Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

A Comparative Analysis of Indian Pre-packaged Insolvency Process with that of US and UK

Author : Sujatha S. Patil

Published in: Comparative Approaches in Law and Policy

Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore

Abstract

Pre-packs, as the name implies, are reorganisation plans that have been reached by the debtor and its creditors before declaring insolvency and have been subsequently recognised by adjudicatory authorities. Pre-packaged bankruptcy, or “Pre-packs,” has its origins in the United States and the United Kingdom but has lately been included into the Indian bankruptcy system. A casual settlement between creditors and debtors is reached in this type of restructuring before it is submitted for approval. MSMEs enterprises are often operated by medium and tiny promoters, making it not difficult to re-correct them, if the administration is removed under the regular CIRP. While the most recent Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has helped to improve the statistics on stressed assets, it is still going through some teething problems and has room for additional changes, such as the introduction of Pre-packs. In light of this context, the current study will concentrate on the fundamental aspects of the bankruptcy system in India and the market performance of prepacks under the current regulatory framework. Additionally, it examines the corporate insolvency procedure in India, identifies specific obstacles to prepack adoption, and presents a summary of the benefits and drawbacks of prepacks. Finally, it focuses on pre-packaged insolvency resolution processes in India using best practises from the US and UK.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Finch [1].
 
2
Insolvency Act 1986, § 1(1); US Courts, Chapter 11—Bankruptcy Basics, US COURTS (2019), https://​www.​uscourts.​gov/​services-forms/​bankruptcy/​bankruptcy-basics/​chapter-11-bankruptcy-basics.
 
3
Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Notice inviting Comments from Stakeholders, MCA (June 16, 2019), https://​ibbi.​gov.​in/​webfront/​Notice%20​for%20​inviting%20​public%20​comments%20​on%20​Code.​pdf.
 
4
Indian Economy and Finance, What is a Joint Lenders’ Forum?, INDIANECONOMY.NET (Aug. 13, 2017), https://​www.​indianeconomy.​net/​splclassroom/​what-is-joint-lenders-forum-jlf/​.
 
5
RBI, Corporate Debt Restructuring, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, (Aug. 23, 2001), https://​www.​rbi.​org.​in/​Scripts/​NotificationUser​.​aspx?​Id=​440&​Mode=​0.
 
6
RBI, Strategic Debt Restructuring Scheme, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (Jun. 8, 2015), https://​www.​rbi.​org.​in/​Scripts/​NotificationUser​.​aspx?​Id=​9767&​Mode=​0.
 
7
RBI, Resolution of Stressed Assets—Revised Framework, Reserve Bank of India (Feb. 12, 2018), https://​www.​rbi.​org.​in/​scripts/​BS_​CircularIndexDis​play.​aspx?​Id=​11218.
 
8
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, Ss. 5 (7), 5 (8).
 
9
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, Ss. 5 (20), 5 (21).
 
10
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, S. 14.
 
11
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, S. 17(1)(b).
 
12
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, S. 18 (c).
 
14
Section 54C, IBC (Amendment) Act, 2021.
 
15
Section 6, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
 
16
Bankruptcy Law Reform Committee, The Interim Report of the Bankruptcy Law Reform Committee, THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE 79 (Feb. 2015), https://​www.​finmin.​nic.​in/​sites/​default/​files/​Interim_​Report_​BLRC_​0.​pdf.
 
18
Ibid.
 
19
Business Today, Supreme Court Rejects Out-of-Court Settlement for Binani Cement, BUSINESS TODAY (Apr. 13, 2018), https://​www.​businesstoday.​in/​current/​corporate/​supreme-court-rejects-out-of-court-settlement-for-binani-cement/​story/​274793.​html.
 
20
Standard Chartered Bank v Essar Steel Ltd, IB No. 39/7/NCLT/AHM/2017.
 
22
If 75% of financial creditors approve it.
 
23
Consent by majority vote—of 66.66% is required.
 
24
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, S. 7(5).
 
25
Govt Tables Bill in Lok Sabha to Amend Insolvency Law, https://​thewire.​in/​government/​govt-tables-bill-in-lok-sabha-to-amend-insolvency-law (last visited Aug 23, 2021).
 
26
Sen et al. [2].
 
27
The Report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee: Volume I: Rationale and Design (November 2015), https://​ibbi.​gov.​in/​BLRCReportVol1_​04112015.​pdf (last visited Aug. 23, 2021).
 
28
Mani and Bakshi [3].
 
29
Id at 26.
 
30
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, S. 53.
 
31
Batra [4].
 
32
Ibid.
 
33
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. v. Synergies Dooray Automative Ltd. & Ors. CA (AT) Nos. 169 to 173-2017, by divesting assets of the debtor company to an associate company, the associate company of the debtor company was able to participate in the CoC as a majority creditor. The resolution plan which was ultimately formulated envisaged a 98% haircut for the lenders of the debtor company.
 
34
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, S. 29A.
 
35
Phoenixing, or phoenixism, are terms used to describe the practice of carrying on the same business or trade successively through a series of companies where each becomes insolvent (can’t pay their debts) in turn; Government of UK, Phoenix Companies and the role of Insolvency Service, GOV.UK (Mar. 24, 2017), https://​www.​gov.​uk/​government/​publications/​phoenix-companies-and-the-role-of-the-insolvency-service/​phoenix-companies-and-the-role-of-the-insolvency-service.
 
36
Indian Companies Act, 2013, S. 424 (1).
 
37
28 U.S.C.S. § 157 (a).
 
38
28 U.S.C.S. § 157 (b).
 
39
11 U.S. Code § 1124.
 
40
Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S. 53.
 
41
Avron [5].
 
42
Ibid.
 
43
Corporate Report, Statement of Insolvency Practice 16, GOV.UK (Apr. 7, 2014), https://​www.​gov.​uk/​government/​publications/​statements-of-insolvency-practice-16-sip-16.
 
44
Independent Report, Graham Review into Pre-pack Administration, GOV.UK (June 16, 2014), https://​www.​gov.​uk/​government/​publications/​graham-review-into-pre-pack-administration.
 
45
LexisNexis, Statement of Insolvency Practice (SIP) 16—Background and Key Amendments, LEXISNEXIS (2015), https://​www.​lexisnexis.​co.​uk/​legal/​guidance/​statement-of-insolvency-practice-sip-16-pre-packaged-sales-in-administration.
 
Literature
Metadata
Title
A Comparative Analysis of Indian Pre-packaged Insolvency Process with that of US and UK
Author
Sujatha S. Patil
Copyright Year
2023
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4460-6_17