Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This study examines how the structure of distribution channels may influence firms’ quality and price strategies and how they may in turn affect consumer welfare. It treats product quality as a decision variable so that the degree of product substitution becomes endogenous rather than exogenous as in previous studies. We find that, with vertically differentiated firms, the changes in channel structure have asymmetric effects depending on whether they occur in the high-quality channel or in the low-quality channel. The product quality of the high-quality channel decreases when it decentralizes unilaterally. However, product quality of the low-quality channel would increase when it decentralizes. The high-quality manufacturer and its channel suffer more from decentralization in comparison with their low-quality counterparts, and the low-quality manufacturer actually receives greater profits when both channels are decentralized. An important driver behind these asymmetries is the interaction between firms’ pricing incentives in integrated versus decentralized channels and what consumer segments they serve. Our analysis indicates that decentralization may reduce consumer welfare, but decentralization in the high-quality channel hurts consumers more than that in the low-quality channel. Therefore in a competitive environment where firms make both quality and price decisions, channel integration would have significant welfare enhancement effects through the elimination of double marginalization, especially if it happens in the high-quality channel. Moreover, we demonstrate that once quality is endogenized, integration is the only equilibrium of channel structure choices. This suggests that the private incentives of firms may actually benefit consumers but do not have to be in line with the general preference of industry regulation for decentralization.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Blanchard, O., & Fischer, S. (1993). Lectures on macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT.
Blattberg, R., & Wisniewski, K. (1989). Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Science, 8(4), 291–309. CrossRef
Bonanno, G., & Vickers, J. (1988). Vertical separation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(3), 257–265. CrossRef
Bruce, N., Desai, P., & Staelin, R. (2005). The better they are, the more they give: Trade promotions of consumer durables. Journal of Marketing Research, XLII, 54–66. CrossRef
Chen, Y. (2001). On vertical mergers and their competitive effects. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32(4), 667–685. CrossRef
Choi, C. (1991). Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Marketing Science, 10, 271–296. CrossRef
Coughlan, A. (1985). Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application. Marketing Science, 4, 110–129. CrossRef
Desai, P. (2001). Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design. Marketing Science, 20(3), 265–283. CrossRef
Desai, P., Koenigsberg, O., & Purohit, D. (2004). Strategic decentralization and channel coordination. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2, 5–22. CrossRef
Economides, N. (1999). Quality choice and vertical integration. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 903–914. CrossRef
Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory (pp. 67–105, 144–200). Cambridge: MIT.
Gupta, S., & Loulou, R. (1998). Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in a duopoly. Marketing Science, 17, 301–316. CrossRef
McGuire, T., & Staelin, R. (1983). An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Science, 2, 161–191. CrossRef
Moorthy, S. (1988a). Strategic decentralization in channels. Marketing Science, 7, 335–355. CrossRef
Moorthy, S. (1988b). Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Science, 7, 141–168. CrossRef
Motta, M. (1993). Endogenous quality choice: Price vs. quantity competition. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2, 113–131.
Neven, D., & Thisse, J.-F. (1990). On quality and variety competition. In Economic decision making: Games, econometrics and optimization (pp. 175–199). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ornstein, S. (2002). Motion pictures: Competition, distribution, and efficiencies. In Duetsch, L. (Ed.), Industry studies (pp. 263–288). Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
Raju, J., & Zhang, Z. J. (2005). Channel coordination in the presence of a dominant retailer. Marketing Science, 24(2), 254–262. CrossRef
Riordan, M. (2005). Competitive effects of vertical integration. Mimeo: Columbia University.
Shugan, S. (2004). Finance, operations, and marketing conflicts in service firms. Journal of Marketing, 68, 24–26.
Tyagi, R. (2004). Technological advances, transaction costs, and consumer welfare. Marketing Science, 23(3), 335–344. CrossRef
Villas-Boas, J. M. (1998). Product line design for a distribution channel. Marketing Science, 17, 156–169. CrossRef
Xie, J., & Shugan, S. (2001). Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: When and how to advance sell. Marketing Science, 20(3), 219–243. CrossRef
- Effects of distribution channel structure in markets with vertically differentiated products
- Springer US
Entwicklung einer Supply-Strategie bei der Atotech Deutschland GmbH am Standort Feucht