Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 6/2015

01.06.2015

Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models

verfasst von: Ming-Chen Hsu, David Kamensky, Fei Xu, Josef Kiendl, Chenglong Wang, Michael C. H. Wu, Joshua Mineroff, Alessandro Reali, Yuri Bazilevs, Michael S. Sacks

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper builds on a recently developed immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction (FSI) methodology for bioprosthetic heart valve (BHV) modeling and simulation. It enhances the proposed framework in the areas of geometry design and constitutive modeling. With these enhancements, BHV FSI simulations may be performed with greater levels of automation, robustness and physical realism. In addition, the paper presents a comparison between FSI analysis and standalone structural dynamics simulation driven by prescribed transvalvular pressure, the latter being a more common modeling choice for this class of problems. The FSI computation achieved better physiological realism in predicting the valve leaflet deformation than its standalone structural dynamics counterpart.
Vorheriger Artikel Particle tracking and particle–shock interaction in compressible-flow computations with the V-SGS stabilization and shock-capturing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Maximum in-plane principal Green-Lagrange strain, the largest eigenvalue of \({\mathbf {E}}\).
 
Literatur
1.
Schoen FJ, Levy RJ (2005) Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: progress toward understanding and prevention. Ann Thorac Surg 79(3):1072–1080CrossRef
2.
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2009) Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation 119(7):1034–1048CrossRef
3.
Li C-P, Chen S-F, Lo C-W, Lu P-C (2011) Turbulence characteristics downstream of a new trileaflet mechanical heart valve. ASAIO Journal 57(3):188–196CrossRef
4.
Yun BM, Wu J, Simon HA, Arjunon S, Sotiropoulos F, Aidun CK, Yoganathan AP (2012) A numerical investigation of blood damage in the hinge area of aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valves during the leakage phase. Ann Biomed Eng 40(7):1468–1485CrossRef
5.
Siddiqui RF, Abraham JR, Butany J (2009) Bioprosthetic heart valves: modes of failure. Histopathology 55:135–144CrossRef
6.
Sacks MS, Schoen FJ (2002) Collagen fiber disruption occurs independent of calcification in clinically explanted bioprosthetic heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res 62(3):359–371CrossRef
7.
Sacks MS, Mirnajafi A, Sun W, Schmidt P (2006) Bioprosthetic heart valve heterograft biomaterials: structure, mechanical behavior and computational simulation. Expert Rev Med Devices 3(6):817–834CrossRef
8.
Sun W, Abad A, Sacks MS (2005) Simulated bioprosthetic heart valve deformation under quasi-static loading. J Biomech Eng 127(6):905–914CrossRef
9.
Saleeb AF, Kumar A, Thomas VS (2013) The important roles of tissue anisotropy and tissue-to-tissue contact on the dynamical behavior of a symmetric tri-leaflet valve during multiple cardiac pressure cycles. Med Eng Phys 35(1):23–35CrossRef
10.
Auricchio F, Conti M, Ferrara A, Morganti S, Reali A (2014) Patient-specific simulation of a stentless aortic valve implant: the impact of fibres on leaflet performance. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 17(3):277–285CrossRef
11.
Kamensky D, Hsu M-C, Schillinger D, Evans JA, Aggarwal A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2015) An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 284:1005–1053MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Hsu M-C, Kamensky D, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2014) Fluid-structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation. Comput Mech 54:1055–1071MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
13.
Peskin CS (1972) Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 10(2):252–271MATHCrossRef
14.
15.
16.
Sotiropoulos F, Yang X (2014) Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid-structure interaction. Prog Aerosp Sci 65:1–21
17.
Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
18.
Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
19.
Hsu M-C, Wang C, Herrema AJ, Schillinger D, Ghoshal A, Bazilevs Y (2015) An interactive geometry modeling and parametric design platform for isogeometric analysis. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. doi:10.​1016/​j.​camwa.​2015.​04.​002
20.
Kiendl J, Bletzinger K-U, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2009) Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3902–3914MATHCrossRef
21.
Kiendl J, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2010) The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2403–2416MATHCrossRef
22.
Kiendl J, Hsu M-C, Wu MCH, Reali A (2015) Isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulations for general hyperelastic materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cma.​2015.​03.​010
23.
24.
25.
Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS Book (Monographs in Visual Communication), 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
26.
Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Sederberg TW, Sederberg MT (2014) An integrated approach to engineering design and analysis using the Autodesk T-spline plugin for Rhino3d. ICES REPORT 14–33, The Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Sept 2014
27.
Li X, Zheng J, Sederberg TW, Hughes TJR, Scott MA (2012) On linear independence of T-spline blending functions. Comput Aided Geom Des 29(1):63–76MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
28.
Li X, Scott MA (2014) Analysis-suitable T-splines: Characterization, refineability, and approximation. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 24:1141–1164MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
29.
30.
31.
Kim H, Lu J, Sacks MS, Chandran KB (2008) Dynamic simulation of bioprosthetic heart valves using a stress resultant shell model. Ann Biomed Eng 36(2):262–275CrossRef
32.
Sederberg TW, Cardon DL, Finnigan GT, North NS, Zheng J, Lyche T (2004) T-spline simplification and local refinement. ACM Trans Graph 23(3):276–283CrossRef
33.
Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, Chichester
34.
Scott MA, Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Sederberg TW, Hughes TJR (2011) Isogeometric finite element data structures based on Bézier extraction of T-splines. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88:126–156MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
35.
Kamensky D, Evans JA, Hsu M-C (2015) Stability and conservation properties of collocated constraints in immersogeometric fluid-thin structure interaction analysis. Communications in Computational Physics. Accepted
36.
Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
37.
Donea J, Giuliani S, Halleux JP (1982) An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 33(1–3):689–723MATHCrossRef
38.
Formaggia L, Gerbeau JF, Nobile F, Quarteroni A (2001) On the coupling of 3D and 1D Navier-Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:561–582MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
39.
Gerbeau J-F, Vidrascu M, Frey P (2005) Fluid-structure interaction in blood flows on geometries based on medical imaging. Comput Struct 83:155–165CrossRef
40.
Nobile F, Vergara C (2008) An effective fluid-structure interaction formulation for vascular dynamics by generalized Robin conditions. SIAM J Sci Comput 30:731–763MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
41.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Liang X, Kvamsdal T, Brekken R, Isaksen J (2010) A fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:3–16MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
42.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Kvamsdal T, Hentschel S, Isaksen J (2010) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:481–498CrossRef
43.
Perego M, Veneziani A, Vergara C (2011) A variational approach for estimating the compliance of the cardiovascular tissue: an inverse fluid-structure interaction problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 33:1181–1211MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
44.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid-structure interaction simulations. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:593–599MathSciNetCrossRef
45.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid-structure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171–225MathSciNetCrossRef
46.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Long CC, Marsden AL, Schjodt K (2014) ST and ALE-VMS methods for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid mechanics modeling. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 24:2437–2486MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
47.
Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44MATHMathSciNet
48.
Tezduyar TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43:555–575MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
49.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modelling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54(6–8):855–900MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
50.
51.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time fluid-structure interaction methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1230001MathSciNetCrossRef
52.
Takizawa K, Schjodt K, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2013) Patient-specific computational analysis of the influence of a stent on the unsteady flow in cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 51:1061–1073MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
53.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014) Space-time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC). Comput Mech 54:955–971MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
54.
Takizawa K, Torii R, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Xu XY (2014) Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates. Comput Mech 54:1047–1053MATHCrossRef
55.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014) Space-time fluid mechanics computation of heart valve models. Comput Mech 54:973–986MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
56.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
57.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
58.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1230002CrossRef
59.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Øiseth O, Mathisen KM, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014) Engineering analysis and design with ALE-VMS and Space-Time methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng 21:481–508MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014) Aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines with the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng 21:359–398MathSciNetCrossRef
61.
Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
62.
Tezduyar TE, Osawa Y (2000) Finite element stabilization parameters computed from element matrices and vectors. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:411–430MATHCrossRef
63.
Hughes TJR, Mazzei L, Jansen KE (2000) Large eddy simulation and the variational multiscale method. Comput Vis Sci 3:47–59MATHCrossRef
64.
Hughes TJR, Mazzei L, Oberai AA, Wray A (2001) The multiscale formulation of large eddy simulation: Decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids 13:505–512CrossRef
65.
Hughes TJR, Scovazzi G, Franca LP (2004) Multiscale and stabilized methods. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, Vol. 3: Fluids, chap. 2. Wiley, Hoboken
66.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrel JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:173–201MATHCrossRef
67.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Tezduyar TE, Hughes TJR (2010) Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flow simulations at small time steps. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:828–840MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
68.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Scott MA (2012) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249–252:28–41MathSciNetCrossRef
69.
Wriggers P (2006) Comput Contact Mech, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRef
70.
Laursen TA (2003) Computational contact and impact mechanics: fundamentals of modeling interfacial phenomena in nonlinear finite element analysis. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRef
71.
Morganti S, Auricchio F, Benson DJ, Gambarin FI, Hartmann S, Hughes TJR, Reali A (2015) Patient-specific isogeometric structural analysis of aortic valve closure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 284:508–520MathSciNetCrossRef
72.
Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y (2009) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3534–3550MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
73.
Esmaily-Moghadam M, Bazilevs Y, Hsia T-Y, Vignon-Clementel IE, MOCHA (2011) A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations. Comput Mech 48:277–291MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
74.
Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J Appl Mech 60:371–375MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
75.
Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM (2000) A generalized-\(\alpha \) method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:305–319MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
76.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006) Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:5743–5753MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
77.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2002–2027MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
78.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855–900MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
79.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
80.
Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Space-time finite element computation of complex fluid-structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1201– 1218MATHCrossRef
81.
Tezduyar TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8:83–130MATHCrossRef
82.
Akin JE, Tezduyar TE, Ungor M (2007) Computation of flow problems with the mixed interface-tracking/interface-capturing technique (MITICT). Comput Fluids 36:2–11MATHCrossRef
83.
Cruchaga MA, Celentano DJ, Tezduyar TE (2007) A numerical model based on the mixed interface-tracking/interface-capturing technique (MITICT) for flows with fluid-solid and fluid-fluid interfaces. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:1021–1030MATHCrossRef
84.
Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Benson DJ, Farthing MW, Kees CE (2011) Free-surface flow and fluid-object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics. Journal of Applied Mechanics, accepted for publication
85.
Wick T (2014) Flapping and contact FSI computations with the fluid-solid interface-tracking/interface-capturing technique and mesh adaptivity. Comput Mech 53(1):29–43MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
86.
Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26(10): 27–36CrossRef
87.
Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94MATHCrossRef
88.
Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid-structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70:58–63MATHCrossRef
89.
Stein K, Tezduyar TE, Benney R (2004) Automatic mesh update with the solid-extension mesh moving technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:2019–2032MATHCrossRef
90.
91.
Bazilevs Y, Michler C, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak Dirichlet boundary conditions for wall-bounded turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:4853–4862MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
92.
Bazilevs Y, Michler C, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2010) Isogeometric variational multiscale modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows with weakly enforced boundary conditions on unstretched meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:780–790MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
93.
Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2012) Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: validation and the role of weakly enforced boundary conditions. Comput Mech 50:499–511MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
94.
Tong P, Fung Y-C (1976) The stress-strain relationship for the skin. J Biomech 9(10):649–657CrossRef
95.
Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
96.
Sun W, Sacks MS, Sellaro TL, Slaughter WS, Scott MJ (2003) Biaxial mechanical response of bioprosthetic heart valve biomaterials to high in-plane shear. J Biomech Eng 125(3):372–380CrossRef
97.
Fan R, Sacks MS (2014) Simulation of planar soft tissues using a structural constitutive model: finite element implementation and validation. J Biomech 47(9):2043–2054CrossRef
98.
Mirnajafi A, Raymer J, Scott MJ, Sacks MS (2005) The effects of collagen fiber orientation on the flexural properties of pericardial heterograft biomaterials. Biomaterials 26(7):795–804
99.
Kim H, Chandran KB, Sacks MS, Lu J (2007) An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 35(1):30–44CrossRef
100.
Li K, Sun W (2010) Simulated thin pericardial bioprosthetic valve leaflet deformation under static pressure-only loading conditions: implications for percutaneous valves. Ann Biomed Eng 38(8):2690–2701CrossRef
101.
Burriesci G, Howard IC, Patterson EA (1999) Influence of anisotropy on the mechanical behaviour of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Med Eng Technol 23(6):203–215CrossRef
102.
Huynh VL, Nguyen T, Lam HL, Guo XG, Kafesjian R (2003) Cloth-covered stents for tissue heart valves, US Patent 6,585,766
103.
Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G, Hendrick R, Deutsch MA, Opitz A, Mazzitelli D, Tassani-Prell P, Schreiber C, Lange R (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve. JACC 4(7):721–732CrossRef
104.
Gao ZB, Pandya S, Hosein N, Sacks MS, Hwang NHC (2000) Bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet motion monitored by dual camera stereo photogrammetry. J Biomech 33(2):199–207CrossRef
105.
Gao BZ, Pandya S, Arana C, Hwang NHC (2002) Bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet deformation monitored by double-pulse stereo photogrammetry. Ann Biomed Eng 30(1):11–18CrossRef
106.
Iyengar AKS, Sugimoto H, Smith DB, Sacks MS (2001) Dynamic in vitro quantification of bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet motion using structured light projection. Ann Biomed Eng 29(11): 963–973CrossRef
107.
Bellhouse BJ, Bellhouse FH (1968) Mechanism of closure of the aortic valve. Nature 217(5123):86–87CrossRef
108.
Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1998) Computational inelasticity. Springer, New YorkMATH
109.
Kenner T (1989) The measurement of blood density and its meaning. Basic Res Cardiol 84(2):111–124CrossRef
110.
Rosencranz R, Bogen SA (2006) Clinical laboratory measurement of serum, plasma, and blood viscosity. Am J Clin Pathol 125: S78–S86
111.
Yap CH, Saikrishnan N, Tamilselvan G, Yoganathan AP (2011) Experimental technique of measuring dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet. J Biomech Eng 133(6):061007CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models
verfasst von
Ming-Chen Hsu
David Kamensky
Fei Xu
Josef Kiendl
Chenglong Wang
Michael C. H. Wu
Joshua Mineroff
Alessandro Reali
Yuri Bazilevs
Michael S. Sacks
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1166-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Computational Mechanics 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Efficient numerical simulation of aeroacoustics for low Mach number flows interacting with structures

Original Paper

Experimental and numerical FSI study of compliant hydrofoils

Original Paper

A plug-and-play coupling approach for parallel multi-field simulations

Original Paper

A unified monolithic approach for multi-fluid flows and fluid–structure interaction using the Particle Finite Element Method with fixed mesh

Original Paper

Goal-oriented model adaptivity for viscous incompressible flows

Original Paper

Flow past two square cylinders with flexible splitter plates

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise