Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
Sustainability in Automotive

Gesamtlebenszyklus wird immer wichtiger

In der Digitalkonferenz am 5. Dezember 2024 geht es um die wachsende Bedeutung der Kreislaufwirtschaft in der Automobilindustrie und wie nachhaltige Werkstoffe sowie wiederverwendbare Komponenten dazu beitragen können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Ecosystem Services and Land Take. A Composite Indicator for the Assessment of Sustainable Urban Projects

verfasst von : Pierluigi Morano, Maria Rosaria Guarini, Francesco Sica, Debora Anelli

Erschienen in: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The worrying levels of land take and insufficient ecosystem services related to phenomena of uncontrolled urban expansion in the cities force many countries far away from achieving Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 2030. It is necessary to promote strategies which lead to effective and efficient measures in the perspective of sustainable development.
The work aim is to propose an evaluation protocol useful to support public and private subjects for sustainable practices in urban contexts. Depending on the types of use and land cover envisaged, the implementation of the proposed methodological framework allows for the definition of a Composite Indicator (CI) to measure the urban environmental and economic sustainability level. The proposed CI expresses qualitatively and quantitatively the socio-economic and environmental impact (trade-off) that single initiative generates in the reference context in terms of ecosystem services as a function of the land use change between ex-ante and ex-post phases of the urban transformation process.
Multi-parameter methodological approach by a sequence of logical-operational phases that lead to the definition of the CI is proposed. Steps of the proposed method are characterized by the algebraic structures typical of the Benefit of Doubt Approach (BDA) and Goal programming principles. Testing of the proposed protocol for CI construction is in progress.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Creative Ecosystem Services: Valuing Benefits of Innovative Cultural Networks
Nächstes Kapitel Building Industry and Energy Efficiency: A Review of Three Major Issues at Stake
Literatur
1.
United Nations: The Sustainable Development Goals Report (2020)
2.
Kovacs, E., Hoaghia, M.A., Senila, L., Scurtu, D.A., Dumitras, D.E., Roman, C.: Sustainability problematization and modeling opportunities. Sustainability 12(23), 10046 (2020)CrossRef
3.
Banga, J.: The green bond market: a potential source of climate finance for developing countries. J. Sustain. Finan. Invest. 9(1), 17–32 (2019)CrossRef
4.
Park, S.K.: Investors as regulators: Green bonds and the governance challenges of the sustainable finance revolution. Stanford J. Int. Law 54, 1 (2018)
5.
UNEP, I.: Preventing the Next Pandemic: Zoonotic Diseases and How to Break the Chain of Transmission, p. 82. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya (2020)
6.
IPBES: Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2019)
7.
Rubino, I., Coscia, C., Curto, R.: Identifying spatial relationships between built heritage resources and short-term rentals before the Covid-19 pandemic: exploratory perspectives on sustainability issues. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(11), 4533 (2020)CrossRef
8.
OECD: Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets 2019: An Assessment of Where OECD Countries Stand. OECD Publishing, Paris (2019)CrossRef
9.
Coscia, C., Curto, R.: Valorising in the absence of public resources and weak markets: the case of “Ivrea, the 20th century industrial city.” Green Energy Technol. 9783319496757, 79–99 (2017)CrossRef
10.
11.
12.
Coscia, C., Chiaravalloti, T.: Vuoti urbani e patrimonio del demanio storico-artistico: una road map per l’ex Carlo Alberto di Acqui Terme (ITA). Urban voids and public historical-artistic heritage: a road map for the Carlo Alberto complex of Acqui Terme. Territorio 84, 128–142 (2018). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3280/​TR2018-084019CrossRef
13.
ASviS, L.: l’Italia e gli Obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile (2020)
14.
Istat, R.S.: informazioni statistiche per l’Agenda 2030 in Italia (2020)
15.
Guarini, M., Nesticò, A., Morano, P., Sica, F.: A multicriteria economic analysis model for urban forestry projects. In: Calabrò, F., Spina, L.D., Bevilacqua, C. (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives: Local Knowledge and Innovation Dynamics Towards Territory Attractiveness Through the Implementation of Horizon/E2020/Agenda2030 – Volume 1, pp. 564–571. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-92099-3_​63CrossRef
16.
Coscia, C., Lazzari, G., Rubino, I.: Values, memory, and the role of exploratory methods for policy-design processes and the sustainable redevelopment of waterfront contexts: the case of Officine Piaggio (Italy). Sustainability 10(9), 2989 (2018). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​su10092989CrossRef
17.
Elmqvist, T., et al.: Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment, p. 755. Springer Nature (2013)
18.
Millennium ecosystem assessment, M.E.A.: Ecosystems and Human Well-being, vol. 5. Island Press, Washington, DC (2005)
19.
Cerreta, M., Panaro, S., Poli, G.: A spatial decision support system for multifunctional landscape assessment: a transformative resilience perspective for vulnerable inland areas. Sustainability 13(5), 2748 (2021)CrossRef
20.
Coscia, C., Rubino, I.: Fostering new value chains and social impact-oriented strategies in urban regeneration processes: what challenges for the evaluation discipline? Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 178 SIST, 983–992 (2021)CrossRef
21.
Guarini, M., Morano, P., Sica, F.: Eco-system Services and Integrated Urban Planning. A Multi-criteria Assessment Framework for Ecosystem Urban Forestry Projects. In: Mondini, G., Oppio, A., Stanghellini, S., Bottero, M., Abastante, F. (eds.) Values and Functions for Future Cities. GET, pp. 201–216. Springer, Cham (2020). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-23786-8_​11CrossRef
22.
De Filippi, F., Coscia, C., Guido, R.: From smart-cities to smart-communities: how can we evaluate the impacts of innovation and inclusive processes in urban context? Int. J. E-Plan Res. 8(2), 24–44 (2019)
23.
24.
Danielis, R., Rotaris, L., Monte, A.: Composite indicators of sustainable urban mobility: estimating the rankings frequency distribution combining multiple methodologies. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 12(5), 380–395 (2018)CrossRef
25.
Asadzadeh, A., Kötter, T., Salehi, P., Birkmann, J.: Operationalizing a concept: the systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 25, 147–162 (2017)CrossRef
26.
27.
Sardi, A., Sorano, E., Cantino, V., Garengo, P.: Big data and performance measurement research: Trends, evolution and future opportunities. Meas. Bus. Excell. (2020)
28.
Morano, P., Guarini, M., Tajani, F., Anelli, D.: Sustainable Redevelopment: The Cost-Revenue Analysis to Support the Urban Planning Decisions. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Garau, C., Blečić, I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Ana, M.A., Rocha, C., Tarantino, E., Torre, C.M., Karaca, Y. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020: 20th International Conference, Cagliari, Italy, July 1–4, 2020, Proceedings, Part III, pp. 968–980. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-58808-3_​69CrossRef
29.
30.
Tajani, F., Morano, P., Locurcio, M., D’Addabbo, N.: Property valuations in times of crisis: artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms in comparison. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, M.L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2015, pp. 194–209. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-21470-2_​14CrossRef
31.
32.
Fregonara, E., Coscia, C.: Multi criteria analyses, life cycle approaches and Delphi method: a methodological proposal to assess design scenarios | Analisi multi criteria, approcci life cycle e delphi method: Una proposta metodologica per valutare scenari di progetto. Valori Valutazioni 23, 107–117 (2019)
33.
Podvezko, V.: The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Eng. Econ. 22(2), 134–146 (2011)CrossRef
34.
Ferreira, F.A., Santos, S.P.: Comparing trade-off adjustments in credit risk analysis of mortgage loans using AHP, Delphi and MACBETH. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 20(1), 44–63 (2016)CrossRef
35.
Attardi, R., Cerreta, M., Sannicandro, V., Torre, C.M.: Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: the land-use policy efficiency index (LUPEI). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(2), 491–507 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRef
36.
Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L.: A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecol. Econ. 62(2), 291–297 (2007)CrossRef
37.
38.
Nesticò, A., Endreny, T., Guarini, M., Sica, F., Anelli, D.: Real Estate Values, Tree Cover, and Per-Capita Income: An Evaluation of the Interdependencies in Buffalo City (NY). In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Garau, C., Blečić, I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Ana, M.A., Rocha, C., Tarantino, E., Torre, C.M., Karaca, Y. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020: 20th International Conference, Cagliari, Italy, July 1–4, 2020, Proceedings, Part III, pp. 913–926. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-58808-3_​65CrossRef
39.
40.
D’Amico, G., Taddeo, R., Shi, L., Yigitcanlar, T., Ioppolo, G.: Ecological indicators of smart urban metabolism: a review of the literature on international standards. Ecol. Indic. 118, 106808 (2020)CrossRef
41.
ISO 37120_2019: Sustainable Cities and Communities — Indicators for City Services and Quality of Life
42.
Purnomo, F., Prabowo, H.: Smart city indicators: a systematic literature review. J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. 8(3), 161–164 (2016)
43.
Yu, W., Xu, C.: Developing smart cities in China: an empirical analysis. Int. J. Public Admin. Digital Age 5(3), 76–91 (2018)
44.
Shi, Y., et al.: An integrated indicator system and evaluation model for regional sustainable development. Sustainability 11(7), 2183 (2019)CrossRef
45.
46.
Satyro, W.C., Sacomano, J.B., Contador, J.C., Almeida, C.M., Giannetti, B.F.: Process of strategy formulation for sustainable environmental development: basic model. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 1295–1304 (2017)CrossRef
47.
Andrews, S.S., Carroll, C.R.: Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 11(6), 1573–1585 (2001)CrossRef
48.
49.
Blancas, F.J., Caballero, R., González, M., Lozano-Oyola, M., Pérez, F.: Goal programming synthetic indicators: an application for sustainable tourism in Andalusian coastal counties. Ecol. Econ. 69(11), 2158–2172 (2010)CrossRef
50.
Bernini, C., Guizzardi, A., Angelini, G.: DEA-like model and common weights approach for the construction of a subjective community well-being indicator. Soc. Indic. Res. 114(2), 405–424 (2013)CrossRef
51.
Salvati, L., Carlucci, M.: A composite index of sustainable development at the local scale: Italy as a case study. Ecol. Indic. 43, 162–171 (2014)CrossRef
52.
Melyn, W., Moesen, W.: Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: unequal weighting when limited information is available. Public Econ. Res. Pap. 1–24 (1991)
53.
Shwartz, M., Burgess, J.F., Berlowitz, D.: Benefit-of-the-doubt approaches for calculating a composite measure of quality. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Method 9(4), 234–251 (2009)CrossRef
54.
Despotis, D.K.: A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(8), 969–980 (2005)CrossRef
55.
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T.: An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 82(1), 111–145 (2007)CrossRef
56.
57.
58.
Guijarro, F., Poyatos, J.A.: Designing a sustainable development goal index through a goal programming model: the case of EU-28 countries. Sustainability 10(9), 3167 (2018)CrossRef
59.
60.
61.
62.
Caballero, R., Gómez, T., Ruiz, F.: Goal programming: realistic targets for the near future. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 16(3–4), 79–110 (2009)CrossRef
63.
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F., Windhorst, W.: Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services—a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landsc. Online 15, 1–22 (2009)CrossRef
64.
Cherchye, L., Kuosmanen, T.: Benchmarking sustainable development: a synthetic meta-index approach (No. 2004/28). WIDER Research Paper (2004)
65.
Sutton, P.C., Costanza, R.: Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecol. Econ. 41(3), 509–527 (2002)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ecosystem Services and Land Take. A Composite Indicator for the Assessment of Sustainable Urban Projects
verfasst von
Pierluigi Morano
Maria Rosaria Guarini
Francesco Sica
Debora Anelli
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86978-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-86979-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_16

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise