Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Efficiency in Contests Between Groups

verfasst von : Roger Hartley

Erschienen in: The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study collective contests in which contestants lobby as groups. Our main observation is that group lobbying effort is efficiently produced in equilibrium, apparently contradicting conventional interpretations of results in the literature. This observation also leads to a substantial simplification of the analysis of equilibria through the application of a decomposition theorem, which shows that, under standard conditions a collective contest can be analyzed by reducing it to a conventional Tullock contest between groups in which each group has a group-specific cost function derived from the individual members’ cost functions. The theorem also allows us to transfer results from standard contest theory to collective contests. For example, it can be used to establish conditions for the existence and uniqueness of equilibria in collective contests. Similarly, we can apply well-known results in comparative statics to study how group composition affects the lobbying effectiveness of groups and to investigate rent dissipation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
When more than one member of a group is active, the equilibrium profile of inputs within the group is not unique.
 
2
Choi et al. (2016) study a similar model, but with the internal and external contests running simultaneously.
 
3
Our analysis extends readily, but at the expense of notational complexity, to vector inputs, possibly of different dimensions. We will omit the details for reasons of clarity.
 
4
We interpret derivatives for functions not defined for negative arguments as one-sided on the boundary.
 
5
A careful study of (3) shows that this conclusion remains true if for each i, in addition to Assumption A2, c ik is strictly convex for all but one of k = 1, , N i .
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baik, K. H. (1993). Effort levels in contests: The public-good prize case. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 103–117.CrossRef Baik, K. H. (1993). Effort levels in contests: The public-good prize case. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 103–117.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baik, K. H. (2008). Contests with group-specific public-good prizes. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 103–117.CrossRef Baik, K. H. (2008). Contests with group-specific public-good prizes. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 103–117.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baik, K. H., Kim, I.-G., & Na, S. (2001). Bidding for a group-specific public good prize. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 415–429.CrossRef Baik, K. H., Kim, I.-G., & Na, S. (2001). Bidding for a group-specific public good prize. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 415–429.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, J. P., Chowdhury, S. M., & Kim, J. (2016). Group contests with internal conflict and power asymmetry. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 82, 816–840.CrossRef Choi, J. P., Chowdhury, S. M., & Kim, J. (2016). Group contests with internal conflict and power asymmetry. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 82, 816–840.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chowdhury, S. M., Lee, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). Top guns may not fire. Best-shot group contests with group-specific public good prizes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 92, 94–103.CrossRef Chowdhury, S. M., Lee, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). Top guns may not fire. Best-shot group contests with group-specific public good prizes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 92, 94–103.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cornes, R. C., & Hartley, R. (2005). Asymmetric contests with general technologies. Economic Theory, 26, 923–946.CrossRef Cornes, R. C., & Hartley, R. (2005). Asymmetric contests with general technologies. Economic Theory, 26, 923–946.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cornes, R. C., & Hartley, R. (2007). Weak links, good shots and other public good games: Building on BBV. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1684–1707.CrossRef Cornes, R. C., & Hartley, R. (2007). Weak links, good shots and other public good games: Building on BBV. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1684–1707.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dijkstra, B. R. (1998). Cooperation by way of support in a rent seeking contest for a public good. European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 703–725.CrossRef Dijkstra, B. R. (1998). Cooperation by way of support in a rent seeking contest for a public good. European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 703–725.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein, G. S., & Mealam, Y. (2009). Group specific public goods, orchestration of interest groups with free riding. Public Choice, 139, 357–369.CrossRef Epstein, G. S., & Mealam, Y. (2009). Group specific public goods, orchestration of interest groups with free riding. Public Choice, 139, 357–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2001). Collective action and the group size paradox. American Political Science Review, 95, 663–672.CrossRef Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2001). Collective action and the group size paradox. American Political Science Review, 95, 663–672.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2008). On the salience of ethnic conflict. American Economic Review, 98, 2185–2202.CrossRef Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2008). On the salience of ethnic conflict. American Economic Review, 98, 2185–2202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Katz, E., Nitzan S., & Rosenberg, J. (1990). Rent-seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice, 65, 49–60.CrossRef Katz, E., Nitzan S., & Rosenberg, J. (1990). Rent-seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice, 65, 49–60.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Katz, E., & Tokatlidu, J. (1996). Group competition for rents. European Journal of Political Economy, 12, 599–607.CrossRef Katz, E., & Tokatlidu, J. (1996). Group competition for rents. European Journal of Political Economy, 12, 599–607.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kolmar, M., & Rommeswinkel, H. (2013). Contests with group-specific public goods and complementarities in efforts. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 89, 9–22.CrossRef Kolmar, M., & Rommeswinkel, H. (2013). Contests with group-specific public goods and complementarities in efforts. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 89, 9–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kolmar, M., & Wagener, A. (2013). Inefficiency as a strategic device in group contests against dominant opponents. Economic Inquiry, 51, 2083–2095.CrossRef Kolmar, M., & Wagener, A. (2013). Inefficiency as a strategic device in group contests against dominant opponents. Economic Inquiry, 51, 2083–2095.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nitzan, S. (1991). Collective rent dissipation. Economic Journal, 101, 1522–1534. Nitzan, S. (1991). Collective rent dissipation. Economic Journal, 101, 1522–1534.
Zurück zum Zitat Nitzan, S., & Ueda, K. (2011). Prize sharing and collective contests. European Economic Review, 55, 678–687.CrossRef Nitzan, S., & Ueda, K. (2011). Prize sharing and collective contests. European Economic Review, 55, 678–687.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nitzan S., & Ueda, K. (2014). Intra-group heterogeneity in collective contests. Social Choice and Welfare, 43, 219–238.CrossRef Nitzan S., & Ueda, K. (2014). Intra-group heterogeneity in collective contests. Social Choice and Welfare, 43, 219–238.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Olsen, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Riaz, K., Shogren, J. F., & Johnson, S. R. (1995). A general model of rent-seeking for public goods. Public Choice, 82, 243–259.CrossRef Riaz, K., Shogren, J. F., & Johnson, S. R. (1995). A general model of rent-seeking for public goods. Public Choice, 82, 243–259.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rockafellar, R. T. (1972). Convex analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rockafellar, R. T. (1972). Convex analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryvkin, D. (2011). The optimal sorting of players in contests between groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 73, 564–472.CrossRef Ryvkin, D. (2011). The optimal sorting of players in contests between groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 73, 564–472.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Topolyan, I. (2014). Rent-seeking for a public good with additive contributions. Social Choice and Welfare, 42, 465–476.CrossRef Topolyan, I. (2014). Rent-seeking for a public good with additive contributions. Social Choice and Welfare, 42, 465–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda, K. (2002). Oligopolization in collective rent-seeking. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 613–626.CrossRef Ueda, K. (2002). Oligopolization in collective rent-seeking. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 613–626.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Efficiency in Contests Between Groups
verfasst von
Roger Hartley
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_2