skip to main content
10.1145/1899503.1899517acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

m-Health adoption and sustainability prognosis from a care givers' and patients' perspective

Published:11 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The penetration of mobile phones and mobile technologies in developing countries has led to innovative developments of various m-Health applications. These applications have proven the potential of mobile technologies for improving the quality of health care service in general and the fight against HIV/AIDS in particular. However, to achieve greater impact on the ground level (e.g. in an antiretroviral (ARV) treatment clinic) in a developing country's context, these applications have to be adopted and their utilization sustained. A study was undertaken to investigate sustainability and scalability challenges of mobile phone-based applications/projects for HIV/AIDS care in developing countries and the adoption and sustainability prospects of such m-Health applications in an ARV clinic in Pretoria. The findings presented here, are that from a care givers' and patients' perspective, adoption and sustainability of these applications is not merely dependent on the proposed technology's capabilities to enhance service delivery. Adoption and sustainability is however, mostly dependant on: (1) the care givers and patients' willingness and capability to incur any technological adoption and continuous use costs and, (2) their pre-conceived notions of government or sponsor-supported service provision.

References

  1. Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., Mahler, C. 2006. IT -- adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 6:3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barnes, S. J., Corbitt, B. 2003. Mobile banking: concept and potential. International journal of Mobile Communications 1: 273--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barnes, S. J., Scornavacca, E. 2004. Mobile markeing: the role of permission and acceptance. International journal of mobile communication 2: 128--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bauer, H. H., Barnes, S. J., Reichardt, T. 2005. Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: a theoretical framework and empirical study. Journal of electronic commerce Research 5:181--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs, R. O., Adkins, M., Mittleman, D., Kruse, J., Miller, S., Nunamaker Jr, J. F. 1999. A technology Transition Model derived from Field Investigartion of GSS use abroad the U.S.S. CORONADO. Journal of management information systems 15: 151--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Benbasat, I., Barki, H. 2007. Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the association for Information systems 8: 211--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bønes, E., Hasvold, P., Henriksen, E., Strandenœs, T. 2007. Risk analysis of Information security in a mobile instant messaging and presence system for healthcare. International journal of medical informatics 76: 677--687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35: 982--1003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Delone, W. H., McLean, E. R. 2003. The Delone and McLean Model of information systems Success: a Ten Year update. Journal of management Information systems 19: 9--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fichman, R. G. 2000. The diffusion and assimilation of Information technology innovations. In Robert Zmud (ed): Framing the domains of IT management: projecting the future through the past. Pinnaflex Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fynn, R. W., de Jager, D., Wood. R., Riviett, U. 2005. Remote HIV/AIDS patient monitoring tool using 3G/GPRS packet-switched mobile technology. In: Institution of Engineering and Technology. 4th Institution of Engineering and Technology seminar on Appropriate Healthcare Technologies for Developing Countries. London: Institution Engineering and Technology: 129--38Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodhue, D. L., Thompson, R. L. 1995. Task-Technology Fit and Individual performance. MIS Quarterly 19: 213--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gordon, A. N., Hinson, R. E. 2007. Towards a sustainable framework for computer based helath information systems (CHIS) in least developed countries (LDSs). International journal of health care quality assurance 20: 532--544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Haux, R. 2006. Health Information systems-past, present, future. Internation journal of medical informatics 75: 268--281Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. InfoDev. 2006. Improving Health, connecting people: The role of ICTs in the health sector in developing countries (2006 Working paper 7). Available from http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.84.html (Accessed on 13 November 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Istepanian, R. S. H., Zhang, Y. T. 2004. Guest editorial introduction to the special section on m-Health: beyond seamless mobility and global wireless healthcare connectivity. IEEE Transactions on Infromatioin Technology in Biomedicine 8(4). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jones, V., Incardona, F., Tristram, C., Virtuoso, S., Lymberis, A. 2006. "Future challenges and recommendations" in M-Health Emerging Mobile Health Systems. Istepanian, R. S. H., LAxminarayan, S., and Pattichis, C. S., Eds. Springer: 267--270Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalichman S. C: Positive prevention: HIV Transmission Risk Reduction interventions for people living with HIV/AIDS. The South African Journal of HIV Medicine 2007: 40--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaplan, W. A. 2006. Can the ubiquitous power of mobile phones be used to improve health outcomes in developing countries? Globalisation and health 2:9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimaro, H. C., Nhampossa, J. L. 2007. The challenges of sustainability of health information systems in developing countries: comparative case studies of Mozambique and Tanzania. Journal of health informatics in developing countires 1: 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinkade, S.' and Verclas, K. 2008. Wireless technology for social change. Washington, DC and Berkshire, UK: UN Foundation-Vodafoe Group Foundation Partnership.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Laukkanen, T., Lauronen, J. 2005. Consumer value creation in mobile banking services. International journal of mobile communications 3: 325--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lucas Jr, H. C., Swanson, E. B., Zmud, R. W. 2007. Implementation, innovation and related themes over the years in Information Systems Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8: 206--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mahendra, V. S., Gilboron, L., Bharat, S., Mudoi, R., Gupta, I., George, B., Samson, L., Daly, C., Pulerwitz, J. 2007. Understanding and Measuring AIDS-related stigma in health care setting: A developing country perspective. Journal of social aspect of HIV/AIDS 4: 616--625.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Moon, J. W., Kim, Y. G. 2001. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management 38: 217--230 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Musa, P. F., Meso, P., Mbarika, V. W. 2005. Towards sustainable adoption of Technologies for human development in sub-saharan Africa: precursors, diagnostics, and prescriptions. Communication of the Association for Information Systems 15, 592--608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Myers, M. D., Newman, M. 2006. The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Information and organisation 17: 2--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nandhakumar, J., Jones, M. 1997. Too close to comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive Information systems research. Info systems journal 7: 109--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ngwenyama, O., Morawczynski, O. 2009. Factors affecting ICT expansion in emerging economies: an analysis of ICT infrastructure expansion in five Latin American countries. Information technology for development 15: 237--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Oates, B. J. 2006. Researching Information Systems and computing. London, Sage Publications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Olla, P., and Tan, J. 2006. The m-Health Reference Model: And Organising Framework for Conceptualizing Mobile Health Systems. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics 1: 1--19Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Patrick, K., Griswold, W. G., Raab, F., Intille, S. S. 2008. Health and the mobile phone. Am J Prev Med 35: 177--181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rogers, E. 1983. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Rossouw, T. 2006. Ethical dilemmas in an antiretroviral clinic -- a narrative. CME, 24: 16--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Seppala, P., Alamaiki, H. 2003. Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of computer assisted learning 19: 330--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sharples, M., Corlett, D., Westmancott, O. 2002. The design and implementation of mobile learning resources. Personal and ubiquitous computing 6: 220--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Tachakra, S., Wang, X. H., Istepanian, R. S. H., Song, Y. H. 2003. Mobile e-health: the unwired evolution of telemedicine. Telemedicine journal and e-Health 9: 247--257Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. D., Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of Information Technoogy: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27: 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Vital Wave Consulting. 2009. Mhealth for development: Opportunity of mobile technology for healthcare in the developing world. Washignton D. C. and Bershire, UK: UN Foundation -- Vodafone foundation partnership.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Walsham, G. 2006. Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15: 320--330Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Walsham, G., Sahay, S. 2006. Research on Information Systems in developing countries: Current Landscape and Future Prospects. Information Technology for Development 12: 7--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. White, G. 2005. Demonstrating the power of mobile technology in enhancing service delivery. A case study of the Dokoza project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. WHO: Toward Universal Access: Scaling Up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector: 2008 Progress Report. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/towards_universal_access_report_2008.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, J. H., Wang, S. C., Lin, L. M. 2007. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Journal of medical informatics 76: 66--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Yu, P., Wu, M. X., Yu, H., Xiao G. Q. 2006. The challenges for the adoption of m-Health. IEEE International conference on service operation and logistics and informatics. Shanghai, china. June 21--23 2006: 181--186Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. m-Health adoption and sustainability prognosis from a care givers' and patients' perspective

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Clarence E Younger

      Mobile phones are used in mobile health (m-health) applications in various settings [1]. They enable and enhance communication between patients and caregivers, making m-health a viable approach to improving HIV/AIDS antiretroviral (ARV) treatment. Successful use of a mobile-based m-health solution depends on adoption, to account for social and environmental factors. A central concern is that initial deployments must be sustained-patients, sponsors, or government sources must support these costs. Therefore, technology adoption is at the heart of the success (or failure) of information technology (IT) deployment. Ammenwerth et al.'s study on IT adoption [2] found that failure to provide sustained support is a barrier to an IT program's success. This interpretive, qualitative study of the use of mobile phones and applications suggests that technology-based solutions to acquiring patient data are important tools in the HIV/AIDS battle. For example, m-health tools make patient condition and status information more easily available to caregivers, enabling them to better manage treatment regimes and provisioning. Additionally, these m-health applications improve records management by reducing errors in recording and by retrieving transcriptions of patient records. This study is part of a larger project in which m-health solutions are being shown to be viable in many contexts. On the other hand, a specific conclusion can be drawn: technology adoption-in terms of information security concerns, viability, and financial sustainability-is a significant, unresolved issue. In the context of HIV/AIDS treatment, and considering established patient/caregiver workflow tasks, findings suggest that the m-health approach can improve care. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAICSIT '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
        October 2010
        447 pages
        ISBN:9781605589503
        DOI:10.1145/1899503

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 October 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%

        Upcoming Conference

        HT '24
        35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
        September 10 - 13, 2024
        Poznan , Poland

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader