find that a positive relation holds. At the same time, they offer a simulation case to illustrate that the growth option might negatively affect equity beta once the firm’s leverage ratio is very high.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Auerbach AJ (1986) The dynamic effects of tax law asymmetries. Rev Econ Stud 53(1):205–225 Auerbach AJ (1986) The dynamic effects of tax law asymmetries. Rev Econ Stud 53(1):205–225
Zurück zum Zitat Badrinath SG, Chatterjee S (1993) Systematic risk estimation in the presence of large and many outliers. Rev Quant Finance Account 3(1):5–27CrossRef Badrinath SG, Chatterjee S (1993) Systematic risk estimation in the presence of large and many outliers. Rev Quant Finance Account 3(1):5–27CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chance D (1982) Evidence on a simplified model of systematic risk. Financial Manag 11(3):53–63CrossRef Chance D (1982) Evidence on a simplified model of systematic risk. Financial Manag 11(3):53–63CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen KC, Cheng D, Hite GL (1986) Systematic risk and market power: an application of Tobins’ q. Q Rev Econ Bus 26(3):58–72 Chen KC, Cheng D, Hite GL (1986) Systematic risk and market power: an application of Tobins’ q. Q Rev Econ Bus 26(3):58–72
Zurück zum Zitat Chiou WJP, Lee A, Lee CF (2009) Variation in stock return risks: an international comparison. Rev Pac Basin Financial Mark Policies 12(2):245–266CrossRef Chiou WJP, Lee A, Lee CF (2009) Variation in stock return risks: an international comparison. Rev Pac Basin Financial Mark Policies 12(2):245–266CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chung KH, Charoenwong C (1991) Investment options, asset in place, and the risk of stocks. Financial Manag 20(3):21–33CrossRef Chung KH, Charoenwong C (1991) Investment options, asset in place, and the risk of stocks. Financial Manag 20(3):21–33CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dixit A, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton Dixit A, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson MF, Shockley RL (2003) Equilibrium anomalies. J Finance 58(6):2549–2580CrossRef Ferguson MF, Shockley RL (2003) Equilibrium anomalies. J Finance 58(6):2549–2580CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gomes J, Kogan L, Zhang L (2003) Equilibrium cross-section of returns. J Political Econ 114(4):693–732 Gomes J, Kogan L, Zhang L (2003) Equilibrium cross-section of returns. J Political Econ 114(4):693–732
Zurück zum Zitat Graham J, Harvey C (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financial Econ 60(2–3):187–243CrossRef Graham J, Harvey C (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financial Econ 60(2–3):187–243CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graham JR, Smith CW (1999) Tax incentives to hedge. J Finance 54(6):2241–2262CrossRef Graham JR, Smith CW (1999) Tax incentives to hedge. J Finance 54(6):2241–2262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hill NC, Stone BK (1980) Accounting betas, systematic operating risk, and financial leverage: a risk-composition approach to the determinants of systematic risk. J Financial Quant Anal 15(3):595–637CrossRef Hill NC, Stone BK (1980) Accounting betas, systematic operating risk, and financial leverage: a risk-composition approach to the determinants of systematic risk. J Financial Quant Anal 15(3):595–637CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hong G, Sarkar S (2007) Equity systematic risk (beta) and its determinants. Contemp Account Res 24(2):423–466CrossRef Hong G, Sarkar S (2007) Equity systematic risk (beta) and its determinants. Contemp Account Res 24(2):423–466CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacKie-Mason JK (1990) Some nonlinear tax effects on asset values and investment decisions under uncertainty. J Public Econ 42(3):301–327CrossRef MacKie-Mason JK (1990) Some nonlinear tax effects on asset values and investment decisions under uncertainty. J Public Econ 42(3):301–327CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelker G, Rhee SG (1984) The impact of the degrees of operating and financial leverage on systematic risk of common stock. J Financial Quant Anal 19(1):45–57CrossRef Mandelker G, Rhee SG (1984) The impact of the degrees of operating and financial leverage on systematic risk of common stock. J Financial Quant Anal 19(1):45–57CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer C (1986) Corporation tax, finance and the cost of capital. Rev Econ Stud 53(1):93–112CrossRef Mayer C (1986) Corporation tax, finance and the cost of capital. Rev Econ Stud 53(1):93–112CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merton R (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J Finance 29(2):449–470 Merton R (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J Finance 29(2):449–470
Zurück zum Zitat Miles J (1986) Growth options and the real determinants of systematic risk. J Bus Finance Account 13(1):95–105CrossRef Miles J (1986) Growth options and the real determinants of systematic risk. J Bus Finance Account 13(1):95–105CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financial Econ 5(2):147–175CrossRef Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financial Econ 5(2):147–175CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nance DR, Smith CW, Smithson CW (1993) On the determinants of corporate hedging. J Finance 48(1):267–284CrossRef Nance DR, Smith CW, Smithson CW (1993) On the determinants of corporate hedging. J Finance 48(1):267–284CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sarkar S (2008) Can tax convexity be ignored in corporate financing decisions? J Bank Finance 32(7):1310–1321CrossRef Sarkar S (2008) Can tax convexity be ignored in corporate financing decisions? J Bank Finance 32(7):1310–1321CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (2002) Estimating Beta. Rev Quant Finance Account 18(2):95–118CrossRef Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (2002) Estimating Beta. Rev Quant Finance Account 18(2):95–118CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tufano P (1998) Agency costs of corporate risk management. Financial Manag 27(1):67–77CrossRef Tufano P (1998) Agency costs of corporate risk management. Financial Manag 27(1):67–77CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Does tax convexity matter for risk? A dynamic study of tax asymmetry and equity beta
verfasst von
Adrian C. H. Lei
Martin H. Y. Yick
Keith S. K. Lam
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0924-865X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7179
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-012-0303-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe