Skip to main content

2000 | Buch

ELECTRE and Decision Support

Methods and Applications in Engineering and Infrastructure Investment

verfasst von: Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre

Verlag: Springer US

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

ELECTRE and Decision Support focuses on the areas of engineering and infrastructure investment. It begins with some general comments about the different decision components within the project planning process - the definition of objectives, the identification of alternative courses of action, the establishing of criteria, the evaluation of alternatives and the final recommendation. The authors highlight the ability of Multicriteria Decision Aid to reconcile the economic, technical and environmental dimensions of the projects for its planners. They emphasize the complexity of this process, illustrating the importance of identifying the stakeholders within it, as they greatly influence the definition of the decision criteria. A brief case study illustrates these different aspects. Following a comparison of Cost Benefit Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Aid, the introductory chapter sets out the structure of the book, with four subsequent chapters devoted to the methodology of ELECTRE and three outlining case studies involving different versions of ELECTRE.
The chapters concentrating on the ELECTRE methodology first give an overview of the main MCDA methods before presenting the ELECTRE method in detail. Each chapter answers the following questions: (1) In what context should the ELECTRE methods be chosen? (2) Which version of the methods is most appropriate to apply to a given problem? Another chapter deals with a critical and delicate problem within MCDA - how to adequately assess the role played by each criterion in a given decision problem, and how this translates into an appropriate weighting for it. Each one covers a different civil engineering discipline and each uses a different version of ELECTRE. The final chapter on methodology presents some accessories which, when used with ELECTRE, can greatly enhance its usefulness in practice.
This book is outstanding in many respects. I am convinced that the simple, clear and concise style of the authors will make this book accessible to very many readers. No important aspect of the subject is neglected, and the concise nature of this book does not hinder its originality. Last but not least, the manner in which the case studies are described allows the authors not only to demonstrate the validity of the approach and procedures presented, but also to help the reader understand how to apply them in an effective manner.
Taken from the Foreword by Bernard Roy, University Paris-Dauphine

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
1. Introduction to Multicriteria Decision Methods
Abstract
The proper planning of a major engineering system requires a set of procedures to be devised which ensures that available resources are allocated as efficiently as possible in its subsequent design and construction. This involves deciding how the available resources, including manpower, physical materials and finance can best be used to achieve the desired objectives of the project developer. Systems analysis can provide such a framework of procedures in which the fundamental issues of design and management can be addressed (de Neufville and Stafford, 1974). Engineering systems analysis provides an orderly process in which all factors relevant to the design and construction of major engineering projects can be considered. Use of the process has the following direct impacts on the coherent and logical development of such a project:
  • The process forces the developer to make explicit the objectives of the proposed system, together with how these objectives can be measured. This has the effect of heightening the developers awareness of his overall core objectives
  • It provides a framework in which alternative solutions will be readily generated as a means to selecting the most desired one
  • Appropriate methodologies for decision making will be proposed within the process for use in choosing between alternatives.
  • It will predict the major demands which will be placed on the facility under examination through the interaction of the various technical, environmental and social criteria generated by the process. These demands are not always detected in advance.
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
2. Multi-Criteria Evaluation Methods
Abstract
There are a large number of multi-criteria methodologies for choosing between options for engineering and infrastructure investment projects. The main ones are:
  • Checklist Methods,
  • Multi-Attribute Utility methods (MAUT),
  • Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),
  • Concordance Analysis
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
3. The Electre Methodology
Abstract
In July 1966, Bernard Roy presented a paper in Rome in which he used his formal training in Mathematics to develop a practical decision-making system, now known as ELECTRE. It involves a systematic analysis of the relationship between all possible pairings of the different options, based on each option’s scores on a set of common criteria of evaluation. The result is a measure of the degree to which each option outranks all others. The methodology entails the construction of an outranking relation, the generation of concordance and discordance indices (including the notion of relative importance of each criterion) and an analysis of the results obtained from an overall evaluation of all the outranking relationships derived.
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
4. Weighting Criteria for Use within ELECTRE
Abstract
The assignment of importance weightings to each criterion is a crucial step in the application of all versions of the ELECTRE model with the exception of ELECTRE IV. Because it is a non-compensatory decision-aid model, the interpretation of weights is different than for a compensatory system such as MAUT (Keeney and Raiffa, 1976), where they amount to being substitution rates, allowing differences in preferences, as they relate to different criteria, to be expressed on the same scale. Within ELECTRE, the ‘weights’ used are not constants of scale, but are simply a measure of the relative importance of the criteria involved. Vincke (1992) likens the weighting of a criterion, in this instance, to the number of votes given to a candidate in a voting procedure, with the final tally indicating the relative importance of each criterion ‘candidate’.
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
5. Case Study 1
Finding the Best Location for the Galway Wastewater Treatment Plant
Abstract
Galway city is located on the west coast of Ireland. It has a population of approximately 40,000, and at present has no sewage treatment plant, with sewage being directly discharged into Galway Bay. The planned project involves the provision of a sewerage network for Galway city and its suburbs, with a main outfall in the Galway Bay area, where a treatment plant would be located. The environmental study undertaken by Consulting Engineers on behalf of Galway Corporation (McCarthy, 1992) to select the optimum location for a proposed new wastewater treatment plant in Galway City considered five potential sites within the Bay area:
  • Mutton Island (MI)
  • Lough Atalia 1 (shallow outfall) (LA1),
  • Lough Atalia 2 (deep outfall) (LA2),
  • Hare Island (HI) and
  • South Park (SP).
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
6. Case Study 2
Choosing the Best Waste Incineration Strategy for the Eastern Switzerland Region
Abstract
Switzerland is a confederation of 23 states, called cantons, three of which are subdivided into half-cantons for administrative purposes. The powers of decision making are usually organised from the bottom upwards. In accordance with the ‘subsidiarity principle’, the Confederation only assumes responsibility for duties which the cantons are unable to carry out themselves. Thus the 26 cantons which make up the Federal State have a certain degree of sovereignty, and possess their own political institutions. Collegial government and therefore compromise are crucial factors in the political culture of the country. A number of years ago, cantons began, in co-operation with localities in other countries, to form regions which are primarity concerned with economic and infrastructural issues such as the siting of waste management plants. These regions as yet possess no political institutions of their own. One such region, Eastern Switzerland, comprising Schaffhausen, Uri, Zug, Zurich, Appenzell (divided in two), St Gallen, Thurgau, Glarus, Schwylz, Graubunden and Ticino, plus the Principality of Liechenstein, is the location for the case study outlined below.
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
7. Case Study 3
Selecting the Optimum Route for the Dublin Port Motorway
Abstract
The Dublin Port Access and Eastern Relief Route (PAERR) was proposed by Dublin Corporation, the local authority with responsibility for road planning in the central city area, as an access route to Dublin Port, which at the same time would provide traffic relief to both the City Centre and nearby residential areas. The route would have to be not only environmentally acceptable but also a sound economic investment. The proposed route is approximately 10 km long, extending from Whitehall on the north side of the city via the Port Area to Booterstown on the south side of the city (Figure 7.1). It was proposed that both ends of the PAERR motorway will connect into a ring road around Dublin which is at present partially completed. Each option considered includes a major crossing of Dublin’s main waterway — the River Liffey.
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
8. New Ideas and Techniques within Decision Aid
Abstract
A decision model strives to represent reality in a rational, logical, coherent and purposeful way. Its primary purpose, in the context of civil and environmental engineering, is to predict the consequences of proposed infrastructure projects. The output from the model can then be used to influence the opinions and decisions of the relevant actors. It is a tool used by the decision-makers to help achieve common set of agreed goals and objectives. It can thus be termed a construct. The model (or construct) in question may be the property of an individual, a group of individuals, a wider community such as the inhabitants of a major city or the general scientific community.
Martin Rogers, Michael Bruen, Lucien-Yves Maystre
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
ELECTRE and Decision Support
verfasst von
Martin Rogers
Michael Bruen
Lucien-Yves Maystre
Copyright-Jahr
2000
Verlag
Springer US
Electronic ISBN
978-1-4757-5057-7
Print ISBN
978-1-4419-5108-3
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7