Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Environmental Management
Erschienen in: Environmental Management 1/2014

01.01.2014

Economic Linkages to Changing Landscapes

verfasst von: Jeffrey M. Peterson, Marcellus M. Caldas, Jason S. Bergtold, Belinda S. Sturm, Russell W. Graves, Dietrich Earnhart, Eric A. Hanley, J. Christopher Brown

Erschienen in: Environmental Management | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many economic processes are intertwined with landscape change. A large number of individual economic decisions shape the landscape, and in turn the changes in the landscape shape economic decisions. This article describes key research questions about the economics of landscape change and reviews the state of research knowledge. The rich and varied economic–landscape interactions are an active area of research by economists, geographers, and others. Because the interactions are numerous and complex, disentangling the causal relationships in any given landscape system is a formidable research challenge. Limited data with mismatched temporal and spatial scales present further obstacles. Nevertheless, the growing body of economic research on these topics is advancing and shares fundamental challenges, as well as data and methods, with work in other disciplines.
Vorheriger Artikel Changing Human Landscapes Under a Changing Climate: Considerations for Climate Assessments
Nächster Artikel Policy Interactions in Human–Landscape Systems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
As a reviewer notes, feedback loops driven by relative scarcity also arise in natural systems. For example, recent literature considers the role of prices in ecological systems, where prices are measured in energy units (e.g., Tschirhart 2000; Eichner and Pethig 2009; Finnoff and Tschirhart 2008).
 
Literatur
Anand M, Archer DW, Bergtold JS, Canales E (2011) Balancing feedstock economics and ecosystem services. In: Braun R, Karlen D, Johnson D (eds) Sustainable feedstocks for advanced biofuels: Sustainable alternative fuel feedstock opportunities challenges and roadmaps for six US regions. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, pp 193–216
Andersen L (1996) The causes of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Environ Dev 5:309–328CrossRef
Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Series: studies in operational regional science, vol 4. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, p 304CrossRef
Anselin L (2002) Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agric Econ 27:247–267CrossRef
Anselin L, Florax RJ (1995) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
Anselin L, Griffith D (1988) Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis? Reg Sci Assoc 65:11–34CrossRef
Anselin L, Florax RJGM, Rey SJ (2004) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
Antle JM, Capalbo SM, Elliott ET, Paustian KH (2004) Adaptation, spatial heterogeneity, and the vulnerability of agricultural systems to climate change and CO2 fertilization: an integrated assessment approach. Clim Chang 64:289–315CrossRef
Bailey KW, Womack AW (1985) Wheat acreage response: a regional econometric investigation. South J Agric Econ 17:171–180
Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev Econ Stud 77:417–458CrossRef
Barbier EB (1997) The economic determinants of land degradation in developing countries. Philos Trans R Soc B 352:891–899CrossRef
Bazilian M, Rogner H, Howells M, Hermann S, Arent D, Gielen D, Steduto P, Mueller A, Komor P, Tol RSJ, Yumkella KK (2011) Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 39:7896–7906CrossRef
Beach RH, McCarl BA (2010) U.S. agricultural and forestry impacts of the energy independence and security act: FASOM results and model description, final report. Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Res Triangle Institute, Res Triangle Park, NC RTI Project Number 0210826.003
Bishop RC (1978) Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of a safe minimum standard. Am J Agric Econ 60:10–18CrossRef
Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2009) Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:139–163CrossRef
Bodin Ö, Norberg J (2005) Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management. Environ Manage 35:175–193CrossRef
Brady M, Irwin E (2011) Accounting for spatial effects in economic models of land use: recent developments and challenges ahead. Environ Resour Econ 48:487–509CrossRef
Bridges D, Tenkorang F (2009) Agricultural commodities acreage value elasticity over time—implications for the 2008 farm bill. In: Proceedings of ASBBS 16, 2009
Brozović N, Schlenker W (2011) Optimal management of an ecosystem with an unknown threshold. Ecol Econ 70:627–640CrossRef
Buchanan RC, Buddemeier RR, Wilson BB (2009) Public information circular 18—The High Plains Aquifer. Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence
Bulatewicz T, Allen A, Peterson JM, Steward DR, Staggenborg S, Welch SM (2013) The simple script wrapper for OpenMI: enabling interdisciplinary water studies. Environ Model Softw 39:283–294CrossRef
Burnham BO (1973) Markov intertemporal land use simulation model. South J Agric Econ 5:253–258
Calvó-Armengol A, Ptacchini E, Zenou Y (2009) Peer effects and social networks in education. Rev Econ Stud 76:1239–1267CrossRef
Chembezi DM, Womack AW (1992) Regional acreage response for U.S. corn and wheat: the effects of government programs. South J Agric Econ 24:187–198
Chomitz KM, Gray DA (1996) Roads, land-use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to belize. World Bank Econ Rev 10:487–512CrossRef
Claasen R, Hansen L, Peters M, Breneman V, Weinberg M, Cattaneo A, Feather, P Gadsby D, Hellerstein D, Hopkins J, Johnston P, Morehart M, Smith M (2001) Agri-environmental policy at the crossroads: guideposts on a changing landscape. Agricultural Economic Report No. 794, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington DC
Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1997) A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ Plan B 24:247–261CrossRef
Cliff A, Ord J (1973) Spatial autocorrelation. Pion, London
Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial processes, models and applications. Pion, London
Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York
Dacey M (1968) A review of measures of contiguity for two and K-Color Maps. In: Berry B, Marble D (eds) Spatial analysis: a reader in statistical geography. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 479–495
Dagel KC (1997) Defining drought in marginal areas: the role of perception. Prof Geogr 49:192–202CrossRef
De La Torre Ugarte DG, English BC, Jensen K (2007) Sixty billion gallons by 2030: economic and agricultural impacts of ethanol and biodiesel expansion. Am J Agric Econ 89:1290–1295CrossRef
Dennehy K, Litke D, McMahon PB (2002) The High Plains Aquifer, USA: groundwater development and sustainability. Special Publications. vol 193. Geological Society, London, pp 99–119
Deschenes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97:354–385CrossRef
Dicks MR, Campiche JL, Ugarte DGDLT, Hellwinckel CM, Bryant HL, Richardson JW (2009) Land use implications of expanding biofuel demand. J Agric Appl Econ 41:435–453
Diggs DM (1991) Drought experience and perception of climate change among Great Plains farmers. Great Plains Res 1:114–132
Eichner T, Pethig R (2009) Pricing the ecosystem and taxing ecosystem services: a general equilibrium approach. J Econ Theory 144:1589–1616CrossRef
Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26:244–268CrossRef
Elhorst JP (2004) Serial and spatial error dependence in space time models. In: Getis A, Mur J, Zoller HG (eds) Spatial econometrics and spatial statistics. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 176–193
Elhorst JP (2010) Spatial panel data models. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 377–408CrossRef
Feng H, Kling CL, Kurkalova LA, Secchi S, Gassman PW (2005) The conservation reserve program in the presence of a working land alternative: implications for environmental quality, program participation, and income transfer. Am J Agric Econ 87:1231–1238CrossRef
Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2008) Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resour Energy Econ 30:91–114CrossRef
Flores D (1991) Bison ecology and bison diplomacy: the Southern Plains from 1800–1850. J Am Hist 78:465–485CrossRef
Flores D (1994) Place: an argument for bioregional history. Environ Hist Rev 18:1–18CrossRef
Fujita M (1989) Urban economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gates DM (1993) Climate change and its biological consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Getis A, Mur J, Zoller HG (2004) Spatial econometrics and spatial statistics. Palgrave MacMillan, New York
Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global chance: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRef
Gutentag ED, Heimes FJ et al (1984) Geohydrology of the High Plains Aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. US Dept of the Interior. US Gov Printing Office, Washington DC
Guttorp P (1995) Stochastic modeling of scientific data. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRef
Hansen CV (1991) Estimates of freshwater storage and potential natural recharge for principal aquifers in Kansas. Available from Books and Open File Report Section, USGS, Box 25425, Denver CO 80225. USGS Water-Resource Investigations Report 87-4230, 1991. 100 p 19 fig 4 tab 66 ref. USGS Project
Hendricks NP (2011) The dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of crop acreage response to price: problems of aggregation and pooling. Dissertation, University of California, Davis
Harden CP, Chin A, English MR, Fu R, Galvin KA, Gerlak AK, McDowell PF, McNamara DE, Peterson JM, Poff NL, Rosa EA, Solecki WD, Wohl EE (2013) Understanding human–landscape interactions in the “Anthropocene”. Environ Manage. doi:10.​1007/​s00267-013-0082-0
Houck JP, Abel ME, Ryan ME, Gallagher PW, Hoffman RG, Penn JB (1976) Analyzing the impact of government programs on crop acreage. USDA, Washington DC
Ives AR, Turner MG, Pearson SM (1998) Local explanations of landscape patterns: can analytical approaches approximate simulation models of spatial processes? Ecosystems 1:35–51CrossRef
Jacquez GM (2010) Space-time intelligence system software for the analysis of complex systems. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 113–124CrossRef
Jahan S (1986) The determination of stability and similarity of markovian land use change processes: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 20:243–251CrossRef
Keller K, Bolker BM, Bradford DF (2004) Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth. J Environ Econ Manage 48:723–741CrossRef
Kline JD (2003) Characterizing land use change in multidisciplinary landscape-level analyses. Agric Resour Econ Rev 32(1):103–115
Krause MA, Lee JH, Koo WW (1995) Program and nonprogram wheat acreage responses to prices and risk. J Agric Resour Econ 20:96–107
Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:438–499CrossRef
Lambim EF, Turner BL II, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes O, Dirzo R, Fisher G, Folke C, George PS, Home-Wodd K, Imberson J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skanes H, Steffen W, Stone DG, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land use and land cover change: moving beyond myths. Glob Environ Chang 11:261–269CrossRef
Landis JD (1994) The California urban futures model: a new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environ Plan B 21:399–420CrossRef
Lee DR, Helmberger PG (1985) Estimating supply response in the presence of farm programs. Am J Agric Econ 67:193–203CrossRef
LeSage JP (1997) Regression analysis of spatial data. J Reg Anal Policy 27:83–94
LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef
Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967CrossRef
Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ (2007) Policies for habitat fragmentation: combining econometrics with GIS-based landscape simulations. Land Econ 83:109–127CrossRef
Lichtenberg E (2004) Cost-responsiveness of conservation practice adoption: a revealed preference approach. J Agric Resour Econ 29:420–435
Limburg KE, O’Neill RV, Costanza R, Farber S (2002) Complex systems and valuation. Ecol Econ 41:409–420CrossRef
Lubowski RN, Plantinga AJ, Stavins RN (2006b) Land-use change and carbon sinks: econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function. J Environ Econ Manage 51:135–152CrossRef
Ludeke AK, Maggio RC, Reid LM (1990) An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS. J Environ Manage 32:247–259CrossRef
Ludwig D, Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2003) Optimal phosphorus loading for a potentially eutrophic lake. Ecol Appl 13:1135–1152CrossRef
Mäler KG, Xepapadeas A, de Zeeuw A (2003) The economics of shallow lakes. Environ Resour Econ 26:603–624CrossRef
McIntosh CS, Shideed KH (1989) The effect of government programs on acreage response over time: the case of corn production in Iowa. West J Agric Econ 14:38–44
Mendelsohn R (2000) Efficient adaptation to climate change. Clim Chang 45:583–600CrossRef
Mertens B, Lambin E (1997) Spatial modeling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Appl Geogr 17:143–162CrossRef
Miller DJ, Plantinga AJ (1999) Modeling land-use decisions with aggregate data. Am J Agric Econ 81:180–194CrossRef
Mumby PJ, Hastings A, Edwards HJ (2007) Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. Nature 450:98–101CrossRef
Nævdal E (2001) Optimal regulation of eutrophying lakes, fjords, and rivers in the presence of threshold effects. Am J Agric Econ 83:972–984CrossRef
Nævdal E (2006) Dynamic optimisation in the presence of threshold effects when the location of the threshold is uncertain—with an application to a possible disintegration of the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet. J Econ Dyn Control 30:1131–1158CrossRef
Nordhaus WD (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven
North GR (2008) Future climate of the continental United States. Choices 23:6–8
Pfaff ASP (1999) What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? J Environ Econ Manage 37:26–43CrossRef
Powell LM, Tauras JA, Ross H (2005) The importance of peer effects, cigarette prices and tobacco control policies for youth smoking behavior. J Health Econ 24:950–968CrossRef
Reilly J, Tubiello F, McCarl B, Abler D, Darwin R, Fuglie K, Hollinger S, Izaurradle C, Jagtap S, Jones J, Mearns L, Ojima D, Paul E, Paustian K, Riha S, Rosenberg N, Rosenzweiy C (2003) U.S. agriculture and climate change: new results. Clim Chang 57:43–69CrossRef
Roberts MJ, Bucholtz S (2005) Slippage in the conservation reserve program or spurious correlation? A comment. Am J Agric Econ 87:244–250CrossRef
Rose SK, McCarl BA (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions, stabilization and the inevitability of adaptation: challenges for US agriculture. Choices 23:15–18
Sandler T (1997) Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic challenges. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Scheffer M, Carpenter SR (2003) Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol Evol 18(12):648–656CrossRef
Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596CrossRef
Schlenker W, Haneman WM, Fisher AC (2007) Water availability, degree days, and the potential impact of climate change on irrigated agriculture in California. Clim Chang 81:19–38CrossRef
Simpson TW, Sharpley AN, Howarth RW, Paerl HW, Mankin KR (2008) The new gold rush: fueling ethanol production while protecting water quality. J Environ Qual 37:318–324CrossRef
Spiertz JHJ, Ewert F (2009) Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints. NJAS-Wash J Life Sci 56:281–300CrossRef
Stonestrom DA, Scanlon BR, Zhang L (2009) Introduction to special section on impacts of land use change and water resources. Water Resour Res 45:1–3
Subramanian SV (2010) Mutlilevel modeling. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 507–528CrossRef
Trogdon JG, Nonnemaker J, Pais J (2008) Peer effects in adolescent overweight. J Health Econ 27:1388–1399CrossRef
Tschirhart J (2000) General equilibrium of an ecosystem. J Theor Biol 203:13–32CrossRef
Tsur Y, Zemel A (2004) Endangered aquifers: groundwater management under threats of catastrophic events. Water Resour Res 40:W06S20. doi:10.​1029/​2003WR002168
Turner BL II, Cortina-Villar S, Foster D, Geoghegan J, Keys E, Kepleis P, Lawrence P, Mendoza PM, Manson S, Ogneva-Himmelberger A, Plotkin B, Pérez-Salicrup D, Chowdhury RR, Savitsky BB, Schneider B, Schmook B, Vance C (2001) Deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: an integrative approach. For Ecol Manage 154:353–370CrossRef
van Vuuren DP, Lowe J, Stehfest E, Gohar L, Hof AF, Hope C, Warren R, Meinshausen M, Plattner GK (2011) How well do integrated assessment models simulate climate change? Clim Chang 104:255–285CrossRef
Vaughn G (1995) Precursors of Ely’s land economics in American universities. Land Econ 71:531–536CrossRef
Veldkamp A, Lambin E (2001) Predicting land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85(1–3):1–6CrossRef
Walker RT (2003) Mapping process to pattern in the landscape change of the Amazonian Frontier. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:376–398CrossRef
Walker RT, Drzyzga SA, Li Y, Qi J, Caldas M, Vergara D (2004) Behavioral model of landscape change in the Amazon Basin: the colonist case. Ecol Appl 14(4):S299–S312CrossRef
White R, Engelen G, Uljee I (1997) The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environ Plan B 24:323–343CrossRef
Worster D (1979) Dust bowl: the Southern Plains in the 1930s. Oxford University Press, New York
Wu JJ (2000) Slippage effects of the conservation reserve program. Am J Agric Econ 82:979–992CrossRef
Wu JJ, Adams RM (2002) Micro versus macro acreage response models: does site-specific information matter? J Agric Resour Econ 27:40–60
Wu JJ, Babcock BA (1998) The choice of tillage, rotation and soil testing practices: economics and environmental implications. Am J Agric Econ 80:494–511CrossRef
Wu F, Webster CJ (1998) Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environ Plan B 25:103–126CrossRef
Ziker JP (2003) Assigned territories, family/clan/communal holdings, and common-pool resources in the Taimyr autonomous region, northern Russia. Human Ecol 31:331–368CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Economic Linkages to Changing Landscapes
verfasst von
Jeffrey M. Peterson
Marcellus M. Caldas
Jason S. Bergtold
Belinda S. Sturm
Russell W. Graves
Dietrich Earnhart
Eric A. Hanley
J. Christopher Brown
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Environmental Management / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0116-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Environmental Management 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Understanding Human–Landscape Interactions in the “Anthropocene”

OriginalPaper

Analyzing Human–Landscape Interactions: Tools That Integrate

OriginalPaper

Can Citizen Science Survey Non-indigenous Fish Species in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea?

OriginalPaper

Carrots and Sticks: New Brunswick and Maine Forest Landowner Perceptions Toward Incentives and Regulations

OriginalPaper

Channel Characteristics and Planform Dynamics in the Indian Terai, Sharda River

OriginalPaper

Space and Time Scales in Human-Landscape Systems