nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

01.03.2019

Effects of B-learning and F2F on college students’ engagement and retention in QBASIC programming

verfasst von: Chijioke Jonathan Olelewe, Emmanuel E. Agomuo, Peter Uzochukwu Obichukwu

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Achieving learner engagement in the teaching and learning process is paramount towards ensuring knowledge retention in QBASIC programming. This study focuses on effects of b-learning and face-to-face (F2F) on college students’ engagement and retention in QBASIC programming. The study adopted quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent group research design. QBASIC Programming Achievement Test (QBPAT) and College Students’ Engagement Questionnaire (CSEQ) were instruments used for data collection. Results showed that the treatment groups’ retention mean score was significantly higher than the control group. Findings further showed that b-learning facilitated college students’ engagement and improved knowledge retention in QBASIC programming compared to their counterparts in the F2F group. It was recommended that faculty members should adopt innovative teaching pedagogies such as b-learning to promote students’ engagement and retention in the learning process.

Vorheriger Artikel A new trend in preparing for foreign language exam (YDS) in Turkey: Case of WhatsApp in mobile learning

Nächster Artikel Fostering information technology students’ internship program

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Acat, B., & Donmez, I. (2009). To compare student-centred education and teacher-centred education in primary science and technology lesson in terms of learning environments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1805–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.320.CrossRef

Albrecht, B. (2006). Enriching student experience through blended learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, 12. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0612.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2011.

Araz, G., & Sungur, S. (2007). The interplay between cognitive and motivational variables in a problem-based learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.04.003.CrossRef

Armaral, K. & Shank, J. (2010). Enhancing student learning and retention with blended learning class guides. Educause Quarterly, 33(4). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/EnhancingStudentLearningandRet/219137. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.

Artino, A. R., & Jones, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170–175.CrossRef

Asiayi, R. I. (2013). Challenges of quality in higher education in Nigeria in the 21^st century. International Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 3(2), 159–172.

Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.

Auwal, A. (2013). Effects of teaching method on retention of Agricultural Science knowledge in senior secondary schools of Bauchi Local Government Area, Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4(4), 63–69.

Awodeyi, A. F., Akpan, E. T., & Udo, I. J. (2014). Enhancing teaching and learning of mathematics: Adoption of blended learning pedagogy in University of Uyo. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(11), 40–45.

Awoniyi, T. A. (1979). Principles and practice of education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.CrossRef

Baeten, M., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2013). Student-centred teaching methods: Can they optimize students’ approaches to learning in professional higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.11.001.CrossRef

Balan, P., & Metcalfe, M. (2012). Identifying teaching methods that engage entrepreneurship students. Education+ Training, 54(5), 368–384.CrossRef

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.CrossRef

Bates, S. & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study. In Proceedings of the HEA STEM learning and teaching conference (Vol. 1).

Berger, J. B., & Milem, J. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in higher Education, 40(6), 641–664.CrossRef

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene: ISTE.

Blackboard, L. (2009). Blackboard Inc. New York: McGraw.

Bonk, C., & Graham, C. (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.

Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). White Plains: Longman.

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., & Mark, J. W. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcome from a cross-care analysis. Journal of Computers & Education, 68, 1–17.CrossRef

Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2011). Science 2.0. The Science Teacher, 78(2), 10.

Byrne, P. & Lyons, G. (2001). The effect of student attributes on success in programming. ITiCSE: Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 49–52). NY: ACM Press.

Chakraborty, M., & Muyia Nafukho, F. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: what do students want in online courses? European Journal of Training and Development, 38(9), 782–802.CrossRef

Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222–1232 Forthcoming.CrossRef

Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin March, 3–7.

Chui, K. J., & Manjit, S. S. (2006). Feedback on E-learning at a telecommunications company in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 4(1), 4–19.

Collier, L. (2015). Grabbing students: Researchers have identified easy ways to boost student success by increasing their engagement in learning. American Psychological Association, 46(6), 58.MathSciNet

Collis, B. (2003). Course redesign for blended learning: Modern optics for technical professionals. International Journal of Continuing Engineering, Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(1/2), 22–38.CrossRef

Cosgrove, S. B., & Olitsky, N. H. (2015). Knowledge retention, student learning, and blended course work: Evidence from principles of economics courses. Southern Economic Journal, 82(2), 556–579.CrossRef

Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org. Accessed 28 Oct 2016.

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783.CrossRef

Diaz, S. B., Diniz, J. A. & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2014). Dynamic fuzzy logic-based quality of interaction within blended-learning: The rare and contemporary dance cases. International Conference e-learning. Accessed 15 Sept, 2016 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557268.pdf.

Diaz, S. B., Hadjileontiadou, S. J., Hadjileontiadis, L. J., & Diniz, J. A. (2015). Fuzzy cognitive mapping of LMS users’ quality of interaction within higher education blended learning environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 7399–7423.CrossRef

Eduviews (2009). Blended Learning: Where Online and Face-to-Face Instruction Intersect for 21st Century Teaching and Learning. Retrieved on 10^th June 2014 from http://www.blackboard.com. Accessed 10 June 2014.

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP, 2015). Vocational pedagogies and benefits for learners: practices and challenges in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop research paper; No 47. Accessed on 10/10/2017 from http://europa.eu.

Federal Ministry of Education. (2004). National Policy on education (4th ed.). Abuja: NERDC.

Federal Ministry of Education. (2012). National Commission for colleges of education: Nigeria certificate in education minimum standards for vocational and technical education in education. Gariki Abuja: NCCE.

Felder, R. M. (2002). Reaching the second tier learning and teaching styles in colleges science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(2), 286–290.

Fredricks, J. (2014). Eight myths of student disengagement: Creating classrooms of deep learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.CrossRef

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.CrossRef

Gaines, M. (2001). What factors effect retention in the classroom? Available from https://gse.gmu.edu/assets/docs/lmtip/vol3/M.Gaines.doc. Accessed 04 Jul 2013.

Gambari, A. I., Shittu, A. T., Ogunlade, O. O., & Osunlade, O. R. (2018). Effectiveness of blended learning and elearning modes of instruction on the performance of undergraduates in Kwara state, Nigeria. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 25–36.

Giannousi, M., Vernadakis, N., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M. & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2009). Students’ satisfaction from blended learning instruction. In TCC (pp. 61–68). Hawaii: TCC.

Hagan, D. & Markham, S. (2000). Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program? Proceedings of the 5th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ACM, NY, pp. 25–28.

Hao, Y. (2014). Students’ attitude towards a flipped classroom and its relationship with motivation orientations in an undergraduate course. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & teacher education international conference 2014 (pp. 2835–2840). Chesapeake: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/131225. Accessed 13 Oct 2017.

Hartman, J.L., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (1999). Faculty satisfaction in ALNs: A dependent or independent variable? Paper presented at the Sloan Summer ALN Workshops: Learning Effectiveness and Faculty Satisfaction, Urbana, IL. http://plcmc.org/teens/secondlife.asp, http://plcmcl2-about.blogspot.com/, and conversation with Kelly Czarnecki, librarian, public library of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, February 8, 2008 http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~divitini/umocec2003/Final/Ahonen.pdf. Accessed 06 Jul 2011.

Harun, N. F., Yusof, K. M., Jamaludin, M. Z., & Hassan, S. A. H. S. (2012). Motivation in problem-based learning implementation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56(2012), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.650.CrossRef

Harris, P., Connolly, J., & Feeney, L. (2009). Blended learning: overview and recommendations for successful implementation. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(3), 155–163.CrossRef

Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1, 16013.CrossRef

Heilesen, S. B. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting? Computers & Education, 55(2010), 1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.002.CrossRef

Herold, B. (2016, February 5). Issues A-Z: Technology in Education: An overview. Education Week. Retrieved on 10/10/2017 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/technology-in-education/. Accessed 10 Oct 2017.

Hill, P. (2012). Online educational delivery models: A descriptive view. Educause Review, 47(6), 84–97. http://www.publicationshare.com/docs/faculty_survey_report.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2017.

Hughes, G. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 349–363.CrossRef

Hytten, K. J. (2010). Facebook's contribution to educationally purposeful activities and college student engagement (Doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont).

Ige, O. A., & Hlalele, D. J. (2017). Effects of computer-aided and blended teaching strategies on students’ achievement in civic education concepts in mountain learning ecologies. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2693–2709.CrossRef

International Society for Technology Education (ISTE) (2008). Technology and Student Achievement—The Indelible Link ISTE Policy Brief retrieved from http://www.iste.org. Accessed 04 Jul 2011.

Irvine, V. (2010). Exploring learners needs for collaborative and access. In J. Hunter (Ed.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2010 (pp. 1093–1097). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Junco, R., Heibergert, G. & Loken, V. (2010). The effect of twitter on college student engagement and grades, 1–14, accessed from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x.

Kahanwal, B. (2013). Abstraction level taxonomy of programming language frameworks. International Journal of Programming Languages and Applications (IJPLA), 3(4), 1–12.

Kelly, B. B. (2014). The effects of motivation on achievement and satisfaction in a flipped classroom learning environment. Doctoral dissertation, graduate Faculty of the School of education, North Central University.

Kember, D., McNaught, C., Chong, F. C., Lam, P., & Cheng, K. F. (2010). Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1183–1192.CrossRef

Kemeny, J.G., & Kurtz, T. E. (1985). Back to BASIC: The history, corruption, and future of the language. Addison-Wesley.

Kettle, M. (2013). Flipped physics. Physics Education, 48(5), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/5/593.CrossRef

Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. (2007). Different patterns of student-faculty interaction in research universities: an analysis by student gender, race, SES, and first-generation status.

King, S. O., & Robinson, C. L. (2009). ‘Pretty lights’ and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Computers & Education, 53, 189–199.CrossRef

Kiriakidis, P., Decosta, J. W., & Sandu, A. (2011). What is the effect of grade point average (GPA) on courses taken either face-to-face or online by undergraduate working adult students? Revista de Cercetaresi Interventie Sociala, 33, 7–26 ISSN: 1584-5397.

Koramo, M. (2011). Developing learning environments in initial VET: National developmental guidelines and descriptions of development projects on learning environments funded by the National Board of education in 2008–10. Finnish National Board of Education: Helsinki.

Kuh, G.D. (2002). The National Survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University, Bloomington. Available at: http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/psychometric_framework_2002.pdf. Last accessed 25 Feb 2010.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What students’ affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683–706.CrossRef

Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540–563.CrossRef

Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(2011), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023.CrossRef

Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison -Wesley.MATH

Markwell, D. (2007). The challenge of student engagement. In Keynote address at the Teaching and Learning Forum. University of Western Australia, 30–31 January.

Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: good practice. Educause Quarterly, 26(1), 18–23.

McCue, L. S., & Scales, G. R. (2007). Embracing the middle ground: Engaging on-and off- campus students within the same ‘classroom’. In B. B. Thomas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE southeastern section annual conference and meeting [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

Moon, J. (2007). Critical thinking: an exploration of theory and practice. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Morgan, K. R. (2002). Blended learning: A strategic action plan for a new campus. Seminole: University of Central Florida.

National Survey of Student Engagement. (2001). The College Student Report (CRS). Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

Neo, M., & Neo, T.-K. (2009). Engaging students in multimedia-mediated constructivist learning- students’ perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 254–266.

Nie, Y., & Lau, S. (2010). Differential relations of constructivist and didactic instruction to students’ cognition, motivation, and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.002.CrossRef

Norberg, A. (2012). Blended learning and new education logistics in northern Sweden. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers: Education and information technologies (pp. 327–330). Boulder: EDUCAUSE.

Norm, F. (2012). Report defining blended learning. Accessed http://learningspaces.org/papers/Defining_Blended_Learning_NF.pdf on 10/05/2017. Accessed 10 May 2017.

OECD (2013). Skilled for Life? Key Findings from the Survey of Adult Skills. Accessed from http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/SkillsOutlook_2013_ebook.pdf. Accessed 06 Nov 2017.

Okwo, F. A. (2001). Research Methodology. In E. A. C. Okeke & G. C. Offorma (Eds.), Project/Thesis writing simplified (pp. 90–127). Nsukka: Institute of Education, University of Nigeria.

Oladipo, S., Olowoye, B., & Adenaike, A. (2010). Comparative study of the effect of study technology mode of instruction and lecture method on the academic performance of university students in Nigeria: Implication for academic staff capacity development. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 8(2), 13.

Olelewe, C. J., & Agomuo, E. E. (2016). Effects of B-learning and F2F learning environments on students’ achievement in QBASIC programming. Computers & Education, 103, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.012.CrossRef

Olelewe, C. J., & Okwor, A. N. (2017). Lecturers’ perception of interactive whiteboard for instructional delivery in tertiary institutions in Enugu state, Nigeria. Journal of Computer in Education, 4(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0077-6.CrossRef

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Pascarella, E. T. (2006). How college affects students: ten directions for future research. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 508–520.CrossRef

Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2009). Validation of the NSSE benchmarks and deep approaches to learning against Liberal arts outcomes. Iowa City: University of Iowa Center for Research on Undergraduate Education.

Pope, C. (2010). Breaking down barriers: Providing flexible participation option for on-campus course. Paper presented at the Fifth Education Research Group of Adelaide Conference, Adelaide, Australia.

Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R. & Evans, E. D (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 301–342.

Rasaki, J. O. (2012). Software development: An entrepreneurial skills requirement by computer science students. Proceeding of the 7 ^th National Conference of the School of Sciences Federal College of Education, Eha-Amufu.

Regha, I. O. (2015). Adoption of blended learning into the Nigerian education system: Prospects and challenges. International Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 129–142.

Roberts, G. (2010). Technology and learning expectations of the net generation. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation 3.1-3.7). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/Resources/EducatingtheNetGeneration/Technologyand LearningExpectati/6056. Accessed 03 June 2012.

Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212.CrossRef

Sekaran, S. (2003). Measurement: Scaling, reliability, validity. In Research methods for business: A skill building approach. London: Wiley.

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation, and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4.CrossRef

Suleiman, M. S., Salaudeen, B. M., & Falode, O. C. (2017). Effects of computer-based blended learning strategy on secondary school chemistry students’ retention in individualized and collaborative learning settings in Minna, Niger state, Nigeria. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 11(2), 267–278.

Thomas, L., Woodbury, J. & Jarman, E. (2002). Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 33–37). NY: ACM Press.

Traub, R. E. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

TYNKER (n.d). Programming is the New Literacy. Accessed from https://www.tynker.com/why-tynker on 31/10/2017.

Uwatt, L. E. (1988). Benefiting from lectures: A call for emphasis on listening skills at the university level. Nigerian Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(1). Available at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/alj/vol8/iss2/13. Accessed 03 Jun 2012.

van Uden, J. M., Ritzen, H., & Pieters, J. M. (2014). Engaging students: the role of teacher beliefs and interpersonal teacher behavior in fostering student engagement in vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 21–32.CrossRef

Vinita, D., & Shikha, B. (2015). The retention effect of computer assisted instruction (CAI) on student’s achievement for teaching the chemistry topics of class VIII students. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(11), 485–488.

Vos, N., van der Meijden, H., & Denessen, E. (2010). Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use. Computers & Education, 11(2011), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.013.CrossRef

Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: using a complex adaptive systems framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380–394.

Wankel, C., & Blessinger, P. (Eds.). (2013). Increasing student engagement and retention in e-learning environments: Web 2.0 and blended learning technologies. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591–602.CrossRef

Weisfeld, M. (2013). The importance of object-oriented programming in the era of Mobile development. Accessed from http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2036576 on 2/11/2017.

Wilson, B.C. & Shrock, S. (2001). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 184–188). NY: ACM Press.

Wright, A., & Angelini, M. (2012). Student engagement as transformation: an exploration of the academic and personal development of student mentors. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 156–169.CrossRef

Yang, Y., & Wu, W. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers and Education, 59, 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012.CrossRef

Zweekhorst, M. B., & Maas, J. (2015). ICT in higher education: students perceive increased engagement. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(1), 2–18.CrossRef

Titel: Effects of B-learning and F2F on college students’ engagement and retention in QBASIC programming
verfasst von: Chijioke Jonathan Olelewe
Emmanuel E. Agomuo
Peter Uzochukwu Obichukwu
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09882-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Editorial for EAIT issue 5, 2019

Computational thinking within the context of professional life: Change in CT skill from the viewpoint of teachers

Prediction of academic achievements of vocational and technical high school (VTS) students in science courses through artificial neural networks (comparison of Turkey and Malaysia)

Learning problem solving skills: Comparison of E-learning and M-learning in an introductory programming course

Enhancing ICT for quality education in sub-Saharan Africa

Internet addiction among college students: Some causes and effects