skip to main content
10.1145/1921168.1921184acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Federation of virtualized infrastructures: sharing the value of diversity

Published:30 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

By federating virtualized computing and network resources one can significantly increase their value thanks to gains from statistical multiplexing and increases in resource diversity (more distinct locations, technologies, etc.). Successful federation depends upon resource providers being able to agree on policies: how to share the profit generated by external customers and/or how to allocate the resources contributed by the federation participants to their affiliated users. This paper's main contribution is a method that enables organizers of a federation to evaluate the relative importance of the resources contributed by each participant. We build on coalitional game theory concepts and formulate a generic economic model of federation that captures the notion of diversity, which is relevant for a variety of overlay services, and notably the networking research experiments that are running today on PlanetLab. Based on this model, we propose the Shapley value as a means for participants to share the value of federation. We show how this approach can help in the design of policies that encourage infrastructure owners to federate.

References

  1. A. Bavier, M. Bowman, B. Chun, D. Culler, S. Karlin, S. Muir, L. Peterson, T. Roscoe, T. Spalink, and M. Wawrzoniak, "Operating system support for planetary-scale network services," in Proc. USENIX NSDI, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Fdida, T. Friedman, and T. Parmentelat, "OneLab: An open federated facility for experimentally driven future internet research," in New Network Architectures, ser. SCI, T. Tronco, Ed. Springer, 2010, vol. 297, pp. 141--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Broberg, S. Venugopal, and R. Buyya, "Market-oriented grids and utility computing: The state-of-the-art and future directions," J. Grid Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. A. Young, B. N. Chun, A. C. Snoeren, and A. Vahdat, "Resource allocation in federated distributed computing infrastructures," in Proc. OASIS Workshop, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Altmann, C. Courcoubetis, G. D. Stamoulis, M. Dramitinos, T. Rayna, M. Risch, and C. Bannink, "GridEcon: A market place for computing resources," in Proc. GECON Workshop, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Courcoubetis and R. Weber, "Economic issues in shared infrastructures," in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM VISA Workshop, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. T. Ma, D. Chiu, J. C. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein, "On cooperative settlement between content, transit and eyeball Internet service providers," in Proc. ACM CoNEXT, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Aram, C. Singh, S. Sarkar, and A. Kumar, "Cooperative profit sharing in coalition based resource allocation in wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. W. Saad, Z. Han, M. Debbah, A. Hjørungnes, and T. Başar, "Coalitional games for distributed collaborative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. V. Misra, S. Ioannidis, A. Chaintreau, and L. Massoulie, "Incentivizing peer-assisted services: A fluid Shapley value approach," in Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Madiman, "Cores of cooperative games in information theory," EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Saad, Z. Han, M. Debbah, A. Hjørungnes, and T. Başar, "Coalitional game theory for communication networks: A tutorial," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 26, no. 5, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. Shapley, "A value for n-person games," in Contributions to the Theory of Games II, H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Eds. Princeton Univ. Press, 1953, pp. 307--317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Elliott, "GENI: Global environment for network innovations," in Proc. IEEE LCN, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Gavras, A. Karila, S. Fdida, M. May, and M. Potts, "Future Internet research and experimentation: The FIRE initiative," ACM SIGCOMM CCR, vol. 37, no. 3, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Antoniadis, T. Friedman, and X. Cuvellier, "Resource provision and allocation in shared network testbed infrastructures," in Proc. ROADS Workshop, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. B. Myerson, Game Theory, Analysis of Conflict. Harvard Univ. Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green, Microeconomic Theory. Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. Peterson, R. Ricci, A. Falk, and J. Chase, "Slice-based Federation Architecture," 2010, working draft V2.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Jain and J. Walrand, "An efficient Nash-implementation mechanism for network resource allocation," Automatica, vol. 26, no. 8, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Dramitinos, G. D. Stamoulis, and C. Courcoubetis, "An auction mechanism for allocating the bandwidth of networks to their users," Computer Networks, vol. 51, no. 18, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. He and J. Walrand, "Pricing and revenue sharing strategies for Internet service providers," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K. Park and V. Pai, "CoMon: A mostly-scalable monitoring system for planetlab," ACM SIGOPS OSR, vol. 40, no. 1, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. S. Shakkottai and R. Srikant, "Economics of network pricing with multiple ISPs," IEEE/ACM ToN, vol. 14, no. 6, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. N. Economides, "The economics of the Internet backbone," in Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, S. Majumdar, I. Vogelsang, and M. Cave, Eds. North Holland, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Feigenbaum, C. Papadimitriou, R. Sami, and S. Shenker, "A BGP-based mechanism for lowest-cost routing," in Proc. ACM PODC, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Corbo, S. Jain, M. Mitzenmacher, and D. C. Parkes, "An economically principled generative model of Internet interdomain connectivity," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. I. Ch. Paschalidis and Y. Liu, "Pricing in multiservice loss networks: static pricing, asymptotic optimality, and demand substitution effects," IEEE/ACM ToN, vol. 10, no. 3, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Federation of virtualized infrastructures: sharing the value of diversity

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          Co-NEXT '10: Proceedings of the 6th International COnference
          November 2010
          349 pages
          ISBN:9781450304481
          DOI:10.1145/1921168

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 November 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate198of789submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader