Skip to main content
Log in

Pursuing genius loci: interaction design and natural places

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human computer interaction (HCI) has little explored everyday life and enriching experiences in rural, wilderness and other predominantly “natural” places despite their socioeconomic importance. Beyond simply addressing the challenge arising from applying an urban perspective to designing technologies for use in natural places, we wish to provoke integration of the natural and computational worlds. To stimulate design that both draws upon and affords such integration, we propose seven themes we have distilled from the literature and supplement these with our own research observations. Bodies Imagine and Remember recognizes the inseparability of meanings and corporeal experience of natural places for design. Indexicality and Habitus refers to the need for design to be sensitive to the processes by which natural features become intelligible in our actions and communication. Values and Story-spaces observes the way representations and infrastructures, infused with particular values, become dominant. Identity and Belonging, suggests the need to reconcile designs with couplings between physical settings, processes of community and personal identity. Rhythm and Dynamism considers links between people’s daily routines, nature’s events and patterns and spatial and social issues pertinent to design and in Revealing and Receding we suggest that design must simultaneously fade into the background and provoke seeing natural places differently. Fragility, Liability and Spirituality refers to technological opportunities to support positive relations within ecosystems and recognizing the limits of technological control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M et al (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford Universtiy Press

  2. Ames T (2003) Putting fishermen’s knowledge to work: the promise and pitfalls. In: Haggan N, Brignall C, Wood L (eds) Putting Fishers’ knowledge to work: conference proceedings: 27–30 August 2001. FCRR, Vancouver, pp 184–189

  3. Appleton J (1975) The experience of landscape. Wiley

  4. Ashok A, Beck C (2007) Using activity theory to develop a design framework for rural development. In: Proc. CHI ‘07 Extended abstracts. ACM Press, New York, pp 2255–2260

  5. Axup J, Viller S (2005) Augmenting travel gossip: design for mobile communities. In: Proc. OzCHI, Canberra, pp 1–4

  6. Bentrupperbäumer JM, Reser JP (2002) Measuring & monitoring impacts of visitation & use in the wet tropics world heritage area: a site based bioregional perspective. Rainforest Cooperative Research Centre Cairns

  7. Bidwell N, Browning D (2006) Making there: methods to uncover egocentric experience in a dialogic of natural places. In: Proc. OZCHI, Sydney, pp 229–236

  8. Bidwell N, Standley PM, George T (2008) The Landscape’s apprentice: lessons for place centred design from grounding documentary. In: Proc. ACM DIS06 (Designing Interactive Systems), Cape Town, South Africa, pp 88–98

  9. Bizzochi J (2007) The aesthetics of the ambient video experience. In: Proc. perthDAC 2007: 7th Digital Arts & Culture Conference, Perth, pp 51–60

  10. Blake EH (2002) Extended Abstract a field computer for animal trackers. In: Conf. on human factors in computing systems, pp 532–533

  11. Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, p 5

  12. Bourdieu P (1991) Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press

  13. Brewer J, Dourish P (2006) Storied spaces: cultural accounts of technology and environmental knowing. IJHCS Working paper

  14. Browning D, Bidwell N, Hardy D, Standley P (2008) Rural encounters: cultural translations through video. In: Proc. OZCHI 08, pp 148–155

  15. Burns GL, Howard P (2003) When wildlife tourism goes wrong: a case study of stakeholder and management issues regarding Dingoes on Fraser Island, Australia. Tourism Manag 24(6):699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campari I, Frank A (1995) Cultural differences and cultural aspects in GIS. In: Nyerges T, Mark D, Laurini R, Egenhofer M (eds) Cognitive aspects of human computer interaction for geographic information systems. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp 249–266

    Google Scholar 

  17. Casey ES (2002) Representing place: landscape painting and maps. University of Minnesota Press

  18. Chang A, Ishii H (2006) Towards culture centred design. In: Proc. DIS’06 (Designing Interactive Systems) University Park

  19. Chenoweth RE, Gobster PH (1990) The nature and ecology of aesthetic experiences in the landscape. Landsc J 9(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cloke P (1994) (En)culturing political economy: a life in the day of a “rural geographer”. In: Cloak P, Doel M, Matless D, Phillips M, Thrift N (eds) Writing the rural: five cultural geographies. Paul Chapman, London, pp 149–190

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cosgrove D (1978) Place, landscape, and the dialectics of cultural geography. Can Geographer 22(1):66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crabtree A, Rodden T (2004) Domestic routines and design for the home. Comput Support Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13(2):191–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey Bass Pubs, San Francisco

  24. de Certeau M (1988) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dourish P (2006) Re-spaceing place: “Place” and “Space” ten years on. In: Proc. 20th CSCW, pp 299–308

  26. Dourish P (2007) Seeing like an interface. In: Proc. OzCHI 2007, Adelaide, pp 1–8

  27. Dreyfus HL (1991) Being in the world: a commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. MIT Press, Cambridge

  28. Ehrke BR, Bidwell NJ (2008) Demonstrating a MR game used to explore locations in tropical North Queensland. In: Proc. interactive entertainment, Brisbane

  29. Facer K, Joiner R, Stanton D, Reid J, Hull R, Kirk D (2004) Savannah: mobile gaming and learning? J Comput Assist Learn 20(6):399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fairweather JR, Swaffield SR (2003) Tourist experiences of landscape in New Zealand: themes from three case studies. Tourism Cult Commun 4(2):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Flynn B (2005) Imaging gameplaythe design and construction of spatial worlds. In: Proc. Imaginary Worlds Symp., UTS, Sydney

  32. Gard MS, Bucolo MS, Wyeld MT (2006) Capturing Australian indigenous perceptions of landscape using a virtual environment. In: Proc. virtual systems and multimedia, Ghent, Belgium

  33. Garfinkel H (1987) Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press

  34. Gaver WW (2006) The video window: my life with a ludic system. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaver WW, Bowers J, Boucher A, Gellerson H, Pennington S, Schmidt A et al (2004) The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In: Proc. conf. human factors in computing systems: CHI’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 885–900

  36. Gilbert E, Karahalios K, Sandvig C (2008) The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life In: Proc. CHI’08, pp 1603–1612

  37. Gowans G, Campbell J, Norman A, Dye R, Astell A, Ellis M (2004) Designing a multimedia conversation aid for reminiscence therapy in dementia care environments. In: Proc CHI'04, pp 825–836

  38. Halfacree KH (1994) The importance of” the rural” in the constitution of counter urbanization: evidence from England in the 1980s. Social Ruralis 34(23):164–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Halloran J, Hornecker E, Fitzpatrick G, Weal M, Millard D, Michaelides D et al (2006) Unfolding understandings: codesigning ubicomp in situ, over time. In: 6th DIS, pp 109–118

  40. Hargreaves D (2008) Low-cost; low-bandwidth online meetings between scientists and farmers. In: Proc. OZCHI'08. Cairns, pp 271–274

  41. Harper R, Randall D, Smyth N, Evans C, Heledd L, Moore R (2008) The past is a different place: they do things differently there. In: Proc. DIS (Designing Interactive Systems) 08, Cape Town, pp 271–280

  42. Harter T, Vroegindeweij S, Geelhoed E, Manahan M, Ranganathan P (2004) Energy-aware user interfaces: an evaluation of user acceptance. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human factors in computing systems, pp 199–206

  43. Hauge AL (2007) Identity and place: a critical comparison of three identity theories. Architect Sci Rev 50(1):44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hovardas T, Stamou GP (2006) Structural and narrative reconstruction of rural residents’ representations of ‘nature’,’wildlife’, and ‘landscape’. Biodivers Conserv 15(5):1745–1770

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ittelson WH, Franck KA, O’Hanlon TJ (1976) The nature of environmental experience. In: Wapner S, Cohen SB, Kaplan B (eds) Experiencing the environment. Plenum Press, New York, pp 187–206

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jeremijenko N “OneTree.” http://www.nyu.edu/projects/xdesign/onetrees/. Accessed 30 Dec 2008

  47. Kaplan R, Ryan RL, Kaplan S (1998) With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. Island Press

  48. Kethers S, Hargreaves D, Wilkinson R (2004) Remote meetings between farmers and researchers: a case study on asymmetry. In: Proc. ACM CSCW, pp 624–627

  49. Klemmer SR, Hartmann B, Takayama L (2006) How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In: Proc. 6th ACM DIS06 (Designing Interactive Systems), pp 140–149

  50. Krug K, Mountain D, Phan D (2003) Location based services for mobile users in protected areas. Geoinformatics 6:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kurokawa T (2006) Japanese landscape and my environmental design. In: Proc. Asia Pacific symp. on information visualisation, pp 9–12

  52. Lee SP, Cheok AD, James TKS, Debra GPL, Jie CW, Chuang W et al (2006) A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for humanpoultry interaction through the internet. Pers Ubiquit Comp 10(5):301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Loibl W, Orthofer R (2002) Spatial risk modeling for water shortage and nitrate pollution in the lower Jordan Valley. ARCóS0162

  54. Maunder A, Marsden G, Tucker WD (2006) Evaluating the relevance of the ‘real access’ criteria as a framework for rural HCI research. In: Proc. CHISA, pp 57–79

  55. Mausner C (1996) A kaleidoscope model: defining natural environments. J Env Psychol 16(4):335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mausner C (2006) Capturing the hike experience on video: a new methodology for studying human transactions with nature. In: Proc. Northeastern Recreation Research Symp, Bolton Landing, NY, pp 168–176

  57. McCarthy J, Wright P (2005) Putting ‘feltlife’ at the centre of humancomputer interaction (HCI). Cogn Technol Work 7(4):262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. McCarthy J, Wright P (2005) Technology in place: dialogics of technology, place and self. In: Proc. INTERACT, Rome, pp 914–926

  59. McCarthy J, Wright P (2006) Dialogical approach to experience: uncovering critical potential. In: Proc. the virtual conference M3: man medium machine research platform, pp 621–638

  60. McCarthy J, Wright P, Wallace J, Dearden A (2006) The experience of enchantment in humancomputer interaction. Pers Ubiquit Comp 10(6):369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. McCaw C (2007) Art and (second) life: over the hills and far away?. In: Proc. perthDAC 2007: 7th Digital Arts & Culture Conference, Perth, pp 241–254

  62. Murphy P (2002) Sea change: reinventing rural and regional Australia. Transform J 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  63. O’Brien S, Mueller FF (2007) Jogging the distance. In: Proc. CHI ‘07, San Jose, pp 523–526

  64. Omodei MM, McLennan J, Whitford P (1998) Using a headmounted video camera and two stage replay to enhance orienteering performance. Int J Sport Psychol 29:115–131

    Google Scholar 

  65. Parikh TS, Lazowska ED (2006) Designing an architecture for delivering mobile information services to the rural developing world. In: Proceedings of the 15th international Conf. on World Wide Web, pp 791–800

  66. Parsons R, Hartig T (2000) Environmental psychophysiology. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology. UP, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pascoe J, Ryan N, Morse D (2000) Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. In: Proc. ACM TOCHI, pp 417–437

  68. Paulos E, Jenkins T (2005) Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres. In: Proc. ACM human factors in computing systems, pp 341–350

  69. Peltzer K (2002) Personality and person perception in Africa. Social Behav Pers 20:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  70. Porteous D (2007) Just how transformational is mbanking? Paper commissioned by FinMark Trust.[http://www.finmarktrust.org.za/accessfrontier/accessfrontier. html]

  71. Reddy M, Dourish P (2002) A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. New Orleans, pp 344–353

  72. Rose DB (1996) Nourishing terrains: Australian aboriginal views of landscape & wilderness. AHC

  73. Rouncefield M et al (2002) Workshop position paper: understanding space, place and ‘community’ in HCI. http://www.infosci.cornell.edu/place/. Accessed Sept 2005

  74. Rouncefield M, Saslis, Laougdakis G, Chevrst K, Dix A, Fitton D, Kray C et al. (2005). Probing designs: designing probes appropriate methods for design. In: Proc. OZCHI design in complex & sensitive settings workshop. http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/c.kray/pub/CheverstEtAl05_ProbingDesign.pdf. Accessed May 2008

  75. Ryan C, Hughes K, Chirgwin S (2000) The gaze, spectacle and ecotourism. Ann Tour Res 27(1):148–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Sell JL, Taylor JG, Zube EH (1984) Toward a theoretical framework for landscape perception. In: Saafinen TF, Seamon D, Sell JL (eds) Env. Percept. & Behav: An Inventory & Prospect, University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 61–83

  77. Sengers P, McCarthy J, Dourish P (2006) Reflective HCI: arcitulating an agenda for critical practice. In: Proc CHI 06. ACM Press, New York, pp 1683–1686

  78. Shafer CS, Inglis GJ (2000) Influence of social, biophysical, and managerial conditions on tourism experiences within the GBRWHA. Env Manag 26(1):73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Short J (1991) Imagined country. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sinanan J (2008) Social tools and social capital: reading mobile phone usage in rural indigenous communities. In: Proc. OZCHI, Cairns, pp 267–270

  81. Smith BK, Reiser BJ (1998) National geographic unplugged: classroomcentered design of interactive nature films. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys., New York, pp 424–431

  82. Suchman L (2000) Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind Culture Activity 7(1&2):4–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Taylor N, Cheverst K, Fitton D, Race NJP, Rouncefield M, Graham C (2007) Probing communities: study of a village photo display. In: Proc. OZCHI'07, pp 17–24

  84. Thwaites K (2001) Experiential landscape place: an exploration of space & experience in neighbourhood landscape architecture. Landsc Res 26(3):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Throop CJ, Murphy KM (2002) Bourdieu and phenomenology: a critical assessment. Anthropol Theory 2(2):185–207

    Google Scholar 

  86. truna aka Turner J, Browning D, Bidwell N (2007) Wanderer beyond game worlds. In: Proc. DAC ‘07, Perth, pp 364–374

  87. Tuan YF (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press

  88. Twigger Ross C, Bonaiuto M, BreakwellL G (2003) 7 Identity theories and environmental psychology. In: Psychological theories for environmental issues

  89. Ulrich RS (1984) Benefits of nature: view from a hospital bed. Science 224:420–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. van Koppen CSA (2000) Resource, Arcadia, lifeworld. nature concepts in environmental sociology. Sociologia Ruralis 40(3):300–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Verran H, Christie M (2007) Using/designing digital technologies of representation in aboriginal Australian knowledge practices. Human Technol Interdiscip J Humans ICT Environ 3(2):214–227

    Google Scholar 

  92. Walker K, Underwood, Johann, MWaema, Thulani, Dunckley L et al (2008) A resource kit for participatory sociotechnical design in rural Kenya. In: Proc. CHI, ACM Press, pp 2709–2714

  93. Webb D (2002) Investigating the structure of visitor experiences in the Little Sandy Desert, Western Australia. J Ecotourism 1(2):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Webb J, Schirato T, Danaher G (2002) Understanding Bourdieu. Sage

  95. Wilde D, Harris E, Rogers Y, Randell C (2003) The periscope: supporting a computer enhanced field trip for children. Pers Ubiquit Comp 7(3):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Williams K, Harvey D (2001) Transcendent experience in forest environments. J Env Psychol 21(3):249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Winschiers-Theophilus H, Fendler J, Stanley C, Joubert D, Zimmermann I, Mukumbira S (2008) A bush encroachment decision support system’s metamorphosis. In: Proc. OZCHI'08 Cairns, pp 287–290

  98. Yarwood R (2006) Beyond the Rural Idyll. Geography 90(1):19–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to: KM for cowcam reflections; GF for insightful discussions; PD for provocation; BT and GM for practical support; and, Mama, Tata, Sixolile, Bulelwa and, especially, Thulani Sithelo for their nurture in Transkei.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola J. Bidwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bidwell, N.J., Browning, D. Pursuing genius loci: interaction design and natural places. Pers Ubiquit Comput 14, 15–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0217-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0217-8

Keywords

Navigation