Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
A lot of workers complain of backache, muscular pains and working in painful or tiring postures . To reduce workload and consequently the drop out of workers due to these complaints, companies adapt the work place, provide tools and/or give training. The objective of this study is to investigate in a real working environment during picking of boxes, the effect of using good lifting techniques and/or work height adjustments on the physical workload.
Five subjects, with experience in lifting, were asked to pick up 12 boxes of 11 kg from a pallet and place them on a cart. They had to repeat this four times. Two times with the pallet on the ground, using first a bad and then a good technique, and two times with an increased height, also using first a bad and then a good technique. 3D registration of movements (TEA, CAPTIV), was used to measure the postures of back and hips. Due to the small amount of subjects, a descriptive analysis was used.
Results showed that using a good technique and increased working height can help to reduce the time spent in harmful postures of the back during lifting boxes. Further research is needed with larger groups of subjects to evaluate these results.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
European Agency for Safety and Health and Work (2010). OSH in figures: work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU – Facts and figures
Kapitaniak B (z.d.) Proposition de zones angulaires. INRS, France
Kingma I, Bosch T, Bruins L, van Dieën JH (2004) Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading. Ergonomics 47(13):1365–1385 CrossRef
Kingma I, Dieën JH, Looze M, Toussaint HM, Dolan P, Baken CTM (1998) Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist. J Biomech 31(6):527–534 CrossRef
Kingma I, Faber GS, Bakker AJM, van Dieën JH (2006) Physical therapy 86(8):1091–1105
Lavender SA, Andersson GBJ, Schipplein OD, Fuentes HJ (2003) The effects of initial lifting height, load magnitude, and lifting speed on the peak dynamic L5/S1 moments. Int J Ind Ergon 31(1):51–59 CrossRef
Schipplein OD, Reinsel TE, Andersson GBJ, Lavender SA (1995) The influence of initial horizontal weight placement on the loads at the lumbar spine while lifting. Spine 20(17):1895–1898 CrossRef
Straker LM (2002) A review of research on techniques for lifting low-lying objects: 1. Criteria for evaluation. Work 19:9–18
Straker LM (2003) A review on techniques for lifting low-lying objects: 2. Evidence for a correct technique. Work 20:83–96
Straker L (2003) Evidence to support using, squat, semi-squat and stoop techniques to lift low-lying objects. Int J Ind Ergon 31(3):149–160 CrossRef
Van der Molen HF, Grouwstra R, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter J, Frings-Dresen MHW (2004) J Ergon 47(7):772–783
Van Dieën JH, Hoozemans MJM, Toussaint HM (1999) Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique. Clin Biomech 14:685–696 CrossRef
Wang Z, Wu L, Sun J, He L, Wang S, Yang L (2012) Squat, stoop, or semi-squat: a comparative experiment on lifting technique. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci Technol 32(4):630–636 CrossRef
- Effectiveness of Specific Lifting Techniques and Tools on Workload in a Lifting Situation – A Case Study
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Product Lifecycle Management/© Eisenhans | vege | Fotolia