Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Knowledge and Information Systems
Erschienen in: Knowledge and Information Systems 3/2018

17.08.2017 | Regular Paper

Dynamic argumentation in UbiGDSS

verfasst von: João Carneiro, Diogo Martinho, Goreti Marreiros, Amparo Jimenez, Paulo Novais

Erschienen in: Knowledge and Information Systems | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Supporting and representing the group decision-making process is a complex task that requires very specific aspects. The current existing argumentation models cannot make good use of all the advantages inherent to group decision-making. There is no monitoring of the process or the possibility to provide dynamism to it. These issues can compromise the success of group decision support systems if those systems are not able to provide freedom and all necessary mechanisms to the decision-maker. We investigate the use of argumentation in a completely new perspective that will allow for a mutual understanding between agents and decision-makers. Besides this, our proposal allows to define an agent not only according to the preferences of the decision-maker but also according to his interests towards the decision-making process. We show that our definition respects the requirements that are essential for groups to interact without limitations and that can take advantage of those interactions to create valuable knowledge to support more and better.
Vorheriger Artikel Discovering topic structures of a temporally evolving document corpus
Nächster Artikel Heterogeneous representation learning with separable structured sparsity regularization

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Bellifemine F, Poggi A, Rimassa G (1999) JADE—A FIPA-compliant agent framework. In: Proceedings of PAAM, London, vol 99, p 33
3.
Bonzon E, Dimopoulos Y, Moraitis P (2012) Knowing each other in argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems-volume 3, international foundation for autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 1413–1414
4.
Booth R, Caminada M, Podlaszewski M, Rahwan I (2012) Quantifying disagreement in argument-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems-vol 1, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp 493–500
5.
Carneiro J, Santos R, Marreiros G, Novais P (2014) Overcoming the lack of human-interaction in ubiquitous group decision support systems. Adv Sci Technol Lett 49:116–124CrossRef
6.
Carneiro J, Martinho D, Marreiros G, Novais P (2015a) Defining agents’ behaviour for negotiation contexts. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–14
7.
Carneiro J, Martinho D, Marreiros G, Novais P (2015b) A general template to configure multi-criteria problems in ubiquitous gdss. Int J Softw Eng Appl 9:193–206. doi:10.​14257/​astl.​205.​97.​17
8.
Carneiro J, Santos R, Marreiros G, Novais P (2015d) UbiGDSS: A theoretical model to predict decision-makers’ satisfaction. Int J Multimed Ubiquitous Eng 10:191–200CrossRef
9.
Carneiro J, Martinho D, Marreiros G, Novais P (2015c) Individual definition of multi-criteria problems in ubiquitous gdss. Adv Sci Technol Lett
10.
Carneiro J, Martinho D, Marreiros G, Novais P (2016) Introducing dynamic argumentation to UbiGDSS. In: Distributed computing and artificial intelligence, 13th international conference, Springer, Berlin, pp 471–479
11.
Daume S, Robertson D (2000) An architecture for the deployment of mobile decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl 19(4):305–318CrossRef
12.
13.
DeSanctis G, Gallupe B (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag Sci 33:589–609CrossRef
14.
Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321–357MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
15.
El-Sisi AB, Mousa HM (2012) Argumentation based negotiation in multiagent system. In: Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES), 2012 seventh international conference on, IEEE, pp 261–266
16.
Fan X, Craven R, Singer R, Toni F, Williams M (2013) Assumption-based argumentation for decision-making with preferences: A medical case study. In: International workshop on computational logic in multi-agent systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 374–390
17.
Fan X, Toni F (2013) Decision making with assumption-based argumentation. In: International workshop on theory and applications of formal argumentation. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–142
18.
Fan X, Toni F, Mocanu A, Williams M (2014) Dialogical two-agent decision making with assumption-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, international foundation for autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 533–540
19.
Gordon TF, Karacapilidis N (1997) The Zeno argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 10–18
20.
21.
Hackman JR, Morris CG (1974) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: a review and proposed integration. Citeseer
22.
Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti VJ, Grasso F, Julián V, McBurney P (2010) How argumentation can enhance dialogues in social networks. COMMA 216:267–274
23.
Heras S, Jordán J, Botti V, Julián V (2013) Argue to agree: a case-based argumentation approach. Int J Approx Reason 54(1):82–108CrossRefMATH
24.
Hill GW (1982) Group versus individual performance: are \(n+ 1\) heads better than one? Psychol Bull 91(3):517CrossRef
25.
Huber GP (1984) Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Q: Manag Inf Syst 8:195–204CrossRef
26.
Ito T, Shintani T (1997) Persuasion among agents: an approach to implementing a group decision support system based on multi-agent negotiation. Int Joint Conf Artif Intell Citeseer 15:592–599
27.
Karacapilidis N, Papadias D (2001) Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system. Inf Syst 26(4):259–277CrossRefMATH
28.
Kraus S, Sycara K, Evenchik A (1998) Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artif Intell 104(1):1–69MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
29.
Kudenko D, Bauer M, Dengler D (2003) Group decision making through mediated discussions. In: International conference on user modeling. Springer, Berlin, pp 238–247
30.
31.
Lamm H, Trommsdorff G (1973) Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): a review. Eur J Soc Psychol 3(4):361–388CrossRef
32.
Marey O, Bentahar J, Asl EK, Mbarki M, Dssouli R (2014a) Agents’ uncertainty in argumentation-based negotiation: classification and implementation. Proc Comput Sci 32:61–68CrossRef
33.
Marey O, Bentahar J, Dssouli R, Mbarki M (2014b) Measuring and analyzing agents’ uncertainty in argumentation-based negotiation dialogue games. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):306–320CrossRef
34.
Marey O, Bentahar J, Khosrowshahi-Asl E, Sultan K, Dssouli R (2015) Decision making under subjective uncertainty in argumentation-based agent negotiation. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 6(3):307–323CrossRef
35.
36.
Martinho D, Carneiro J, Marreiros G, Novais P (2015) Dealing with agents’ behaviour in the decision-making process. In: Workshop proceedings of the 11th international conference on intelligent environments, IOS Press, vol 19, p 4
37.
Müller J, Hunter A (2012) An argumentation-based approach for decision making. In: 2012 IEEE 24th international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, IEEE, vol 1, pp 564–571
38.
Osborn AF (1963) Applied imagination; principles and procedures of creative problem-solving: principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Scribner
39.
Parsons S, Sklar E, Singh MP, Levitt KN, Rowe J (2013) An argumentation-based approach to handling trust in distributed decision making. In: AAAI spring symposium: trust and autonomous systems
40.
Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17(1):45–56CrossRef
41.
Rahwan I, Simari GR, van Benthem J (2009) Argumentation in artificial intelligence, vol 47. Springer, London
42.
Sánchez-Anguix V, Botti V, Julián V, García-Fornes A (2011) Analyzing intra-team strategies for agent-based negotiation teams. In: The 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 53, pp 929–936
43.
Shaw ME (1932) A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. Am J Psychol 44(3):491–504CrossRef
44.
Sierra C, Jennings NR, Noriega P, Parsons S (1997) A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: International workshop on agent theories, architectures, and languages. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–192
45.
Sklar EI, Parsons S, Li Z, Salvit J, Perumal S, Wall H, Mangels J (2016) Evaluation of a trust-modulated argumentation-based interactive decision-making tool. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 30(1):136–173CrossRef
46.
Van der Weide TL, Dignum F, Meyer JJC, Prakken H, Vreeswijk G (2011) Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues. In: International workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 136–153
47.
Watson WE, Michaelsen LK, Sharp W (1991) Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: a longitudinal study. J Appl Psychol 76(6):803CrossRef
48.
Wyner A, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2012) A functional perspective on argumentation schemes. In: Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems (ArgMAS 2012), pp 203–222
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamic argumentation in UbiGDSS
verfasst von
João Carneiro
Diogo Martinho
Goreti Marreiros
Amparo Jimenez
Paulo Novais
Publikationsdatum
17.08.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Knowledge and Information Systems / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0219-1377
Elektronische ISSN: 0219-3116
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1093-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Knowledge and Information Systems 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Regular Paper

GLEAM: a graph clustering framework based on potential game optimization for large-scale social networks

Regular Paper

Time series classification with feature covariance matrices

Regular Paper

Discovering topic structures of a temporally evolving document corpus

Regular Paper

Mobile Apps identification based on network flows

Regular Paper

Graph-based review spammer group detection

Survey Paper

Core techniques of question answering systems over knowledge bases: a survey