nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. Dynamics of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Proposed 4S Model

verfasst von : Mine Yilmazer, Meltem Onay

Erschienen in: Ethics, Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this study is to research the dimensions of sustainable entrepreneurship in the industrial sector and to bring out the effects on sustainable development. For this purpose, activities of sustainable entrepreneurship of two firms operating in Turkey are examined. Considering the theoretical basis of the concept sustainable entrepreneurship and the practical studies on the subject, a new model called 4S has been developed involving economic, environmental, technological and social sustainability dimensions. In the study, multiple, exploratory and qualitative case study is preferred. Findings of the research show that firms’ accomplice a cost lowering production with a technology that increases source efficiency, and this increases both the firms’ competition force and profitability and fulfills the social and economic responsibilities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Sustainability Practices of Higher Education Institutions—An Analysis from a Developing Country

Nächstes Kapitel Developing Sustainable Strategies at the Base of the Pyramid

3M. (2015). 2015 Sustainability Report.

Akatay, A., & Aslan, Ş. (2008). Yeşil yönetim ve işletmeler: ISO 14001 sertifikası almaya yönelten faktörler. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(1), 313–339.

Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625–641.CrossRef

Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18(1), 127–146.CrossRef

Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278–293.CrossRef

Chen, Y., Lai, S., & Wen, C. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 331–339.CrossRef

Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747–760.

Darnall, N. (2006). Why firms mandate ISO 14001 certification. Business and Society, 45(3), 354–381.CrossRef

Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2011). Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: Government policies and firm motivations. Ecological Economics, 70, 1546–1557.CrossRef

Doni, N., & Ricchiuti, G. (2013). Market equilibrium in the presence of green consumers and responsible firms: a comparative statics analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 35, 380–395.CrossRef

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4).

Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2007). End-of-pipe or cleaner production? an empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD Countries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(8), 571–584.CrossRef

Hascic, I., de Vries, F., Johnstone, N., & Medhi, N. (2009). Effects of environmental policy on the type of innovation: the case of automotive emission-control technologies. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 1, 1–18.

Horbach, J. (2006). Determinants of environmental innovation new evidence from German panel data sources. Working Paper Econstor.

Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact-the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122.CrossRef

http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2020/index_en.htm. 24.04.2016.

http://www.ab.gov.tr/index.php?p=92. 24.04.2016.

http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2872.pdf. 02.05.2016.

http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2007/05/20070502-2.htm. 02.05.2016a.

http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/01/20110108-3.htm. 02.05.2016b.

http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2016/03/20160323-5.htm. 02.05.2016c.

http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPTemelBelge/files/7kwq0+Turkiye_Sanayi_Strateji_Belgesi_.pdf. 05.05.2016.

Jabbour, C. J. C., Neto, A. S., Gobbo, A. J., Ribeiro, A., & Jabbour, A. B. L. (2015). Eco-innovations in more sustainable supply chains for a low-carbon economy: A multiple case study of human critical success factors in Brazilian leading companies. International Journal Production Economics, 164, 245–257.CrossRef

Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation an innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.CrossRef

Johnstone, N., Hascic, I., & Popp, D. (2008). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation evidence based on patent counts. NBER Working Paper 13760.

Kainrath, D. (2009). Ecopreneurship in theory and practice, a proposed emerging framework for ecopreneurship. Umeâ School of Business, Bachelor Thesis.

Kammerer, D. (2009). The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecological Economics, 68, 2285–2295.CrossRef

Kardos, M. (2012). The relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and sustainable development. Research on European Union countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 1030–1035.CrossRef

Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation (No. 044513). Accessed April 25, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/env/consumption-innovation/43960830.pdf.

Kesidou, E., & Demirel, P. (2012). On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK. Research Policy, 41, 862–870.CrossRef

Kim, K., & Kim, Y. (2015). Role of policy in innovation and international trade of renewable energy technology: Empirical study of solar PV and wind power technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 717–727.CrossRef

Klaassen, G., Miketa, A., Larsen, K., & Sundqvist, T. (2005). The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 54(2–3), 227–240.CrossRef

Kunapatarawong, R., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2016). Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment? Research Policy, 45(6), 1218–1232.CrossRef

Leonidou, L. C., Fotiadis, T. A., Christodoulides, P., Spyropoulou, S., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2015). Environmentally friendly export business strategy: Its determinants and effects on competitive advantage and performance. International Business Review, 24, 798–811.CrossRef

Li, K., & Lin, B. (2016). Impact of energy technology patents in China: Evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Policy, 89, 214–223.CrossRef

Nath, P., & Ramanathan, R. (2016). Environmental management practices, environmental technology portfolio, and environmental commitment: A content analytic approach for UK manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 1(31), 427–437.CrossRef

OECD. (2010). Eco-Innovation in industry enabling green growth. Accessed April 21, 2016, from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/eco-innovation-in-industry_9789264077225-en.

OECD. (2011). Compendium of OECD Well-Being Indicators. OECD Better Life Initiative: OECD.

Pastakia, A. (2002). Assessing ecopreneurship in the context of a developing country. Greener Management International: The Journal of Corporate Environmental Strategy and Practice, 38, 93–108.CrossRef

Popp, D. (2006). International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: The effects of NO_x and SO₂ regulation in the US, Japan and Germany. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51(1), 46–71.CrossRef

Popp, D. (2010). Innovation and climate policy. NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper 15673. Accessed March 12, 2016, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15673.

Popp, D., Hafner, T., & Johnstone, N. (2007). Policy vs. consumer pressure: Innovation and diffusion of alternative bleaching technologies in the pulp industry. NBER Working Paper 13439.

Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235–248.CrossRef

Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.CrossRef

Pujari, D., Peattie, K., & Wright, G. (2004). Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 381–391.CrossRef

Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., & Zwick, T. (2004). The effect of environmental innovations on employment changes: An econometric analysis. Business Strategy Environment, 13, 374–387.CrossRef

Samad, G. & Manzoor, R. (2015). Green growth: Important determinants. The Singapore Economic Review, 60(2), 1550014 (15 p).

Schell, C. (1992). The value of the case study as a research strategy. Manchester: Manchester Business School.

Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management—An exploratory literature review. R&D Management, 42(2), 180–192.CrossRef

Soubbotina, T. P. (2004). Beyond economic growth an introduction to sustainable development. World Bank, p. 10.

Tantau, A., Chinie, A., & Carlea, F. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation in the renewable energy field. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 353–362.CrossRef

UNDP. (2017). Sustainable development goals. Accessed January, 5, 2016, from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/.

Volery, T. (2002). Ecopreneurship: Rationale, current issues and future challenges. In Conference Papers of Swiss Research Institute of Small Business and Entrepreneurship (pp. 541–553). St. Gallen (Switzerland). Accessed February 23, 2016, from https://www.academia.edu/1278788/Ecopreneurship_Rationale_current_issues_and_future_challenges.

Wagner, M. (2009). Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 291–306.CrossRef

WCED-World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: WCED.

Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1).

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research-design and method. In ASR method series (3rd ed., Vol. 5). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Titel: Dynamics of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Proposed 4S Model
verfasst von: Mine Yilmazer
Meltem Onay
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Ethics, Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7923-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-7924-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7924-6_13