skip to main content
10.1145/1921168.1921204acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Auto-configuration of 802.11n WLANs

Published:30 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Channel Bonding (CB) combines two adjacent frequency bands to form a new, wider band to facilitate high data rate transmissions in MIMO-based 802.11n networks. However, the use of a wider band with CB can exacerbate interference effects. Furthermore, CB does not always provide benefits in interference-free settings, and can even degrade performance in some cases. We conduct an in-depth, experimental study to understand the implications of CB. Based on this study we design an auto-configuration framework, ACORN, for enterprise 802.11n WLANs. ACORN integrates the functions of user association and channel allocation, since our study reveals that they are tightly coupled when CB is used. We show that the channel allocation problem with the constraints of CB is NP-complete. Thus, ACORN uses an algorithm that provides a worst case approximation ratio of [EQUATION] with Δ being the maximum node degree in the network. We implement ACORN on our 802.11n testbed. Our experiments show that ACORN (i) outperforms previous approaches that are agnostic to CB constraints; it provides per-AP throughput gains from 1.5x to 6x and (ii) in practice, its channel allocation module achieves an approximation ratio much better than [EQUATION].

References

  1. IEEE 802.11n Standard 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Shrivastava, S. Rayanchu, J. Yoon, and S. Banerjee. 802.11n Under the Microscope. In ACM IMC, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. V. Visoottiviseth, T. Piroonsith, and S. Siwamogsatham. An Empirical Study on Achievable Throughputs of IEEE 802.11n Devices. In ACM WinMee, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Heusse, F. Rousseau, G. Berger-Sabbatel, and A. Duda. Performance Anomaly of 802.11b. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Wireless Open-Access Research Platform. http://warp.rice.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ralink Technology. http://www.ralinktech.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Mishra, V. Shrivastava, S. Banerjee, and W. Arbaugh. Partially overlapped channels not considered harmful. In ACM SIGMETRICS, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Hanzo, M. Munster, B. J. Choi, and T. Keller. OFDM and MC-CDMA for Broadband Multi-User Communications, WLANs and Broadcasting. IEEE WILEY. ISBN 0-470-85879-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Rahul, F. Edelat, D. Katabi, and C. Sodini. Frequency-aware Rate Adaptation and MAC Protocols. In ACM MobiCom, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Tang and V. J. Stolpman. A Gradient-Based Method for OFDM Sub-Carrier Power Allocation. In IEEE VTC, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Atheros AR5001J. http://www.atheros.com/news/AR5001J.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Chandra, R. Mahajan, T. Moscibroda, R. Raghavendra, and P. Bahl. A Case for Adapting Channel Width in Wireless Networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Mishra, D. Agrawal, V. Shrivastava, S. Banerjee, and S. Ganguly. Distributed channel management in uncoordinated wireless environments. In ACM MobiCom, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Mishra, S. Banerjee, and W. Arbaugh. Weighted Coloring based Channel Assignment for WLANs. In MC2R, Volume 9, Issue 3, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Kumar and V. Kumar. Optimal association of stations and APs in an IEEE 802.11 WLAN. In NCC, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Mishra, V. Brik, S. Banerjee, A. Srinivasan, and W. Arbaugh. A client-driven approach for channel management in wireless LANs. In INFOCOM, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Kauffmann, F. Baccelli, A. Chaintreau, V. Mhatre, K. Papagiannaki, and C. Diot. Measurement-Based Self Organization of Interfering 802.11 Wireless Access Networks. In INFOCOM, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. I. Broustis, K. Papagiannaki, S. V. Krishnamurthy, M. Faloutsos, and V. Mhatre. MDG: Measurement-Driven Guidelines for 802.11 WLAN Design. In ACM MobiCom, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. S. Rappaport. Wireless Communications. Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-042232-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. M. Alamouti. A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. In IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, October 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wi-Fi Wireless LAN Frequency, Bands and Channels. http://www.networkdictionary.com/Wireless/Wi-Fi-Wireless-LAN-Frequency.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. JPcap Library. http://netresearch.ics.uci.edu/kfujii/jpcap/doc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R. Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-50336-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. UCR Wireless Testbed. http://networks.cs.ucr.edu/testbed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Z. Asif. Aligning business and technology strategies-an evolution of a third generation wireless technology. In Engineering Management Conference, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Bali, S. Machiraju, H. Zang, and V. Frost. On the performance implications of proportional fairness (PF) in 3G wireless networks. In PAM, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. C. Tsilimantos, D. A. Zarbouti, G. V. Tsoulos, G. E. Athanasiadou, and D. I. Kaklamani. Fairness and Throughput Trade-Off Analysis for UMTS WCDMA Network Planning. In WPC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. D. Panigrahi and F. Khaleghi. Enabling trade-offs between system throughput and fairness in wireless data scheduling techniques. In WWC, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. K. Sundaresan and K. Papagiannaki. The Need for Cross-Layer Information in Access Point Selection Algorithms. In ACM IMC, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. T. R. Jensen and B. Toft. Graph Coloring Problems. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-02865-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. IEEE. Recommended Practice for Multi-Vendor Access Point Interoperability via an Inter-Access Point Protocol Across Distribution Systems Supporting IEEE 802.11 Operation. In IEEE Standard 802.1f, July 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M. Vutukuru, H. Balakrishnan, and K. Jamieson. Cross-Layer Wireless Bit Rate Adaptation. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. CRAWDAD. http://uk.crawdad.org/meta.php?name=ilesansfil/wifidog.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. R. Morris, E. Kohler, J. Janotti, and M. F. Kaashoek. The Click Modular Router. In ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Auto-configuration of 802.11n WLANs

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            Co-NEXT '10: Proceedings of the 6th International COnference
            November 2010
            349 pages
            ISBN:9781450304481
            DOI:10.1145/1921168

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 30 November 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate198of789submissions,25%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader