Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Over four decades, research and policy have created layers of understandings in the quest for “good” corporate governance. The corporate excesses of the 1970s sparked a search for market mechanisms and disclosure to empower shareholders. The UK-focused problems of the 1990s prompted board-centric, structural approaches, while the fall of Enron and many other companies in the early 2000s heightened emphasis on director independence and professionalism. With the financial crisis of 2007–09, however, came a turn in some policy approaches and in academic literature seeking a different way forward. This paper explores those four phases and the discourse each develops and then links each to assumptions about accountability and cognition. After the financial crisis came pointers n policy and practice away from narrow, rationalist prescriptions and toward what the philosopher Stephen Toulmin calls “reasonableness”. Acknowledging that heightens awareness of complexity and interdependence in corporate governance practice. The paper then articulates a research agenda concerning what “reasonably” good corporate governance might entail.
Aguilera, Ruth V., Igor Filatotchev, Howard Gospel, and Gregory Jackson. 2008. An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities. Organization Science 19 (3): 475–492. CrossRef
Ahrens, Thomas, Igor Filatotchev, and Steen Thomsen. 2011. The research frontier in corporate governance. Journal of Management and Governance 15 (3): 311–325. CrossRef
Arena, Matteo P., and Marcus V. Braga-Alves. 2013. The discretionary effect of CEOs and board chairs on corporate governance structures. Journal of Empirical Finance 21 (0): 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.01.002. CrossRef
Berle, Adolf A., Jr. 1931. Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review 44 (7): 1049–1074. CrossRef
Berle, Adolf A., Jr., and Gardiner C. Means. 1932/1991. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Revised Aufl. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Boyd, Brian K. 1995. CEO duality and firm performance: a contingency model. Strategic Management Journal 16 (4): 301–312. CrossRef
Breeden, R.C. . 2003. Restoring Trust: A Report on Corporate Governance for the Future of MCI, Inc. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/breeden_cg_report.pdf. Accessed October 15 2006.
Brooks, John. 1973. The Go-Go Years: A Lively Exploration of That Incredible Era - The 1960's on Wall Street. New York: Weybright & Talley.
Butler, Judith. 2005. Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press. CrossRef
Cadbury, Adrian. 1992. The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.
Carpenter, Mason A., and Brian R. Golden. 1997. Perceived managerial discretion: A study of cause and effect. Strategic Management Journal 18 (3): 187–206. CrossRef
Charreaux, Gérard. 2005. Pour une gouvernance d'entreprise « comportementale » Une réflexion exploratoire…. (French); Toward a Behavioral Corporate Governance Theory. An Exploratory View…. (English). Revue Française de Gestion 31 (157): 215–238. CrossRef
Cheffins, Brian R. 2010. The Stewardship Code's Achilles' Heel. Modern Law Review 73 (6): 1004–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00828.x. CrossRef
Chiu, Iris H.Y. 2012. Institutional shareholders as stewards: Toward a new conception of corporate governance. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law 6 (2): 387–432.
Cioffi, John W. 2010. Public Law and Private Power: Corporate Governance Reform in the Age of Finance Capitalism. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cooper, Melinda. 2011. Complexity theory after the financial crisis: The death of neoliberalism or the triumph of Hayek? Journal of Cultural Economy 4 (4): 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2011.609692. CrossRef
Cromme Commission. 2002/2007. German Corporate Governance Code. http://www.corporate-governance-code.de. Accessed 20 June 2007.
Dalton, Dan R., Catherine M. Daily, Alan E. Ellstrand, and Jonathan L. Johnson. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19 (3): 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K. CrossRef
Deakin, Simon, and Suzanne J. Konzelmann. 2004. Learning from Enron. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12 (2): 134–142. CrossRef
Economist. 2004. Executive compensation: A better option. The Economist. Retrieved January 30, 2018, from http://www.economist.com/node/2601791.
Ees, van, Gerwin van der Laan Hans, and Theo J.B.M. Postma. 2008. Effective board behavior in The Netherlands. European Management Journal 26 (2): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.01.002. CrossRef
European Commission. 2014. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2007/36/EC as regards the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement. European Commission legislative proposal. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:59fccf6c-c094-11e3-86f9-01aa75ed71a1.0003.01/DOC_1&format=PDF. Accessed 6 May 2015.
European Union. 2016. Directive amending Shareholder Rights Directive 2007/36/EC, as agreed by European Parliament and Council. European Council and the Council of the European Union. http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15248-2016-INIT/en/pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2017.
Fama, Eugene F. 1970. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance 25 (2): 383–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x. CrossRef
Forbes, Daniel P., and Frances J. Milliken. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 489–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202133.
Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Trans. Graham Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
FRC. 2010a. The UK Corporate Governance Code. UK Financial Reporting Council. http://www.frc.org.uk/documents/pagemanager/Corporate_Governance/UK%20Corp%20Gov%20Code%20June%202010.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2010.
FRC. 2010b. The UK Stewardship Code. UK Financial Reporting Council. http://www.frc.org.uk/images/uploaded/documents/UK%20Stewardship%20Code%20July%2020103.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2010.
Gabrielsson, Jonas, and Morten Huse. 2004. Context, Behavior, and Evolution: Challenges in Research on Boards and Governance. International Studies of Management & Organization 34 (2): 11–36.
Goergen, Marc, Christine Mallin, Eve Mitleton-Kelly, Ahmed Al-Hawamdeh, and Iris Hse-Yu Chiu. 2010. Corporate Governance and Complexity Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.. CrossRef
Hermalin, Benjamin E., and Michael S. Weisbach. 1991. The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance. FM: The Journal of the Financial Management Association 20 (4): 101–112.
Higgs, Derek. 2003. Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/higgsreport.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2006.
Jensen, Michael C. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14 (3): 8–21. CrossRef
Kant, Immanuel. 1785/1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. H.J. Paton. 3rd Aufl. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Kay, John. 2012. The Kay review of UK equity markets and long-term decision making - Final report. Consultation of the UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business-law/docs/k/12-917-kay-review-of-equity-markets-final-report.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2012.
Ko, Wai Wai, and Gordon Liu. 2016. A Typology of Guanxi-Based Governance Mechanisms for Knowledge Transfer in Business Networks of Chinese Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Group & Organization Management Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115627942.
Lampel, Joseph, and Alan D. Meyer. 2008. Guest Editors' Introduction: Field-Configuring Events as Structuring Mechanisms: How Conferences, Ceremonies, and Trade Shows Constitute New Technologies, Industries, and Markets. Journal of Management Studies 45 (6): 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00787.x. CrossRef
Letza, Steve, Xiuping Sun, and James Kirkbride. 2004. Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: a critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12 (3): 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00367.x. CrossRef
Library of Congress. 2002. H.R.3763, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_bills&docid=f:h3763enr.txt.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2006.
Library of Congress. 2010. H.R.4173: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act US Library of Congress. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.4173:. Accessed 20 Jan 2013.
Markowitz, Harry. 1952. Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974.
Marnet, Oliver. 2005. Behavior and Rationality in Corporate Governance. Journal of Economic Issues 39 (3): 613–632. CrossRef
Marnet, Oliver. 2007. History repeats itself: The failure of rational choice models in corporate governance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 18 (2): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2005.11.010. CrossRef
McNulty, Terry, John Roberts, and Philip Stiles. 2003. Creating accountability within the board: The work of the effective non-executive director. A report for the Review of the Role and Effectiveness of the Non-Executive Director conducted by Mr Derek Higgs. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/tna/+/http://www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_exec_review/pdfs/stilesreport.pdf/. Accessed 21 Aug 2010.
Mulgan, Richard. 2000. 'Accountability': An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration 78 (3): 555–573. CrossRef
Nordberg, Donald. 2011. Corporate Governance: Principles and Issues. London: Sage.
Nordberg, Donald, and Terry McNulty. 2013. Creating better boards through codification: Possibilities and limitations in UK corporate governance, 1992-2010. Business History 55 (3): 348–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2012.712964. CrossRef
Oliver, Amalya L., and Kathleen Montgomery. 2008. Using Field-Configuring Events for Sense-Making: A Cognitive Network Approach. Journal of Management Studies 45 (6): 1147–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00786.x. CrossRef
O'Neill, Onora. 2002. Lecture 3: Called to Account. Reith Lectures, BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002/lecture3.shtml Accessed 30 July 2010.
Painter-Morland, Mollie. 2006. Redefining Accountability As Relational Responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1): 89–98. CrossRef
Pearlstein, Steven. 2014. Social Capital, Corporate Purpose and the Revival of American Capitalism. Center for Effective Public Management at Brookings. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2014/01/10%20social%20capital%20corporate%20purpose%20pearlstein/brookingspearlsteinv5_revised%20feb%202014.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2014.
Pye, Annie. 2004. The Importance of Context and Time for Understanding Board Behavior. International Studies of Management & Organization 34 (2): 63–89.
Rappaport, Alfred. 1981. Selecting strategies that create shareholder value. Harvard Business Review 59 (3): 139–149.
Rappaport, Alfred. 1986. Creating shareholder value: The new standard for business performance. New York: Free Press.
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Aufl. Cambridge: Belknapp Press.
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded Aufl. New York: Columbia University Press.
Reisberg, Arad. 2015. The UK Stewardship Code: On the road to nowhere? Journal of Corporate Law Studies 15 (2): 217–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2015.1044771. CrossRef
Roberts, John. 1991. The possibilities of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 (4): 355–368. CrossRef
Roberts, John. 2001. Trust and Control in Anglo-American Systems of Corporate Governance: The Individualizing and Socializing Effects of Processes of Accountability. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences 54 (12): 1547–1572. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267015412001.
Roberts, John, Terry McNulty, and Philip Stiles. 2005. Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom. British Journal of Management 16 (S1): S5–S26. CrossRef
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Sandberg, Jürgen, and Haridimos Tsoukas. 2011. Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 338–360.
Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin.
Sharfman, Bernard S. 2014. Shareholder Wealth Maximization and its Implementation under Corporate Law. Florida Law Review 66 (1): 389–432.
Simon, Herbert A. 1959. Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. American Economic Review 49 (3): 253–283.
Simon, Herbert A. 1978. Rationality as Process and Product of Thought. American Economic Review 68 (2): 4.
Smith, Adam. 1759/1984. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. CrossRef
Smith, Adam. 1776/1904. The Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen & Co..
Tosi, Henry L., Steve Werner, Jeffrey P. Katz, and Luis R. Gomez-Mejia. 2000. How Much Does Performance Matter? A Meta-Analysis of CEO Pay Studies. Journal of Management 26 (2): 301–339. CrossRef
Toulmin, Stephen. 1992. Cosmopolis: Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Toulmin, Stephen. 2001. Return to Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Updated Aufl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westphal, James D. 1998. Board Games: How CEOs Adapt to Increases in Structural Board Independence from Management. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (3): 511–537. CrossRef
- Edging Toward ‘Reasonably’ Good Corporate Governance
- Springer International Publishing
- Philosophy of Management
Print ISSN: 1740-3812
Elektronische ISSN: 2052-9597
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität