skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300246acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Airport Accessibility and Navigation Assistance for People with Visual Impairments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

People with visual impairments often have to rely on the assistance of sighted guides in airports, which prevents them from having an independent travel experience. In order to learn about their perspectives on current airport accessibility, we conducted two focus groups that discussed their needs and experiences in-depth, as well as the potential role of assistive technologies. We found that independent navigation is a main challenge and severely impacts their overall experience. As a result, we equipped an airport with a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacon-based navigation system and performed a real-world study where users navigated routes relevant for their travel experience. We found that despite the challenging environment participants were able to complete their itinerary independently, presenting none to few navigation errors and reasonable timings. This study presents the first systematic evaluation posing BLE technology as a strong approach to increase the independence of visually impaired people in airports.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper016p.mp4

mp4

992.8 KB

paper016.mp4

mp4

275.3 MB

References

  1. Ali Abdolrahmani, William Easley, Michele Williams, Stacy Branham, and Amy Hurst. 2017. Embracing Errors: Examining How Context of Use Impacts Blind Individuals' Acceptance of Navigation Aid Errors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4158--4169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Federal Aviation Administration. 2017. AC 150/5360--14A - Access to Airports by Individuals with Disabilities. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/ AdvisoryCircular/150--5360--14A.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Federal Aviation Administration. 2018. Airport Disability Compliance Program. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://www.faa.gov/about/ofceorg/headquartersofces/acr/ comcivsupport/disabilitycompliance/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dragan Ahmetovic, Cristian Bernareggi, Andrea Gerino, and Sergio Mascetti. 2014. Zebrarecognizer: Efcient and precise localization of pedestrian crossings. 2566--2571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dragan Ahmetovic, Cole Gleason, Chengxiong Ruan, Kris Kitani, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2016. NavCog: A Navigational Cognitive Assistant for the Blind. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 90--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dragan Ahmetovic, Uran Oh, Sergio Mascetti, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. Turn Right: Analysis of Rotation Errors in Turn-by-Turn Navigation for Individuals with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 333--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fraport TAV Antalya Terminal Isletmeciligi A.S. 2018. Antalya Airport SmartSteps. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://appadvice.com/ game/app/antalya-airport-smart-steps/1246202175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. BlindSquare. 2018. BlindSquare iOS Application. Retrieved in January, 2019 from http://blindsquare.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stacy M. Branham, Ali Abdolrahmani, William Easley, Morgan Scheuerman, Erick Ronquillo, and Amy Hurst. 2017. "Is Someone There? Do They Have a Gun": How Visual Information About Others Can Improve Personal Safety Management for Blind Individuals. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 260--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Diana M Brouwer, Gaynor Sadlo, Karen Winding, and Marianne IG Hanneman. 2008. Limitations in mobility: experiences of visually impaired older people. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 71, 10 (2008), 414--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yu-Chung Cheng, Yatin Chawathe, Anthony LaMarca, and John Krumm. 2005. Accuracy Characterization for Metropolitan-scale WiFi Localization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 233--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Marc Ciurana, David López, and Francisco Barceló-Arroyo. 2009. SofTOA: Software ranging for TOA-based positioning of WLAN terminals. In International Symposium on Location-and Context-Awareness. Springer, 207--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. SM Cobb. 2012. National mobility report: Mobility experiences and perceptions of blind and vision impaired persons. Dublin, NCBI and Irish Guide Dogs for the blind (2012), 1--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. William Crandall, John Brabyn, Billie Louise Bentzen, and Linda Myers. 1999. Remote infrared signage evaluation for transit stations and intersections. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 36, 4 (1999), 341--355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Simon Darcy. 2017. Accessibility as a key management component of the Paralympics. In Managing the Paralympics. Palgrave Macmillan, 49--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Navid Fallah, Ilias Apostolopoulos, Kostas Bekris, and Eelke Folmer. 2012. The User As a Sensor: Navigating Users with Visual Impairments in Indoor Spaces Using Tactile Landmarks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 425--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Navid Fallah, Ilias Apostolopoulos, Kostas Bekris, and Eelke Folmer. 2013. Indoor human navigation systems: A survey. Interacting with Computers 25, 1 (2013), 21--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alexander Fiannaca, Ilias Apostolopoulous, and Eelke Folmer. 2014. Headlock: A Wearable Navigation Aid That Helps Blind Cane Users Traverse Large Open Spaces. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Vítor Filipe, Filipe Fernandes, Hugo Fernandes, António Sousa, Hugo Paredes, and João Barroso. 2012. Blind navigation support system based on Microsoft Kinect. Procedia Computer Science 14 (2012), 94-- 101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. German Flores and Roberto Manduchi. 2016. Experiments with a public transit assistant for blind passengers. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. German Flores and Roberto Manduchi. 2018. Easy Return: An App for Indoor Backtracking Assistance. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. American Printing House for the Blind. 2018. Nearby Explorer. Retrieved in January, 2019 from http://www.aph.org/nearby-explorer/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicholas A Giudice. 2018. Navigating without Vision: Principles of Blind Spatial Cognition. In Handbook of Behavioral and Cognitive Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing, Chapter 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicholas A. Giudice and Gordon E. Legge. 2008. Blind Navigation and the Role of Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chapter 25, 479--500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Google. 2018. Introducing Android 9 Pie. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2018/08/ introducing-android-9-pie.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas L Greenbaum. 1998. The handbook for focus group research. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. João Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Kris M. Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. Virtual Navigation for Blind People: Building Sequential Representations of the Real-World. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 280--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. João Guerreiro, Eshed Ohn-Bar, Dragan Ahmetovic, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. How Context and User Behavior Afect Indoor Navigation Assistance for Blind People. In Proceedings of the Internet of Accessible Things (W4A '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kotaro Hara, Shiri Azenkot, Megan Campbell, Cynthia L. Bennett, Vicki Le, Sean Pannella, Robert Moore, Kelly Minckler, Rochelle H. Ng, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2015. Improving Public Transit Accessibility for Blind Riders by Crowdsourcing Bus Stop Landmark Locations with Google Street View: An Extended Analysis. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 6, 2, Article 5 (March 2015), 23 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Suining He and S-H Gary Chan. 2016. Wi-Fi fngerprint-based indoor positioning: Recent advances and comparisons. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18, 1 (2016), 466--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. HULOP. 2018. HULOP Human-scale Localization Platform - Github. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://github.com/hulop/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Airports Council International. 2018. Airport Terminal Beacons Recommended Practice. Retrieved in January, 2019 from http: //www.aci.aero/media/6b4d6043--1bab-457c-8352--53c4c51dd634/ 5XBxhA/AboutACI/Priorities/IT-New/Initiativies/Beacons/ACIAirport-Terminal-Beacons-Recommended-Practice.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Corinne Iozzio. 2014. Indoor mapping lets the blind navigate airports. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/indoormapping-lets-blind-navigate-airports-180952292/. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Hernisa Kacorri, Sergio Mascetti, Andrea Gerino, Dragan Ahmetovic, Valeria Alampi, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. Insights on Assistive Orientation and Mobility of People with Visual Impairment Based on Large-Scale Longitudinal Data. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 11, 1, Article 5 (March 2018), 28 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hernisa Kacorri, Eshed Ohn-Bar, Kris M. Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. Environmental Factors in Indoor Navigation Based on RealWorld Trajectories of Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 56, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Loizos Kanaris, Akis Kokkinis, Antonio Liotta, and Stavros Stavrou. 2017. Fusing bluetooth beacon data with Wi-Fi radiomaps for improved indoor localization. Sensors 17, 4 (2017), 812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Fredrick Kunkle. 2017. Blind travelers can get around an airport more easily with new app. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https: //www.washingtonpost.com/news/tripping/wp/2017/12/21/blindtravelers-can-get-around-an-airport-more-easily-with-new-app/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Gordon E Legge, Chris Downey, Nicholas A Giudice, and Bosco S Tjan. 2016. Indoor airport wayfnding for blind and visually impaired travelers. In Technical Report to the Federal Aviation Administration, No. DOT/Faa/TC-TN16/54. http://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/Download/Airport-SafetyPapers-Publications-Detail/dt/Detail/ItemID/572/Indoor-AirportWayfnding-for-Blind-and-Visually-Impaired-Travelers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Bing Li, J Pablo Munoz, Xuejian Rong, Jizhong Xiao, Yingli Tian, and Aries Arditi. 2016. ISANA: wearable context-aware indoor assistive navigation with obstacle avoidance for the blind. In Computer Vision, ECCV Workshops. Springer, 448--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Dierna Giovanni Luca and Machà Alberto. 2016. Towards accurate indoor localization using iBeacons, fngerprinting and particle fltering. In 2016 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberto Manduchi and James M. Coughlan. 2014. The Last Meter: Blind Visual Guidance to a Target. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3113--3122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Roberto Manduchi and Sri Kurniawan. 2011. Mobility-related accidents experienced by people with visual impairment. AER Journal: Research and Practice in Visual Impairment and Blindness 4, 2 (2011), 44--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. James R Marston and Reginald G Golledge. 2000. Towards an accessible city: Removing functional barriers for the blind and vision impaired: A case for auditory signs. (2000). Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Mei Miao, Martin Spindler, and Gerhard Weber. 2011. Requirements of indoor navigation system from blind users. In Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group. Springer, 673--679. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Masayuki Murata, Dragan Ahmetovic, Daisuke Sato, Hironobu Takagi, Kris M Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. Smartphone-based Indoor Localization for Blind Navigation across Building Complexes. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom '18). IEEE, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2009. Blobby: How to Guide a Blind Person. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3601--3606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Eshed Ohn-Bar, João Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Kris M. Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. Modeling Expertise in Assistive Navigation Interfaces for Blind People. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 403--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Eshed Ohn-Bar, João Guerreiro, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. Variability in Reactions to Instructional Guidance During SmartphoneBased Assisted Navigation of Blind Users. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 3, Article 131 (Sept. 2018), 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. En Peng, Patrick Peursum, Ling Li, and Svetha Venkatesh. 2010. A smartphone-based obstacle sensor for the visually impaired. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing. Springer, 590--604. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. J. Eduardo Pérez, Myriam Arrue, Masatomo Kobayashi, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. Assessment of Semantic Taxonomies for Blind Indoor Navigation Based on a Shopping Center Use Case. In Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference on The Future of Accessible Work (W4A '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 19, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Yaniv Poria, Arie Reichel, and Yael Brandt. 2010. The fight experiences of people with disabilities: an exploratory study. Journal of Travel Research 49, 2 (2010), 216--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Supriya Raman. 2011. Airport accessibility for travellers with disabilities. Journal of Airport Management 5, 3 (2011), 239--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Dan Reed. 2018. A.I. 'Glasses' Turn Airports, Other Chaotic Places For The Blind Into Liberating Experiences. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielreed/2018/02/06/ a-i-glasses-turn-airports-other-chaotic-places-for-the-blind-intoliberating-experiences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Abbas Riazi, Fatemeh Riazi, Rezvan Yoosf, and Fatemeh Bahmeei. 2016. Outdoor difculties experienced by a group of visually impaired Iranian people. Journal of current ophthalmology 28, 2 (2016), 85--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Victoria Richards, Annette Pritchard, and Nigel Morgan. 2010. (Re) Envisioning tourism and visual impairment. Annals of Tourism Research 37, 4 (2010), 1097--1116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Rene Ritchie. 2018. Complete list of Apple Maps 'Look Inside' for Airports. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://www.imore.com/ apple-maps-indoor-airports.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Daisuke Sato, Uran Oh, Kakuya Naito, Hironobu Takagi, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. NavCog3: An Evaluation of a SmartphoneBased Blind Indoor Navigation Assistant with Semantic Features in a Large-Scale Environment. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 270--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Jeff Sauro and Joseph S. Dumas. 2009. Comparison of Three Onequestion, Post-task Usability Questionnaires. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1599--1608. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, William Easley, Ali Abdolrahmani, Amy Hurst, and Stacy Branham. 2017. Learning the Language: The Importance of Studying Written Directions in Designing Navigational Technologies for the Blind. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2922--2928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Martin Spindler, Michael Weber, Denise Prescher, Mei Miao, Gerhard Weber, and Georgios Ioannidis. 2012. Translating foor plans into directions. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Anja Thieme, Cynthia L. Bennett, Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, and Alex S. Taylor. 2018. "I Can Do Everything but See!" -- How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate Their Abilities in Social Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 203, 14 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. YingLi Tian, Xiaodong Yang, Chucai Yi, and Aries Arditi. 2013. Toward a computer vision-based wayfnding aid for blind persons to access unfamiliar indoor environments. Machine vision and applications 24, 3 (2013), 521--535.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Wayfndr. 2017. Open Standard for audio-based wayfnding: Version 1.1. Retrieved in January, 2019 from https://www.wayfndr.net/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/Wayfndr-Open-Standard-Rec-1.1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. William R Wiener, Richard L Welsh, and Bruce B Blasch. 2010. Foundations of orientation and mobility. Vol. 1. American Foundation for the Blind.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Michele A. Williams, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2013. "Pray Before You Step out": Describing Personal and Situational Blind Navigation Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Limin Zeng, Markus Simros, and Gerhard Weber. 2017. Camera-based Mobile Electronic Travel Aids Support for Cognitive Mapping of Unknown Spaces. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Airport Accessibility and Navigation Assistance for People with Visual Impairments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2019
        9077 pages
        ISBN:9781450359702
        DOI:10.1145/3290605

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format