Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

24. Econometric Approaches to the Measurement of Research Productivity

verfasst von : Cinzia Daraio

Erschienen in: Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The measurement of research productivity is receiving more and more attention. Besides scholars that are interested in understanding how research works and evolves over time, there are supranational, national and local governments, and national evaluation agencies, as well as various stakeholders, including managers of academic and research institutions, scholars and more generally the wider public, who are interested in the accountability and transparency of the scholarly production process.
The main objective of this chapter is to analyze econometric approaches to research productivity and efficiency, highlighting what econometric approaches to research assessment can offer and what their benefit is, compared to traditional bibliometric or informetric approaches. We describe the nature of, and the ambiguities connected to, the measurement of research productivity, as well as the potential of econometric approaches for research measurement and assessment. Finally, we propose a checklist when developing econometric models of research assessment as a starting point for further research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Societal Impact Measurement of Research Papers
Nächstes Kapitel Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as Data Sources for Studies of Research
Literatur
A. Bonaccorsi, C. Daraio: Econometric approaches to the analysis of productivity of R&D systems, production functions and production frontiers. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, ed. by H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Springer, Dordrecht 2004) pp. 51–74
C. Daraio: A framework for the assessment of research and its impacts, J. Data Inf. Sci. 2(4), 7–42 (2017)
C. Daraio: Assessing research and its impacts: The generalized implementation problem and a doubly-conditional performance evaluation model. In: Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Scientometr. ISSI (2017) pp. 1546–1557
C. Daraio: The Democratization of Evaluation and Altmetrics, Technical Report DIAG (Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 2018)
L. Floridi: The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality (OUP, Oxford 2014)
W. Glänzel, B. Thijs, K. Debackere: Productivity, performance, efficiency, impact—What do we measure anyway?, Some comments on the paper “A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators” by Abramo and D'Angelo, J. Informetr. 10(2), 658–660 (2016)CrossRef
L. Waltman: Special section on size-independent indicators in citation analysis, J. Informetr. 10(2), 645 (2016)CrossRef
G. Abramo, C.A. D'Angelo: A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators, J. Informetr. 10(2), 646–651 (2016)CrossRef
M. Zitt: Paving the way or pushing at open doors? A comment on Abramo and D'Angelo “Farewell to size-independent indicators”, J. Informetr. 2(10), 675–678 (2016)CrossRef
OECD: Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities (OECD, Paris 2015)CrossRef
OECD: Making Open Science a Reality, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, Vol. 25 (OECD, Paris 2015)
C. Daraio, L. Simar: Advanced Robust and Non-Parametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications (Springer, New York 2007)
S.K. Mishra: Brief history of production functions, IUP J. Manag. Econ. 8(4), 6–34 (2010)
W. Härdle: Applied Nonparametric Regression (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1992)
D.J. Henderson, C.F. Parmeter: Applied Nonparametric Econometrics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2015)CrossRef
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, C.K. Lovell: Production Frontiers (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1994)
H.O. Fried, C.K. Lovell, S.S. Schmidt (Eds.): The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2008)
H. Varian: Microeconomic Theory (W.W. Norton, New York 1992)
T.C. Koopmans: Efficient allocation of resources, Econometrica 19(4), 455–465 (1951)CrossRef
G. Debreu: The coefficient of resource utilization, Econometrica 19(3), 273–292 (1951)CrossRef
R.W. Shephard: Theory of Cost and Production Functions (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 1970)
M.J. Farrell: The measurement of productive efficiency, J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. A 120(3), 253–290 (1957)CrossRef
A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E. Rhodes: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)CrossRef
S.C. Kumbhakar, C.A.K. Lovell: Stochastic Frontier Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2000)CrossRef
P.E. Stephan: The economics of science, J. Econ. Lit. 34(3), 1199–1235 (1996)
F. Lissoni, J. Mairesse, F. Montobbio, M. Pezzoni: Scientific productivity and academic promotion: A study on French and Italian physicists, Ind. Corp. Change 20, 253–294 (2011)CrossRef
P.E. Stephan, G. Levin: The critical importance of careers in collaborative scientific research, Rev. Econ. Ind. 79(1), 45–61 (1996)
S. Stack: Gender, children and research productivity, Res. High. Educ. 45, 891–920 (2004)CrossRef
Y. Xie, K.A. Shauman: Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle, Am. Sociol. Rev. 63(6), 847–870 (1998)CrossRef
J. Mairesse, M. Pezzoni: Does gender affect scientific productivity?, Rev. Econ. 66, 65–113 (2015)
M. Pezzoni, J. Mairesse, P. Stephan, J. Lane: Gender and the publication output of graduate students: A case study, PLoS ONE 11, e0145146 (2016)CrossRef
B. Bozeman, S. Lee: The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity, Soc. Stud. Sci. 35(5), 673–702 (2003)
P. Azoulay, J.S.G. Zivin, J. Wang: Superstar Extinction, Working Paper No. 14577 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge 2008)CrossRef
B.A. Jacob, L. Lefgren: The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity, J. Public Econ. 95, 1168–1177 (2011)CrossRef
L. Turner, J. Mairesse: Individual Productivity Differences in Public Research: How Important are Non-Individual Determinants? An Econometric Study of French Physicists Publications and Citations (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris 2005) pp. 1986–1997
M.F. Fox: Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review, Soc. Stud. Sci. 13, 285–305 (1983)CrossRef
J.A.D. Holbrook: Basic indicators of scientific and technological performance, Sci. Public Policy 19(5), 267–273 (1992)
R. Johnston: Effects of resource concentration on research performance, High. Educ. 28, 25–37 (1993)CrossRef
P. Ramsden: Describing and explaining research productivity, High. Educ. 28, 207–226 (1994)CrossRef
F. Narin, A. Breitzman: Inventive productivity, Res. Policy 24(4), 507–519 (1995)CrossRef
P.E. Stephan: How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 2012)CrossRef
P. Bazeley: Conceptualising research performance, Stud. High. Educ. 35(8), 889–903 (2010)CrossRef
G.S. Åkerlind: An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature, Stud. High. Educ. 33(1), 17–31 (2008)CrossRef
G. Abramo, C.A. D'Angelo: How do you define and measure research productivity?, Scientometrics 101(2), 1129–1144 (2014)CrossRef
P. Wouters, W. Glänzel, J. Gläser, I. Rafols: The dilemmas of performance indicators of individual researchers—an urgent debate in bibliometrics, ISSI Newsletter 9(3), 48–53 (2013)
G. Ruocco, C. Daraio, V. Folli, M. Leonetti: Bibliometric indicators: The origin of their log-normal distribution and why they are not a reliable proxy for an individual scholar's talent, Palgrave Commun. 3, 17064 (2017)CrossRef
A.F. Van Raan: Measuring science. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, ed. by H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Springer, Dordrecht 2004) pp. 19–50CrossRef
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow: The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (SAGE, London 1994)
H. Nowotny, P. Scott, M. Gibbons: Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Polity, Cambridge 2001)
M. Bucchi: Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens (Springer, New York 2009)CrossRef
A. Benessia, S. Funtowicz, M. Giampietro, A.G. Pereira, J. Ravetz, A. Saltelli, J.P. van der Sluijs: Science on the Verge, The Rightful Place of Science (Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Tempé 2016)
M. Bucchi, B. Trench (Eds.): Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (Routledge, Hershley 2014)
R. Whitley, J. Gläser (Eds.): The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Vol. 26 (Springer, Dordrecht 2007)
P. Dahler-Larsen: The Evaluation Society (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford 2011)CrossRef
D. Hicks: Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation, High. Educ. 57(4), 393–404 (2009)CrossRef
C. Daraio, A. Bonaccorsi: Beyond university rankings? Generating new indicators on universities by linking data in open platforms, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68(2), 508–529 (2017)CrossRef
E. Hazelkorn: Measuring world-class excellence and the global obsession with rankings. In: A Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education, ed. by S. Marginson, R. Naidoo, R. King (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2011) pp. 497–515
J. Priem, P. Groth, D. Taraborelli: The altmetrics collection, PLoS ONE 7(11), e48753 (2012)CrossRef
M. Hilbert, P. López: The world's technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information, Science 332(6025), 60–65 (2011)CrossRef
S. Pinfield, J. Salter, P.A. Bath, B. Hubbard, P. Millington, J.H. Anders, A. Hussain: Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005–2012: Past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(12), 2404–2421 (2014)CrossRef
J.S.A.H. Katz, D. Hicks: Desktop scientometrics, Scientometrics 38(1), 141–153 (1997)CrossRef
B. Cronin, C.R. Sugimoto: Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (MIT Press, Cambridge 2014)CrossRef
B. Cronin, C.R. Sugimoto (Eds.): Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing (Information Today, Medford 2015)
M. Bladek: DORA: San Francisco declaration on research assessment, Coll. Res. Libr. News 75(4), 191–196 (2014)CrossRef
D. Hicks, P. Wouters, L. Waltman, S.D. Rijcke, I. Rafols: Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, Nature 520, 429–431 (2015)CrossRef
J. Wilsdon, L. Allen, E. Belfiore, P. Campbell, S. Curry, S. Hill, R. Jones, R. Kain, S. Kerridge, M. Thelwall, J. Tinkler, I. Viney, P. Wouters, J. Hill, B. Johnson: The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. Available at: http://​epc.​ac.​uk/​wp-content/​uploads/​2015/​07/​2015-07_​metric_​tide.​pdf (last accessed 10 January 2019) (2015)
M. Zitt: Les Dérives de l'Évaluation de la Recherche: du bon usage de la bibliométrie (The excesses of research evaluation: The proper use of bibliometrics) by Yves Gingras. Paris: Raisons d'Agir Editions, 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(10), 2171–2176 (2015)CrossRef
Y. Gingras: Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses (MIT Press, Cambridge 2016)CrossRef
R. Benedictus, F. Miedema, M.W. Ferguson: Fewer numbers, better science, Nature 538(7626), 453–455 (2016)CrossRef
P. Stephan, R. Veugelers, J. Wang: Blinkered by bibliometrics, Nature 544(7651), 411–412 (2017)CrossRef
H.F. Moed, G. Halevi: Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(10), 1988–2002 (2015)CrossRef
W. Glänzel: The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology, Scientometrics 35(2), 167–176 (1996)CrossRef
C. Daraio, W. Glänzel: Grand challenges in data integration–state of the art and future perspectives: An introduction, Scientometrics 108(1), 391–400 (2016)CrossRef
W. Glänzel, H. Willems: Towards standardisation, harmonisation and integration of data from heterogeneous sources for funding and evaluation purposes, Scientometrics 106(2), 821–823 (2016)CrossRef
M. Nielsen: Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 2012)
C.L. Borgman: Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world (MIT Press, Cambridge 2015)CrossRef
J. Stewart: Models of priority-setting for public sector research, Res. Policy 24(1), 115–126 (1995)CrossRef
R. Moscati: Transforming a centralised system of higher education: Reform and academic resistance in Italy. In: From Governance to Identity, A Festschrift for Mary Henkel, ed. by A. Amaral, I. Bleiklie, C. Musselin (Springer, Dordrecht 2008)
S. Boffo, P. Dubois, R. Moscati: Changes in university governance in France and in Italy, Tert. Educ. Manag. 14(1), 13–26 (2008)CrossRef
G. Rebora, M. Turri: The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face, Res. Policy 42(9), 1657–1666 (2013)CrossRef
C. Daraio: Non-parametric methods and higher education. In: Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, ed. by P. Teixeira, J. Shin (Springer, Dordrecht 2018)
P.A. Samuelson, T.C. Koopmans, J.R.N. Stone: Report of the evaluative committee for Econometrica, Econometrica 22(2), 141–146 (1954)
J. Geweke, J. Horowitz, M.H. Pesaran: Econometrics. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn., ed. by S. Durlauf, L. Blume, U. Schmoch (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2008)
W.J. Baumol, A.S. Blinder: Economics: Principles and Policy, 12th edn. (South-Western Cengage Learning, Boston 2012)
J.D. Gibbons, S. Chakraborti: Nonparametric statistical inference. In: International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, ed. by M. Lovric (Springer, Berlin 2011) pp. 977–979CrossRef
B. Efron, R.J. Tibshirani: An Introduction to the Bootstrap (CRC, Boca Raton 1994)
D.P. Kroese, T. Brereton, T. Taimre, Z.I. Botev: Why the Monte Carlo method is so important today, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 6(6), 386–392 (2014)CrossRef
P.F. Drucker, J.A. Maciariello: Management (Collins, New York 2008), Revised edition
M.E. Porter: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York 1985)
M.E. Porter: Competitive Advantage of Nations: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Simon and Schuster, New York 2011)
M.E. Porter, V.E. Mirrar: How information gives you competitive advantage, Harv. Bus. Rev. 64(4), 149–160 (1985)
T.H. Davenport: Competing on analytics, Harv. Bus. Rev. 84(1), 98 (2006)
T. Zenger: Beyond Competitive Advantage (Harvard Business Review, Boston 2016)
D. Besanko, D. Dranove, M. Shanley, S. Schaefer: Economics of Strategy (Wiley, New Jersey 2009)
B.M. Frischmann: Infrastructure: The Social Value of Shared Resources (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2012)CrossRef
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science 185(4157), 1124–1131 (1974)CrossRef
H.A. Simon: The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge 1969)
H.A. Simon: Models of Bounded Rationality (MIT Press, Cambridge 1982)
R. Simons, A. Dávila, R.S. Kaplan: Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River 2000) p. 203
D. Kahneman, P. Egan: Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York 2011)
J. Friedman, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, New York 2009)
M. Mezard, A. Montanari: Information, Physics, and Computation (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2009)CrossRef
K.P. Murphy: Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge 2012)
D. Barber: Bayesian Reasoning and Machine Learning (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2012)
M.I. Jordan, T.M. Mitchell: Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects, Science 349(6245), 255–260 (2015)CrossRef
A. Graves, G. Wayne, M. Reynolds, T. Harley, I. Danihelka, A. Grabska-Barwinska, A.P. Badia: Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory, Nature 538(7626), 471–476 (2016)CrossRef
R. Layard, S. Glaister: Cost–Benefit Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1994)CrossRef
A.E. Boardman, D.H. Greenberg, A.R. Vining, D.L. Weimer: Cost–Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 4th edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River 2011)
D. Weimer (Ed.): Cost–Benefit Analysis and Public Policy (Wiley, Blackwell 2008)
A.M. Ghalayini, J.S. Noble: The changing basis of performance measurement, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 16(8), 63–80 (1996)CrossRef
R.G. Eccles: The performance measurement manifesto, Harv. Bus. Rev. 69(1), 131–137 (1991)
A. Neely (Ed.): Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2002)
R.S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton: The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive Performance, Harv. Bus. Rev. 70, 71–79 (1992)
A.A. Atkinson, J.H. Waterhouse, R.B. Wells: A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement, MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 38(3), 25 (1997)
A.D. Neely, C. Adams, M. Kennerley: The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success (Financial Times/Prentice Hall, London 2002)
E. Ferlie, L. Fitzgerald, A. Pettigrew: The New Public Management in Action (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1996)CrossRef
J.E. Lane: New Public Management: An Introduction (Routledge, London 2002)CrossRef
R.S. Kaplan: Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations, Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 11(3), 353–370 (2001)CrossRef
W. Van Dooren, G. Bouckaert, J. Halligan: Performance Management in the Public Sector (Routledge, London 2015)
R.D. Behn: The new public management paradigm and the search for democratic accountability, Int. Public Manag. J. 1(2), 131–164 (1998)CrossRef
R.C. Box, G.S. Marshall, B.J. Reed, C.M. Reed: New public management and substantive democracy, Public Adm. Rev. 61(5), 608–619 (2001)CrossRef
P. Dunleavy, H. Margetts, S. Bastow, J. Tinkler: New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance, J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 16(3), 467–494 (2006)CrossRef
J. O'Flynn: From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications, Aust. J. Public Adm. 16(3), 353–366 (2007)CrossRef
S. Van Thiel, F.L. Leeuw: The performance paradox in the public sector, Public Perform. Manag. Rev 25(3), 267–281 (2002)CrossRef
L. Bryl: Intellectual capital measurement. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 4th edn., ed. by M. Khosrow-Pour (IGI Global, Hershley 2018) pp. 5056–5066CrossRef
A. Tiwana: The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System (Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River 2000)
M. Alavi, D.E. Leidner: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly 25(1), 107–136 (2001)CrossRef
J. Liebowitz (Ed.): Knowledge Management Handbook (CRC, Boca Raton 2012)
A. Bounfour, L. Edvinsson (Eds.): Intellectual Capital for Communities (Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames 2012)
J. Guthrie, J. Dumay: New frontiers in the use of intellectual capital in the public sector, J. Intellect. Cap. 16(2), 258–266 (2015)CrossRef
J. Dumay, J. Guthrie, P. Puntillo: IC and public sector: A structured literature review, J. Intellect. Cap. 16(2), 267–284 (2015)CrossRef
G. Secundo, R. Lombardi, J. Dumay: Intellectual capital in education, J. Intellect. Cap. 19(1), 2–9 (2018)CrossRef
A. Pulic: The Principles of Intellectual Capital Efficiency—A Brief Description (Croatian Intellectual Capital Center, Zagreb Center 2008)
G. Iazzolino, D. Laise: Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): A methodological and critical review, J. Intellect. Cap. 14(4), 547–563 (2013)CrossRef
D. Helbing, S. Bishop, R. Conte, P. Lukowicz, J.B. McCarthy: FuturICT: Participatory computing to understand and manage our complex world in a more sustainable and resilient way, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214(1), 11–39 (2012)CrossRef
J.A. Doornik, D.F. Hendry: Statistical model selection with “Big Data”, Cogent Econ. Finance 3(1), 1045216 (2015)CrossRef
H. Ekbia, M. Mattioli, I. Kouper, G. Arave, A. Ghazinejad, T. Bowman, C.R. Sugimoto: Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(8), 1523–1545 (2015)CrossRef
F. Schweitzer, G. Fagiolo, D. Sornette, F. Vega-Redondo, D.R. White: Economic networks: What do we know and what do we need to know?, Adv. Complex Syst. 12(04n05), 407–422 (2009)CrossRef
F. Schweitzer, G. Fagiolo, D. Sornette, F. Vega-Redondo, A. Vespignani, D.R. White: Economic networks: The new challenges, Science 325(5939), 422–425 (2009)CrossRef
W. Elsner, T. Heinrich, H. Schwardt: The Microeconomics of Complex Economies: Evolutionary, Institutional, Neoclassical, and Complexity Perspectives (Academic Press, Oxford 2015)CrossRef
A. Kirman: Networks: A paradigm shift for economics? In: The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks, ed. by Y. Bramoullé, A. Galeotti, B.W. Rogers (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2016)
M.P. Mandell, R. Keast: Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganizational relations through networks: Developing a framework for revised performance measures, Public Manag. Rev. 10(6), 715–731 (2008)CrossRef
A. Golan: Information and entropy econometrics, A review and synthesis, Found. Trends Econ. 2(12), 1–145 (2008)
G.G. Judge, R.C. Mittelhammer: An Information Theoretic Approach to Econometrics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2011)CrossRef
N. Georgescu-Roegen: The economics of production, Am. Econ. Rev. 60(2), 1–9 (1970)
N. Georgescu-Roegen: Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1971)CrossRef
N. Georgescu-Roegen: Process analysis and the neoclassical theory of production, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 54(2), 279–294 (1972)CrossRef
N. Georgescu-Roegen: Methods in economic science, J. Econ. Issues 13(2), 317–328 (1979)CrossRef
M. Morroni: Production Process and Technical Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1992)CrossRef
M. Morroni: Production of commodities by means of processes. The flow-fund model, input–output relations and the cognitive aspects of production, Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 29, 5–18 (2014)CrossRef
M. Morroni: Knowledge, Scale and Transactions in the Theory of the Firm (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2006) pp. 1–358CrossRef
G. Fioretti: The production function, Physica A 374(2), 707–714 (2007)CrossRef
C. Kao: Network Data Envelopment Analysis, Foundations and Extensions (Springer, Cham 2017)CrossRef
C. Daraio, R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, M.G. Izzo, L. Leuzzi, G. Ruocco, M. Bostian: Inference for nonparametric productivity networks: A pseudo-likelihood approach, paper presented at the CMStat Conference, London (2017)
B. Bozeman, J. Melkers (Eds.): Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice (Springer, New York 1993)
S.B. Khandker, G. Koolwal, H. Samad: Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices (The World Bank, Washington DC 2010)
A. Saltelli, A. Guimaraes-Pereira, J.P. van der Sluijs, S. Funtowicz: What do I make of your latinorum? Sensitivity auditing of mathematical modelling, Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy 9, 2–3 (2013)CrossRef
A. Saltelli, S. Funtowicz: When all models are wrong, Issues Sci. Technol. 30(2), 79–85 (2014)
A. Saltelli, S. Funtowicz: Evidence-based policy at the end of the Cartesian dream: The case of mathematical modelling. In: Science, Philosophy and Sustainability: The End of the Cartesian Dream, Routledge Explorations in Sustainability and Governance, ed. by Â.G. Pereira, S. Funtowicz (Routledge, New York 2015) pp. 147–162
Z. Griliches, J. Mairesse: Production functions: The search for identification. In: Practising Econometrics: Essays in Method and Application, ed. by Z. Griliches (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 1998) pp. 383–411
A.R. Hall: Generalized Method of Moments (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2005)
W.H. Greene: Econometric Analysis (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River 2003)
A. Pagan, A. Ullah: Nonparametric Econometrics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1999)CrossRef
D. Aigner, C.K. Lovell, P. Schmidt: Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, J. Econometr. 6(1), 21–37 (1977)CrossRef
A. Kneip, L. Simar: A general framework for frontier estimation with panel data, J. Prod. Anal. 7(2/3), 187–212 (1996)CrossRef
P. Hall, L. Simar: Estimating a changepoint, boundary or frontier in the presence of observation error, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97, 523–534 (2002)CrossRef
L. Simar: How to improve the performances of DEA/FDH estimators in the presence of noise, J. Product. Anal. 28, 183–201 (2007)CrossRef
S.C. Kumbhakar, B.U. Park, L. Simar, E.G. Tsionas: Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: A local likelihood approach, J. Econ. 137(1), 1–27 (2007)CrossRef
L. Simar, V. Zelenyuk: Stochastic FDH/DEA estimators for frontier analysis, J. Product. Anal. 36, 1–20 (2011)CrossRef
B. Park, L. Simar, V. Zelenyuk: Categorical data in local maximum likelihood: Theory and application to productivity analysis, J. Product. Anal. 43, 199–214 (2015)CrossRef
J.P. Florens, L. Simar, I. Van Keilegom: Estimation of the Boundary of a Variable Observed with Symmetric Error, Discussion paper 2018/08, ISBA, UCL (Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve 2018)
W. Härdle: Applied Nonparametric Regression (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1990)CrossRef
J.P. Florens, L. Simar: Parametric approximations of non-parametric frontiers, J. Econ. 124(1), 91–116 (2005)CrossRef
L. Simar, P.W. Wilson: Estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives, Found. Trends Econ. 5(3/4), 183–337 (2013)
L. Simar, P.W. Wilson: Statistical approaches for non-parametric frontier models: A guided tour, Int. Stat. Rev. 83(1), 77–110 (2015)CrossRef
C. Mastromarco, L. Simar, P.W. Wilson: Non-parametric statistical analysis of production. In: Handbook of Economic Performance Analysis, ed. by W. Greene, T. ten Raa (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2018)
Z. Griliches: Economic Data Issues. In: Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 3, ed. by Z. Griliches, M. Intriligator (North Holland, Amsterdam 1986) pp. 1465–1514
Z. Griliches: Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint, Am. Econ. Rev. 84(1), 1–23 (1994)
C. Parent, S. Spaccapietra: Database integration: The key to data interoperability. In: Advances in Object-Oriented Data Modeling, ed. by M.P. Papazoglou, Z. Zari (MIT Press, Cambridge 2000) pp. 221–253
M. Luwel: The use of input data in the performance analysis of R&D systems. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, ed. by H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, H. Schmoch (Springer, Dordrecht 2004) pp. 315–338
D. Aksnes, G. Sivertsen, T.N. van Leeuwen, K.K. Wendt: Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators, Sci. Public Policy 44(2), 246–258 (2017)
A. Bonaccorsi, C. Daraio: Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2007)CrossRef
A. Bonaccorsi, C. Daraio, B. Lepori, S. Slipersaeter: Indicators on individual higher education institutions: addressing data problems and comparability issues, Res. Eval. 16(2), 66–78 (2007)CrossRef
C. Daraio, A. Bonaccorsi, A. Geuna, B. Lepori, L. Bach, P. Bogetoft, M.F. Cardoso, E. Castro-Martinez, G. Crespi, I. Fernandez de Lucio, H. Fried, A. Garcia-Aracil, A. Inzelt, B. Jongbloed, G. Kempkes, P. Llerena, M. Matt, M. Olivares, C. Pohl, T. Raty, M.J. Rosa, C.S. Sarrico, L. Simar, S. Slipersaeter, P.N. Teixeira, P. Vanden Eeckaut: The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project, Res. Policy 40(1), 148–164 (2011)CrossRef
G.E.P. Box: Science and Statistics, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 791–799 (1976)CrossRef
J.H. Stock: The other transformation in econometric practice: Robust tools for inference, J. Econ. Perspect. 24(2), 83–94 (2010)CrossRef
Q. Li, J.S. Racine: Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 2007)
H.R. Varian: Big data: New tricks for econometrics, J. Econ. Perspect. 28(2), 3–27 (2014)CrossRef
F.J. Alexander, A. Hoisie, A. Szalay: Big data, Comput. Sci. Eng. 13(6), 10–13 (2011)CrossRef
J.B. Cushing: Beyond Big Data?, Comput. Sci. Eng. 15(5), 4–5 (2013)CrossRef
L. Einav, J. Levin: Economics in the age of big data, Science 346(6210), 1243089 (2014)CrossRef
R. Rossi, K. Hirama: Characterizing big data management, Issues Inf. Sci. Inf. Technol. 12, 165–180 (2015)
S.F. Wamba, S. Akter, A. Edwards, G. Chopin, D. Gnanzou: How ‘big data’ can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 165, 234–246 (2015)CrossRef
C. Daraio: Challenges of big data for economic modeling and management. Tools from efficiency analysis, sensitivity analysis, sensitivity auditing and physics of complex systems. In: Proc. Workshop 10/11, 2015 DIAG, Sapienza Univ. Rome, ed. by C. Daraio (Efesto Edizioni, Roma 2016)
D. Acemoglu, P. Aghion, F. Zilibotti: Vertical integration and distance to frontier, J. Eur. Economic Assoc. 1(2/3), 630–638 (2003)CrossRef
D. Acemoglu, P. Aghion, F. Zilibotti: Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 4(1), 37–74 (2006)CrossRef
J. Vandenbussche, P. Aghion, C. Meghir: Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital, J. Econ. Growth 11(2), 97–127 (2006)CrossRef
C.M. Chen, M.A. Delmas, M.B. Lieberman: Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research, Strateg. Manag. J. 36(1), 19–36 (2015)CrossRef
J.E. Galán, H. Veiga, M.P. Wiper: Bayesian estimation of inefficiency heterogeneity in stochastic frontier models, J. Product. Anal. 42(1), 85–101 (2014)CrossRef
L. Bădin, C. Daraio, L. Simar: How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a non-parametric production model, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(3), 818–833 (2012)CrossRef
L. Bădin, C. Daraio, L. Simar: Explaining inefficiency in non-parametric production models: The state of the art, Ann. Oper. Res. 214(1), 5–30 (2014)CrossRef
C. Daraio, L. Simar: Directional distances and their robust versions: Computational and testing issues, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237(1), 358–369 (2014)CrossRef
C. Daraio, L. Simar, P.W. Wilson: Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the “separability” condition in nonparametric, two-stage models of production, Econ. J. 21(2), 170–191 (2018)
C.F. Parmeter, A.T. Wan, X. Zhang: A model averaging stochastic frontier estimator. Paper presented at the NAPW 2016 Quebec City, June 2016
C.J. O'Donnell: Using information about technologies, markets and firm behaviour to decompose a proper productivity index, J. Econ. 190(2), 328–340 (2016)CrossRef
P. Bogetoft: Performance Benchmarking: Measuring and Managing Performance (Springer, New York 2013)
L. Simar, A. Vanhems, I. Van Keilegom: Unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity in nonparametric frontier estimation, J. Econ. 190(2), 360–373 (2016)CrossRef
C.F. Parmeter, S.C. Kumbhakar: Efficiency analysis: A primer on recent advances, Found. Trends Econ. 7(3/4), 191–385 (2014)CrossRef
R.C. Sickles, V. Zelenyuk: Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency: Theory and Practice (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2018), forthcoming in 2019
C. Daraio, K. Kerstens, T. Nepomuceno, R.C. Sickles: Productivity and efficiency analysis software: An exploratory bibliographical survey of the options, J. Econ. Surv. 33(1), 85–100 (2019)CrossRef
D. Kahnemann, D. Lovallo, O. Sibony: Before you make that big decision, Harv. Bus. Rev. 89(6), 50–60 (2011)
J.W. Creswell, P.V.L. Clark: Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Sage, Thousand Oaks 2011)
National Research Council: Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond (National Academies Press, Washington DC 2014)
Metadaten
Titel
Econometric Approaches to the Measurement of Research Productivity
verfasst von
Cinzia Daraio
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Buch
Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02510-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-02511-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_24

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise